I mean sure we could just shoot them all and be done with it, but if you seriously believe that there is a possible future in which each and every one of them has a bullet in their head then you are seriously naive. So what other solution is there?
Why are they emigrating their countries? Because they are shit. If they werent shit (or at least good enough so that entire hordes of them dont come to the conclusion that it is worth it to cross the fucking Sahara desert or whatever) they wouldnt leave. So if somebody helped them improve their countries, then they would stay there instead of invading ours. Additionally you can implement policies that encourage those who are already here to go back.
There, problem solved, and nobody had to fucking die.
>>7939 Told myself that I as going to attempt to make Nanon /pol/ the way it was before, guess I better start contributing.
First off, OP objectively reeks of a shitpost. Clearly, what little argument there is, has nigger tier foresight and critical thinking is non-existent. But, despite my better judgment, I`ll give it an effort post:
>Why are they emigrating their countries? Because they are shit.
OP complete skips over any sort of reasoning as to WHY they are shit. Non-White, Non-Ethnic Europeans, however you wish to rationalize darkies, have not made anywhere near the technological and civilized advances Ethnic European society has. "B-but, the Egyptians!" Ancient Egypt was genetically more similar to the phenotype of The Original Mediterraneans than that of modern day North Africans. (This being reflected in their artworks, hint, the works reflect darkening of Egypt over time). All this above is not to negate the advancements of other, well known civilizations, but to prove a point that there is a reason why darkies reside in shit countries, and, more importantly, you`ll never make them good enough to have decent countries. Ex: South Africa.
> So if somebody helped them improve their countries, then they would stay there instead of invading ours.
OP, I don`t know if you`ve ever actually been around niggers and shitskins long enough to know that statement is as absurd as it comes. The standard deviation of shitskins will not one day decide to better themselves with some help. They will simply keep on asking for gibs and take from whoever they can. Ex: United States welfare program and just niggers in everyday life.
>Additionally you can implement policies that encourage those who are already here to go back.
Why would they go back when they get gibs here? That is why many talk of Right Wing Death Squads and making entire populations disappear.
>>7940 >WHY they are shit
While the standard deviation surely did its part, theres multiple reasons for the underdevelopment of sub-saharan Africa, namely the Sahara desert (preventing any kind of technological advancement from reaching them, the exact advancements that europeans and asians got to share just fine) and the disruption to power structures caused by colonialism that leaves many regions in war to this very day.
With education and a promise of a brighter future i do genuinely believe that they can "catch up" to an extent.
Taking the gibs away would be the exact kind of policy change necessary for them to consider leaving. Also you obviously have to be careful about the kind of help you give them as we know how simply dropping foodcrates and being done with it ends up. Education for example would not only cause them to be less nigger-y, but would also lower the rate at which the population is exploding, making it a win-win for everybody.
>>7941 Objectively, I have no argument with your first section, and overall your post is well thought out. Geographic conditions do inhibit the development of civilized society. My counter point would be in comparison to Europe itself. You mentioned the Sahara, but I`d argue more broadly Africa as a whole. Sub-Sahara Africa, pic related, is much more to consider than the Sahara itself. Hence, I have a hard time subscribing to the idea that one specific geographic feature was such a great inhibitor for Africans in general. It`s hard because what we hard discussing is an extremely broad landscape, heh. Yes, the desert prevented travel, but shouldn`t have Africans been more advanced by the time Europeans began expanding. African society certainly has been around for much longer. My thoughts hard a bit loose, but hopefully I convey enough to grant an understanding of my position.
Aforementioned. my counter point is against the idea that Non-Whites can catch up. I`d argue Europe was a much more harsh geographic area, with a short growing season and drastically difference in abundance of resources, namely food, compared to Africa. Hence, evolution occurred and foresight was greatly developed. Because of this genetic predisposition, Europeans were able to make great strides. Did greater Asia make strides as well? Certainly, I won`t deny what is factual, but it was European society that, yes, colonized the globe.
For the gibs, I`m still not certain taking it away would make "them," go away. Take my position, Blacks in the United States already have roots here, so they`re not going anywhere. I simply couldn`t imagine a Syrian leaving the well established city of Hamburg, to go back to the underdeveloped country of Syria. Essentially, it comes down to two solutions: Attempt to recondition or removal.
I hope to hear from you soon, Nanon. For once, this conversation reminds me of old /pol/.
>>7942 Sahara spans the entire width of the continent so how were the advancements supposed to get there before ship travel?
Humans left Africa 200k years ago. Evolution takes an insane amount of time. To put that into perspective, the first humans (or, you know, their equivalent at the time) to ever take advantage of fire were doing so at least 1 million years ago. So yes, although the lighter conditions may have leave them a bit... behind to say the least, i refuse to believe that its enough to warrant considering them an entirely different species and just genociding them or leaving them to die of hunger.
Im not saying that their average IQ being on the border of medically retarded is not a contributing factor. So yeah
>shouldn`t have Africans been more advanced by the time Europeans began expanding
They are literally retarded. Thats why we need to help them run their countries and build infrastructure and schools etc.
You need to keep it acceptable in the eyes of the mainstream public. I dont think that after ww2 there will be a time where deporting people based on their skin color will be acceptable. "Helping the poor africans to build and to improve their quality of life", well that sounds much better. Even if it may miss the ones that are already here, at least it will stop the invading packs.
>>7943 S-Star? Ah, well, regardless. We share a similar concession: Niggers are retarded. Seems are bottom line disagreement is how to mitigate/deal with them. I cannot see any realistic way in which we, as first world countries, provide means for Non-Whites to have better quality of life. Could we do it? Yes, but would it worth it and would they be incentivized to better themselves is the hypothetical to answer. Even so, that leads me to bring up Ethnic replacement and the decline of the Ethnic European population. I will not proceed, unless you wish.
>>7946 Whose to say they`ll respect us and stay away from us? And even then, that`s a hypothetical scenario. Ethnic Europeans are statistically being replaced in in this current timeline. Not to dodge your posed question, but that`s where my thought process goes
Okay. I've had enough of this stupid shit going unchecked. You've been reading too many of Jared Diamond's books. The reason Europe was advanced then is because they were and are less related to african homosapian genes. Recent human reasons for European Cromagnon advancements is the fact they had genetic bottleneck via natural selection and harsh capital punishment, even 1% or 2% of the criminal/degenerate population each generation will have drastic effects.
You're also just assuming Europeans were always this good and that the environment handed them everything. You also fail to see that Winter presented a struggle for planning ahead (need for higher IQ). That's your fatal error.
>before ship travel
What the hell do you mean before ship travel, you stupid fucking nigger?
Ship travel is a legitimate and ancient means of travel. Sailing by water and with wind in your sail can sometimes be less intensive and quicker than traveling on land. You can literally sail the ocean (granted if you prepared i.e. had a good IQ) by primitive balsawood ships, this has been repeated by experiment. Even in a rare case you didn't have the supplies to build a ship you still traded for them. Despite that the ocean is a damn highway.
This is more proof that it's just isolationist propaganda, an excuse for why niggers didn't have the IQ to expand and advance beyond in the ways Europeans did.
The truth is there are many writings and accounts of civilizations colliding and interacting with one another instead of remaining separate and isolated. The only reason the opposite is expressed in academia is that it's easier to create easy separate targets, as you can easily frame historical dilemmas through the lens of political correctness this way.
>>7948 They are BOTH retarded and having a massive geographical disadvantage. Not sure how many times do i have to repeat that. The fact that you can theoretically get there doesnt mean that there is going to be the trade necessary for the exchange of technologies.
>Jared Diamond
Never heard of that guy
>>7960 >dey retarded but GEOGRAPHY
Anon, they've traded their own very same Africans through those deserts. Africans had milleniums to change and yet many of them didn't, save for a few African Kangdoms such as the Mali Empire. There were african kingdoms that flourished despite the vast desert and had extensive trade routes but why does this excuse others that didn't. Why can't you and other so called "historians" just accept that equality is a myth.
They could have traded as many had, they could have relocated to a better area like any other low IQ animals would, they could have made their environments more hospitable as some did, etc. You can come with millions of excuses as to why certain groups didn't succeed but that's on them. However, it still assumes everything is static and isolationist, with no emphasis on human ability or biology. It excuses lack creative thinking and resourceful decisions that is
possible with higher IQ societies.
Ever since the first sign of life with the first microbe, biology has always been diverging. Life simply isn't fair. Sure geography might shape the people for certain traits with generations, but the environment itself doesn't cause the random gene mutations to occur. We got the genes we were dealt and we adapted. We captured the right genes by extensive selection.
We have no responsibility to "save" Africa. There is no "catching up" that can be achieved. If anything we'll end up increasing their birthrates even further. We should cut off foreign aid and send you to Africa to help them. How about that?
>technologies
The same reason giving a retard a smartphone won't increase their IQ or abilities. Same goes for any "technologies" for Africans, save for gene editing and eugenics programs.
We practiced healthy natural selection and they didn't. They've had plenty of time to do it but not. Spare me this white savior complex. Fuck Africa.
>never heard of Jared Diamond
Well he's a good reason you hear many of these arguments.
>>7961 >Africans had milleniums to change and yet many of them didn't
>They could have traded as many had
>they could have relocated to a better area like any other low IQ animals would
>they could have made their environments more hospitable
>There were african kingdoms that flourished despite the vast desert and had extensive trade routes
They are retarded. Ive admitted that like 20 times in this thread. There is no desert in SUBsaharan africa. Its actually quite fertile down there so why would they move anywhere? How can you trade with anybody when theres a fucking Sahara desert in your way? if you live in a desert already, well thats different, isnt it. You know how to deal with it. But if you live on the african plains and you see nothing but a bunch of sand in a one direction and food and plenty in the other, why in the fucks name would you go in the sand direction? You read but you dont understand. Its both the location and iq, both pretty bad on their own, but together significantly worse than the sum of them alone.
>The same reason giving a retard a smartphone won't increase their IQ or abilities.
It wont. Education and not having to waste the life away just by the efforts to not die will.
>If anything we'll end up increasing their birthrates even further
Quite the opposite. History shows that technology = lower birthrates in literally every case.
>>7962 >But if you live on the african plains and you see nothing but a bunch of sand in a one direction and food and plenty in the other, why in the fucks name would you go in the sand direction?
Lmao, because niggers will always take the gibs and not think of what`s beyond, instead only capable of living in the moment.
>Education and not having to waste the life away just by the efforts to not die will.
Seriously, have you ever been around Niggers and Shitskins?
>Quite the opposite. History shows that technology = lower birthrates in literally every case.
I could attack this from multiple angles, but I`ll give one example. Niggers here in the United States have access to the apex of what technological advances European society has to offer, yet they still breed like roaches.
In sum, Nigger, Shitskins and alike will not change and the only solution is, unironically, death.
>>7962 >But if you live on the african plains and you see nothing but a bunch of sand in a one direction and food and plenty in the other, why in the fucks name would you go in the sand direction?
Lmao, because niggers will always take the gibs and not think of what`s beyond, instead only capable of living in the moment.
>Education and not having to waste the life away just by the efforts to not die will.
Seriously, have you ever been around Niggers and Shitskins?
>Quite the opposite. History shows that technology = lower birthrates in literally every case.
I could attack this from multiple angles, but I`ll give one example. Niggers here in the United States have access to the apex of what technological advances European society has to offer, yet they still breed like roaches.
In sum, Nigger, Shitskins and alike will not change and the only solution is, unironically, death.
>>7962 >SUBsaharan africa. Its actually quite fertile down there
Africa is very genetically diverse, why did they still fuck up in human development? Why does their success depend on the basis of northern expedition and trade from other people? They had much potential to develop in such rich environments and trade like others, if not north or by river as some did but through the Indian Ocean.
>if you live in a desert already, well thats different, isnt it
How did they get there? "God" didn't just shit them there to remain indefinitely in the desert. It's on any group if they choose to stay and settle, or any individual if they remain with their group and avoid potential risk. Psychometric and biological differences as a result of migration and genetic drift is just icing on the cake.
>you see nothing but a bunch of sand in a one direction and food and plenty in the other
>why in the fucks name would you go in the sand direction?
Would I? Would you? Would they? Would who?
You're literally just demonstrating the carrot and stick mentality that most Africans truly have which is why they are some of the most corrupt countries on the planet, conflating it with the nuance and planning of the Euro mindset.
Average African: "Why should I need to change in anyway? I already got what I need right here. I don't care about the most successful in my society that keeps me alive. I don't care about development, expansion, sustainability, or even the future. Tomorrow just comes. I takes, I rapes, and I steals." Truly paradise.
Through the mind of many Africans this is simply life. When a European explains this static lifestyle it's used as an isolationist excuse and a push for harmful foreign and domestic policy.
>technology = lower birthrates in literally every case
I meant in terms of foreign aid or regime change there's no justification, i.e. the white savior complex. In terms of technology it is may be arguable, but compared to what human populations and what relevant data? Europeans are not a good case study to compare. They aren't the same as Africa. I have an open mind about somethings but freeshit to growing shithole countries is not something I approve of.
Even when technologies are introduced they still need to be adopted by the less advanced. The mere introduction of technologies will not guarantee success. You need a smart populous to see the need for and how to adopt it, like the wheel for instance.
The only thing I might settle on is airdrops of condoms for Africa and that "liberal" missionaries go Peace Corp style away from our civil societies and help developing nations themselves.
>>7964 >Seriously, have you ever been around Niggers and Shitskins?
There is very little of them where i live, but those whom i did meet were pretty nice.
>Niggers here in the United States have access to the apex of what technological advances European society has to offer, yet they still breed like roaches.
Well i highly doubt that each women has 7 little niglets like africans do, though i might be wrong.
>7965
So you are saying that no matter what we do, theyll still nigger it up and end up where theyve started? Its very hard to believe that there is just no help for them. They are still humans after all, you cant just shoot them all
>>7959 This channel has been promoted here at least one other time before. It was his microtransaction video. This channel was made by someone who was at least formerly extremely obsessed with Asuka. Maybe it is just a coincidence.
>>7939 If you seriously believe that there is a possible future in which each and every one of them HASN'T a bullet in their head then you are seriously naive.
The genocide of niggers and jews will come soon. One leads to another.
>and nobody had to fucking die.
Jew exposed. There is no future for your or your leftist pets. We will kill you all, and there iis nothing that you can do about it.
how fucckkin dare you white boi!!! we be tha originnle humanss and wee concured the worild.. we got bigga braainns mussles ann dickks than u.SO HSAA HA! HHA!
Why are they emigrating their countries? Because they are shit. If they werent shit (or at least good enough so that entire hordes of them dont come to the conclusion that it is worth it to cross the fucking Sahara desert or whatever) they wouldnt leave. So if somebody helped them improve their countries, then they would stay there instead of invading ours. Additionally you can implement policies that encourage those who are already here to go back.
There, problem solved, and nobody had to fucking die.