>There's literally nothing wrong with pedophilia.
Then why is it illegal?
Something something... taking advantage... something something... ruining childhood...?
Pedophilia by its strict definition is inherently degenerate because it doesn't result in off-spring. Hebephilia might not appear to be inherently degenerate but it's certainly not the most effective way to construct a society, and is therefore degenerate by causing more problems than it solves. Dating people your own age lowers the chance of creating unnecessary gaps in the dating people and potentially leaving men at risk of being alone. So I suppose if your only care in the world is muh dick then hebephilia isn't really all that bad, but if you're even remotely concerned about the future of the ethno-state hebephilia can be highly problematic. Mass distribution of women is vital to keeping a productive and healthy society.
It's fine to find little girls cute, attractive, and want to protect them. But wanting to bed them creates a very degenerate kiked environment filled with distrust.
>>2085 This. Also prepubescents should be busy playing with dolls and toy cars, not an adult's genitals. Pedophilia = hedonism = muh dick = degeneracy, imho.
>>2105 >There's something wrong with you if you spend your free time arguing about pedophilia on the internet.
<argues about arguing about pedophilia on the internet
Here's an objectively superior in every way opinion: pedophilia should be illegal, hebephilia is ok, rape illegal, CP should be legalized, but filming it should be illegal. If you disagree you're probably either a moralfag or a rapist, but lets hear it.
>>2107 Depends on what kind of society you want to live in. In a fascist ethno-state watching porn would absolutely be illegal, or at the very least incredibly taboo. The desire to have hebephilia legalized is a selfish one. It's not you who is deserving of these women. You're stealing them from an appropriately aged husband. The only situation in which hebephilia could reasonably be legal is in a dying kike dominated society filled with utter degeneracy left and right, which is why you're seeing leftypol begin to support it.
Your fixation on child porn makes you constantly let your guard down and show just how little you care for your people. The argument is never about child marriage being productive, because it ultimately isn't. The argument is always about things like pleasure and consent, which in an ethno-state are both completely irrelevant. Stop thinking with your dick like some stupid nigger. Porn isn't nearly as amazing as your kike warped brain thinks it is to be worthy of discussing the laws surrounding it. Your goal should be to abolish the need for porn all together by forging a world where distribution of women is normalized.
I think old men should have the young girls, and old women should have the young boys. What does everyone think? I also think Old men should have young boys and old women should have young girls. I'm so nice
The young lust after the old and the old lust after the young. Why is there this prohibition against true desires? Also, if you are against this you'd better consider anyone who mutilates the genitals of their children far worse.
Most of the civilized world has the age of consent 14-16.
Teenagers have the right to consent to sex. They understand the implications, and contrary to your beliefs they don't get PTSD from consensual sex.
>>2108 >It's not you who is deserving of these women. You're stealing them from an appropriately aged husband.
>O-only the young strapping bulls should be fucking the lolis.
LOL AGECUCK! If anything, it should be illegal for only young boys to have sex, then every man can have a loli wife when they reach adulthood, where they have more prospects and financial stability, instead of wasting their youth worrying about women.
>>2108 If most women married at 13-20, nobody would be stealing anything, because within a generation or two "distribution of women would be normalized" as you said. All your talk about porn is a bunch of moralfaggotry and strawmanning, I don't even watch porn, I prefer erotic images that are banned for being "inappropriate" or "sexual" or whatever. It's not even relevant to begin with, because there aren't any fascist ethno-states around and I don't think we'll get to see any in our lifetimes.
>>2160 >>2176 Your argument is literally the current argument posed by roasties. That if you just wait until you're rich and successful you can get a hot young wife. The distribution of women is not normalized now and that is the current method of things. 18 year olds aren't settling down with 30 year olds. You are so delusional and fixated on children that you can't even adjust your argument to see if it would function if even just slightly shifted forward a few years. How brain dead can you possibly be?
Creating an environment in which a young mans peers are actively avoiding them and only fucking old men is incredibly degenerate. Once again you prove that you are all completely disconnected from reality. "JUST" be alone for a decade or two then you can fuck a cute loli like in my cartoon porn!
>It's not even relevant to begin with, because there aren't any fascist ethno-states around and I don't think we'll get to see any in our lifetimes.
There it is again. You want to function within and adjust to a fundamentally broken society. Talking about the negative effects of porn if your goal is to create a highly productive society isn't "moralfagging". Everything pedo's say is an appeal to moralfags as I've already pointed out. Stop projecting.
If all you're concerned about is ranking the levels of degeneracy within our current society that is almost universally ran by kikes then yes, the jews have created a large number of inconsistencies on which degeneracy is allowed and which is not. On the day of the rope all degenerates are getting the bullet. And the day of the rope only gets closer the more degenerate society becomes. Legalizing fucking children might actually be productive in bringing that day much closer, I suppose. As far as I see it hebephiles are muh dick fags, and muh dick fags are no better than niggers in their sociability.
Old men + young girls, regardless.
Women are too weak to function in normal society. Have them married and shipped off with a man. Ideal society would be young man + young girl, however.
At this point my hatred of pedos isn't even moralfaggotry anymore. You guys are like furfags; you rub your dumb fetish in everyone's face constantly and cry about oppression when you're told to fuck off. You're like that MS Paint comic of the faggot pondering how to make normal people hate him less so he dresses up in drag and acts like a massive faggot in front of everybody. You're like bronies who respond to bans with love and tolerance spam. I don't need a logical reason to hate pedos anymore; you're just fucking annoying niggers.
>>2264 https://archive.fo/FBblE >spic raped 13 year old girl, uploaded it to the internet, distributing CP to millions upon millions of people, got off free with not even a slap on the wrist
>meanwhile if you so much as think about having sex with a 17 year old while you're 21 you'll be sent to prison and put on the sex offenders list until the day you die
Pedos are degenerate retards but this shit is beyond fucked. Just have money and be a shit-skin and you can literally do anything you want.
>>2212 >Ideal society would be young man + young girl
no, and it's never really been that way. 14-25 year old males either had to get lucky, or find an older woman, or go raping and pillaging. fathers don't want dumbass 20 something faggots marrying their daughters. young men are too stupid, reckless, inexperienced and unestablished to be good mates for a young girl.
>>2190 You're one rabid /pol/yp, alright. I never mentioned old men marrying younger women, didn't even bother reading the rest of your angry word salad. Something about ethno-states in there again, Jesus Christ.
>>2269 >t. 40 year old pedo
Try being a young adult (zoomer) hebe. Literally the only logical choice. Once I was out of middle/high school, those girls were the only thing I could like.
Unless, of course, you want them to all go to 60 year old farts who can't even get hard anymore.
>>2298 99% of CP is just really bad softcore porn. The edgy shit isn't satisfying because children are innocent and I only enjoy watching whores get tortured. CP is just this really retarded taboo that is incredibly over hyped by both pedo niggers and normalfags alike. It's so bland and boring it's not even worth discussing really. Unfortunately the pedo niggers won't shut the fuck up trying to justify their autistic fixation.
Pedophilia is degenerate and comes strictly from sexual perversity, but being sexually attracted to kids that have already gone through puberty is totally normal and biologically correct. Though not immoral, I still think hebephillia is pathetic as girls at that age are usually still to stupid to make good decisions.
>Here's an objectively superior in every way opinion: pedophilia should be illegal, hebephilia is ok, rape illegal, CP should be legalized, but filming it should be illegal. If you disagree you're probably either a moralfag or a rapist, but lets hear it Sex should be illegal outside of marriage between a man and woman.
ftfy
>>2651 >Sex should be illegal outside of marriage between a man and woman.
>Marriage is illegal if either the man or the woman is under the age of 13.
there you go pedojew
>>2651 >to marry girls as young as 7
Why do you want to marry her so young, Muhammed? She's too young to have kids of her own, Abdul. Basically she's still a kid herself and raising her is up to her parents not a stranger who wants to fuck her, Abu Hajaar.
>A girl of 16 who isn't yet married
If she's an absolute whore, yes. But if she's a virgin she's not an embarrassment yet, Haji.
Pretty amazing that even on the most secure and pbscure parts of the internet CP isn't even posted or allowed anymore, when in the early days of 4chan up until 2009 maybe 2010 you would regularly find cp posted on /b/.
>>2713 I can't speak for most but CP isn't really taboo for me anymore. I've seen plenty of it and it just doesn't do anything. Maybe like some insane snuffcore shit might be mildly interesting because it's something I've yet to see, but even pedokikes somehow have moral objection to it so it's very rare. Plus there's the normalization of sexualized children in media. The content on jewtube and "tictok" is probably better suited for pedophiles than actual CP is, considering most CP is just a deadfish traumatized girl sitting there with no fucking clue what's going on.
>>2714 >tiktok
>pedo
most of the whores on tiktok are already in or past puberty, which means it isn't pedophilia.
>>2713 >Oy vey let me jerk off to your women getting damaged before thy are even fertile, goy! Muh dik!
>muh trauma myth
https://www.ipce.info/sites/ipce.info/files/biblio_attachments/the_trauma_myth.pdf >During the process of writing, my
first priority was to protect the confidentiality of the victims discussed in this book
>In my attempt to reconcile both goals, I have opted to change the
names of all the victims featured in this book and to either omit or modify any clearly identifying charac-teristics (such as age, birth date, place of residence, and specific occupation).
Meaning there is no proof of any of this even happening. It's nothing but a sham.
>Muh privacy tho
What are we supposed to just take your word for something taking place with no evidence to support the book?
>Muh circumcision
If someone smashes a baby against a wall, how did the baby consent to that???
>Muh transgenderism cnn link
Nothing but a mentally illness or parents forcing their own children to become one as a political statement.
This can only prove that name dropping a bunch of shit that you agree with is not an argument and sometimes even goes against your case.
I am starting to think it benefits both the women and the men, if the girls get into a long term relationship at a younger age.
Women are the most attractive and will remain so for the longest time when they are young, so if they want a good man they should get one then not at 30 when they are declining. It is also best they have children when young though I am not sure how young is the best.
Maybe some women would rather spend their youth on their career than children, but in that case they have to make that decision early or it will be too late for them to change their mind.
A woman making a decision that affects a large part of her life can be difficult so she needs to be made aware early so she has lots of time to think, especially because she is so young and can struggle to make good decisions. No later than 13 should the girl be before she is made aware of the choice she has to make, that at least gives her 5 years to think before she turns 18.
But it may be hard for her to know what she wants if she has not even met or tried spending some time with these men, and even if she already knows she would surely want to not have to rush but be able to meet different men and find one she is compatible with, so dating while young is a good idea. Should she find this man early when she is still less than 18 I don't see why she and her partner cannot have sex, it is certainly a good way to ensure he sticks around.
The girl being young means her parents can be a big help in finding a good partner and ensuring he treats her well, unlike an independent girl that cannot be controlled by her parents in any way and will make poor and naive judgements.
Of course the parents can't help judging romance and other personal stuff but good indicators like life experience, wealth, taking good care of himself etc and not having bad traits like drugs, alcoholic, being violent/aggressive, etc.
In particular I will point out it is a good idea for her to find a guy she has a large age gap with because even if the young guy is fun at first, when they both get older he will not be appreciating her because she is becoming ugly (while he has become more attractive due to rise in wealth and life experience) and that will make them both unhappy.
With an older guy she will not have this problem because they both become unattractive at the same time.
This is also the reason I am not all out against the really young girls (below 13) getting into relationships because the age gap can work to her advantage and I don't see why that should be taken away from her if she can use it to get a happier life. That said I doubt many girls will be sexually interested at that age, so the interest in the partner would have to be more childish, while there also being a lot of interest in him being with her from the parents.
From the male perspective some might find a less than 13 year old not as attractive as the older girls but remember that an 18 year old only has 12 years of prime before hitting 30 while a 9 year old has 21. For the older men an 18 year old is not that bad but a guy at 29 will need a 9 year old if he wants his wife to be declining at 30 when he does at 50(or well unless he is really rich then there is no decline :P).
The idea of a little girl does not sound bad compared to an unattractive older lady, even if you won't stick it in she is way better for cuddling. Of course you have be considerate that it is a little girl though, if she is too young to comfortably take it in or she is not mentally ready to be doing sexual things then it will have to wait. This is also why the parents being involved is so important.
As for the young guys they can still have fun and mature by having short term relationships with the career women before getting older and marrying a proper little girl; as well there is no reason a girl has to avoid younger guys before committing to an older guy (unless you take the must be virgin perspective), she just can't waste much time on it or it will be bad for her.
>>3898 >retarded pedo nigger can't go two sentences without reddit spacing or using emoticons
Every fucking time. It's almost as if you want your gibberish to be unreadable to anyone with a 3 digit IQ. Learn how to write and express your thoughts you absolute brain dead fuck.
>>3912 Yes because doing exactly that for 50% of your post then doing it after every 2 sentences for literally every other line in the entire post is absolutely not obnoxious and terrible writing format in the slightest. Writing like that is to accommodate the fact that your ideas are jumping around spasticly, which is terrible writing. Consolidate your thoughts then convert them into a readable structure before blurting them out. This is a forum, not a chat room.
>>3917 to
>>3898 If I click one the fucking post number, it should place the number in the response field, If it doesn't then what is the purpose of clicking the post number to reply?
>>3918 >newfag is a weeb pedophile who doesn't understand not having niggerscript enabled
What a time to be alive
>>3919 Half of the thread is just pedos repeating the same arguments a week after they get refuted in the exact same thread. If they had their way the same handful of pedoniggers would just make a new thread every time they get btfoed.
There's literally nothing wrong with pedophilia.