/b/ - Random

New boards: /k/ and /o/. Accepting board ownership applications.
[Make a Post]
[X]





Is the internet real anymore? Nanonymous No.5426 [D][U][F][S][L][A][C] >>5437
File: 2f4d950e744f55f90c0b0dc7ea33731eff44fb6b7691a437aa9cd37c2bf6c7ac.jpg (dl) (30.31 KiB)

Assuming ISP's, megacorps and perhaps governments are working together, how would we know if the internet is real?
I know the lot of us here are constantly glued to our screens, so we make up a huge portion of reality from the info that is sent through the cables and displayed on our monitors.
How do we know this information is not fake?
We have to assume that there's organizations with much more advanched technology and software than we have access to.
If a Neural Network is trained to process information and act accordingly as if it were real brain trained for that specific scenario, couldn't the same be applied to network connections?
Could and artificial Intelligence learn to read the requests we send out and the data that is sent back in return? Could it make up its own data with the right inputs?
If an AI was trained to do exactly as the internet does, couldn't it be used for other purposes?
Why would the AI show you the truth? Why wouldn't they train it so it shows a different story?

Even if this scenario is not real, there's no telling if it won't be real in the future. China is already constantly scanning their internet throughput, do you think they are not using artificial intelligence for this purpose? To warp information to suit them?

Control of information is the best way to get propaganda across, and if an artificial intelligence senses that you are about to receive a picture of the Tiananmen Square massacre, who says it wouldn't automatically change the data of the picture to be displaying the protestors as the aggressors and send that through instead?
Artificial Intelligence is going to get bigger, bigger and more influential, not because of its own will, but because some humans are corrupt.

Nanonymous No.5436 [D] >>5437

The twin towers were nuked from beneath, explosives were planted at the so-called impact zone of the planes, footage of planes hitting the towers was supplied by people specialized in CGI, animation, game development, movies, and one literally wrote a paper on how to fabricate evidence. More here: https://911history.de

Nanonymous No.5437 [D]

>>5426
The longer you wait the more history, truth, facts Jews will destroy by whatever means possible and spread more and more lies.
It's their "religious duty", they have to erase "Amalek" from existence, "Amalek" can simply be replaced by "the enemy" (even though it was meant to describe a people that has been destroyed long ago)

I'm >>5436

Nanonymous No.5549 [D]

What you're describing is basically an advanced version of a man-in-the-middle attack. It's always been possible for data to be manipulated by malicious actors in transit. That's why we use cryptography to sign and verify the contents of our web requests.

It's still true that ISPs and corporations have way too much control over the internet. This is partially due to how the internet is designed to work on a technical level. It was not built with security or anonymity in mind. If we all moved to darknets like the Tor network or i2p, it would fix a lot of the problems regarding ISPs and governments being able to locate and coerce internet users and server admins alike. Right now, anyone who does not tow the line (on clearnet) can be located and forced into submission with virtually no effort on the part of powerful entities like megacorps and governments. We need to make it harder for them to control and manipulate the flow of information online, so that one day we will have the chance to break out of this technological prison