/l/ - The Lounge

Non board-specific discussion

[Make a Post]
[X]





Nanochan's future Nanonymous No.11332 [D][U][F][S][L][A][C] >>11333
File: d24658d069704b53a55f93c2ac31dedc2ed50cdc51dde56ee66e86789989892b.mp4 (dl) (9.65 MiB)

first a commemoration of the return of our beloved home.
Next let's discuss the current state of nanochan. As in how we fix some of the issues that plagued the site during the reign of Hakase. I would make the argument that /t/ simply isn't needed with such a small userbase and I would also suggest the consideration of the low effort posting thread I decided to test in the endchan bunker I had made. This way not only we contain the problematic flood of low effort posting and condense it into a singular thread but we also solve the problem of balkanisation which seemed to plague the old nanochan. We need to discuss this places future and see how we can improve on what has already been built without destroying the culture.


Nanonymous No.11333 [D]

>>11332
That's exactly what I made >>>/meta/3508 for. I have my own opinions for a couple of the changes I would like to see, but before committing to any of them I'd like to see what the others think should be done.

Nanonymous No.11334 [D]

Probably the correct idea I normally forget /meta/ even exists tbh

Nanonymous No.11336 [D] >>11337 >>11338

How did it happen? hapase gave data or anon mirrored whole site? I really like dedication of this community.

Nanonymous No.11337 [D] >>11339

>>11336
Hapase likely sent the new owner a backup of all the files in the web directory, the keys for the hidden service, and the keys for the https certificate.

Nanonymous No.11338 [D] >>11339

>>11336
Hakase gave me the data (certs, keys, database), but most of the files I have a copy of already.

Nanonymous No.11339 [D] >>11340 >>11341

>>11337
>>11338
So theoretically would you be able to recreate nano without hapase data?
Is link changed to show it's new nano?

Nanonymous No.11340 [D] >>11341

>>11339
(I am not the admin, the other guy probably is)
I don't think it would be easy to recreate the entire posts database from just the html files. It would be incredibly tedious work.
And I think the admin changed the onion address and tls certs because reusing the old ones would be a security risk (it would let hapase control the website).
Anyway, hapase certainly approved of the creation of the successor, because the old addresses are redirecting here. Either hapase shared the keys or is actively redirecting users here. Either way, we can consider this the "official" successor.

nanon ## Nanochan Administrator No.11341 [D] >>11342

>>11339
You could definitely do it. I've already already hosted nanochan myself before hakase called it quits.
>>11340
I wasn't too specific in my original post, but yes, I got the html files too. Basically everything in the root directory. And it really isn't too hard to regenerate the html files (just a few function calls and sqlite commands, and you can already wget the static files anyway)
I got the certs and tls keys from hakase, but I made my own too. Hakase's addresses redirect to this one, and the servers on hakase's end are currently shut down.

Nanonymous No.11342 [D] >>11343

>>11341
>to regenerate the html files
There are html files from way back. e.g. >>>/l/7 is the earliest one I could find, and >>>/l/8 as well. Can't regenerate those from the database.
It's also really hard to regenerate the DATABASE from the HTML files, is what I'm saying. You could definitely write a parser to do it, but it would be a big pain in the ass.

Nanonymous No.11343 [D] >>11344

>>11342
Well it's an imageboard, threads are meant to die anyway (keeping threads alive =/= archiving)
One of my plans is to keep every single thread ever made inside the database instead of deleting the record upon deletion, and just keep it from being rendered into html. But for now I can just do database backups.
And you're right about it being hard, I misread.

Nanonymous No.11344 [D] >>11345 >>11364

>>11343
>keep every single thread ever made inside the database
I think the database would get too big and clunky and it would slow everything down. but idk, maybe it would work

Nanonymous No.11345 [D] >>11346

>>11344
The web stack has barely any effect on my cpu usages currently, but I'll keep that in mind.

Nanonymous No.11346 [D] >>11347

>>11345
Are you hosting nano in your house? Is it a good idea?

Nanonymous No.11347 [D] >>11348

>>11346
Not necessarily my house, but it's not some random hosting provider either. Not that it being on another server means I can't tell the CPU usages, or that I might not have overprovisioned it.
Hakase hosted nanochan from home off of an old laptop, so I guess it could be.

Nanonymous No.11348 [D] >>11349

>>11347
I just assumed by way you talked about it.
>Hakase hosted nanochan from home off of an old laptop, so I guess it could be
Seriously? She said about bunker being in other country, so why buy server when you host in home? It doesn't make sense, unless it was Daniel's hosting.

Nanonymous No.11349 [D] >>11350

>>11348
The bunker is just a server hosted by hakase's friend. All of this was mentioned by hakase on nanochan so you could find the evidence yourself in one of thse /meta/ threads if it hasn't been slid off.

Nanonymous No.11350 [D]

>>11349
hapase and friends? friend she knew irl? Sorry, I find it hard to believe, there's this thread http://nanochanqwrwtmamtnhkfwbbcducc4i62ciss4byo6f3an5qdkhjngid.onion/meta/1059.html but with circumstances and being truly anonymous I can't get it. Are chans run by normies with friends?

Nanonymous No.11360 [D][U][F] >>11361
File: f08a662f25a0986be234983f32f365414acdd7591687fd7dc4ce630c15129bf6.jpg (dl) (18.09 KiB)

It's quite nice to be back. Endchan wasn't a bad bunker, but a bit too consolidated and random downtime seemed iffy.

Instead of a /t/ maybe make a /d/ for dump threads? I personally don't really have strong opinions about board structure other than keeping /l/ /g/ /meta/

Nanonymous No.11361 [D]

>>11360
I think it's really imporant that the shitpost board it's called /b/ or nobody is gonna use it, why would you post in a board that nobody cares about, some kind of people enjoys shitposting on /b/ but don't care about dumps, i say just make /b/ ruleless and people can dump there o do whatever else they want and everybody is happy.

Nanonymous No.11364 [D]

>>11344
>I think the database would get too big and clunky
You underestimate database engines. If you cluster the records based off if they are deleted or not there will be pretty much no difference in query time. On a related note, hapase unfortunately designed the database stuff very poorly. Though what can you expect for a girl? For a simple example of how bad the design is, if you load up /k/ the site has to loop over all ~14k posts on the site in order to show those 4 threads.

Nanonymous No.11366 [D] >>11375

whamen in tech amirite

Nanonymous No.11375 [D] >>11377

>>11366
There are some good ones that know their stuff. I don't actually know henkse, but it sounds like she doesn't know what she's doing if things are parsing like that.

Nanonymous No.11377 [D][U][F]
File: 92b7b82bb1b3c1b6e19192020ec4d5a84cce50febc999a25dd0687e14732b9ca.jpg (dl) (425.33 KiB)

>>11375
>she doesn't know what she's doing
every website written by boyim in tech has javascript and pajeet-cancer in it. prove me wrong nigger
where's YOUR superior imageboard, boyim?