I've recently come across an interesting ideology called anarcho-communism which is quite compatibile with national socisiem.
- Anarcho cokmmunism advocates for the destruction of the state, which means no more Zog.
- Anarcho communism advocates for universal equality which means you won't be squashed under the boot of the jews and niggers anymore.
- Anarcho communism will redistribute wealth which means that jews won't be rich anymore.
All Nationel socislists should convert to Anarcho-Communism immediately in order to dismantle and destroy the Jewish New World Order.
>Anarcho communism advocates for universal equality
This is against the natural order. There is a hierarchy of people. Some people are higher or lower than others on the totem pole. These differences is a part of nature, and something that we must deal with. Ideally as a nation we should try to all ascend to be greater and greater, but this does not mean everyone will become equal.
>>4488 Why aren't you advocating for Anarcho Communism? Anarcho Communism is a step in the right direction. With the current zionists social order, the hierarchy is jews at the top, then lgbt/trannies/niggers/spics, then asians, then Aryans at the bottom. If we strive for real equality then Aryans will be able to operate on an even playing field which is a net benefit!
Communism is completely incompatible with anarchism, this is cause to ensure that everyone is equal you need somebody to enforce equality, that means police taking away stuf from some people that earned it and giving it to others that did not earn it. This is why communist shitholes always turns into authoritarian nightmares.
Most anarcho-communists are antifa revolutionists larpers, that are just bitter cause they don't know to do anything in life, are jealous of succesful people and want to take away stuff from them.
>you won't be squashed under the boot of the jews and niggers anymore.
>With the current zionists social order, the hierarchy is jews at the top, then lgbt/trannies/niggers/spics, then asians, then Aryans
Imagine being this fucking bluepilled. I hope this is you trolling natsoc larpers, cause if you really believe you're inferior to jews and niggers then you are seriously pathetic.
>>4488 >private property is natural
Yeah, nice.
>>4509 Daily reminder we ancoms/libsoc' have the same/similar goals as tankies, statelessnes and principal egality as in no private property. The conflict between us exists because they don't know what's enough, hinder human with 'work' like bourg caps(both want life to submit to 'work') and they never want to give up power, because, well, power. We dislike means they use too, as we have other priorities than prolongment of long-gone survival struggle and zealous anti-polymathism. Latter is reason why we dislike fascists; human is not a bee nor an ant.
>antifa revolutionists larpers
I'm libsoc and I'm neither antifa nor larper. I like ancoms more than any other left, although I know only few irl and none of them is what you described them to be. Furthermore jealousy has nothing to do with private property or ancom/libsoc.
>you're inferior to jews and niggers
Yes, you're inferior to jews and niggers.
>>4509 The other guy is bullshitting. The real hierarchy is as such:
>hapas
>quapas
>japanese
>taiwanese
>other asians (koreans chinese etc)
>spics
>arabs
>jews
>aryans
>niggers
>>4513 >anarkiddie babble
<no anarchist society has ever existed or could exist in the future without someone else btfo'ing the fuck out of it and instating a natural hierarchy
get rekt cumskin
>>4514 What is natural hierarchy? Either literal retards or exploiting fuckers on top? Yes, natural, tradition since state exists, but it feels unnatural to me.
Moreover natural doesn't exist at all, unless we are talking plato or natural as in "I was born into this thus it's natural".
>>4515 >natural doesn't exist at all
<I don't understand it so it doesn't exist
Let me explain it to you in babby terms.
The strong rule over the weak. This doesn't necessarily mean that the strong have to kill the weak, or force them into absolute slavery. It just means that the strong have the option of doing that, or they can do something more benevolent such as organizing their people under a banner and defending their land, or whatever scenario you can think of.
The incapable settle into a position lesser than that of the capable. Through natural forces, those who are less capable of looking after themselves (and their group) will not be as successful of those who are. Here, "success" can be defined as amassing resources, living comfortably, and being able to control their surroundings to a degree when it suits them.
>it feels unnatural to me
<I don't understand it so it's wrong
It feels unnatural because your birdshitter race and society worships jews willingly. Of course, you will never do anything about it; no one has ever done anything meaningful to unseat jewish power although it would be very easy if all white people were unified in their goal. When Hitler tried, other white people came in to stop him, for example.
>>4522 >I won't.
literally what are you replying to cumskin? try to make some sense, although I understand it's hard when you have lower iq than a goldfish
>>4524 Struck a chord with you birdshitter?
Maybe you should take some time off to reflect on those statements. Radical changes in worldview are hard to process, after all.
>>4487 >Anarcho communism advocates for the destruction of the state, which means no more Zog.
Good.
>Anarcho communism advocates for universal equality which means you won't be squashed under the boot of the jews and niggers anymore.
Nobody really wants equality, even feminists and liberals just want power on the opposite side, equality is the classic excuse for revolution, you're falling for the revolutionary meme. Nobody wants equality cause people are not born equal, some are smarter and some are dumber, some deserves more money than others cause they have more knowledge and capacities than others. Some people correlates this to racial differences like asuka does other correlates this to individual differences(like me).
>Anarcho communism will redistribute wealth which means that jews won't be rich anymore.
Who is gonna redistribute wealth(a central government? oops back to stage 1)? On what merit? If you just redistribute wealth you're just gonna give money to niggers and other subhumans that are gonna waste it cause they are not educated and are easily manipulatable and once they wasted their money they are gonna ask a central entity(central gov again? or banks?) to give them more, rinse and repeat exactly like Venezuela did. Also there are lot of people that are not jews and that earned their money, is it ethical to steal from them in your opinion?
Communism is retard-tier, private property and anarcho capitalism is the way. >>>/l/10912
>>4526 >Communism is retard tier
Oh hey, someone who isn't reta-
<anarcho capitalism is the way
Anarcho-capitalism, just like all other forms of anarchism, doesn't exist, cannot exist and will never exist. See my above posts. I don't like repeating myself, cumskin.
>>4531 We already discussed this so i know your opinion on it.
Just cause i'm curious what do you think of minarchism(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night-watchman_state), since you think that the state cannot be completely eliminated, do you at least think it should be minimized to what is necessary?
Describe to us your how your hapa goverment works and how much power it has on its hapa citizens.
>>4532 Minarchism is better than anarchism, and it would certainly work just fine. But optimally the state would have slightly more powers, for example to provide incentives for families to have children if the birth rate were too low (thus allowing for fine-tuning of the birth rate to meet replacement, if necessary), to strongly enforce immigration/racial laws, to provide institutions such as marriage (without divorce being permitted as liberally as it is today, of course), and to lead national projects in the interests of the race (examples of that being antarctic colonization and space exploration, if and when technology advances sufficiently).
The state should be as unrestrictive as possible, only restricting degenerate activities of citizens (degeneracy defined as "behaviour engaged in by members of a society which is detrimental to the well-being of that society"); not always directly through laws, but by ensuring that the media and education systems are never again allowed to push forth their destructive, cancerous agendas to the populace; in this way, a general social revulsion for feminists, homosexuals and multiculturalists will be created, ensuring that they are strongly discriminated against and eventually eliminated from society in the natural manner.
The American idea of a citizens' militia where capable citizens own weaponry of all types makes a country almost invincible, since an invader has to deal with not only the military, but also the civilians who may possess weapons almost or just as advanced as those of the military. This model clearly works very well until cancerous elements are introduced into society (see previous paragraph).
>>4537 That awfully sounds to me like an authoritarian shithole.
In your example:
Demographics are under central state control.(next is genetical manipulation i guess)
Medias are under central state control.(what could go wrong, working out very well in china amirite)
Education is under central state control.(i wonder what are they gonna teach in history class uh)
Scientific research is under central state control.(the state cares about research only if it has military purpose or to oppose another nation look how nasa changed after USSR fucked off)
>degeneracy defined as "behaviour engaged in by members of a society which is detrimental to the well-being of that society"
So if you are gonna commit wrong-think we jail you in short. Sounds like a nice place to live 10/10
You described the opposite of minarchism.
Why don't you just say it that you are pro-authoritarian and against freedom?
Also what government system the hapa ethnostate uses? Democracy? Oligrarchy? Absolute monarchy?
>>4538 >let's just generalize everything and use scary words to describe it
>this makes it wrong
come on faggot, get a brain.
>Demographics are under central state control
Yes, and there is no problem with this. The alternative is opening the nation up to destructive immigration and eventual racial death.
>Medias are under central state control
There is merely a set of rules describing what the media is and is not allowed to do. In other words, the media is required to not add their own opinion to their reporting if their opinion is in favor of certain societal cancers. There is no reason to believe that this is equivalent to china-style retardation.
>Education is under central state control
What's the problem with this nigger? Do you want the freedom to teach jewish/cumskin bullshit in school?
>Scientific research is under central state control
this is blatantly false and you have not read my post
>So if you are gonna commit wrong-think we jail you
this, also, is blatantly false and clearly you have not read my post
>You described the opposite of minarchism
There is no "opposite" of minarchism. Neither did I claim to support it, you did not understand my post.
>Why don't you just say it that you are pro-authoritarian
Because then retards like you will immediately jump to the wrong conclusion and wilfully misinterpret my statements.
>and against freedom
Because I'm not against "freedom" in general, boomer faggot. I'm against people having the freedom to infect society with cancer.
>Also what government system the hapa ethnostate uses?
The hapa ethnostate does not currently exist.
>Yes, and there is no problem with this. The alternative is opening the nation up to destructive immigration and eventual racial death.
In another thread you literally said there there is gonna be forced racial homogeneity in the hapa ethnostate aka eugenics, that's what i was referring to. In other words you take away the freedom to reproduce which is one of the fundumental human rights. Or did you change your mind about that?
>There is merely a set of rules describing what the media is and is not allowed to do. There is no reason to believe that this is equivalent to china-style retardation.
But it's exactly what they do in china, they give a set of rules to the media like, you can't criticize the government, you can't talk about certain topics, explain how is it different and how such a system won't be exploited to control the state narrative.
>What's the problem with this nigger? Do you want the freedom to teach jewish/cumskin bullshit in school?
I don't want the state to decide what is true or false, that is something that should be unrelated to politics and decided using the scientific method, truth is not an opinion of politicians or lords, do you really disagree with this?
The state should not be involved in science and education.
>Scientific research is under central state control
>this is blatantly false and you have not read my post
You wrote:
>But optimally the state would have slightly more powers, for example to provide ... and to lead national projects in the interests of the race (examples of that being antarctic colonization and space exploration, if and when technology advances sufficiently).
You clearly said that scientific reasearch projects should be led by the state. I know how to read fag.
>So if you are gonna commit wrong-think we jail you
>this, also, is blatantly false and clearly you have not read my post
You wrote:
>in this way, a general social revulsion for feminists, homosexuals and multiculturalists will be created, ensuring that they are strongly discriminated against and eventually eliminated from society in the natural manner.
If you did not mean put them in jail, what did you mean? Ridicule them in state TV? Take away their rights(not that different from putting them in jail)? What did you mean by "strongly discriminated against and eventually eliminated from society" then? And how far are you gonna go with your fight against degeneracy? Are you gonna ban alcohol and then porn and then explicit clothes and so on until everyone can be labeled a degenerate against the mighty hapa ethnostate and can be made disappear legally if the state wants it.
>Why don't you just say it that you are pro-authoritarian
>Because then retards like you will immediately jump to the wrong conclusion and wilfully misinterpret my statements.
Aww, what is it are you scared of expressing your opinions asuka? Go ahead i'm curious of what you really think.
>boomer faggot.
I'm just a few years older than you lol, not a boomer.
>I'm against people having the freedom to infect society with cancer.
Tor in theory could be used to spread degeneracy and avoid state censorship, are against the freedom to use Tor? Same for encryption and lot of other tools.
>Also what government system the hapa ethnostate uses?
>The hapa ethnostate does not currently exist.
And?
Don't tell me you just didn't think about this lol. I know that you are against democracy from another thread, so not much remain it either oligarchy or tiranny/monarchy.
Quartet No.2 in D minor, Op.30-Andante pensieroso ed espressivoGeorges EnescoNo.4547[D][U][F]
>minarchism
Minarchism, as in defense mechanism for when your revolution happened in confined space, is necessary. It should have only necessary overreaching power and be democratic though.
>>4542 >you literally said there is gonna be forced racial homogeneity
Non-hapas (specifically quapas) will have breeding restrictions placed on them to ensure that their genetic lines merge into being the same as hapas. It's right there in the name "hapa ethnostate"
>you take away the freedom to reproduce which is one of the fundamental human rights
Are you seriously going to bitch at me about "hooman roights" cumskin? Non-hapas don't have rights in a hapa ethnostate.
>BUT ITS EXACTLY LIKE CHINA
But the rules are different and have a different intention, so it's not like China at all.
>I don't want the state to decide what is true or false
Do you want schools and jewniversities to decide what is true and false, instead?
>muh scuntific meffod
Doesn't function in this circumstance, because primary school kids don't have the time or inclination to cross-check every single claim made by mrs shekelstein in the classroom.
>You clearly said that scientific research projects should be led by the state.
That doesn't restrict someone else from performing their own scientific experiments in any way whatsoever. Ergo, scientific research is not under state "control".
>hurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr ur gunna take away dem roights
I meant let everyone do what they want with them. As in, the cake shops wouldn't want to bake cakes for fags, so fags couldn't enjoy that. Any business which wants to refuse degenerates can do so freely and without restriction, and so on. No government involvement needed.
>Are you gonna ban alcohol and then porn then explicit clothes
I'm not interested in banning anything. I just said that people and businesses will be totally free to discriminate against degenerates, which is perfectly reasonable. The only thing I said would be controlled is education and media, so they cannot get infiltrated by jews and jew sympathizers.
>Tor in theory could be used to spread degeneracy and avoid state censorship, are you against the freedom to use Tor?
I didn't say anything about banning Tor. The only thing I said was that there should be restrictions on what education and media are permitted to do.
In general, you are definitely jumping to something that sounds outrageous whenever I have left a statement unclear. You misinterpret what I write all the time, and you don't even share my core values. There is no point in arguing with you further.
>redistribute wealth
>nobody works anymore because working doesn't give any reward
>universal equality
>now jews and niggers are officially equal to you despite one doing nothing but making sure you don't get above the niggers and the other doing nothing but smoking crack all day
also hapafag sperging like a retard is always funny, a hapa ethnostate is a funnier joke than ancoms
>>4619 Jim shouldn't just delete /pol/, he should give addresses to feds and public so that random fuckers can beat you uglos to a bloody pulp.
>seethe
>>>/4cucks/
There will need to be a complete rethinking of government in order to make something kike proof. It will need to be robust and hardened against any organized criminal gang, kike or not (there are others, just as bad or worse than kikes).
>>4616 >nobody works anymore because working doesn't give any reward
I don't see problem here. It's the moment where you are free of necessity. From that point on you work on what you want whenever you want. If you can't do without being rewarded for it, there's something very, very wrong with you or with the work you talk about.
One of the basic principles of individualism is growth anyway, not gain.
>>5430 >Commies
This was made into post-left thread by its posters. Left is overtly prone to valorization of job and statism.
>- Anarcho communism advocates for universal equality
which is a vague undefined concept which at worst means just making laws and shit which means this meme brand of anarchy doesnt even real
>>5528 Yeah, left flavored anarchy is impossible cause you need a central entity to enforce muh equality, right flavored anarchy is impossible cause you need a central entity to enforce muh hierarchies, anarcho-capitalism and minarchism are the only somewhat doable anarchist ideologies.
Just to put things into historical perspective, anarcho-communism has already been tested.
During the Spanish civil war, which was basically the result of an anarcho-communist coup, the communists ended up killing anarchists despite them fighting side by side. Even Durruti, an idiot anarchist, was probably murdered through such a plot, though the communists preferred to attribute his death to some far away sniper.
During the Greek civil war, there was no need for any cooperation, as the communists outright started murdering anarchists in cold blood. The main reason was that during the previous years the anarchists had their own movement instead of joining the jew-controlled communist part (led by Avraam Benaroya).
During the Russian October revolution, there was a brief period of cooperation before anarchists got the boot. Please note that Russian anarchists were actually little more than animals. Still, Makhno was successful in establishing a ruthless anarchist state in Ukraine till Lenin and Trotsky sent Christian Rakovsky (of Red Symphony fame) to deal with him.
In other words, for communism anarchists are the useful idiots.
"Although I am an anarch, I am not anti-authoritarian. Quite the opposite: I need authority, although I do not believe in it. My critical faculties are sharpened by the absence of the credibility that I ask for." Ernst Junger
Anarchism and communism are mutually exclusive in terms. Communism is predicated on force, and the use of this force amounts to the formation of the state.
If you envision a stateless society where everybody just ought to share wealth equally that's one thing, but you can't call that communism.
>>5853 You don't understand what Communism is. All communism by definition is anarcho-communism, because communism seeks the abolition of the state and all the social class differences that come with being a part of the state vs not part of the state.
- Anarcho cokmmunism advocates for the destruction of the state, which means no more Zog.
- Anarcho communism advocates for universal equality which means you won't be squashed under the boot of the jews and niggers anymore.
- Anarcho communism will redistribute wealth which means that jews won't be rich anymore.
All Nationel socislists should convert to Anarcho-Communism immediately in order to dismantle and destroy the Jewish New World Order.