/g/ - Technology

install openbsd

[Make a Post]
[X]





TempleOS Nanonymous No.3789 [D][U][F][S][L][A][C] >>3740 >>3790 >>3800
File: 347dddc912249a37bf353d3fcfd04e082dd4fb80048610eace30752480f98dc9.jpg (dl) (105.18 KiB)

Have any of you used this? It seems pointless to use such an insular, esoteric system. However now that it is used have there been any good software developed for the system?

Nanonymous No.3790 [D] >>3793 >>3795

>>3789
TempleOS is just a meme. No networking means it's useless, since without the internet, a computer is just a glorified word processor.

Nanonymous No.3793 [D]

>>3790
Mean.
:<

Nanonymous No.3794 [D] >>3795 >>3796 >>3808

It also doesn't have memory protection so probably not that secure either. It is interesting though.

Nanonymous No.3795 [D][U][F]
File: 2a4473817a3655ace0d10755bac1831429558b2ca0a2bf1e607bd4be916f19fe.png (dl) (28.71 KiB)

If you watch Terrys videos he said a lot of time that TempleOS was never supposed to be a Windows/Linux replacement, quoting him "That would be stupid". TempleOS is supposed to be small <100000 lines of code, and simple, not bloated and with lot of functionalities like Linux. It's purpose it's just to play around, and make offerings to god if you're into that. Still i thinks it's really well designed for it's purpose, HolyC integrated in the terminal is an incredible idea.
>>3790
Zoomer detected, remove yourself thanks.
>>3794
>It also doesn't have memory protection
It's a feature at least Terry says so.

Nanonymous No.3796 [D]

>>3794
It doesn't need to be secure if it doesn't have networking.

Nanonymous No.3797 [D]

It's designed to be fun, fast, and tweakable. It's designed to be a toy. A modern Commadore 64. It's not designed for media. Piano Key sound, limited resolution. Use it as a creative outlet. Use it to play with programming. Use it to worship god.

Nanonymous No.3798 [D]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYOJYqFsfOI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7URNlmdBkKs
Educate thyself, watch the prophet viedos.

Nanonymous No.3800 [D]

>>3789
It's a work of art. You wouldn't think it, but there are some features in it which nobody has done before. Actually quite a few.

I like to consider it as an example of what happpens when you let a programmer build all their tools from scratch. You can end up with something amazing and innovative, but also useless for anyone who isn't a programmer. Modern technology is a clusterfuck of features, but if you remove them, you end up with something very primitive.

Maybe you could call it a proof of concept. There are features in there which could potentially be integrated into modern OSs.

Nanonymous No.3808 [D] >>3819

>>3794
memory protection only adds marginal security benefits.

imagine firefox has a buffer overflow or your image viewer, memory proteciton doesn't help you at all here since now the infected process can simply copy all your files to the hacker

mainstream OSs like Linux still aren't any good at isolating programs despite all their shitty attempts at isolation.

TempleOS is shit though

Nanonymous No.3819 [D] >>3823

>>3808
From what I understand, Plan9 solved that issue pretty well with namespaces.

Nanonymous No.3823 [D]

>>3819
no, it didn't

Nanonymous No.3825 [D] >>3826

Even though it doesn't have networking, would it be possible to communicate through a file to the VM? From what I'm reading it uses FAT32, so if you mount that partition on both the host and the VM,couldn't you make a simple HolyC program to pipe input/output to the Oracle and therefore channel the word of God to the deepweb?

Nanonymous No.3826 [D]

>>3825
It might kind of work for very simple situations, but any sort of caching or high-speed transfers would fuck it up royally and corrupt your data.
Better to implement a serial driver tbqh. Or parallel driver.

bumpy bump Nanonymous No.8331 [D][U][F] >>8359
File: 65b7051a936929745dc47cb4ef814db026bdef296a8a1ea6da91a8bbee037901.png (dl) (222.91 KiB)
So nanons what can we salvage from TempleOS to use for future operating systems designs?
IMO real time compiling integrated in the commandline and binary data in source files are just so good.

Nanonymous No.8336 [D] >>8347
For the operating system I'm designing (Not sure if I will ever have time to make it), it stores everything as source code like TempleOS so that you can edit any part of the system. This will give the users of the operating system software freedom. It will also have a versioning filesystem which will also have the ability to let you share your changes with other people. Instead of using HolyC it has its own language with an effect system + refined types to limit what resources an application has access to since everything is running in ring 0 like TempleOS. Instead of "drivers" programs are able to register new effects such as a networking effect or a filesystem effect. There are only a couple basic effects built in like using assembly or having divergence. Since the operating system runs everything in ring 0 you do not want to give out the assembly effect to random programs since they can use it to do anything, even crash the system (using the assembly effect is the only way to crash the system).

Nanonymous No.8346 [D][U][F]
File: fe7dbccfc331aa3b1710cba162ad624bda4292fa5f28a98929dfcced0155d8b8.jpg (dl) (2.02 MiB)
Some of you in this thread need to tread carefully. God will not be mocked (Galatians 6:7). And neither shall his prophets (2 Kings 2:23-24).
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=galatians+6%3A7&version=KJV
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+kings+2%3A23-24&version=KJV

Nanonymous No.8347 [D] >>8350
>>8336
>compiling source on the fly
Forth operating systems have reportedly been doing this since the 1970s.

Nanonymous No.8350 [D]
>>8347
LISP machines also did this in the 1970s.

Nanonymous No.8359 [D] >>8888 >>8893
>>8331
He didn't implement something if it was shit. For instance he said he'd never implement PCI drivers.
Classic programmer virtue, wholly forgotten today.

Nanonymous No.8888 [D]
>>8359
ARE YOU SAYING HE DINDU SOMETHING?
HE DUNDU IT GUYS HORY SHET!
Don't 8channer asshats say they don't like dindus, and he the terry man was anti-dindu? THUS YOU FUCKERS FUCKED THE FUCKING HELL UP, WTF

Nanonymous No.8893 [D]
>>8359
Heh, are you the Unix hater from 8ch/Tech?

Nanonymous No.8894 [D][U][F]
File: 3bb631d1e9f3427db670176799ef8aa3fbe3b0a18311146e8087330d9df4c9c8.png (dl) (15.40 KiB)
Apparently he dindu nuffin, because at some point he was scraping glow-in-the-dark off the bottom of his mini-van tires.