/l/ - The Lounge

Non board-specific discussion

[Make a Post]
[X]





/o/ thread Nanonymous No.15016 [D][U][F][S][L][A][C] >>15032 >>15124 >>16853 >>16883
File: 61753ca297363c0e321c2c0297a27aec8ff69860da31c01a3ea67429b34895a7.jpg (dl) (104.17 KiB)
What's your dream car?
Mine is a corolla from the 70s.
>rwd, none of that (((fwd))) crap
>no (((ECU))) or (((EFI)))
>lots of space under hood
>made in japan
>will last for another 1000 years
see if yours can beat that

Nanonymous No.15017 [D][U][F]
File: acd834621af95f795c20ed2fbd16bc2ba09876f09453eb85a348e5c9e5126675.jpg (dl) (140.08 KiB)
>will last for another 1000 years
not for them northerners

Nanonymous No.15021 [D] >>15129
Lada Niva, a Russian four wheel drive car that has that 80's square aesthetics

Nanonymous No.15031 [D]
One of those enormous station wagons with the fake wood down the side.

Nanonymous No.15032 [D]
>>15016
>Mine is a corolla from the 70s.
pic with timestamp or is underage larp

Nanonymous No.15044 [D][U][F]
File: b2429c3955e686282b58cd01bcc031bc14e7a24a7dd91d5d6fc82e21e305ea95.jpg (dl) (368.82 KiB)
I like the look of the Bollinger B2, even though it is (((electric))).

Nanonymous No.15121 [D]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haul_truck#Ultra_class

Pick one.

Nanonymous No.15124 [D][U][F] >>15320 >>16852 >>16853
File: 1cea23e83a35f5b1d706e129f75406ff02dbdd11b650e66e856947fa65a0070c.jpg (dl) (114.81 KiB)
>>15016
>Mine is a corolla from the 70s.
I am sorry to meet you, slownigger.

My weapon of choice is a Porsche 911 GT3 RS
>rwd, none of that (((fwd))) crap
K
>no (((ECU))) or (((EFI)))
Are you a fucking caveman?
>lots of space under hood
Under my hood is literally a storage compartment. ((((Rear engine placement master race checking in))))
>made in japan
The Nazi's have always done things best
>will last for another 1000 years
Only if you drive like a cuck

I would challenge you to a race, but i dont race slowniggers.

P.S. the last two letters in the captcha to make this post are gg

Nanonymous No.15125 [D][U][F]
File: 397ad8934516703364eba465a2200219c0f8debfd183b7076b1b0702035b4332.jpg (dl) (114.37 KiB)
Edison2, but with 4x4 in-wheel axial halbach-array permanent magnet hub motor and electronic stability control:
http://edison2.com/

Nanonymous No.15129 [D]
>>15021
The niva is really an incredible vehicle, at least pre-1995. Seconding this.

Unfortunately I live in a shitty country with stricter emissions regulations and where access to spare parts is a real problem, so it's not something I can really consider as a daily driver.

Nanonymous No.15131 [D] >>15139
And why is /o/ posting disabled?

Nanonymous No.15139 [D]
>>15131
There was not enough /o/ discussion for it to warrant an entire board, so it was merged into /l/.

Nanonymous No.15157 [D][U][F] >>15303
File: 21f0176966e000f7e9b519b05022552fb08e50ad1defd7cd0e2e29372b93ac9f.jpg (dl) (7.15 MiB)
>car
Cars made for something other than fun or for special purposes are cringe. Public transportation is superior.
picrel is my dream car since I've seen it for the first time

Nanonymous No.15271 [D]
I hate cagers and cages. I hope you burn alive in your cages.

Nanonymous No.15274 [D][U][F] >>15479
File: 51e84b2c2d485c533005c648a3afda7c820de7d7a477c87dbba754832bc468a7.jpg (dl) (489.14 KiB)

Nanonymous No.15303 [D][U][F] >>15478 >>15484 >>15486 >>15498
File: 38005bb4b3d0de26f238c163152dcf2ee349bd81acb92cdf20e12a20ccaa309c.jpg (dl) (51.15 KiB)
>>15157
Totally disagree.
Performance cars made only to burn gas are cringey.
"Yeah got the best engine, but only two seats that don't move".
Take that Ferrari, and put a truck bed on it!
Otherwise it's a car that gets driven just for the sake of fucking around, not even a remotely useful object.

Nanonymous No.15320 [D]
>>15124
>Are you a fucking caveman?
>wow you dont use the google anal plug 7.0 what is wrong with you get with the times

Nanonymous No.15476 [D]
Computers in cars as the new standard are fucking cancer!
I wonder if the computers are just glow devices so they can "Princess Diana" anyone they (glowers) want.

Nanonymous No.15478 [D] >>15480
>>15303
>put a truck bed on it
<or for special purposes
Car you bought for the purpose of using it as a carthorse can be considered as made for special purposes.
For moving around "usefully" there's public transportation unless you live in some remote shithole and then again car becomes made for special reason.

Nanonymous No.15479 [D]
>>15274
Most tasteful post here.

Nanonymous No.15480 [D][U][F] >>15498 >>15639
File: 70f2d15ecc610ec043c7409537dcadfbd350ce07736c0cee25730a154f9009fa.gif (dl) (8.04 KiB)
>>15478
Public transportation only works if you want to walk several miles to the closest bus stop, often times on a fucking highway.
Not everywhere (more like nowhere) has people trains let alone maglev/bullet trains, even if they should.

>special purpose
Not really.
Correctly equipped a vehicle is both a people mover, a stuff mover, and a fuel efficient performance machine.
Something dainty-ass Europeans don't understand with their half size roads and half size cars, and why the pickup truck is king, even if it gas guzzles like nobody's business.

Nanonymous No.15484 [D] >>15486
>>15303
That's such a cute Matchbox car.

Nanonymous No.15486 [D][U][F] >>15488
File: 7301a16c0f1ead681036279a82fc3ab2ef4d302817bb34cf425368d3d574f74e.jpg (dl) (186.38 KiB)
>>15484
It is the Dodge Deora concept car (not sure if that particular image in >>15303 is of a hotwheels or matchbox though).
There was a newer one as well.

Nanonymous No.15488 [D]
>>15486
Looks great

Nanonymous No.15498 [D][U][F] >>15499 >>15657
File: d2f5322978b7be3bdc0b8a90b70815d86ea96e369a6f2af9b66a1d586abd5992.jpg (dl) (30.02 KiB)
FD3S because initial D, and the because it has the sexiest ass I've ever seen.

>>15303
>not even a remotely useful object
Cars are already inefficient. They take up too much space, they are slow, and they use more gas than Auschwitz. The only reason anyone should use a car is to show their wealth or simply to admire the engineering (optimized for something other than MPG or transportation). Trains overall are a superior method of transport for long distances and bikes for short distances.

>>15480
> if you want to walk several miles
You need the exercise.
>pickup truck
< as if you use the back more than twice a year
Worse than driving a car, Americans must drive BIG SUV and BIG pickup truck so car doesn't stop when run over pedestrians. The reason you drive cars is because roads are the only infrastructure project that your government is half capable at. China and California started their high speed rail projects in 2008. china has connected their entire country (even the sparse middles of nowhere), and California has decided to use diesel trains slower than japan in 1960's.

Nanonymous No.15499 [D]
>>15498
>Trains overall are a superior method of transport for long distances
It's to expensive to get a train line to go from your house to where you want to go, not to mention it is probably more expensive to even run.

Nanonymous No.15500 [D]
We had this same conversation about transportation efficiency on this other thread, some of you might find interesting:
https://nanochanqwrwtmamtnhkfwbbcducc4i62ciss4byo6f3an5qdkhjngid.onion/l/12020.html

Nanonymous No.15639 [D] >>15657
>>15480
>murca
well since it's never acctually several miles like you claim (anywhere in a suburb or city), it looks like you're just a fat fuck who cant handle a 5 minute walk.
the country on the other hand will make you walk on roads with cars, which proves how meme it is. america is a dead piece of capitalist shit

Nanonymous No.15657 [D]
>>15639
>the country on the other hand will make you walk on roads with cars
>looks like you're just a fat fuck who cant handle a 5 minute walk
>You are a fatfuck who can't handle a short walk because you don't wanna walk on a road with speeding cars
10/10 deductive reasoning moron

>>15498
>The reason you drive cars is because roads are the only infrastructure project that your government is half capable at. China and California started their high speed rail projects in 2008.
This is true.
Commiefornia is shit though and has no idea what they are doing.
Last I checked their train funding was removed by the Trump Admin because they were fucking around.

>as if you use the back more than twice a year
You are thinking of the posers who get the CrewCab models and just wanna drive a truck so they say they drive a truck. Unless you're a business that regularly, actually, hauls a big ass crew, you don't need the fucking CrewCab.
But try actually hauling shit in your little fucking trunk (oh sorry, "boot", because you speak cuck english probably). Be one of those idiots who bungee ties their trunk closed lmfao.

>It's to expensive to get a train line to go from your house to where you want to go, not to mention it is probably more expensive to even run.
No one said run one from your house.
Just have some actual (safe) sidewalks (not just in a city) where you can walk to the station, that runs in a loop around given town/city/whatever, then have a main connector line that goes between cities. Not that hard, just make it cheaper than gas costs.
Murica used to have the best train system before the oil companies bought the lines and replaced them with ass-phalt.
>wE dOn'T tHe monnnnnneeeeyyyyyyyyy
FUD. Absolute FUD.
We can go bomb, aid and occupy 10+ different countries, we can have roads, but we can't have rail lines like most other countries?
Why does not being a cuck leftist always result in being anti-cool shit? Can't we be based and have good infrastructure at the same fucking time? Wtf!?

Nanonymous No.16852 [D][U][F]
File: f1d69036f742ebc8f217250eb774afca2c576ac1b0406be07da5e66c71b5d981.jpg (dl) (151.86 KiB)
>>15124
911's are divine but the GT versions are a bit retarded.

When you look at the back of a 911 you want to see the iconic ducktail or tea tray, not a huge pikey spoiler. And if you look through the back window all you see is that red bars of the roll cage.

And everything is stripped out to save weight, even the Porsche logo on the front is just a thin sticker instead of a metallic badge like the other versions.

By the way, the GT naming refers to specific racing classification the car was designed for and lower numbers are faster, so GT1s and GT2s are faster than your GT3. Porsche don't have a current road legal GT1 model but they do have a GT2 RS if you are just looking for blind performance and nothing else.

If I had the money for a Ferrari tier Porsche I'd get a turbo rather than any of the GT versions though since it's designed to be a practical everyday road car as well as mentally fast.

The Porsche brand has been diluted a bit since the Cayman though. Most rubberneckers on the street can't tell the difference between a 10K Cayman and 100K 911 so modern Porsches are pretty lame at projecting Ferrari tier wealth unfortunately.

Nanonymous No.16853 [D]
>>15016
>Mine is a corolla from the 70s.
The car in your pic looks like more an 80s Supra.

>no (((ECU))) or (((EFI)))
The Supra is fuel injected but even so, 3.0L with only 200bhp and 0-60 in 8 seconds. >>15124 is right, you need all that modern shit if you don't want to be outdragged by soccermoms in minivans.

It does look amazing though.

Nanonymous No.16883 [D]
>>15016
That Japanese or Korean girl is cute.