/meta/ - Board Meta

[Make a Post]
[X]






Nanonymous No.6446 [D][U][F][S][L][A][C] >>6447
File: 024e10f990251b73295c1ff3764d61f906323979112160bcc38dc37d5fd511b7.png (dl) (374.72 KiB)
>out of the 18 threads on the top of the overboard, 10 are /g/ content
>yet /pol/ can't be on the overboard because fagmin said it would flood it with its relatively low pph
Sincerely, why is this? I can't really imagine a reason. It would trigger some faggots? You forgot to remove Hakase's swastika on the main page.

Nanonymous No.6447 [D] >>6461
>>6446
>flood with it's relatively low pph
it's low because they can't flood the overboard with shit. On top of that, /pol/ users kvetch endlessly if you try and impose standards of decency on them, whereas /g/ allows itself to have the shit moderated away.

Nyanonymous ## Global Volunteer No.6449 [D]
The decision to remove /pol/ from overboard was made during the invasion of 8chan refugees when 8chan shut down, during these 3 months things changed a lot, adding back /pol/ to overboard is not a bad idea in my opinion.

To be honest i also think that we should add /meta/ back to the overboard at some point in the future when and if asukafag decides to leave us alone and there is less drama.

Nanonymous No.6461 [D] >>6466 >>6470
>>6447
>it's low because they can't flood the overboard with shit. On top of that, /pol/ users kvetch endlessly if you try and impose standards of decency on them, whereas /g/ allows itself to have the shit moderated away.

Either you`re Asukanigger or a shitskin /g/ tier poster. If anything, Nano /g/ is more cancerous than Nano /pol/. If you look at any of the pre-Asuka /pol/ threads, it showed plenty of insightful and informative discussions. Even avatar fags like Star and Lain would post on /pol/.

Nanonymous No.6462 [D][U][F] >>6470
File: 6be25e1a6f8400e4e71f383f227c7c38147e72ad4b2ba9436bcd1c9b8f9ccfae.jpg (dl) (294.27 KiB)
TBH I don't post there because of the sorrowful state of /pol/. Seriously, it's that bad. Any time I open it, I just want to close it and never come back again. Hence, I have no reasons to wish it being on the overboard.
Though I see it slow down considerably since the time of the initial removing from overboard, so at this point I wouldn't really mind it back. If it does gain its speed back while not improving though, down into oblivion it goes. Or, alternatively, I stop using the overboard, no need to make a drama out of this.

BTW what about that ancap thread on /l/, was it created there or moved from /pol/?

Nanonymous No.6466 [D]
>>6461
>If you look at any of the pre-Asuka /pol/ threads, it showed plenty of insightful and informative discussions
Correction, pre /l/-/t/ split threads. Incidentally it was also when hakase had a cultural awakening and the asukafag persona was created, so you're kind of right on that.
anyway, /pol/ is now slow enough to be put back on the overboard, i think. there hasn't been much resistance against the idea in this thread, so this might not be that rough after all. /meta/ is back on the overboard too.

なのにもうす No.6470 [D] >>6473
Personally i'm fine with reinstating /pol/ in the overboard.

>>6461
I always wondered, do you use "`" instead of "'" on purpose to be recognizable?
>Even avatar fags like Star and Lain would post on /pol/
It's not like i never posted there before xD i just don't really avatarfag outside of /g/ or /meta/ and sometime /l/ cause Lain would feel out of place.

>>6462
>TBH I don't post there because of the sorrowful state of /pol/
One of the big problems of our /pol/ is that there are few happenings threads or news threads in general, most threads are about shilling one ideology or another(ok maybe i am also guilty of that with ancap, but i am a special snowflake ok? uwu) or just about memes and 4chan copypastas, you can't really have a conversation about political actuality in this state.
>BTW what about that ancap thread on /l/, was it created there or moved from /pol/?
I created it on /l/ cause i wanted the discussion to be more related to economics, although it turned out political in the end. If mods wants to move it to /pol/ go ahead, it was my mistake.

Nanonymous No.6473 [D]
>>6470
>I always wondered, do you use "`" instead of "'" on purpose to be recognizable?

Mostly to be subtly recognizable. My interests are more /pol/ and /lit/ related. However, without ID`s, it is difficult to carry out serious discussions without knowing who you`re talking with. Usually the grave symbol is subtle enough that no one who intends to derail a thread may impersonate me. (Unless they are a top tier shitposter).

>One of the big problems of our /pol/ is that there are few happenings threads or news threads in general

I haven`t posted on /pol/ in a while. Someone on there keeps mentioning (((Jews))) and it puts me off. Like, yeah, I acknowledge Zionism and the undermining of European culture, but may we actually have productive discussions? If anything, you`ll see me more in /ar/ or /l/. Maybe /b/, if the topic is more in my interests. Perhaps if moderation reduced anything discussion of Zionism to a single thread, /pol/ would be more tolerable.

>6462
TBH I have no quarrels with your sentiments, Star. As I share similar thoughts. This is simply an obligatory acknowledgment, fren!

Nanonymous No.6474 [D]
Everything is muh jooos should stay off the overboard.

Nanonymous No.6475 [D][U][F]
File: cc084f6dc98ac36469f8ddbbbd24388c314dab2f7ba6027f01ee99594a3806a4.jpg (dl) (65.21 KiB)
it sucks because it's all fed & fakeposting. it's basically impossible to have a legit /pol/ anymore without strict moderation because of the times we live in.