>>9854
>gatekeeping
It can be retarded when you force "purity of culture" too much. Stagnates invocation and new things being added to the culture. I do understand why you would want to have some gatekeeping from the standpoint of keeping people from changing said culture in a negative way (i.e, Twitter and Reddit). I actually like what the OP says here on the topic:>>5559
>This board is not /mlp/, 8/pone, /mlpol/ or Ponychan. Not saying this board is the most unique or wonderful place in the world but a posting style and a limited culture has arisen that is distinct from those models and is arguably in sometimes in contrast. Expect sometimes long meandering discussions jumping randomly from topic to topic and experimental projects of various levels of merit. We also recognize that board culture is not finite and could easily evolve with what any new anon or two could bring something to the table that could alter things significantly. Just don't bring in a mentality of endless low quality threads and shitposting like glimmmmmer! to X is cucked. It would ruin the board and will not be tolerated.
It both acknowledges that board culture can change while also showing examples of behavior that won't be allowed.

>>9847
Nice! As someone with some nostalgia for ponychan I am glad to see efforts to preserve it.

> ponybro
I haven't seen someone fill out the email field for something longer than saging in a low time. Any reason for doing so?

>>9825
>Back to the drawing board. Permanently raising the bump limit past 500 would mess with the flow of the board but this thread has gone so fast and if such a speed keeps up it would be honestly better if it could be prolonged. I might just pin /go/ to the front page or something
Making thread cyclic? That would require splitting archiving from the information and historical purpose though something I admit might be needed.