/meta/ - Board Meta

[Make a Post]
[X]






Nanogate Nanonymous No.4557 [D][U][F][S][L][A][C] >>4571
File: 942023b9be750fc1ac22799fbd111bddc836f8c568e9001f56ec53d9f5d2099d.png (dl) (141.63 KiB)
Boycott nano

"oh, not the same shit again" - Mod

Moderation on this site is full of shit in treating users with different opinions than their own. They're biased and show their double standard with using vague rules to benefit them even though rules are clear but abused nevertheless. Let me show you allowed threads (excluding /b/):

>>>/l/13050 - porn dump, "OP started an actual discussion and people joined it, so it did generate a "good discussion" in the end"
>>>/a/701 - yuri dump
>>>/meta/4442 - ???
>>>/meta/4221 - porn board request
>>>/a/1250 -cartoon whore music dump
>>>/g/518 - desktop thread (!) I know hapase made rules after this thread, but should it still be alive with new mods? Who knows
>>>/l/6613 - picture dump thread
>>>/l/7722 - another dump thread
>>>/a/1382 - make me not watch x anime
>>>/pol/4031 - ">that fucking jew nose"

Now, what's not allowed:
>>>/l/12915 - discussion about Jews
>>>/l/12913 - news that could generate good discussion
>>>/l/12521 - site discussion
>>>/l/12123 - anon calling mods showing double standard
>>>/l/7019 - classical music thread (porn is fine but not classical music?)
>>>/l/11064 - art thread
>>>/l/10275 - infographics (at least could be moved to /ar/)
>>>/pol/3777 - news that could generate good discussion
Countless deleted threads.

Some threads were done under hapase regime but I don't only critisize new mods - I critisize site for treating me like a second class citizen for having different opinion and "shilling" good things yet (((bad things))) get a pass.

Now see rules:

1.Child pornography is not permitted. Links to child pornography are not permitted either, and neither are links to websites which contain a significant number of direct links to CP.
Clear.

2. Flooding is not permitted. We define flooding as posting similar posts more than 3 times per hour, making a thread on a topic for which a thread already exists, or posting in such a way that it significantly changes the composition of a board. Common sense will be utilized.
This "common sense" means mods decide what's good and what's not. For example porn dump is ok but not discussion about Jews.

/l/ has additional rules:
1. Do not make threads here which fit in another board (except for /t/).
Ok.

2. Do not make low-effort threads. Threads which only consist of one or two sentences are almost always of poor quality.
Arguable what is "low effort thread" and mods love to abuse it.

3. Do not outright derail threads. Discussion which gradually shifts away from the OP's topic is permitted.
Now they claim they won't delete threads if users don't complain. For some reason they won't delete porn thread with at least two (2) complains.

4. Do not make threads about a topic which cannot generate a good conversation.
That's biased as fuck. What is good conversation? Why someone is deciding what is quality? Porn is quality but not not anti-porn? So what if I have three (3) threads (two (2) with lots of porn) discussing three (3) different things when we get porn, complain and other every other day?

>Further addendum: Dump threads are almost always a violation of rule 2
!!!

>Nothing against the rules in that thread, it's a discussion thread it's fine where it is
Yes, porn is discussion. Someone is writing text along porn pics so it's discussion.

>TBH I think threads that are deliberately created to "piss someone off" belong in /b/
Yes, they do.

>If you want me to point at the rule, I'll go with
>4. Do not make threads about a topic which cannot generate a good conversation
Mods are people that don't respect rules. Only use them when it's

>Now, I know that you hate him and I don't support him in the slightest, but hey, make it somewhat less obvious that you are biased. xP
Thanks starfag.

>But the OP started an actual discussion and people joined it, so it did generate a "good discussion" in the end
Same deal with >>>/l/12915 . I was looking forward to respond to starfag and thread got autosaged.

>personally I don't think the dump rules should be a thing (only hakase removed dump threads), and nobody's complained about them before you so I never did anything about it
I complained and starfag supported me. That's "nobody" according to Moderation.

I get the same treatment even though I respect rules. hapa spammer went full nuts and spammed site, that's fine because I'm the bad one.

I didn't provoke situation, I didn't practise double standard, I didn't try to be malicious. I like this place but I don't like the treatment I receive.


Nanonymous No.4558 [D][U][F] >>4561
File: 12ba4a9235c647014dfb7499b34b4872c3c7885c1b983f2df337206ac1946f9b.jpg (dl) (137.71 KiB)
>oh no im a victim
>ya gotta follow DA RUELZ
>ermegurd porn is bad
>lol anime is porn XDDDDDD
>delete things I don't like plz
>it stops being discussion if there's porn
Hmm, I wonder why.

Nanonymous No.4559 [D] >>4561 >>4570 >>4571
Moderation is always subjective. Dont give a damn about /pol/, would like mods to just ban desktop and consumerism threads for the sake of not becoming the second coming of 8ch.

Have you thought about asking mods in a polite manner why they banned those threads before you went on a righteous rampage about the injustice of mods deleting one shit thread too many? And why do people feel so personally attacked if a thread goes down? Did you complain when they deleted the hapase spam for you? Boycotting Nanochan by the likes of you would be the best thing to happen. Sayonara.

Common advice is to not feed the trolls. Neither should you feed the mods in this way.

Nanonymous No.4561 [D] >>4562 >>4570 >>4571
>>4558
Even though I don't like you we're alike and should stick together as we're on the same boat. But you're braindamaged so let me ignore you.

>>4559
>Have you thought about asking mods in a polite manner why they banned those threads before you went on a righteous rampage about the injustice of mods deleting one shit thread too many?
Plenty of times. I don't mean harm like hapa spammer.

>And why do people feel so personally attacked if a thread goes down?
I'm known as "Antipornfag" or other names and Moderation is censoring my opinions because people don't like what I do.

>Did you complain when they deleted the hapase spam for you?
What do you mean? It was spam.

>Boycotting Nanochan by the likes of you would be the best thing to happen
Daily reminder nano died once and it wasn't me who let that happen.

>Common advice is to not feed the trolls. Neither should you feed the mods in this way
So why are users provoking me and Moderation is not doing anything about it? I contribute to this site and separating porn from overboard is the least they can do. I mean, I fight for the good cause and stimulating users with just discussion (not porn) could produce nice things but you're too stubborn to let that happen. My threads are deleted for being duplicate, "low quality", schizopost, derailing and other reasons.

Nanonymous No.4562 [D][U][F]
File: 454bcf2888b099564e18a090d264420d7a5e724657c3cd718a406f9a423df58b.jpg (dl) (189.37 KiB)
>>4561
>we're alike
No. You are a cumskin, and thus a subhuman. I am a hapa, and thus a member of the master race.
>we're on the same boat
You are getting butthurt over nothing. I just don't give a shit.
I think you are taking this way too seriously, cumskin-san.

Nanonymous No.4566 [D]
<Have you thought about asking mods in a polite manner why they banned those threads?
>Plenty of times.
And because you didn't get your way you decide to throw a temper tantrum.
>Moderation is censoring my opinions because people don't like what I do.
<It was spam.
Hapas is superior to whites or some bullshit
>I fight for the good cause and stimulating users
Are you sure you're Antipornfag? For now I trust the mods. Not that I ever really cared on any chans what mods did or didn't do.

Nanochan is getting pessimistic. Someone should cheer her up.

Nanonymous No.4570 [D][U][F] >>4574 >>4579 >>4582
File: 5cb694de948ee4d8e62e1c47eff08eec0f7230d2f6ab7ce1888a2cfda8a313f5.jpg (dl) (222.57 KiB)
>>4559
>Dont give a damn about /pol/
+1
>just ban desktop and consumerism threads
+1
>>4561
>Moderation is censoring my opinions
Jezz son. You're not a victim, you're just a idiot.
>>4563
Nice.

Here we go again. Nanonymous No.4571 [D] >>4574 >>4582
>>4557
Here we go again.

>>>/l/13050 is a discussion thread and not a porn dump that's my final word, you first accuse me of censorship(even if i left three of your antiporn threads untouched) and then you ask me to censor discussion that you don't like ... and i'm the biased one -.-
>>>/a/701 is ontopic with /a/, /l/ antidump rule(more on that later) doesn't apply to /a/
>>>/meta/4442 ??????
>>>/meta/4221 i would prefer if the global meta thread was used for board requests(or just don't request boards at all), but a thread is fine if it's on /meta/, you dislike it only cause it goes against your shilling, talking about your bias again
>>>/a/1250 is ontopic with /a/, /l/ antidump rule(more on that later) doesn't apply to /a/
>>>/g/518 is ontopic with /g/, /l/ antidump rule(more on that later) doesn't apply to /g/
>>>/l/6613 i've decided to change the dump rule read global meta thread, so it's staying up
>>>/l/7722 i've decided to change the dump rule read global meta thread, so it's staying up
>>>/a/1382 you even replied to that thread with your shilling(bumping it), it's a thread about an anime and there is no qtddtot on /a/ so it's fine to make such a thread
>>>/pol/4031 ??????

>>>/l/12915 is a thread about the cancer of nanochan(you and asuka) since it belonged in /meta/ i autosaged it for that reason, the discussion about jew shit it's technically derail, sorry if i try to keep /l/ clean of shit threads that belongs on other boards -.- but since nobody seems to care or complained fine it's back up unsaged, let that be your containment thread faggots
>>>/l/12913 weak bait and low quality, doesn't belongs on /l/, i double down on my judgement
>>>/l/12521 i'm not the one that autosaged it, it's kind of a weak thread for /l/'s standards but fine i'll go against what i said in the moderation feedback thread and i'll give it a second chance, unsaged
>>>/l/12123 what happened was that asuka shat all over the frens thread and that nanon(was that you?) replied to asuka and his post was removed with asukas ones, it was just collateral damage you're bullshitting with you're "double standards" accusations, just don't reply to asuka or thread derailers in general, i autosaged the complaining thread cause it belongs in /meta/ not /l/, it's incredible how people can't fucking get the board right when making threads and then accuses you of muh censorship when you do basic moderation
>>>/l/7019 hakase saged it not me, anyway there is already the music thread and i don't want two music threads on /l/ so use the existing thread
>>>/l/11064 hakase saged it not me, anyway it's low quality, make a better one if you care
>>>/l/10275 as you admitted it belongs in /ar/ if you really care repost them to /ar/, but IMO it would be better to make infographics on a single topic and post on the relevant board instead of a big unreadable vague infographic thread.

>Countless deleted threads.
Countless deleted spam threads. ftfy

Fucking stop with the victimism act, nobody is buying into it and it's fucking obvious that you're doing it to manipulate the users into getting on your side and bite into your shilling.
>I didn't provoke situation
You did multiple times, this whole thread is a provocation.
>I didn't practise double standard
You did multiple times, you don't want to be censored but at the same time want to censor others that goes against your shilling.
>I didn't try to be malicious
You impersonated admin, spammed the board on pigchan to cause a board war and derailed multiple threads like the kyoani one, so fuck off with your innocence act.

>>4559
>would like mods to just ban desktop and consumerism threads for the sake of not becoming the second coming of 8ch
That's a lot of work for me and i can already see people complaining cause i removed their thread and arguing for ages about the definition of consumerism and then saying that i censor stuff, sorry but i don't think it's a good idea as much as i would like a /g/ free of that stuff like you. You can always report if you really think a thread shouldn't stay on /g/ but no promises.

>>4561
>Even though I don't like you we're alike and should stick together as we're on the same boat.
Just a couple of days ago you were sperging that asuka was a conspiracy made by the moderators to delete your stuff, already changed your narrative? Or are you a schizo for real?

Nanonymous No.4574 [D] >>4579 >>4582
>>4571
>is a discussion thread and not a porn dump that's my final word
Porn thread is discussion thread? Then what is anti-porn thread?

>??????
Not discussion, one liner.

>i would prefer if the global meta thread was used for board requests
>but a thread is fine if it's on /meta/
Hmmm.

>is ontopic with /a/, /l/ antidump rule(more on that later) doesn't apply to /a/
>s ontopic with /g/, /l/ antidump rule(more on that later) doesn't apply to /g/
In other words if one doesn't have thread meant for board other than /l/ it's automatically rulecucked? This is what you implied.

>i've decided to change the dump rule
Great, so multiple dumps are fine but should I dump anti-porn infographic it'll be deleted.

>??????
No discussion. >>>/l/12913 got deleted.

>is a thread about the cancer of nanochan(you and asuka) since it belonged in /meta/ i autosaged it for that reason
Sure, why not.

>but since nobody seems to care or complained fine it's back up unsaged
Thanks.

>weak bait and low quality
It's news so what do you expect? It's could get good discussion if not you autosaging.

>unsaged
Thanks.

>anyway there is already the music thread and i don't want two music threads on /l/ so use the existing thread
It's CLASSICAL MUSIC. How would you feel if anime got put into /c/artoons board? I'm not using these threads but it's oversimplification.

>hat happened was that asuka shat all over the frens thread and that nanon(was that you?)
It's not my thread but autosaging criticism can be judged by users.

>hakase saged it not me, anyway it's low quality, make a better one if you care
I don't, it's double standard if porn is fine but not art, but ok it wasn't you so I'll drop it.

>as you admitted it belongs in /ar/
Lives would be saved if you introduced thread moving.

>Countless deleted spam threads. ftfy
My arguing is spam, great.

>Fucking stop with the victimism act, nobody is buying into it
I'm oppressed with different opinion of mine.

>You did multiple times, this whole thread is a provocation.
This is what happens when discussion using other channels fails.

>You did multiple times, you don't want to be censored but at the same time want to censor others that goes against your shilling
Yes, I don't want to censor users. I want to argue if we have different opinions about x thing but with porn it's unfair because of how human brain is reacting when seeing porn. Imagine shitting threads with gore, certainly not pleasant or comfy. It's the same league whether you like it or no. Porn does not contribute to this site.

>You impersonated admin
? You just assumed I'm admin, I never said I'm the one, I answered what would I do if I was. You can't blame me for it.

>spammed the board on pigchan to cause a board war
No, I just wanted to advertise my Chad vs Virgin meme as it was censored here.

>derailed multiple threads like the kyoani one
It just happened. At first I talked about kyoani arson and it just went.

>Just a couple of days ago you were sperging that asuka was a conspiracy made by the moderators to delete your stuff
That's right.

>already changed your narrative?
No, he once assumed what we have in common is that we want to say whatever we want. It was manipulative act and in this thread I responded to it accordingly.

>Or are you a schizo for real?
I want to get diagnosed but I won't share it for obvious reasons.

Now to the new rules
>1. Do not make threads here which fit in another board
As I said it's rulecucking kinds like me.

>New rules will be applied to threads made before the establishment of the rules if they are bumped and/or kept on the overboard for a considerable amount of time
Who cares, it doesn't change anything and autosaged threads are impossible to bump.

>Dump threads are allowed as long as they encourage "discussion", we define discussion as a meaningful exchange of information between users, the medium to exchange such information may be text, code, documents, images, videos or music, /l/ rule 2, 3 and 4 still applies of course.
Fitting your own. So please unsage infographic thread and don't delete my anti-porn thread I'll at one point of history dump (when I get nice collection) because most likely it'll be removed. Or move existing threads to better places (if it's possible with current code).

I'm curious - why all porn but >>4570 got deleted? Do you take pleasure from fooling with me?

Nanonymous No.4579 [D]
>>4574
>why all porn but >>4570 got deleted?
Because she is yummy!
t. no mod.

Nanonymous No.4580 [D][U][F] >>4581
File: 2c21ee9271699b696f243c3db7b5696531d7fc13d0258bdae69f9d8bc14a0ae7.jpg (dl) (337.82 KiB)
Holy fuck cut the mods some slack, this is getting really meticulous.

Nanonymous No.4581 [D]
>>4580
They forced me to do this. I just want my threads to be alive.

Nanonymous No.4582 [D] >>4585
>>4574
Thank you antipornfag. You produced such a beautifull trainwreck with your schizo shilling.
>why all porn but >>4570 got deleted?
I expected nothing less from you, were you raised in the middle east with a burqa? Or were you a nun in your past life? Can you even watch bra commercials or go to the beach without going on an anti pornography rampage?
>I'm oppressed
Yeah, no one should be forced to cover up most of their body. Dont censor >>4570 please!

>>4571
>i don't think it's a good idea as much as i would like a /g/ free of that stuff like you.
expected as much, which is why I didn't bother you with it in meta threads. Still, glad you're on the same boat as me.

Somewhere next/this week I'm going to start /dpt/ again. Feel free to create it without me if a Nanon has time.

Nanonymous No.4583 [D]
By the way, file dumps should still be made in /ar/, since it has a higher post cap before the captcha triggers.
Speaking of which, it should really be disabled by now.

Nanonymous No.4585 [D]
>>4582
>were you raised in the middle east with a burqa?
Speaking of burkas, it's a shame we don't have something like that in non-Islam world. It might be weird to force women to cover themselves but we already know of slippery slope of making them decide - they'll wear less and less with final - going naked. We're slowly going through this process and thirsty men don't complain. That's degeneracy.

>Can you even watch bra commercials
I don't watch TV.

>go to the beach without going on an anti pornography rampage?
Real things aren't porn. I don't react to real woman in swimsuit same as to the picture.

Nanonymous No.4589 [D]
>they'll wear less and less with final - going naked.
You're actually shizo. Not all women only think about sex appeal. vice versa for men. Shame you're such perverted in your thoughts about the other sex.
>That's degeneracy.
Is a self-solving problem. Look at the upbringing of kids in a stable family (read: not promiscuous women you rave about) versus broken families. One will have tremendous prosperity in life compared to the uphill battle of the other.
>I don't react to real woman in swimsuit same as to the picture.
There's your perversion. Victim of the very thing you claim to be free of. I did enjoy the beach if you want to know. It was quite hot so some took the liberty of taking their top off. I wont expect you to understand that they're not what's wrong with society.