>>9899
>Other test I could do: raw leaves with the default 256K chunk size.
Moved to cold storage:
. torrent? magnet:?xt=urn:btih:514f07c721fdc6542123ea024d09d46da70af5b7&dn=4chan_gif_2023_04.tar
. where? "/zb/ipfs/", offline /ipfs/QmenNrszLQokbUgYDe8z7aU8XBDLWBdfvrFVBD3VW5BoAs <- "ipfs add -w --raw-leaves 4chan_gif_2023_04.tar"
. size? 79.66 GiB for file "/ipfs/QmUAdHwm59oHiu6Vx1N9jFpUGZ5JuyaDA4X1tnhg7tHVeN 4chan_gif_2023_04.tar"; 83 GB on disk.
. (IPLD? QmUA...HVeN: 7936671744 B, 45613056 B, 262144 B)
. time? HDD->HDD took about 1.67 hours; 2024-03-20T13:56:33.494758907Z -> 2024-03-20T15:36:34.068124974Z
. speed? 1 file, 14.3 MB/s (85537239040 B / 6001 sec)

Compared to rawleaves+1Mchunk, rawleaves+256Kchunk is a bit larger and a bit slower. 1# MB/s vs. 2# MB/s and +~4.2% (+~3 GB) vs. +~1%. Rawleaves+256Kchunk is the encoding used on that one IPFS folder (not mine) which was online in the past and contained about 1TB of full images from /mlp/ - that data is now a torrent which I hope is still online:
. magnet:?xt=urn:btih:9671fb0855c7931fe98f03f7612c18010fb10121&dn=4chan-mlp
.. 1.058 TiB, contains CAR files