>>3998 >Sex is the orgasm of love.
Said the cumbrain
Love is a connection of two souls on the deepest possible level. Something your underdeveloped dopamine-oversaturated brain apparently cannot ever understand
>>4001 >What are you talking about?
Cumbrains that are governed only by sex desire are animals not human beings, therefore they belong with the other animals.
>>4006 Can confirm. I don't worry about sex because I have normal relationships with other people and the chances come so naturally that such thoughts never even crossed my mind as to worry about what I consider a daily bread.
Sex is normal part of being a human being. When you don't have sex you are not really a normal human being because it means you didn't experience what is usual and normal to experience in age appropriate for it, thus you are anormal human being. Moreover not having sex means you never had relationship with person other than that of your family or your sex.
Not having sex and wanting sex does not make you an animal, it's agonal cry to be part of community of human beings, society.
>I don't worry about sex
<What is love to another human good for without sex?
<I hate this kind of love.
OK luv
Responding to the bait in op, you have to realize other people mean different things when they say "love" and for them the answer "what it is good for" is obvious.
>>4008 >you didn't experience what is usual and normal to experience in age appropriate for it
Thus you are underdeveloped cripple.
>ou never had relationship with person other than that of your family or your sex
Again, underdeveloped cripple.
If incels are unable to form relationships with other human beings they so much want to stick their peepee in they are filthy animals.
>Not having sex and wanting sex does not make you an animal, it's agonal cry to be part of community of human beings, society.
crying about it on muh intershits makes you an animal
case in point
INCELS ARE ANIMALS AND NEED TO BE GENOCIDED >>>/inceland/
>>4008 I am in celibate and happy. Roasties are not worth the effort. They are evil and will cut your wand off nanon. Steer clear of them. I bet >>4008 is a roastie in disguise, attempting to rule some poor fella into her cavernous traps
>>4005 >friends without benefits
You see, >>4002 is anticumbrain. Both cumbrain and anticumbrain are cucks. Cumbrain wants lover without lover while anticumbrain wants lover without lover. They are harvey dent.
>>4008 >Sex is normal part of being a human being.
Completely agree, it should be, yet, despite we are living in 21st century where people can buy shit for nothing at all, people are lacking what people didn't lack for centuries, that is sex, love and friendship, merely because our society is so shattered and undersocialized and so coherent and oversocialized at the same time.
Incels are scum of the earth, there's no debate allowed, but look at volcels or cels at all, there's so much of them, they suffer and when they get used to it, they become clogs in the rigid machinery of tasteless capitalism: instead of becoming revolutionary force they become with each year fading latent revolutionary force. Yet all they want is what was once considered healthy for nation, state and the individual: state of at least some balance and trust. Sure, it's their fault, but it's not only their fault. We need to reintegrate those naive morons.
>means you didn't experience what is usual and normal to experience in age appropriate for it
Some people simply didn't have chance to experience age-appropriate things at appropriate age. What about them? This is problem of society, their parents problem and only then theirs. Imagine how much better we could be off if at least tenth of all problems was rooted out by the perpetrators.
>thus you are anormal human being
You are, because, again, you can't move, or at least socially, when you feel like you need to experience what's essential of life at age when everybody else considers it puberty-tier bullshit.
>Moreover not having sex means you never had relationship with person other than that of your family or your sex.
Also true. Girls have it easy, doesn't matter that they were studying on all-girls school, they'll just have in the starts few bad experiences, while boys suffer because they are supposed to be the hunter, not prey. How can you hunt when you didn't practice? When you don't have any practice you may as well become rapist because you can rely only on the truly natural, primordial instincts.
>Not having sex and wanting sex does not make you an animal, it's agonal cry to be part of community of human beings, society.
incels are pathetic misogynistic trash
>not ever having sex
It's normal.
That is, it's part of the norm. If you think that all males in the past got to continue their bloodline, you are mistaken.
Males offer, females choose. Have been ever since the dawn of humankind and will be forever.
x(h)e should immediately kill x(h)eselfNanonymousNo.4022[D]>>4023
>>4015 >How can you hunt when you didn't practice?
By practicing you idiot, but past twenty you are doomed because it's all so tiring, even more so when you just want to fuck twice a week or something. It doesn't make any sense when all you want to say is "hey let's fuck today and the next week too".
>>4018 >procreation=sex
lol
>males offer, females choose
Bullshit. He offers and he chooses, the same happens on the other side, she offers and she chooses. It's like you say only when man feels romantic interest and that's when he becomes a cuck because he'll get cucked.
>>4022 >lol
Well, if you are able procreate without sex, you are a fascinating specimen indeed.
>He offers and he chooses, the same happens on the other side, she offers and she chooses.
Maybe that was a wrong way to put it, but what I mean to say is a girl usually gets approached by the boys, not the other way around. Though the opposite happens too, but it's hard to separate from culture. By doing that, a girl puts herself into unfavorable position, because having children and then getting dumped is pretty tough, while as a male you can always bail. Playing tough to get is the usual strat.
>>4030 >approached
People approach very rarely unless they are really lonely or have no friends. Most people don't go out of their way to approach somebody unless in designated place like some fourth-rate nightclub, either because there's too much unknown and the chance of success is too low or simply because they are satisfied with the social life they have. Only exception seem to be sluts and easy people.
I'm nice and kind and have firm tits and firm ass, but I was never approached.
>>4032 >I'm an ayylien
Can you take me to another planet please?
I'm not even joking.
I will share information about the human race and willingly partecipate in experiments.
I just want out of here.
>>4033 This proves really nothing.
>People approach very rarely unless they are really lonely or have no friends
Could be true to a degree but ultimately "approaching while being shipped by friends" is also approaching. "Approaching a friend in a sexual way" is also approaching.
But it's not as important is this
>Only exception seem to be sluts and easy people.
ROFLMAO
Is this a confession of being a loner (no offense btw) or what is this?
There is a lot of easygoing people out there. Like, A LOT. Same for sluts, maybe.
>I'm nice and kind and have firm tits and firm ass, but I was never approached.
But you're a man dude, a porn-posting man at that. Also WTF?
>I'm nice and kind
I have my doubts about this as well.
>>4034 Our civilization takes the non-intrusive stance on the matter of humans.
Interactions like this one are allowed because you cannot confirm that I am actually an alien.
>>4036 >Is this a confession of being a loner (no offense btw) or what is this?
I'm the girl who always gets left behind...
>I have my doubts about this as well.
Haha! O-Okay, I'm only nicer than most people...
Well Melanie looked cool and soon she had quite a pool
Of hopeful lovers swooning at her feet
But only one stood out, the boy with the film star pout
Was this the boy to make her life complete?
Yes, it's true,
Got a new boy who loves me
I love him too
And our love is heavenly
Yes, I do
Love him, anyone can see
So we're through
And now I am gonna leave you
Oh yeah, I've got to leave you
Sorry, too
Love does not exist. Both men and women but especially women are quick to replace each other if they can. When people are allowed to do as they please they usually end up with hundreds of sex partners during their lifetime.
In the past men were loyal to women because they needed them to produce and take care of their children. They also needed women to share other chores like cleaning and cooking with them.
Women needed men for protection and because they had no means to earn money on their own. They inherited nothing from their father who entrusted their life in the hands of another man.
>>4023 >By doing that, a girl puts herself into unfavorable position, because having children and then getting dumped is pretty tough
It's not. Abortion costs nothing and she can always threw the infant into amazon or seina or whatever other river you can think of. Not a problem. Taking pills, not a problem.
>as a male you can always bail
Sure you can.
>Playing tough to get is the usual strat.
What else can she play if she wants him to stay and for the sake of muh game? Nothing much. What's funny is that some cucks literally spend four years "courting" a girl above what they can possibly get just to get pissed on one autumn night and then they are happy with it.
>>4063 This is stupid.
>Abortion costs nothing
It might cost her health, including mental health.
>she can always threw the infant into amazon or seina
After wasting 9 months of intoxicating herself and taking a metabolism hit (read: stress and health hit). Regardless of what she does with a child, it's not free.
>Not a problem.
It is.
>Taking pills
Taking pills could be a risk, too. Ancient drugs for that could be poisonous, too. The amount of effort put by humans into preventing/interrupting the unwanted pregnancy is impressive in itself.
Anyway the point of this is if a woman doesn't deal with it by herself somehow (or asks for help from the witch or whoever else by herself), she's going to be screwed.
>Sure you can.
In case of this being sarcasm, females obviously benefit more from various family laws.
>What else can she play if she wants him to stay
The "your momma" play lol. Another strat.
>>4023 Why are all avatarfags retarded shits? Men can't bail on their children because they are forced to pay child support until at least the age of 18. When a woman gets pregnant a man can't decide that he does not want to pay child support and force her to abort the baby.
Women hold all the cards but the are too retarded to use protection which in most countries is dirt cheap or free. Also women are never shamed for being single mothers. They are elevated and praised while the father who financially provides for the child is called a deadbeat.
>>4065 Again, family laws clearly benefit women, just as they should.
Another question is whether they benefit women too much.
>the father who financially provides for the child
Well, if it's his child, then how exactly is it unjust? Single mothers work too btw.
If he doesn't want a child but his woman wants, the current system will give the woman rights to decide. It can be motivated by the same old "the woman does most of the work regarding babies". Obviously it should be a 2(or more even)-people enterprise but we're talking about the case of family falling apart here, so unless a woman explicitly doesn't want a child (which seems unlikely in modern day since she gave birth after all) a man is probably better off just becoming a money provider and living his life, don't you agree? If he is a resourceful gentleman, he can provide for multiple women and be very respectable lol.
In case of him wanting to remain a father keeping children and kick the mother out, it would still be unjust, but towards the mother, except that the mother actually gave birth, with all the losses.
The logic is simple here, choose the lesser evil. It's still evil because family falls apart. This means both parents made a mistake with their lives. It's their mistake and they have to fix it, society just can settle something the way it sees right.
>>4065 Also for the "bailing not being possible in general" part, in the case when it's impossible to determine who the father is, a father can bail. A mother cannot.
I mean, even if you know who the father is, until the DNA test came into play it was possible to deny everything.
The same argument which justifies abortion debunks the child support laws.
Muh body muh choice
Her body, her responsibility
Women who chose not to abort a baby should not be entitled to any child support. Not only are these laws discriminatory towards the male gender they contradict themselves.
If child support is mandatory men should be allowed to force women into having an abortion.They should be allowed to have a choice if they want a child or not.
>>4067 >Also for the "bailing not being possible in general" part, in the case when it's impossible to determine who the father is, a father can bail. A mother cannot.
Literally what century we are speaking of? You have 0% chance to inseminate somebody these days unless they want to be inseminated, unless we are talking africa or shitholes like ireland of course.
>I mean, even if you know who the father is, until the DNA test came into play it was possible to deny everything.
Yeah, in the past you would only spark family war by that.
>>4068 >Women who chose not to abort a baby should not be entitled to any child support.
>If child support is mandatory men should be allowed to force women into having an abortion.
This.
>>4066 >Again, family laws clearly benefit women, just as they should.
Why should they? Seems pretty unfair to me tbh. The fact that they have it a bit harder the first 9 months doesnt justify the remaining 18 years or even more. This is how you end up with a society full of single mothers.
Abortion should be a two person decision
- both dont want it - kill the baby
- mother wants it - if she wants to keep it its on her, dont drag anybody else in on it
- father wants it - well that one is a bit difficult but im gonna side with the father. Men dont have uteri so its borderline cruel that the woman gets to decide whether to murder his baby. If she doesnt want it, she can hand it over to the father on day 1.
>>4068 >Women who chose not to abort a baby should not be entitled to any child support.
That makes it more evident how screwed women are by design. Before the laws being put into play, women had to rely on themselves or their clans or whatever to hold the men.
I dunno how exactly just that proposed solution is though. The divorce can happen way after birth, too.
> If child support is mandatory men should be allowed to force women into having an abortion.They should be allowed to have a choice if they want a child or not.
Again, it's about risks they take.
A girl can be smart, use protection (including cocp) and safe days and whatnot, but then she makes a mistake and trusts a bad guy. The result is she would be left with a child on her hands, shattered soul and a hit to her health with 9 months of wasted time, which is honestly a lot if you're young and fertile age is not that long for women as for men.
A guy can be smart, use protection and whatnot, but then he makes a mistake and trusts a bad girl. The result is he would be left with a child support, shattered soul and that's it.
>>4069 >Yeah, in the past you would only spark family war by that.
This might not work out that way. Sure, families (clans and what not) could go to settle that feud but they also could settle on just holding the grudge or doing favors or whatever. Some tribe union interests might prevail over family issues.
>>4040 >"low tier" girls don't get as much attention
It's low-hanging fruit, why don't they? Imagine being an ugly incel, who would you hit on, on nice girl or on something that's on your level? Then you have there the absolute majority of people being ugly skinnyfat monsters without an ounce of virility and when they have the virility, they are still ugly skinnyfat monsters so it's good for nothing.
>>4071 >This is how you end up with a society full of single mothers.
Maybe the problem is that it's too easy to get divorced these days. Like, if a couple cannot stand each other, is breaking it apart worth lowering the children's chances in this world?
> - mother wants it - if she wants to keep it its on her, dont drag anybody else in on it
That system makes a lot of sense, basically whoever wants to keep a child, keeps it and the other can go away. It's probably tougher for women to pull it though.
Hovewer, what if she just gets dumped after the fact of birth? You cannot plan for that.
Also I don't know really, but most women I know just want babies naturally. The science or whatever says they get changes in their chemistry making them attached to babies. The 3rd scenario is realistic, but I find it rare.
>>4075 >Imagine being an ugly incel, who would you hit on, on nice girl or on something that's on your level?
As far as my experience with incels goes, they have issues.
They feel entitled to a girl and after a nice girl they've been hitting on rejects them, they become bitter immediately and don't take any new chances.
And when such a girl gets attention, she still filters out a lot of guys because she wants something that she wants.
And then there are girls who don't get approached basically at all. It doesn't mean that the general rule of them being filters is less true. Most girls get more sex than most boys, if that makes sense.
That's all because realistically people seek for people they love, not for people they have "chances" with. It's a sad world out there.
>Then you have there the absolute majority of people being ugly skinnyfat monsters without an ounce of virility
Those people are actually not perfectly healthy (low virility probably means some minor hormone issues), and they get filtered out, because girls probably feel low-tier men and don't want them.
>when they have the virility, they are still ugly skinnyfat monsters
If they are active enough, they'll get some eventually, unless they are absolutely unsightly.
Anyway skinnyfat is not as bad. It's not sexy by any means, but it's charming in a sense, I guess.
>>4078 >They feel entitled to a girl and after a nice girl they've been hitting on rejects them, they become bitter immediately and don't take any new chances.
I don't really know any incel, I mean, I don't know any other human beings outside my family, but that seems incredibly stupid, don't you think? What even goes on in an incels head? How can they feel entitled when they never did shit to attract any? How can they feel biter after being rejected once? It just doesn't make any sense.
>low virility probably means some minor hormone issues
Not necessiraly, but yeah, i think so partly too. then there's that, like you said in your other post, that man offers: that's bullshit simply because he has to have somebody to offer something. That's not sign of low virility, it's sign of that nobody is attractive enough to make him offer. Kind of like neidhammel.
>it's charming in a sense
?
It's bodily defect on par with being an ancap.
>>4079 >It just doesn't make any sense.
People are stupid. That makes sense.
People can learn though but sometimes they can't.
>it's sign of that nobody is attractive enough to make him offer
I never implied that boys are absolutely active players and that girls are absolutely passive players. What I said just results in "Most girls get more sex than most boys" (because they get to pick in the end).
>It's bodily defect on par with being an ancap.
lol
I suppose you have to cope with the fact that indeed skinnyfat people do fuck, and not necessarily with somebody awful, either. Also that defect is much more easily fixable than low virility caused by some mental issues or something.
>>4080 >People can learn though but sometimes they can't.
The problem with teachers is that they don't get you can't make somebody learn what said somebody already knows. Teachers are the real niggers.
>Also that defect is much more easily fixable than low virility caused by some mental issues or something.
That certainly is.
All the women that used to be able to experience romantic love are dead and gone. In our past when we lived in small tribes and had tribal warfare when one tribe conquered another all the men were killed and the women turned into war brides and rape slaves but the women that were still loyal to their husband because they were romantically in love with them killed themselves or were killed--no chance to leave offsprings. All the women around today have no loyalty and cannot experience romantic love but men are suckers for love so cunts fake love to manipulate and enslave men. Modern women are chameleons whose behavior can be explained with Briffault's law. Perhaps there is still a few outlier women that can experience romantic love but it's not worth the time and resources to try and find them for they are very very rare.
Anyways, fuck(not literally) overused biocunts. One session with a spinning robot pussy that rotates and telescopes with varying speeds and your dick will be in love for life. Roasties fishholes can't ever come close to matching spinning robot pussy for pleasure and stimulation. Spinning robot pussy will make roasties obsolete assuming they don't go crying to the government and get them banned.