>>9824
Nope, I can't! I thought I had found a cheat by setting the bump limit to higher in the settings here, but I guess whatever venerable is fixed at the time of thread creation. My plan was to set the reply limit from the default 500 to higher temporary to bump this thread and keep it on the front page. So there goes that plan...

Back to the drawing board. Permanently raising the bump limit past 500 would mess with the flow of the board but this thread has gone so fast and if such a speed keeps up it would be honestly better if it could be prolonged. I might just pin /go/ to the front page or something.

>>9816
>"Probably" my computer will crash/reboot then I won't return to it, so I'll just get a small portion of that site which requires a delay between requests.
I think this is probably more reasonable than...

>Or, I could keep working on it in various ways. A dealy of 5000ms-10000ms will take 306 or 612 days; let's say it will take about a year. A delay of 5000ms will maybe take "only" 150 days to download all of that website. I wish that grab-site was more fault-tolerant.
...this. I have crawled sites before but wget and various delays. Albeit, usually text heavy or otherwise small. Still, good thing to consider when weighing options.

> https://www.canterlot.com/gallery/image/8372-blinded-by-the-twilight/
>2021
Wow, that is very late to see custom artwork still being posted to a forum like this.

>>9820