>>54496 Oh, I get it. Don't worry. I was being inflamatory in general, not targeted. But you had the correct response.
In less inflamatory language: The thing I wanted to be wrong about is what the "slow" but sure move to a global state means. It means relying on society, on the systems we rely, instead of private systems or like I said "extra-legal" (in the sense its not based on governmental contracts/laws/police), will degenerate into literal subhuman farming. The capable people are expected to move into private structures, while the rest will be "managed".
