>>10168
>but this goes for the other two the three contributors who have been contributing somewhat regularly over the past 4 months as well and any oldfags here, like YT!
Encouraging tech discussion as a secondary topic for archival related reasons?

>/culture/
I know some lurkers here wanted more of a focus on:
>Active archival is a major feature, but a variety of topics are also active points of discussion. From analysis of trends and situations, to self reflection and representation.
and were annoyed by archival derailing it. I understood where they were coming from in the sense that having 100 posts on random crap would derail more substantive discussion but /go/ was kind of like that already, just with a slower tempo. I think having a second, slower/random tempo thread for stuff is much better than trying to split this thread into two or three. A place to stash certain topics sounds way more sensible.

>Cozy Glow
Though such autism might make you pretty sick. Be careful and get well soon.

>>10173
>>10174
Might want to compress it down. Do you want him to post that exactly or just a synopsis of it?

>>10177