>>141 i think tor hidden services are immune to ddos because there are 3 tor relays in between any attacker and the server
so it's really hard to ddos something like nanochan
cloudflare is legit ciagnigger shit. it's a mitm for any site that uses it and the block-cloudflare addon was deleted and banned from firefox for no reason.
>>1020 basically all anti-ddos services are cancerous in some way, either they require the user to use proprietary jabbashit, do mitm, or (in 8chode's case) fail altogether to provide protection.
>>142 the entire tor network would probably break if someone DDoSed a tor website (unless the website goes down first)
>>1022 only these new soyboy services like cuckflare and its clones do that shit. it's completely unnecessary and only a soyboy would come up with such a dumbass solution
>>2466 >the whole tor network would probably break If it were so easy to "break" the tor network, someone would have done it already. DDoSing nanochan would at best take down the 3 nodes on the route between the attacker and nanochan, and then other people using different nodes would still be able to access it.
>>2467 obviously a non-trivial DDoS would take multiple routes to the target. either all the nodes will go down or the target will
>If it were so easy to "break" the tor network, someone would have done it already.
tor is just a bunch of volunteer-run servers in a centralized directory
>>2474 I'd be interested in seeing if the top tier professionals are as clueless as the CIAniggers. If "sassy cat" is really the highest, most elite tier then I weep, for there are no more worlds to conquer.
8cucks is down again lol
Cuckflare: not even once
Glorious nanochan will not be brought down