>>9581
As for foalcon of a kid's personal pony OC, see the "stupid/problem" bullet point. And if someone makes foalcon of that OC without trying to mess with anyone, I don't see any issue. It's like Chris-chan and Sonichu - "My OC, do not steal!"

>legality
I read about the legality in the US at https://wiki.froth.zone/wiki/Legal_status_of_fictional_child_pornography . I'm glad that TOR exists, because USA has overly-controlling idiotic laws which restrict freedom in the guise of fighting "obscenity". Other countries have similar problems:
>United States[...]
>The PROTECT Act also enacted 18 U.S.C. § 1466A into U.S. obscenity law:[130]
>Section 1466A of Title 18, United States Code, makes it illegal for any person to knowingly produce, distribute, receive, or possess with intent to transfer or distribute visual representations, such as drawings, cartoons, or paintings that appear to depict minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct and are deemed obscene.
>Thus, virtual and drawn pornographic depictions of minors may still be found illegal under U.S. federal obscenity law. The obscenity law further states in section C "It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exist."
>[...]
>The first major case occurred in December 2005, when Dwight Whorley was convicted in Richmond, Virginia under 18 U.S.C. 1466A for using a Virginia Employment Commission computer to receive and distribute "obscene Japanese anime cartoons that graphically depicted prepubescent female children being forced to engage in genital-genital and oral-genital intercourse with adult males".[135][136] On December 18, 2008, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction, consisting of 20 years' imprisonment.[137] Whorley appealed to the Supreme Court, but was denied certiorari, meaning the appeal was not heard.[138][139][140]
>[words words words, IDK, the US probably became more tyrannical]