/b/ - Random

Anything goes.

[Make a Post]
[X]





Nanonymous No.1226 [D][U][F][S][L][A][C] >>1231
File: d8e506194320257437231f8e51fdbe9ba58564f8ddcba00f34278af18a83dab2.jpg (dl) (78.70 KiB)
Can you install freenet on persistent TAILS?

Nanonymous No.1231 [D] >>1236
>>1226
tails OS is basically a fork of debian, so yeah of course you can.
also >>>/g/

Nanonymous No.1236 [D]
>>1231
Makes sense. I'm concerned a simple install won't be very secure though.

Nanonymous No.1238 [D][U][F] >>1249
File: 29a877168cdacfccdb6c2ca0f00904ed929c5bd762376431547f1a8f7ac3e7fe.png (dl) (208.43 KiB)
I wouldn't use the zero 8chan its talking about. The known admins of 8chan dont know who set that up. Thats enough reason for me to be concerned about the data being gathered; of course it is possible its just some superfans that want to continue forward..

https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/status/1158897000470814721

Nanonymous No.1249 [D]
>>1238
It's a p2p network. Anyone can track everyone hence my paranoia for a functional tails freenet

Nanonymous No.1258 [D] >>1415
>It's a p2p network. Anyone can track everyone
That... isn't true.
Well, for zeronet it probably is since zeronet basically uses torrent under the hood IIRC.
Freenet however provides anonymity.
Also it wont be easy to setup on tails because tor doesnt work with udp. Youll need a tunnel, e.g. a vpn or ssh. Performance will likely suck too.

Nanonymous No.1365 [D] >>1366
Performance always sucks with tor

Nanonymous No.1366 [D] >>1388
>>1365
I never have any performance problems with Tor.

Nanonymous No.1388 [D]
>>1366
>300kb/second is good

Nanonymous No.1415 [D] >>1418
>>1258
This anon is right. But you can modify the iptables to allow UDP traffic on the Freenet ports. Also change the DNSPort on torrc to other port than 53. This probably works, haven't tested.
Also, don't use Freenet.
>java
>secure
Pick one.

Nanonymous No.1418 [D]
>>1415
>Freenet however provides anonymity.
It was designed to be anonymous but they failed.
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/05/13/freener_not_so_anonymous/
https://freenetproject.org/police-departments-tracking-efforts-based-on-false-statistics.html

Notice that none of the official branding or documentation claims that Freenet is anonymous, they say "strong privacy protections".

Basically any node you connect to directly can do statistical analysis on file fragments going in and out of your node to detect A) what files they belong to and B) whether you are requesting them or only proxying them. That's why the Freenet press statement above includes this line
>The only way to defend against serious attacks is to use Freenet in Friend-to-Friend mode
Basically the only way to use Freenet anonymously is to only connect to nodes you 100% trust (but don't know how you are somehow), which defeats the whole point of having an anonymity network.

>Well, for zeronet it probably is since zeronet basically uses torrent under the hood IIRC.
Yes that's right. Html-over-bittorrent means that your entire browsing history is publicly accessible to everyone else on the network since you seed everything you download. Nobody with a brain would go anywhere near that shit.

OP's infograghic is actually talking about Zeronet but OP's post says Freenet so that's probably where the confusion is coming from.
tl;dr both are shit but for different reasons.

Nanonymous No.1538 [D]
>I never have any performance problems with Tor.

Same here. If there's a difference, I didn't notice. Maybe someone's got a problem with their setup or they're running on old hardware.