What's the admin's email address? It would be useful if e.g. nanochan goes down. I can see it being useful for private mod discussions as well, but I'm not a mod so idk how that works.
I assume it is darkcoder@secmail.pro, he was the only other person who posted that they requested the site in the thread. Star said she was denied, and I never heard anything back. Unless they just emailed hakase without posting anything in the thread, that's the guy.
>>3768 I don't think I would check my mail very much, even if I wanted to suffer trying to make a cock.li account through tor. If the server goes down, I'll be around at the /nc/ board on endchan, or the thread on pigchan. If there's anything you need to say in private I guess you can just use pgp keys, I'll make one later.
>>3769 Nope, different guy. Never posted in the threads
>>3770 >even if I wanted to suffer trying to make a cock.li account through tor
you already have one you lying faggot, how else would you have talked with hapase? hapase stated specifically that she wanted someone to email her about succession in her thread.
Plus, it's easy to make cockmail accounts through tor. Just don't use the hidden service address, and if it doesn't work, restart your tor and try again.
>>3772 Yes I used email, but that's a throwaway address that only hakase knows about, so I just made it with a vpn. Whatever, I'll just make an email.
>don't use the hidden service
It's that easy? Didn't know about this, thanks
>>3773 >cock.li stores emails on an encrypted filesysetm
<secmail doesn't state that they do
>cock.li has support for IMAP and POP so you can use your own email clients
<secmail says it's still in "development"
>cock.li does not have a religious affiliation
<secmail claims that God is not real
>>3775 >he believed encrypted email meme
>he doesn't use gpg to make sure things are confidential
>he will only use something is (((he))) told him he can use it
>he cares about ethics in email service
>implying I think the point of encrypting the filesystem is to protect me from VC
>he will only use something is (((he))) told him he can use it
I can not understand you. Your grammar is too bad.
>he cares about ethics in email service
I'd rather not promote services with bad ethics and morals as it signals that those qualities are acceptable in society.
>>3777 >>implying I think the point of encrypting the filesystem is to protect me from VC
So why it's important? If you depend on someone's infrastructure to keep you safe on Tor your OPSEC is shit.
>he (that means you) will use something (for example email site) [only] if (not "is", I mistyped) (((he))) (Jewish person) told him he can use it (you mentioned being still in "development" so it's not ready product. You will wait until they announce "completed development! full version! ready for mass use"?
>I'd rather not promote services with bad ethics and morals as it signals that those qualities are acceptable in society
It's hard to agree with everything you see on the Internet and their goal is to just, well, provide you with safe email.
>So why it's important?
I would prefer to keep my emails as private as possible. Even if you always still used PGP you would be leaking the subject of your emails in plain text. Also if you are registering for services, they will likely send you email in plain text.
>you mentioned being still in "development" so it's not ready product
I am referring specifically to them offering support for IMAP and POP, not that the entire service is a WIP.
>You will wait until they announce "completed development! full version! ready for mass use"?
The IMAP and POP features were implied to be in development and not available to the public. It's hard to use something if you don't even have access to it.
>>3780 >I would prefer to keep my emails as private as possible
Sorry to break it for you, but what if provider is honeypot and CIAniggers have access to it? I'm not implying cockli is, but theoretically could be. You can't trust anybody with your data. That's why Tor got developed.
>It's hard to use something if you don't even have access to it.
Won't http site work? Unless you're serious about email and refreshing it every 5 seconds.
>>3781 >Sorry to break it for you, but what if provider is honeypot and CIAniggers have access to it?
That's why it's important to have multiple identities. It reduces your attack surface. Also for actual encrypted communication I would prefer to use a protocol actually designed for encrypted messages. I don't really do much do much sensitive communication over email.
>Won't http site work?
Yeah it will work, but I prefer having local backups of my emails and being able to read them from GNU Emacs.
What's the admin's email address? It would be useful if e.g. nanochan goes down. I can see it being useful for private mod discussions as well, but I'm not a mod so idk how that works.