02/01/2018 (Thu) 15:06:53
Out of all options you had throw the fucking pinkerton at my face, fucking spare me...
I'll spare your money and write more succinctly and for free.
What about how atheists present their identity of non-believer as the only thing that makes an atheist,
but christians are held to strict standard of what must
be the belief of a true
christian. Atheists fling around this idea of compelled thought so naturally, I can never understand how somebody can be so slave-minded. Like if you're told something you just have
to take it at face value, like they're people who had to be specifically trained to think for themselves and that seems like an amazing thing to them. I actually don't think atheists should be converted. They probably would be the machiavellians rising on top of secular churches and using it only for evil. More on that later if you ask.
Pinker does no control grouping. He just posits that if there's a christian ever inventing something useful then it's not a real christian if there's not enough hay peeking from under his hat to burn a witch with, in the atheist witch hunt for the one true christian strawman. The requirement for the purity test suddenly gets a lot stricter when it suits you, when previously the purity test you invented rewrote reality (what a christian must
believe) instead of conforming to it (christian is as christian does, but only when it's something bad and barbaric that everybody is doing at the time).>pic
Atheist ethic: hang everybody up to cross for days, if it doesn't matter in the end it won't count in the end. Sounds like good way to handle people who refuse to believe lecturers in athiest opinion manufacturing facilities.
God didn't say you'd survive, and I killed you, so non-god was right!