Anonymous 07/21/2017 (Fri) 10:35:42 Id: f8fa6a No. 49406 del
one thing i need to point out to at least myself,
If we are assuming kikes only remove leaders if they rebel against the kikes, why do so many of them seem to rebel? Of course leaders are happy to receive kike money when they are fighting to take power, but why not keep taking the money once they are in power?
It may be that when a society is completely ruled by a leader, even if the leader is a shitlord who is always happy to take kike money, then the country will experience some degree of economic improvement, simply because the population is fighting and everyone is working.
If the kikes want to keep a society in dirt poverty, they have to keep it in a state of recurring civil war. So in the case of the Philipinnes, the kikes might simply have stopped supporting Duterte and shifted support to muzzie insurgents, even though Duterte had done everything the kikes asked him to do. The kikes simply need another civil war in the Philippines to keep it dirt poor.
Duterte's 'defection' to China might have been a response to the kikes withdrawal of support and funding of counter gov forces, rather than vice versa.

Check the International Sex Guide forum and look at the Philippines posts. Mongers are complaining that prostitutes have been putting on weight recently, i.e. the country is getting prosperous enough to feed itself. For the most part, girls are so poor in the Philippines they will agree to sex in exchange for food i.e. a BigMac, but that is changing fast. The Philippines is getting richer as a country.
Kikes and western paedos want the the Philpinnes to stay dirt poor, and one of the reasons is so that filipino girls can be bought with a burger.