what do you think about teens or little girls, compared to adult women?
not a pedo here but I like to explore different thoughts. we need to have open minds about many things. here is my observation about women:
little girls
>cute, innocent, weak, naive
>romantic
>wants to be a princess
>tight holes, beautiful looks, velvet skin
>you can raise her how you want, she will listen to you and be good wife
>virgin, was not used by some chad or nigger
>will love a men that is nice to her
teens
>fertile, sexual, healthy, horny, likes to masturbate
>might be virgin or non-virgin, but had limited amount of cocks inside her
>still you have chance to change her views and culture
>a bit brainwashed but you can revert it
>perfect age for sex and breeding
adult women
>trashy, slutty, manipulative
>only looks after degenerate chads, criminals, bad boys, niggers
>will make baby with chad and tell you it's yours
>will divorce you and steal your money and property
>had 200 cocks inside her, probably has STD's
>loose pussy and ass from pounding by niggers
>brainwashed by feminism, SJW, jews, TV, MSM
>if you impregnate her, she will give birth to a child with Down syndrome or other defects
>everywhere in her body she still has sperm residues of her previous partners, sperm atoms hidden in cavities, if you will eat her pussy you will be eating someone's else sperm and his sperm atoms
>if you make babies with her, it won't be yours because of Telegony. all the sperm she took into her pussy will be used when producing that baby
I often hear how anons complain that women are sluts, they choose chads, etc. So why are you looking after adult women that does that? Why not look after little girls that possess qualities that you desire form a girl?
In the Bible there is nothing against marrying 12 year old girls, actually it's even encouraged. The nature also intended that men will take young girls as wives.
and if you married young girl like 7-11 you don't need to penetrate her if you are not a pedo. you can just raise her, kiss her, go for trips.
you can consume love with her when she's a bit older and bigger and she feels ready :)
>currentyear
>anons still fall into old whores and their tricks
>anons are bluepilled and fell for the pedo hate meme
>they don't know there is nothing better in life than love with a pure little girl
Loving little girls (protectively, romantically, and sexually) is unironically based and redpilled. It's the only viable option in a society which engages in the absurd delusion that adult women are the intellectual, moral, or spiritual equals of men.
In a less disordered society, in which adult women were put firmly in their place by law, custom, and habit, it would be appropriate to direct one's sexual impulses exclusively to adult women and to direct only platonic, protective, and romantic (non-sexual) love to little girls. Unfortunately, in the roastie free-for-all in which we find ourselves, "dating" "modern" "adult" women is a fast track to herpes, genital warts, hepatitis, and decades of court ordered misappropriation of the fruits of your labor.
Loving (and making love to) little girls and simultaneously raising them to be devoted adult wives is the only sane path left to men now.
Assuming that by "little girls" you mean literal children, meaning prepubescents, any sexual desire of yours is one-sided deviancy and is degenerate. Rule of thumb: if no pregnancy is possible = it's wrong.
>Loving (and making love to) little girls
Why do you conflate normal behavior (wanting to protect little girls) with abnormal behavior (wanting to fuck little girls)? They do not go together yet you're mixing them up on purpose.
Regarding women, my personal opinion is that they destroy civilizations if given too much leeway, like the right to vote or the freedom to whore their youth away. Women are naturally selfish and emotional creatures who have little loyalty for country and their own men, and so are easily manipulated by the Jews to behave against their best interests long-term, "Refugees Welcome".
So the above paragraph could be our common ground but if you take it further and say little girls ought to play with a grown man's dick instead of a Barbie doll, then I don't agree.
>>3370 >Assuming that by "little girls" you mean literal children, meaning prepubescents,
I do.
>any sexual desire of yours is one-sided deviancy
Our entire society is a deviation.
>and is degenerate.
Our society and much of our species has already degenerated. Loving little girls is *generate*, not degenerate.
>Rule of thumb: if no pregnancy is possible = it's wrong.
So: masturbation is wrong, getting a handjob is wrong, blowjobs are wrong, sex with your wife is wrong if you're infertile, sex with your wife is wrong if she's infertile (permanently), sex with your wife is wrong if she's infertile (temporarily, e.g. infertile part of her menstrual cycle), sex with your wife is wrong if she's already pregnant, sex with your wife is wrong once she hits menopause (enjoy 40 years of celibacy). You're either a Catholic that's even more strict than the church actually requires, or you haven't really thought through your rule of thumb.
>Why do you conflate normal behavior (wanting to protect little girls) with abnormal behavior (wanting to fuck little girls)?
It's not a conflation, it's an addition. And your distinction between "normal" and "abnormal" is meaningless, and in the context of our current bizarro way of life, comical.
>So the above paragraph could be our common ground but if you take it further and say little girls ought to play with a grown man's dick instead of a Barbie doll, then I don't agree.
Very well. In the coming loli-loveocracy, you will be permitted to live in peace and not make sweet love to adorable, grateful little girls. Maybe you'll come around eventually.
>>3384 He won't, I'm sure Hakase would love to fuck kids. This isn't the first pro-pedophilia thread on here.
>>3382 >Pizza Movies & Pillow Fights
Pizza movies? Hm.
Anyway, people like you will have their way (if they're not murdered off by the coming wave of third-world immigration into western countries, that is), almost every person with some degree of influence and power is involved in the torture (e.g., rape) or murder of little children. This has been normal for them for thousands of years.
Just FYI, children cannot consent nor do they like (UNDERSTATEMENT) to be raped by delusional grown men like you.
Everything to please your selfish pleasures, hm?
>>3389 This. Children haven't gone through puberty yet. They don't have any of the traits which make grown women subconsciously enjoy rape. Therefore, it is wrong to rape them.
>>3382 >>you mean literal children, meaning prepubescents,
>I do.
Too bad. Had you been talking about teens instead, I may have agreed with certain points you made.
>Our entire society is a deviation.
I agree with this sentiment in general.
>Loving little girls is *generate*, not degenerate.
No, I see it as a selfish pursuit of pleasure, so degeneracy. As I said, if no pregnancy...
>So: masturbation is wrong
Not really, because it's solo action.
>getting a handjob is wrong, blowjobs are wrong
In a way yes, because they're two player masturbation games that don't result in a pregnancy. Even more obvious when faggots do it because then it's clear how pointless it all is. Equal to bestiality.
>sex with your wife is wrong if you're infertile [infertile this, infertile that, etc.]
In a way yes, because what's the point of a relationship if you don't procreate? A woman being infertile is the ideal reason why the man should friendzone her IMO. Otherwise you indulge in sex for fun, which is degenerate, and punishable by death.
>And your distinction between "normal" and "abnormal" is meaningless
OK, if you choose to discard what I consider normal/abnormal because you're a fan of solipsism, so be it. Your bubble will burst when you accept that normal/abnormal are defined by the majority, which you're not part of. IMO.
>not make sweet love to adorable, grateful little girls
You're just trolling us all, aren't you? Just admit it. You're not even being serious. "Grateful little girls".
>>3402 Your views are inconsistent. You deride making love to lolis as a "selfish pursuit of pleasure," but say that masturbation is OK, when it's the very definition of a selfish pursuit of pleasure. The rest is a vague appeal to your idiosyncratic notion of "degeneracy." You're entitled to it, of course, but you've not given me or anyone else any reason to take it seriously.
As for (ab)normality being defined by the majority, I suppose it is, in a purely descriptive sense. But I don't regard the majority's judgement to be inherently correct. And it's certainly not timelessly correct, as the majority's opinions change. Fifty years ago, homosexuality in the West was "abnormal." Now it's "normal." It was wrong and disgusting then, and it's wrong and disgusting now, but the extent to which it is normal has changed significantly.
Anyway, the accusation of my (ab)normality is a strange one to make, as your beliefs about women and civilization are abnormal as well.
>You're just trolling us all, aren't you? Just admit it.
Given the above, I can't help but wonder whether *you're* trolling. Surely you're not in earnest when you criticize the "selfish pursuit of pleasure" in one sentence, but OK onanism in the next? I am in earnest, however.
>You're not even being serious. "Grateful little girls".
You're on a Tor hidden service, so surely you're not such an NPC that you think every instance of an adult man making love to a little girl is some violent, tearing, screaming rape? Little girls can enjoy consensual sex and are not harmed by it as long as the man doesn't have a gargantuan penis, the girl isn't too young/too small, and proper precautions are taken. None of this should take place outside of the bonds of matrimony, with the approval of the girl's father, of course.
>>3408 >Your views are inconsistent.
Masturbation is OK because it doesn't involve another person. I don't see this as inconsistency. Masturbation is not sex. That which is sex ought to result in pregnancy.
>But I don't regard the majority's judgement to be inherently correct. And it's certainly not timelessly correct
You're right. But if this is how you reason I could follow suit and say "if pedophilia becomes normal in 50 years it won't matter because it will just become abnormal again in 100 years". Here, now, pedophilia is abnormal. And the present situation is what matters when judging what is normal/abnormal. Call me a conformist sheep if you will. I won't hate you.
>surely you're not such an NPC that you think every instance of an adult man making love to a little girl is some violent, tearing, screaming rape
Don't go in the direction of a strawman. I argue about the degeneracy of a sex act that does not result in a pregnancy and the selfish pursuit of pleasure that lead to it. If little girls went around begging for cock, drooling, you could say "see? they want it". But as it is it is grown men who want it and the little girls are fooled into thinking it's a fun game.
what do you think about teens or little girls, compared to adult women?
not a pedo here but I like to explore different thoughts. we need to have open minds about many things. here is my observation about women:
little girls
>cute, innocent, weak, naive
>romantic
>wants to be a princess
>tight holes, beautiful looks, velvet skin
>you can raise her how you want, she will listen to you and be good wife
>virgin, was not used by some chad or nigger
>will love a men that is nice to her
teens
>fertile, sexual, healthy, horny, likes to masturbate
>might be virgin or non-virgin, but had limited amount of cocks inside her
>still you have chance to change her views and culture
>a bit brainwashed but you can revert it
>perfect age for sex and breeding
adult women
>trashy, slutty, manipulative
>only looks after degenerate chads, criminals, bad boys, niggers
>will make baby with chad and tell you it's yours
>will divorce you and steal your money and property
>had 200 cocks inside her, probably has STD's
>loose pussy and ass from pounding by niggers
>brainwashed by feminism, SJW, jews, TV, MSM
>if you impregnate her, she will give birth to a child with Down syndrome or other defects
>everywhere in her body she still has sperm residues of her previous partners, sperm atoms hidden in cavities, if you will eat her pussy you will be eating someone's else sperm and his sperm atoms
>if you make babies with her, it won't be yours because of Telegony. all the sperm she took into her pussy will be used when producing that baby
I often hear how anons complain that women are sluts, they choose chads, etc. So why are you looking after adult women that does that? Why not look after little girls that possess qualities that you desire form a girl?
In the Bible there is nothing against marrying 12 year old girls, actually it's even encouraged. The nature also intended that men will take young girls as wives.
only friendly discussion allowed! :-)