File: ec76d6ee855eb3a15077ac6dea7534063829b32fed492c37415e3c172819a67a.webm (dl) (13.47 MiB)
/g/ - Technology
install openbsd
[Make a Post]File: 63ee76f04636c01a02bd30c2374cf64a2b2d70c705672b439d2c4881d809d4da.png (dl) (87.42 KiB)

I have made an effort to share and spread this recent information, and I wish to share this screenshot. The lainchan thread, which is by-far the most active of all the threads I've made today, has an apparent shill in it. I wanted to bring attention to this. This screenshot is my own reply.
File: a941d023c37ae4f06f0abdfde87e3952b081d0d827f197a965b63193bebfd227.png (dl) (307.12 KiB)

NPCs get their news from fake news media like Vice who just make click bait headlines for traffic and the NPCs believe all she SJW shit they read their. In the court of public opinion sheboon wins against man every time. It doesn't matter if the sheboon is retarded and illogical.
File: d0c9c1e9d991663a436c60149ba97a8f4b0177a5909abbc587e4747ca00e5aa4.jpg (dl) (237.10 KiB)

>>6932
>A giant
He is certainly that. His gut is listed on peakbagger.com
>and a freedom-fighter like RMS
C'mon now. Freedom fighter? For his own highly idiosyncratic definition of "freedom", I guess.
>claims that it is RMS supporting Epstein (which, if you read it, you can tell that no it is not in any form)
If I understand Stallman's arguments correctly, he was basically saying two things:
1. Even if Epstein was trafficking these girls (which I gather Stallman doesn't dispute), if Minsky had no way of knowing they were trafficked, and thought that his sexual encounter with one of the girls was consensual, then it's not fair to accuse him of rape.
2. While Minsky having sex with the girl was statutory "rape" because of the location where the sex occurred and the fact that the girl was 1 year under the age of consent there, that's really not the same as being a rapist in any meaningful sense. Clearly, a 17 year old can consent to sexual activity under many circumstances, regardless of arbitrary age requirements in different jurisdictions.
Now, Stallman is clearly not defending Epstein, so his opponents are certainly mischaracterizing his argument. But it's difficult to believe that Minsky didn't know the score. No cute 17 year old girl would want to fuck that tubby old Jew (pic related) unless she was being paid or coerced or both. The idea that having sex with her was consensual in the way that a 17 year old having sex with a cute 22 year old guy is consensual is laughable. And Epstein had a well-known reputation, and though Minsky was a disgusting kike, he wasn't an idiot, and it's hard to believe he didn't know something nefarious was going on. So Stallman is making a subtle argument that's being mischaracterized in the press, sure, but he's also being pretty disingenuous. Still, we don't live in a culture or have a media that deals well with subtlety, so you lose the nuance and get "OMG STALLMAN SUPPORTS TODDLER RAPE."
As far as Minsky goes, on the one hand, he's dead and can't defend himself, so it's pretty shitty to bring this stuff up now. Also, Wikipedia talks about it under the heading "Allegation of child sex abuse", which is absurd, because while the girl was a minor, she certainly wasn't a child. That makes it sound like he fucked a kindergartner or something. On the other hand, Minsky was a vile heeb who, quite apart from what he did or didn't do to one of Epstein's underaged whores, should have been gassed on general principle. Same with Epstein. And Stallman. And every other fucking sheenie. Whatever occasional good they might do as scientists or doctors is far outweighed by the harm they cause.
All of this said, though, I'm surprised that Stallman was forced out of the FSF. MIT, yeah, I get it, university politics being what they are. But the FSF was his baby. Btw, you say he resigned from "FSF-GNU" but that's not a thing. GNU is sponsored by the FSF, sure, but they're not the same thing, and the presidency of the FSF is not synonymous with leadership of the GNU project. Do you have any evidence that the Great Red One is stepping down from GNU, too?
>A giant
He is certainly that. His gut is listed on peakbagger.com
>and a freedom-fighter like RMS
C'mon now. Freedom fighter? For his own highly idiosyncratic definition of "freedom", I guess.
>claims that it is RMS supporting Epstein (which, if you read it, you can tell that no it is not in any form)
If I understand Stallman's arguments correctly, he was basically saying two things:
1. Even if Epstein was trafficking these girls (which I gather Stallman doesn't dispute), if Minsky had no way of knowing they were trafficked, and thought that his sexual encounter with one of the girls was consensual, then it's not fair to accuse him of rape.
2. While Minsky having sex with the girl was statutory "rape" because of the location where the sex occurred and the fact that the girl was 1 year under the age of consent there, that's really not the same as being a rapist in any meaningful sense. Clearly, a 17 year old can consent to sexual activity under many circumstances, regardless of arbitrary age requirements in different jurisdictions.
Now, Stallman is clearly not defending Epstein, so his opponents are certainly mischaracterizing his argument. But it's difficult to believe that Minsky didn't know the score. No cute 17 year old girl would want to fuck that tubby old Jew (pic related) unless she was being paid or coerced or both. The idea that having sex with her was consensual in the way that a 17 year old having sex with a cute 22 year old guy is consensual is laughable. And Epstein had a well-known reputation, and though Minsky was a disgusting kike, he wasn't an idiot, and it's hard to believe he didn't know something nefarious was going on. So Stallman is making a subtle argument that's being mischaracterized in the press, sure, but he's also being pretty disingenuous. Still, we don't live in a culture or have a media that deals well with subtlety, so you lose the nuance and get "OMG STALLMAN SUPPORTS TODDLER RAPE."
As far as Minsky goes, on the one hand, he's dead and can't defend himself, so it's pretty shitty to bring this stuff up now. Also, Wikipedia talks about it under the heading "Allegation of child sex abuse", which is absurd, because while the girl was a minor, she certainly wasn't a child. That makes it sound like he fucked a kindergartner or something. On the other hand, Minsky was a vile heeb who, quite apart from what he did or didn't do to one of Epstein's underaged whores, should have been gassed on general principle. Same with Epstein. And Stallman. And every other fucking sheenie. Whatever occasional good they might do as scientists or doctors is far outweighed by the harm they cause.
All of this said, though, I'm surprised that Stallman was forced out of the FSF. MIT, yeah, I get it, university politics being what they are. But the FSF was his baby. Btw, you say he resigned from "FSF-GNU" but that's not a thing. GNU is sponsored by the FSF, sure, but they're not the same thing, and the presidency of the FSF is not synonymous with leadership of the GNU project. Do you have any evidence that the Great Red One is stepping down from GNU, too?
>>6945
Oh, get real. That's not an
>apparent shill
that's a typical lainchanner. That place is a hive of faggots, trannies, bluehairs, SJWs, and various other weepy snowflakes. The only "lains" who get triggered harder than the users are the mods. It's a fucking shitshow. Yeah, yeah, the guy you're responding to isn't arguing, he's engaging in an irrelevant emotional outburst. That's not shilling, that's just expected behavior on lainchan.
Oh, get real. That's not an
>apparent shill
that's a typical lainchanner. That place is a hive of faggots, trannies, bluehairs, SJWs, and various other weepy snowflakes. The only "lains" who get triggered harder than the users are the mods. It's a fucking shitshow. Yeah, yeah, the guy you're responding to isn't arguing, he's engaging in an irrelevant emotional outburst. That's not shilling, that's just expected behavior on lainchan.
>>6950
Perhaps I have miscatagorized the userbase of lainchan. I have been using it intermittently since it was created circa 2014, but only recently have I really "been there" due to the 8chan debacle.
Perhaps I have miscatagorized the userbase of lainchan. I have been using it intermittently since it was created circa 2014, but only recently have I really "been there" due to the 8chan debacle.
For people defending Stallman: yes he was 'important' to free software and this is probably a difamation campaign. But you should learn history: after Bell Labs closed UNIX, many alternatives appeard. One of these was BSD. Even before the Minix/Linux war, BSD was already a thing and had permissive license. Even if Stallman didn't existed, free software would still be a thing.
Stop sucking his dick.
Stop sucking his dick.
>>6955
MIT/BSD Licenses have always been closer to Open Source than Free Software, and Open Source is a bastardization of the Free Software Movement. I argue that it is you who has study to do.
MIT/BSD Licenses have always been closer to Open Source than Free Software, and Open Source is a bastardization of the Free Software Movement. I argue that it is you who has study to do.
File: f5612c647a946ba3182912a8979924b2e909265c936d7cf4c743975312eb40e8.jpg (dl) (289.42 KiB)

He DID fuck up though. Like, c'mon you don't go and say child sexual slavery/prostitution is OK in public in the current year.
File: 090933817f94a5bb3801d08a23de442b61c2f6e0525edcdfbda0a2ea1a07d495.pdf (dl) (191.23 KiB)
Going to be dumping related files
File: b7d265068300edbf4c5143e8a5d842501eb379663197836fdce9af3b30b880d4.pdf (dl) (353.41 KiB)
The individual has deleted her website, though an archive is available via the Internet Archive
https://web.archive.org/web/20190914212622/https://selamgano.wordpress.com/experience/
>>6959
This poorly made thing, which is in reverse chronological order, is the email thread in question which she sent to Vice Publishing.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190914212622/https://selamgano.wordpress.com/experience/
>>6959
This poorly made thing, which is in reverse chronological order, is the email thread in question which she sent to Vice Publishing.
There are UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIMS she has worked for Triton Oil Company. I have yet to see substantiation of these claims.
The individual is not a fake person, she is in-fact a member of MIT and has been posting on her medium for the past few years. This is one of the first things I checked.
The individual is not a fake person, she is in-fact a member of MIT and has been posting on her medium for the past few years. This is one of the first things I checked.
File: bce8223d09edf75f3f14711bfb4361a84ba8d08a764fcdf32a7d2720685e3567.jpg (dl) (292.59 KiB)

>>6949
> All of this said, though, I'm surprised that Stallman was forced out of the FSF.
Apparently GNOME project or something said they would cut the ties with GNU Foundation or whatever. Maybe he didn't want the split.
> All of this said, though, I'm surprised that Stallman was forced out of the FSF.
Apparently GNOME project or something said they would cut the ties with GNU Foundation or whatever. Maybe he didn't want the split.
>>6957
>you don't go and say child sexual slavery/prostitution is OK
Where did he say that? Direct quote, please.
>you don't go and say child sexual slavery/prostitution is OK
Where did he say that? Direct quote, please.
File: 2ff0d3d2bec466b227824fc87e960ae908444d1be44e9d6db6f6e826c788c4d3.png (dl) (130.83 KiB)

This is part of her about page, linked
File: 4332b3b7eb02b08c663205c031eb774060a1d9a90d80fe6beb75b95ab5bbd003.jpg (dl) (57.05 KiB)

This is her photograph, which was on her about page. Her website may have been deleted as recently as today. It had been up until now.
File: 84831c5e250ce2c53b3ad0074e0f54f1e6994bf3958d3c335afb6c38ecede072.png (dl) (139.10 KiB)

Providing this image as proof that it was herself who deleted the site. It shows suspicion, certainly.
File: ea2dfb1c64fc427432c92a31b6a625f61d5e4f6b9e0b13033f845f7749da2f93.pdf (dl) (2.59 MiB)
File: 4710e01bd32d1fa1696506e4f685ed5384869f21978fec127c6d024fcab7b771.png (dl) (165.72 KiB)

File: 744c6bacb7c2aeaeace70da8bfbda73da0376120c4818f19d10444915776dab5.jpg (dl) (325.41 KiB)

>>6963
He was defending Minsky by questioning legal terms, which questions Minsky's accusation by proxy, and then basically went full autismo on her ass on that, perhaps rightfully so, but still, he could show sum luv at least. Jeez.
I agree that it's vague and, given time, that misunderstanding could be cleared, but the girl just "leaked shit to vice" and it worked. Vae victis, delenda est, whatever.
He was defending Minsky by questioning legal terms, which questions Minsky's accusation by proxy, and then basically went full autismo on her ass on that, perhaps rightfully so, but still, he could show sum luv at least. Jeez.
I agree that it's vague and, given time, that misunderstanding could be cleared, but the girl just "leaked shit to vice" and it worked. Vae victis, delenda est, whatever.
File: c094c42c3518390795aaba0ec925530ef8ba6331817d0538ce049eea4242edda.jpg (dl) (325.53 KiB)

This is what you get for working at a (((university))) or starting a foundation so faggy that it kicks you out over nothing.
Stallkike btfo. Uninstallman'd.
Stallkike btfo. Uninstallman'd.
>>6969
>He was defending Minsky by questioning legal terms, which questions Minsky's accusation by proxy
And after I talked about the lack of subtlety and nuance in our society and media. Tsk. Do better. Or why bother with this place? Shut it down and go to the Vice comment sections.
>>6949
Like I said, I think Stallman's argument is probably disingenuous, but he didn't
>go and say child sexual slavery/prostitution is OK
>He was defending Minsky by questioning legal terms, which questions Minsky's accusation by proxy
And after I talked about the lack of subtlety and nuance in our society and media. Tsk. Do better. Or why bother with this place? Shut it down and go to the Vice comment sections.
>>6949
Like I said, I think Stallman's argument is probably disingenuous, but he didn't
>go and say child sexual slavery/prostitution is OK
>>6949
>No cute 17 year old girl would want to fuck that tubby old Jew (pic related) unless she was being paid or coerced or both
Or she had a good idea of his net worth and was hoping to become his next mistress, just like many other women would have done.
>No cute 17 year old girl would want to fuck that tubby old Jew (pic related) unless she was being paid or coerced or both
Or she had a good idea of his net worth and was hoping to become his next mistress, just like many other women would have done.
>>6988
>Or she had a good idea of his net worth and was hoping to become his next mistress
Not buyin' it. Minsky had won a few awards that came with monetary prizes, but he was far more famous than he was rich. A 17 year old girl who wants a sugar daddy would be at least as well off with a handsome 40 year old anesthesiologist as with some ancient, sagging Jew with a few hundred grand in the bank.
>Or she had a good idea of his net worth and was hoping to become his next mistress
Not buyin' it. Minsky had won a few awards that came with monetary prizes, but he was far more famous than he was rich. A 17 year old girl who wants a sugar daddy would be at least as well off with a handsome 40 year old anesthesiologist as with some ancient, sagging Jew with a few hundred grand in the bank.
>>6989
Maybe his fame was her thing then. You're probably right that she was just a whore, but she left her "girl"hood behind a long time ago.
Maybe his fame was her thing then. You're probably right that she was just a whore, but she left her "girl"hood behind a long time ago.
>>6991
Not buyin' it. Girls who want the jizz of famous guys become rock band groupies. They don't get flown to tropical islands by nobodies to get fucked by computer scientists. Get real, nigger.
Not buyin' it. Girls who want the jizz of famous guys become rock band groupies. They don't get flown to tropical islands by nobodies to get fucked by computer scientists. Get real, nigger.
>6992
She was still many years past being a girl. Learn to read, nigger.
She was still many years past being a girl. Learn to read, nigger.
>we don't live in a culture or have a media that deals well with subtlety, so you lose the nuance and get "OMG STALLMAN
So true.
This is cultural murder though, Stallman is a giant, and we need (non-violent) extremists like him as a counter to the absolute retardation that exists throughout society
Society is offended by so many of the wrong things, yet sees many ACTUALLY wrong things (like this false accusation bullshit) as a-okay.
Can we put society on trial yet, and prosecute the case?
Does this not mean that the FSF is now very fucking suspect? They buckled like brittle Chinese slave labor made plastic to force Stallman's resignation. WTF!
So true.
This is cultural murder though, Stallman is a giant, and we need (non-violent) extremists like him as a counter to the absolute retardation that exists throughout society
Society is offended by so many of the wrong things, yet sees many ACTUALLY wrong things (like this false accusation bullshit) as a-okay.
Can we put society on trial yet, and prosecute the case?
Does this not mean that the FSF is now very fucking suspect? They buckled like brittle Chinese slave labor made plastic to force Stallman's resignation. WTF!
>>6994
>She was still many years past being a girl.
I never said otherwise.
I call all women younger than menopause-age girls, because they never really mature mentally past their teenage years. Yes, she had left childhood behind a long time ago by the time she was Epstein/Minsky's fuckpuppet. She was as adult as the relatively limited intellectual abilities of females allowed her to become.
Of course, that has nothing to do with the point I was making.
Perhaps you should learn to read, yourself. And to understand context, and standard English-language discourse while you're at it, you salty fucking nigger.
>She was still many years past being a girl.
I never said otherwise.
I call all women younger than menopause-age girls, because they never really mature mentally past their teenage years. Yes, she had left childhood behind a long time ago by the time she was Epstein/Minsky's fuckpuppet. She was as adult as the relatively limited intellectual abilities of females allowed her to become.
Of course, that has nothing to do with the point I was making.
Perhaps you should learn to read, yourself. And to understand context, and standard English-language discourse while you're at it, you salty fucking nigger.
>>6995
>we need (non-violent) extremists like him as a counter to the absolute retardation that exists throughout society
Maybe, but what we need isn't synonymous with what we deserve, or what we're going to get. Are you ready for Idiocracy? It's coming.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiocracy
Only it's not going to be poor white trash flooding society with their spawn, it's going to be poor beaners (in the US) and poor Arabs and Africans (in Europe). Thanks, Jews!
>we need (non-violent) extremists like him as a counter to the absolute retardation that exists throughout society
Maybe, but what we need isn't synonymous with what we deserve, or what we're going to get. Are you ready for Idiocracy? It's coming.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiocracy
Only it's not going to be poor white trash flooding society with their spawn, it's going to be poor beaners (in the US) and poor Arabs and Africans (in Europe). Thanks, Jews!
>>6965
>MIT fem-bugnigger leading the charge
i personally am empowered by this. i wonder what the CIA backed corporatocracy will undermine next.
>MIT fem-bugnigger leading the charge
i personally am empowered by this. i wonder what the CIA backed corporatocracy will undermine next.
>>6997
Mislabeling women as girls is often done by someone with an agenda to attempt to paint them as more innocent. It's the kind of word games multiracial Selam Guanos like to play. Is that the company with which you want to be associated?
>salty
Thanks nigger, same to you.
Mislabeling women as girls is often done by someone with an agenda to attempt to paint them as more innocent. It's the kind of word games multiracial Selam Guanos like to play. Is that the company with which you want to be associated?
>salty
Thanks nigger, same to you.
File: b3666c91e4eb6308b1b262ec70d5d34779cb169bfdf8227844fbe8f356176885.jpg (dl) (29.26 KiB)

>>6998
It's already here, more like.
Beavis and Butthead (another work of Mike Judge's) seem not to far off the average apathetical dunce on most issues either.
Immigration is a huge issue, one of many.
Understanding said issue I don't believe was one of Stallman's strong suits though.
Isn't he a Bernie/Green Party supporter?
It's already here, more like.
Beavis and Butthead (another work of Mike Judge's) seem not to far off the average apathetical dunce on most issues either.
Immigration is a huge issue, one of many.
Understanding said issue I don't believe was one of Stallman's strong suits though.
Isn't he a Bernie/Green Party supporter?
File: 7bbb3ae7412ac23fb00715e32227e4b95171220c999d205825b4e502f0eb26be.jpg (dl) (282.05 KiB)

>>6987
>lack of subtlety
Well, RMS made a subtle argument on what? On Minsky's possible legal or even moral innocence. It's not just "asking for misrepresentation", there is simply not much to "misrepresent".
Though obviously it's being pedaled hard. I'm guessing there's something behind the scenes we don't get. I mean, media can throw shit at him all they want, he doesn't have to RESIGN, and he does have a reputation of an eccentric individual with a specific area of interest.
>Tsk. Do better. Or why bother with this place? Shut it down and go to the Vice comment sections.
Holy shit.
Do you have some mental quirks? I have a Nanochan Psychiatric Hospital thread on /b/, we could chat. xD
>lack of subtlety
Well, RMS made a subtle argument on what? On Minsky's possible legal or even moral innocence. It's not just "asking for misrepresentation", there is simply not much to "misrepresent".
Though obviously it's being pedaled hard. I'm guessing there's something behind the scenes we don't get. I mean, media can throw shit at him all they want, he doesn't have to RESIGN, and he does have a reputation of an eccentric individual with a specific area of interest.
>Tsk. Do better. Or why bother with this place? Shut it down and go to the Vice comment sections.
Holy shit.
Do you have some mental quirks? I have a Nanochan Psychiatric Hospital thread on /b/, we could chat. xD
I still don't get why he stepped down. Fuck that, RMS, you should have made them remove you.
Stallman is old as hell and probably left the FSF voluntarily as to not hurt its reputation.
File: 3b849d3880f1ae6ed802809262a2c4cb4261c0d7497f1494a769447c97936431.jpg (dl) (45.84 KiB)

>>7005
>Is that the company with which you want to be associated?
I don't let mudskin Bantu/Gook hybrids or SJWs dictate how I use my ancestral language.
My use of "girls" reflects wombmyn's immaturity. Not their supposed innocence, soyboy. What are you doing here? Don't you have a pink-pussy-hat march to attend?
>>7006
>Isn't he a Bernie/Green Party supporter?
Sure, he's a nonconformist. But he's still a kike. As is Bernie.
>>7009
Cute. Respond to the things I said anytime, uwu owo, Starfag.
>Is that the company with which you want to be associated?
I don't let mudskin Bantu/Gook hybrids or SJWs dictate how I use my ancestral language.
My use of "girls" reflects wombmyn's immaturity. Not their supposed innocence, soyboy. What are you doing here? Don't you have a pink-pussy-hat march to attend?
>>7006
>Isn't he a Bernie/Green Party supporter?
Sure, he's a nonconformist. But he's still a kike. As is Bernie.
>>7009
Cute. Respond to the things I said anytime, uwu owo, Starfag.
File: 75e47f2ee9179089389a3bd5c77befe6b9bd8d388f5e5db818a80eb546b24664.jpg (dl) (445.39 KiB)

>>7014
You don't get it. Nuances don't matter. Society wants blood. Stallman doesn't feel it, because he's autistic. He fucked up.
I suppose you don't go to some women rights activist hideout place and say that shit about immaturity while telling them your real name and ID, right? That's because you're not as autistic.
Though you're autistic enough to spout retarded memes about soyboys. Well, I guess it's ironic.
You don't get it. Nuances don't matter. Society wants blood. Stallman doesn't feel it, because he's autistic. He fucked up.
I suppose you don't go to some women rights activist hideout place and say that shit about immaturity while telling them your real name and ID, right? That's because you're not as autistic.
Though you're autistic enough to spout retarded memes about soyboys. Well, I guess it's ironic.
>>7017
>You don't get it.
O rly?
>Nuances don't matter. Society wants blood.
Interesting. Feel free to read >>6949 at your leisure, qt. I already said that, but hey, it's free to repeat. Enjoy.
>Stallman doesn't feel it, because he's autistic.
Yep.
>He fucked up.
Yep.
>I suppose you don't go to some women rights activist hideout place and say that shit about immaturity while telling them your real name and ID, right? That's because you're not as autistic.
Yep.
Obviously, Stallman made a tactical mistake, due in no small part to his 'tism. That has nothing to do with the merits (or demerits) of his actual claims, however.
Yeah, he made a dumb mistake. I'm expecting you to be smarter than your typical 90 IQ headline-skimmer and tackle his actual words on their merits instead of the digested version proferred to retards as clickbait.
Have I overestimated you?
Feel free to admit "I'm a fucking retard, and I'll accept anything on a clickbait website as gospel truth instead of actually bothering to think" if you want.
But I had a higher opinion of you, avatarfag. Maybe I was mistaken.
>You don't get it.
O rly?
>Nuances don't matter. Society wants blood.
Interesting. Feel free to read >>6949 at your leisure, qt. I already said that, but hey, it's free to repeat. Enjoy.
>Stallman doesn't feel it, because he's autistic.
Yep.
>He fucked up.
Yep.
>I suppose you don't go to some women rights activist hideout place and say that shit about immaturity while telling them your real name and ID, right? That's because you're not as autistic.
Yep.
Obviously, Stallman made a tactical mistake, due in no small part to his 'tism. That has nothing to do with the merits (or demerits) of his actual claims, however.
Yeah, he made a dumb mistake. I'm expecting you to be smarter than your typical 90 IQ headline-skimmer and tackle his actual words on their merits instead of the digested version proferred to retards as clickbait.
Have I overestimated you?
Feel free to admit "I'm a fucking retard, and I'll accept anything on a clickbait website as gospel truth instead of actually bothering to think" if you want.
But I had a higher opinion of you, avatarfag. Maybe I was mistaken.
>>7014
Calling them girls implies they are maidens you autistic jewhore fucker, mental maturity on females is irrelevant as their purpose is to conceive and bring forth young.
Calling them girls implies they are maidens you autistic jewhore fucker, mental maturity on females is irrelevant as their purpose is to conceive and bring forth young.
File: a7fa5bde2d24caa71ce641226482af6002c2fec3f3d87d87a0fd6be1b4d10a5c.jpg (dl) (333.01 KiB)

>>7020
>tackle his actual words on their merits
Well, he engaged in a rather meaningless discussion about whether a dead person should or should not be accused of "rape" or something. You cannot seriously ask me to read it thoroughly. There is no "merit" here. It's like shitposting on chans, but with real names and real consequences.
Though this story stinks. I mean, it reeks of that dude Epstein that is evil as shit according to American society. And RMS just talks about that and cannot shut up, it's weird. Like, he goes and considers the possibility of the girl (not) being forced as if it was OK. Then he goes and considers the possibility of them having sex as if it was OK. See the pattern? You don't have to spin the story much here. Honestly, I don't know RMS as a person and I don't want to accuse him of anything, but that lack of empathy makes people think you're a fucking criminal (at least in closet LOL).
I dunno what else to say. Epstein is a convicted criminal (RIP). Given that Minsky was involved, he is likely to be guilty of whatever American law could find, at least of the awareness of/participation in the criminal conspiracy and not reporting it, and of letting down his university (morally at least). But he's dead, so RIP him too. RMS jumps into this story and his words may be interpreted as defending of the conspiracy itself, no less, it's that bad. You seem to be heavy, so I'll repeat - it is EASILY interpreted that way, RMS presents himself as a ruthless "moral vagueness" destroyer speaking of the issue that is mostly moral, and stays moral. He literally opposed all this stuff those feminists fight for and actually put people in jail for. He discussed how a 17-year-old may give consent "on many circumstances" (which is right, but not according to the law) or something, like, what the heck else you need? He clearly defied authority on a controversial issue in the middle of a scandal.
Jeesh, this post is too long.
>tackle his actual words on their merits
Well, he engaged in a rather meaningless discussion about whether a dead person should or should not be accused of "rape" or something. You cannot seriously ask me to read it thoroughly. There is no "merit" here. It's like shitposting on chans, but with real names and real consequences.
Though this story stinks. I mean, it reeks of that dude Epstein that is evil as shit according to American society. And RMS just talks about that and cannot shut up, it's weird. Like, he goes and considers the possibility of the girl (not) being forced as if it was OK. Then he goes and considers the possibility of them having sex as if it was OK. See the pattern? You don't have to spin the story much here. Honestly, I don't know RMS as a person and I don't want to accuse him of anything, but that lack of empathy makes people think you're a fucking criminal (at least in closet LOL).
I dunno what else to say. Epstein is a convicted criminal (RIP). Given that Minsky was involved, he is likely to be guilty of whatever American law could find, at least of the awareness of/participation in the criminal conspiracy and not reporting it, and of letting down his university (morally at least). But he's dead, so RIP him too. RMS jumps into this story and his words may be interpreted as defending of the conspiracy itself, no less, it's that bad. You seem to be heavy, so I'll repeat - it is EASILY interpreted that way, RMS presents himself as a ruthless "moral vagueness" destroyer speaking of the issue that is mostly moral, and stays moral. He literally opposed all this stuff those feminists fight for and actually put people in jail for. He discussed how a 17-year-old may give consent "on many circumstances" (which is right, but not according to the law) or something, like, what the heck else you need? He clearly defied authority on a controversial issue in the middle of a scandal.
Jeesh, this post is too long.
File: 8966ac4e65c06038f2f9af1f322b68d721d2770889285a3f6a45c0100787c9c6.png (dl) (2.96 MiB)

>hurr durr muh rights muh responsibilities muh justice muh morality
White people in jail = good
White people dead = good
White person's reputation damaged = good
That is all.
Jews, especially american jews, are a subset of white people, so don't be coming at me talking about how ackchyually it wuz da jooz n' shiieeeet.
White people in jail = good
White people dead = good
White person's reputation damaged = good
That is all.
Jews, especially american jews, are a subset of white people, so don't be coming at me talking about how ackchyually it wuz da jooz n' shiieeeet.
File: 2f798bbe6fd5ce6b0c268f5497bc234de3cdeb12093b53f70fd198a064a9d012.jpg (dl) (54.66 KiB)

>>6955
Non-copyleft license is like polytheist faith.
All it takes is 1 religion that denies the others (proprietary software) and the polytheists/non-copylefts are quickly erased, because they don't fight their enemies, but their enemies fight them.
BSDs need someone to fight for them or they'll die off.
And "still being alive" is fine and all, but it's also important that free software is all software, which will be immensely harder without Stallman. Specially if his replacement is a tranny.
Non-copyleft license is like polytheist faith.
All it takes is 1 religion that denies the others (proprietary software) and the polytheists/non-copylefts are quickly erased, because they don't fight their enemies, but their enemies fight them.
BSDs need someone to fight for them or they'll die off.
And "still being alive" is fine and all, but it's also important that free software is all software, which will be immensely harder without Stallman. Specially if his replacement is a tranny.
>>6949
>C'mon now. Freedom fighter? For his own highly idiosyncratic definition of "freedom", I guess.
No, he defends free speech, you communist faggot. The only thing idiosynractic about RMS is that he is cucked by American mainstream and bends to sound less radical.
How many of you fucking gay cucks out there defend even such a basic right as the right to do whatever the fuck I want with hardware and software I bought?
>trafficking this trafficking that
it doesn't fucking matter. it means instead of fucking with girls in the streets, he brought them to his house. Any reference to "Trafficking" in the Epstein cases are just clickbait. It has no meaning other than a technical legal term.
>C'mon now. Freedom fighter? For his own highly idiosyncratic definition of "freedom", I guess.
No, he defends free speech, you communist faggot. The only thing idiosynractic about RMS is that he is cucked by American mainstream and bends to sound less radical.
How many of you fucking gay cucks out there defend even such a basic right as the right to do whatever the fuck I want with hardware and software I bought?
>trafficking this trafficking that
it doesn't fucking matter. it means instead of fucking with girls in the streets, he brought them to his house. Any reference to "Trafficking" in the Epstein cases are just clickbait. It has no meaning other than a technical legal term.
>>6955
actually, it's YOU FAGGOTS who make us defend RMS. I never even cared who the fuck RMS is until faggots on imageboards started saying "RMS IS BAD WAHHHHH". And I discovered he supports a subset of my beliefs that I can do whatever the fuck I want on the internet and with hardware I buy, so obviously I agree with him.
The fact that you faggots think it's controversial or a bad PR move or even bad, to say:
>it is morally absurd to define ‘rape’ in a way that depends on minor details such as which country it was in or whether the victim was 18 years old or 17.
Proves that you're all cucks.
>>6962
GNOME should just fuck off and die already
>muh hamburger menus
>muh transitions
>muh im a big boy because i support real world concerns like implementing the above
>>7017
>Stallman doesn't feel it, because he's autistic. He fucked up.
No. In Saudi Arabia you get stoned for saying "fuck muhammed". In America you get stoned for saying "muh minor laws are retarded". And RMS said it, which just makes him more based (or at least not as bluepilled as you cucks).
actually, it's YOU FAGGOTS who make us defend RMS. I never even cared who the fuck RMS is until faggots on imageboards started saying "RMS IS BAD WAHHHHH". And I discovered he supports a subset of my beliefs that I can do whatever the fuck I want on the internet and with hardware I buy, so obviously I agree with him.
The fact that you faggots think it's controversial or a bad PR move or even bad, to say:
>it is morally absurd to define ‘rape’ in a way that depends on minor details such as which country it was in or whether the victim was 18 years old or 17.
Proves that you're all cucks.
>>6962
GNOME should just fuck off and die already
>muh hamburger menus
>muh transitions
>muh im a big boy because i support real world concerns like implementing the above
>>7017
>Stallman doesn't feel it, because he's autistic. He fucked up.
No. In Saudi Arabia you get stoned for saying "fuck muhammed". In America you get stoned for saying "muh minor laws are retarded". And RMS said it, which just makes him more based (or at least not as bluepilled as you cucks).
According to Suke Lmith he `retracted` what he said.
But yeah, the whole is dumd.
Some people say he was an asshole, maybe its more about that than anything else, but certain people were too much of cowards to say so, so they made shit up maybe.
But yeah, the whole is dumd.
Some people say he was an asshole, maybe its more about that than anything else, but certain people were too much of cowards to say so, so they made shit up maybe.
>it is morally absurd to define ‘rape’ in a way that depends on minor details such as which country it was in or whether the victim was 18 years old or 17.
>>7213
EVERYONE WITH HALF A BRAIN AND TWO FUCKIN NON-FRIED OR MEDICATED BRAIN CELLS UNDERSTANDS THIS OBJECTIVE TRUTH.
>11:59 before a persons 21st birthday it is illegal to drink, but 59 seconds later it's legal
>marijuana is less bad for you than alcohol but is immoral so it gets banned
>Saudi Arabia funded terrorists to go shit up New York
>LETS GO KILL SOME IRAQIS11111
The problem is that society OBVIOUSLY DOES NOT have two fucking (if the brain cells were fucking they would have more than two) brain cells and half a brain.
>Morally
Morality is bullshit and leads to all sorts of retarded dilemmas (like this), how about we just do away with morality and go with practicality and "maximum benefit to society" (in whatever way the later is quantifiable) !?
>>7213
EVERYONE WITH HALF A BRAIN AND TWO FUCKIN NON-FRIED OR MEDICATED BRAIN CELLS UNDERSTANDS THIS OBJECTIVE TRUTH.
>11:59 before a persons 21st birthday it is illegal to drink, but 59 seconds later it's legal
>marijuana is less bad for you than alcohol but is immoral so it gets banned
>Saudi Arabia funded terrorists to go shit up New York
>LETS GO KILL SOME IRAQIS11111
The problem is that society OBVIOUSLY DOES NOT have two fucking (if the brain cells were fucking they would have more than two) brain cells and half a brain.
>Morally
Morality is bullshit and leads to all sorts of retarded dilemmas (like this), how about we just do away with morality and go with practicality and "maximum benefit to society" (in whatever way the later is quantifiable) !?
>>7229
yeah if you just remove "morally", that's what I agree with. and he might have just added "morally" for emphasis of how retarded this is
yeah if you just remove "morally", that's what I agree with. and he might have just added "morally" for emphasis of how retarded this is
Who is the larger group though?
Those who are simply too scared to say what they think, or those who truly believe it?
Those who are simply too scared to say what they think, or those who truly believe it?
[Catalog][Overboard][Update]
[Reply]22 files, 58 replies
https://stallman.org/archives/2019-jul-oct.html#16_September_2019_(Resignation)
> To the MIT community,
>I am resigning effective immediately from my position in CSAIL at MIT. I am doing this due to pressure on MIT and me over a series of misunderstandings and mischaracterizations.
>Richard Stallman
https://www.fsf.org/news/richard-m-stallman-resigns
> On September 16, 2019, Richard M. Stallman, founder and president of the Free Software Foundation, resigned as president and from its board of directors.
>The board will be conducting a search for a new president, beginning immediately. Further details of the search will be published on fsf.org.
>For questions, contact FSF executive director John Sullivan at johns@fsf.org.
BACKGROUND:
A giant and a freedom-fighter like RMS taken down by a single article by a Negro-Chink who literally claims she's a polymath, and completly (and perhaps deliberatly) mischaracterizing the entire conversation chain. This probable-LEO that no one has ever heard of takes the conversation, claims that it is RMS supporting Epstein (which, if you read it, you can tell that no it is not in any form), then leaks it in an incredibly poorly-made PDF to Vice, a known CIA front organization.
From there, a three-day long smeer campaign starts in which multiple news outlets (failing to reproduce the conversation, and only linking to the Vice article) all say along the lines "Top MIT Professor Richard Stallman claims support for Jeffery Epstein".
Now, due to this slander campaign, RMS has decided to resign not only from CSAIL-MIT, but also FSF-GNU. It's another Jaccob Applebaum.