A White House lawyer chosen by Donald Trump to serve on the federal appeals court previously argued countries were weakened by ethnic diversity.
Steven Menashi, the president’s nomination for the Court of Appeals Second Circuit, wrote in an academic journal that “ethnic ties provide the groundwork for social trust” and “solidarity underlying democratic polities rests in large part on ethnic identification”.
“Surely, it does not serve the cause of liberal democracy to ignore this reality,” he added in the 2010 article for the University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law.
The passages resurfaced on social media following the announcement of Mr Menashi’s nomination on Wednesday and were later discussed on air by MSNBC host Rachel Maddow, who described them as “a highbrow argument for racial purity in the nation state”.
{snip}
Maddow described the article as “blood-curdling”, while the Council on American-Islamic Relations called on Mr Trump to withdraw Mr Menashi’s nomination.
{snip}
Mr Menashi, former general counsel for the US Department of Education and currently a special assistant to the president, rejected claims he was advocating for racial purity and — apparently contradicting his article — acknowledged the dangers of ethnic nationalism.
{snip}
“Rachel Maddow grossly distorts Menashi’s argument,” wrote Ed Whelan in National Review. He said Mr Menashi’s argument was is ”clearly not about racial purity” but instead “what makes a population regard itself as a nation, what gives rise to national self-consciousness”.
-
Ask yourself the possibility of this happening unless something big had changed.
>>5809 >The passages resurfaced on social media following the announcement of Mr Menashi’s nomination on Wednesday and were later discussed on air by MSNBC host Rachel Maddow, who described them as “a highbrow argument for racial purity in the nation state”.
This is hilarious. It just goes to show the incredible neurotic insanity of the jew. Some kike read that document a decade ago and squirreled it away in a blacklist, just so that it could be released if Menashi ever came into power. These people are a disease. You simply cannot have a functional society with jews in it.
It is shameful and a symptom of a dying civilization when the emotional idiocracy of the overpopulated plebs takes precedence over science and progress. Menashi's research merely rediscovered something which superior men and women have always known and which modern-day social scientists are increasingly proving to be true: that demographic diversity = bad, homogeneity = good. For such politically incorrect statistical facts to exist, however, is incompatible with the very foundations upon which (((their))) fearmongering idiocracy is founded. Thus, plebian celebrities like Maddow are invoked to spout bullshit for the unthinking masses to gorge upon while the words of scientists and of great men who built civilizations are forgotten or ignored.
From a quick online search of social science research articles on diversity within the last 20 years, I found that higher demographic diversity is at the very least correllated with reduced social capital, lower economic efficiency, higher crime, poorer health, poorer quality of life and weaker government institutions. If only Menashi had a supreme hapa brain then he could use all this published research to fuck Maddow's gay pride parade on live TV right in its nigger stank roast beef pussy.
Steven Menashi, the president’s nomination for the Court of Appeals Second Circuit, wrote in an academic journal that “ethnic ties provide the groundwork for social trust” and “solidarity underlying democratic polities rests in large part on ethnic identification”.
“Surely, it does not serve the cause of liberal democracy to ignore this reality,” he added in the 2010 article for the University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law.
The passages resurfaced on social media following the announcement of Mr Menashi’s nomination on Wednesday and were later discussed on air by MSNBC host Rachel Maddow, who described them as “a highbrow argument for racial purity in the nation state”.
{snip}
Maddow described the article as “blood-curdling”, while the Council on American-Islamic Relations called on Mr Trump to withdraw Mr Menashi’s nomination.
{snip}
Mr Menashi, former general counsel for the US Department of Education and currently a special assistant to the president, rejected claims he was advocating for racial purity and — apparently contradicting his article — acknowledged the dangers of ethnic nationalism.
{snip}
“Rachel Maddow grossly distorts Menashi’s argument,” wrote Ed Whelan in National Review. He said Mr Menashi’s argument was is ”clearly not about racial purity” but instead “what makes a population regard itself as a nation, what gives rise to national self-consciousness”.
-
Ask yourself the possibility of this happening unless something big had changed.