/l/ - The Lounge
Non board-specific discussion
[Make a Post]File: 5360d23c6e0070e78228226e424ff79506be278dac2c1561b8973d347b394b47.jpg (dl) (1.38 MiB)

You made me archive their /fa/. 8/fa/ at least has pic, but worthless just like 4/fa/, consisting only of uglos/redditors.
>Our server thinks you look like a robot. Please solve the CAPTCHA below to access the site.
I'm not changing my settings for that shit. Can you browse that without actually going to 4gag?
I'm not changing my settings for that shit. Can you browse that without actually going to 4gag?
unfortch but i havent used it in ages. there were citizen mirrors with torrents though iirc.
File: ce839fb0c9f7f5242638a8ee8326017d1643feb1c0aef9a6cf7cbae5bdd6f88d.png (dl) (56.27 KiB)

>sadpanda
lmao who cares wtf is sadpanda anyway
lmao who cares wtf is sadpanda anyway
File: 8a5de33cd37dca56e95e5e7b60e75427c6d0ab32bc3763f5e5a838cd5d201952.jpg (dl) (141.45 KiB)

I never thought I would live to see the day, but whatever.
Like, to be honest with all their p2p distribution network I thought they were fairly immune to bullshit, but hey, the copyright-related gallery takedowns happened too if I recall.
And that's why Web is shit. Too much public exposure, too much law exposure, too much owner's responsibility, too much owner in general.
Like, to be honest with all their p2p distribution network I thought they were fairly immune to bullshit, but hey, the copyright-related gallery takedowns happened too if I recall.
And that's why Web is shit. Too much public exposure, too much law exposure, too much owner's responsibility, too much owner in general.
>>13080
it's the transnational copyright law and encroaching police state that's the shit part, tho
it's the transnational copyright law and encroaching police state that's the shit part, tho
>biggest source of jap printed pornography will close
Wonderful news, I'm really happy to see it going down. This is what I've been fighting for.
Wonderful news, I'm really happy to see it going down. This is what I've been fighting for.
>This is what I've been fighting for.
Good to know you fight for online censorship antipornfag, kys.
Good to know you fight for online censorship antipornfag, kys.
>>13098
Not allowing CP is also censorship you dumb fuck? Pornography is harmful and should be banned, extreme views are already banned and people go to jail for having different opinions. There was always few freedom on the internet, use Tor and stay safe.
>kys
>>>/4cuck/
Not allowing CP is also censorship you dumb fuck? Pornography is harmful and should be banned, extreme views are already banned and people go to jail for having different opinions. There was always few freedom on the internet, use Tor and stay safe.
>kys
>>>/4cuck/
File: 0dcba02db3bd64331e8c86ac5a63c11d2156519c4047e1625418d5d263eb416d.jpg (dl) (460.67 KiB)

>>13099
>Not allowing CP
is protection against the admin getting fuckoed, narc
>>>/4cuck/
>>/reddit/
>Not allowing CP
is protection against the admin getting fuckoed, narc
>>>/4cuck/
>>/reddit/
>>13099
>Not allowing CP is also censorship you dumb fuck?
Websites can decide what kind of content they want to host, not wanting to host CP with all the risks associated with it is not censorship retard. Taking down websites cause they host or link to CP is(whatever you think of CP this is a fact).
>Pornography is harmful and should be banned, extreme views are already banned and people go to jail for having different opinions.
So you support internet censorship and government banning stuff, GTFO of this board faggot you are outside of your territory here and are our enemy.
>Not allowing CP is also censorship you dumb fuck?
Websites can decide what kind of content they want to host, not wanting to host CP with all the risks associated with it is not censorship retard. Taking down websites cause they host or link to CP is(whatever you think of CP this is a fact).
>Pornography is harmful and should be banned, extreme views are already banned and people go to jail for having different opinions.
So you support internet censorship and government banning stuff, GTFO of this board faggot you are outside of your territory here and are our enemy.
>>13104
>Websites can decide what kind of content they want to host, not wanting to host CP with all the risks associated with it is not censorship retard
I was talking how strict laws of CP are not considered by you censorship because "im not pedo lololol". You're the kind that would put pedo on death trial but not loli dude because it's legal.
>So you support internet censorship and government banning stuff
Strawman, I never said something like this. I'm pro-speech but porn just like drugs should be regulated because for widespread and harmful it is. I just want to keep nano pornfree to keep quality.
>Websites can decide what kind of content they want to host, not wanting to host CP with all the risks associated with it is not censorship retard
I was talking how strict laws of CP are not considered by you censorship because "im not pedo lololol". You're the kind that would put pedo on death trial but not loli dude because it's legal.
>So you support internet censorship and government banning stuff
Strawman, I never said something like this. I'm pro-speech but porn just like drugs should be regulated because for widespread and harmful it is. I just want to keep nano pornfree to keep quality.
First kyoani, now sadpanda. Whats happening? What is this new era thing on Japan?
>>13115
Person using pornography is a victim because he's harming himself, most of the time involuntary without knowing consequences.
Person using pornography is a victim because he's harming himself, most of the time involuntary without knowing consequences.
>>13117
Taking away agency from people just to make your argument work, i have no words. I consume hentai and porn out of my own free will, it just makes my masturbation sessions better, just as i smoke and drink sometime cause i like it, i own my body who are you to tell me what to do with it.
Taking away agency from people just to make your argument work, i have no words. I consume hentai and porn out of my own free will, it just makes my masturbation sessions better, just as i smoke and drink sometime cause i like it, i own my body who are you to tell me what to do with it.
>>13118
>Taking away agency from people just to make your argument work
Please write it in other words, I don't understand.
>I consume hentai and porn out of my own free will
Most people believe they do x stuff and can quit whenever they want.
>it just makes my masturbation sessions better
Your brain is thinking you're really fucking but it's actually superficial stimuli. Drugs also pump your dopamine to abnormal amounts and it's confirmed they kill.
>just as i smoke and drink sometime cause i like it
Duh.
>i own my body
Every single time. This is reddit tier argument for women who want to abort children because "it's MY BODY I CAN DO WHAT I WANT!".
>who are you to tell me what to do with it
I don't tell you what to do, I'm realist and I know how people work. At first I try to educate nanons and get porn off overboard. Force won't work just like prohibition didn't work. Imagine suddenly porn is illegal, it'll drive to underground or just make it little harder to access. You can go to prison just for watching CP and yet people share it (in small amounts but they do).
>Taking away agency from people just to make your argument work
Please write it in other words, I don't understand.
>I consume hentai and porn out of my own free will
Most people believe they do x stuff and can quit whenever they want.
>it just makes my masturbation sessions better
Your brain is thinking you're really fucking but it's actually superficial stimuli. Drugs also pump your dopamine to abnormal amounts and it's confirmed they kill.
>just as i smoke and drink sometime cause i like it
Duh.
>i own my body
Every single time. This is reddit tier argument for women who want to abort children because "it's MY BODY I CAN DO WHAT I WANT!".
>who are you to tell me what to do with it
I don't tell you what to do, I'm realist and I know how people work. At first I try to educate nanons and get porn off overboard. Force won't work just like prohibition didn't work. Imagine suddenly porn is illegal, it'll drive to underground or just make it little harder to access. You can go to prison just for watching CP and yet people share it (in small amounts but they do).
>>13119
>I don't understand
Educate yourself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agency_(philosophy)
>Every single time. This is reddit tier argument for women who want to abort children because "it's MY BODY I CAN DO WHAT I WANT!".
It's true though, i don't give a fuck if it triggers you. Philosophical question for you, who owns your body? If you reply god you're niggercattle. If you reply the state you're a cuck.
>I don't tell you what to do
That's literally what you're doing dude, you also put yourself in some kind of position of authority, which is fucking retarded on an anonymous imageboard were nobody has an identity and nobody has authority.
>I don't understand
Educate yourself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agency_(philosophy)
>Every single time. This is reddit tier argument for women who want to abort children because "it's MY BODY I CAN DO WHAT I WANT!".
It's true though, i don't give a fuck if it triggers you. Philosophical question for you, who owns your body? If you reply god you're niggercattle. If you reply the state you're a cuck.
>I don't tell you what to do
That's literally what you're doing dude, you also put yourself in some kind of position of authority, which is fucking retarded on an anonymous imageboard were nobody has an identity and nobody has authority.
>>13120
>Educate yourself
By "taking away agency from people just to make your argument work" you meant if something is bad then it's not free will? Is it right?
>Philosophical question for you, who owns your body? If you reply god you're niggercattle. If you reply the state you're a cuck
I do and I can understand why state doesn't want me to do drugs, not that I abide rules 100%. It's a tricky question to be honest. Do you think all drugs should be legal? Even those that make person addicted after one hit? Porn is similar to it but really easy to get. Addicted people don't make decisions, they can't choose if they get a next hit or not, am I right? It's also free will for you?
>you also put yourself in some kind of position of authority
I want to make this place lurkable and by the way help other nanons. This is all I want to do.
>which is fucking retarded on an anonymous imageboard were nobody has an identity and nobody has authority
Moderation has authority and can decide what's good and what's not. I'm here because I don't like identities and account, I feel safe on imageboards. I'm not even trying to avatarfag or opinionfag, there's no other way for me to blend into crowd if I want somehow influence people to benefit site.
>Educate yourself
By "taking away agency from people just to make your argument work" you meant if something is bad then it's not free will? Is it right?
>Philosophical question for you, who owns your body? If you reply god you're niggercattle. If you reply the state you're a cuck
I do and I can understand why state doesn't want me to do drugs, not that I abide rules 100%. It's a tricky question to be honest. Do you think all drugs should be legal? Even those that make person addicted after one hit? Porn is similar to it but really easy to get. Addicted people don't make decisions, they can't choose if they get a next hit or not, am I right? It's also free will for you?
>you also put yourself in some kind of position of authority
I want to make this place lurkable and by the way help other nanons. This is all I want to do.
>which is fucking retarded on an anonymous imageboard were nobody has an identity and nobody has authority
Moderation has authority and can decide what's good and what's not. I'm here because I don't like identities and account, I feel safe on imageboards. I'm not even trying to avatarfag or opinionfag, there's no other way for me to blend into crowd if I want somehow influence people to benefit site.
File: f668f6816a99be9c5ac4960a2697fbac9d7f667f51eb949cdb2643c0f54ec824.jpg (dl) (470.18 KiB)

>>13119
>superficial stimuli.
So you're not just against pornography, you're against masturbation too.
Please link me studies about how masturbation is bad (with large statistical sample). I did a fast research on that about a year ago and couldn't find anything, other than excessive/obsessive masturbation causing desensitization of depamine receptors (read bellow) and the potential addictive effects (normally atributed to the "Coolidge effect").
There's no evidence (or very few) showing this is bad for health within the 'normal' amount (non-obsessive).
>Drugs also pump your dopamine
You see, this is how you show you don't understand shit about what you're talking about. "Drugs" is a generic term. The "drugs" that modulate dopamine are only stimulants, but there's a incredible amount of other drugs. If you mean "street drugs", you're also wrong, since many of them don't modulate dopamine (such as ketamine, lsd and triptamines).
>it's confirmed they kill.
In what amount (LD-50) and for what drug? Do you think someone that snorts cocaine, even a small amount, will die? No, they won't.
It's all about the quantity. Let me give you a example: everybody thinks methamphetamine is bad. But if you find someone freezing and starving in a mountain and you give them methamphetamine, what happens? The person is saved. You see, this is the same drug FDA puts on "schedule 1" (not usable for medical conditions), but it can save a life if you apply in the right quantity. It is so effective for this purpose that some historians think it would have a big impact on the WWII (Germany was testing meth/cocaine/oxycodone in soldiers). Also, meth is the most effective drug against obesity (prescribed as 'Desoxyn' in the USA).
And this is just one example. If you get studies on MDMA you'll see there's a large amount of evidence for treating PTSD.
Both meth and MDMA modulate dopamine and they don't kill if you use it right.
Masturbation and pornography is not bad. It's just a matter of how you use it.
>superficial stimuli.
So you're not just against pornography, you're against masturbation too.
Please link me studies about how masturbation is bad (with large statistical sample). I did a fast research on that about a year ago and couldn't find anything, other than excessive/obsessive masturbation causing desensitization of depamine receptors (read bellow) and the potential addictive effects (normally atributed to the "Coolidge effect").
There's no evidence (or very few) showing this is bad for health within the 'normal' amount (non-obsessive).
>Drugs also pump your dopamine
You see, this is how you show you don't understand shit about what you're talking about. "Drugs" is a generic term. The "drugs" that modulate dopamine are only stimulants, but there's a incredible amount of other drugs. If you mean "street drugs", you're also wrong, since many of them don't modulate dopamine (such as ketamine, lsd and triptamines).
>it's confirmed they kill.
In what amount (LD-50) and for what drug? Do you think someone that snorts cocaine, even a small amount, will die? No, they won't.
It's all about the quantity. Let me give you a example: everybody thinks methamphetamine is bad. But if you find someone freezing and starving in a mountain and you give them methamphetamine, what happens? The person is saved. You see, this is the same drug FDA puts on "schedule 1" (not usable for medical conditions), but it can save a life if you apply in the right quantity. It is so effective for this purpose that some historians think it would have a big impact on the WWII (Germany was testing meth/cocaine/oxycodone in soldiers). Also, meth is the most effective drug against obesity (prescribed as 'Desoxyn' in the USA).
And this is just one example. If you get studies on MDMA you'll see there's a large amount of evidence for treating PTSD.
Both meth and MDMA modulate dopamine and they don't kill if you use it right.
Masturbation and pornography is not bad. It's just a matter of how you use it.
>>13125
>So you're not just against pornography, you're against masturbation too
Strawman.
>other than excessive/obsessive masturbation causing desensitization of depamine receptors (read bellow) and the potential addictive effects (normally atributed to the "Coolidge effect")
https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/rebooting-porn-use-faqs/dont-i-need-to-ejaculate-frequently-for-prostate-health/discussion-of-prostate-research/the-relative-health-benefits-of-different-sexual-activities-2010/
Higher masturbation frequency (and even the desire for more masturbation) is associated with depression, and masturbation is associated with less happiness.
>The "drugs" that modulate dopamine are only stimulants, but there's a incredible amount of other drugs
You know what I meant, you deliberately complicate things to make you right. Great move.
>In what amount (LD-50) and for what drug?
Cocaine, Heroin, MDMA and Methamphetamine among other, I don't see why you try to derail this thread.
>everybody thinks methamphetamine is bad. But if you find someone freezing and starving in a mountain and you give them methamphetamine, what happens? The person is saved
Yes, this is strong stimulant but what you're trying to say? Porn can also be strong stimulant by abusing reward system and in general brain. It's not something that should be done often. East German women runners would get pregnant and then abort child to achieve abortion doping, thus abusing natural processes.
>It is so effective for this purpose that some historians think it would have a big impact on the WWII
You will do anything to win war.
>Both meth and MDMA modulate dopamine and they don't kill if you use it right
It's hard to use it right because of addictive nature.
>Masturbation and pornography is not bad. It's just a matter of how you use it
You're full of shit.
>So you're not just against pornography, you're against masturbation too
Strawman.
>other than excessive/obsessive masturbation causing desensitization of depamine receptors (read bellow) and the potential addictive effects (normally atributed to the "Coolidge effect")
https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/rebooting-porn-use-faqs/dont-i-need-to-ejaculate-frequently-for-prostate-health/discussion-of-prostate-research/the-relative-health-benefits-of-different-sexual-activities-2010/
Higher masturbation frequency (and even the desire for more masturbation) is associated with depression, and masturbation is associated with less happiness.
>The "drugs" that modulate dopamine are only stimulants, but there's a incredible amount of other drugs
You know what I meant, you deliberately complicate things to make you right. Great move.
>In what amount (LD-50) and for what drug?
Cocaine, Heroin, MDMA and Methamphetamine among other, I don't see why you try to derail this thread.
>everybody thinks methamphetamine is bad. But if you find someone freezing and starving in a mountain and you give them methamphetamine, what happens? The person is saved
Yes, this is strong stimulant but what you're trying to say? Porn can also be strong stimulant by abusing reward system and in general brain. It's not something that should be done often. East German women runners would get pregnant and then abort child to achieve abortion doping, thus abusing natural processes.
>It is so effective for this purpose that some historians think it would have a big impact on the WWII
You will do anything to win war.
>Both meth and MDMA modulate dopamine and they don't kill if you use it right
It's hard to use it right because of addictive nature.
>Masturbation and pornography is not bad. It's just a matter of how you use it
You're full of shit.
File: f4cf20532eadee8e2e3704802d559a056e927c16dc29a25cec73213ce98c0d6f.jpg (dl) (378.21 KiB)

>>13126
>Strawman.
Hah. Do you even know the definition of "strawman"? My argument was deduction, not strawman.
>try to derail this thread.
I was trying to show you don't understand about what you're talking about.
>It's not something that should be done often.
>often.
This is not your original argument at all. Your previous posts show you are against porn/masturbation in all cases. Which is wrong. That's my point.
>You will do anything to win war.
You see, this shows you can't comprehend even the simple complex of "analogy". Yes, this was a intentional ad hominem, stop using you fallacies to dodge.
>It's hard to use it right because of addictive nature.
MDMA is not very addictive. Read the research from MAPS.
>You're full of shit.
Ok, so let's review the research you linked. Some of their citations links to "wiley.com" and they block Tor. So I couldn't access them.
First point:
>Other sexual activities have weaker, no, or (in the cases of masturbation and anal intercourse) inverse associations with health indices.
Your brain doesn't differentiate between vagina and anus, as far as sensations tell. You can't even measure it, if not with FMRI (which is impossible, because you need steady images in FMRI).
>An overview of the empirical evidence on psychological and physiological
>empirical
There you go. This is no "scientific" as they claim in the introduction, this is based on anecdotes. But let's keep going...
>this review adjust for the tendency of some people to underreport behaviors
They are creating data from nothing.
>Although it might be conjectured
Yes, it is.
>there is some evidence to the contrary
>some
Some. And, how to you measure this statistically? You can't.
>social desirability scores were higher than normative values in large groups of men and women convicted of intimate partner abuse
They are comparing masturbation with rape. Neatly done research.
>The discussion will address the compatibility of the observed results with both evolutionary and early psychoanalytic theories.
>psychoanalytic theories
Are you fucking kidding me? We developed behaviorism for a century and the guys resort to Freud bullshit?
>problems of childhood psychosexual development
This is complete bullshit not accepted in modern psychology.
>In contrast, masturbation was inversely associated with mental health satisfaction
>satisfaction
They forget to make emphasis on this word, "satisfaction". If you read just the title, they seem to be talking about "metal health", as if masturbation makes you schizophrenic. The point of the study they quote is: sex provides more pleasure than masturbation. Oh, what a surprise. Sex has physical contact, which produces oxytocin in the brain.
>Intimate Relationship Quality
They misinterpreted the whole research cited (called "Women's relationship quality is associated with specifically penile-vaginal intercourse orgasm and frequency"). The point of the research was to test if woman have more pleasure with or without clitoris stimulation. Their point was: most woman masturbate through clitoris stimulation, which does not happen when doing penetration. So they measure the satisfaction between penetration with and without clitoris stimulation and their result was that woman had better satisfation when doing penetration *with* clitoris stimulation.
>sexual behaviors other than PVI was uncorrelated with the PRQC dimensions
Of course it was uncorrelated, the study focused on a hypothesis different than what they are so desperate to "prove".
>sexual behavior diaries and recall
This is a fanfic or a research? As I said above, anecdote is not science.
I could go on and on with this. The "study" you linked has serious problems with methodology and bias. No one serious in the field of psychology would accept it as "scientific".
I won't review everything, as I have other things to do, but I'll review later the "Depression" section.
>Strawman.
Hah. Do you even know the definition of "strawman"? My argument was deduction, not strawman.
>try to derail this thread.
I was trying to show you don't understand about what you're talking about.
>It's not something that should be done often.
>often.
This is not your original argument at all. Your previous posts show you are against porn/masturbation in all cases. Which is wrong. That's my point.
>You will do anything to win war.
You see, this shows you can't comprehend even the simple complex of "analogy". Yes, this was a intentional ad hominem, stop using you fallacies to dodge.
>It's hard to use it right because of addictive nature.
MDMA is not very addictive. Read the research from MAPS.
>You're full of shit.
Ok, so let's review the research you linked. Some of their citations links to "wiley.com" and they block Tor. So I couldn't access them.
First point:
>Other sexual activities have weaker, no, or (in the cases of masturbation and anal intercourse) inverse associations with health indices.
Your brain doesn't differentiate between vagina and anus, as far as sensations tell. You can't even measure it, if not with FMRI (which is impossible, because you need steady images in FMRI).
>An overview of the empirical evidence on psychological and physiological
>empirical
There you go. This is no "scientific" as they claim in the introduction, this is based on anecdotes. But let's keep going...
>this review adjust for the tendency of some people to underreport behaviors
They are creating data from nothing.
>Although it might be conjectured
Yes, it is.
>there is some evidence to the contrary
>some
Some. And, how to you measure this statistically? You can't.
>social desirability scores were higher than normative values in large groups of men and women convicted of intimate partner abuse
They are comparing masturbation with rape. Neatly done research.
>The discussion will address the compatibility of the observed results with both evolutionary and early psychoanalytic theories.
>psychoanalytic theories
Are you fucking kidding me? We developed behaviorism for a century and the guys resort to Freud bullshit?
>problems of childhood psychosexual development
This is complete bullshit not accepted in modern psychology.
>In contrast, masturbation was inversely associated with mental health satisfaction
>satisfaction
They forget to make emphasis on this word, "satisfaction". If you read just the title, they seem to be talking about "metal health", as if masturbation makes you schizophrenic. The point of the study they quote is: sex provides more pleasure than masturbation. Oh, what a surprise. Sex has physical contact, which produces oxytocin in the brain.
>Intimate Relationship Quality
They misinterpreted the whole research cited (called "Women's relationship quality is associated with specifically penile-vaginal intercourse orgasm and frequency"). The point of the research was to test if woman have more pleasure with or without clitoris stimulation. Their point was: most woman masturbate through clitoris stimulation, which does not happen when doing penetration. So they measure the satisfaction between penetration with and without clitoris stimulation and their result was that woman had better satisfation when doing penetration *with* clitoris stimulation.
>sexual behaviors other than PVI was uncorrelated with the PRQC dimensions
Of course it was uncorrelated, the study focused on a hypothesis different than what they are so desperate to "prove".
>sexual behavior diaries and recall
This is a fanfic or a research? As I said above, anecdote is not science.
I could go on and on with this. The "study" you linked has serious problems with methodology and bias. No one serious in the field of psychology would accept it as "scientific".
I won't review everything, as I have other things to do, but I'll review later the "Depression" section.
>>13126
>It's hard to use it right because of addictive nature.
MDMA, absolutely not addictive. Quite the opposite. It has extreme withdrawals afterwards that make it not so worth it because your serotonin gets depleted. Its also great fun for a night.
Meth in high dosage is more harmfull but in small dosages it is very usefull for treating a wide variety of disorders like ADHD.
There, MDMA and Meth, not that hard to use. You dont see many adhd patients with tremors in their hands for their next shot.
Another question for you. Since masturbating releases dopamine and a host of other hormones you claimed are corrupting your brain into bad behaviour (Masturbating more, Fetishes, other perverse behaviour). Surely you'll be consequent in your conviction and abstain ANY activity releasing dopamine which you deem immoral? By its nature, browsing and replying on Nanochan releases dopamine at various activities and intervals. Or do you consider Nanochan more moral than the porn being posted on it?
>>13129
>resort to Freud bullshit?
>not accepted in modern psychology.
Please refrain from critisicing Freud untill I finished his book of dream psychology. Thank you <3
>It's hard to use it right because of addictive nature.
MDMA, absolutely not addictive. Quite the opposite. It has extreme withdrawals afterwards that make it not so worth it because your serotonin gets depleted. Its also great fun for a night.
Meth in high dosage is more harmfull but in small dosages it is very usefull for treating a wide variety of disorders like ADHD.
There, MDMA and Meth, not that hard to use. You dont see many adhd patients with tremors in their hands for their next shot.
Another question for you. Since masturbating releases dopamine and a host of other hormones you claimed are corrupting your brain into bad behaviour (Masturbating more, Fetishes, other perverse behaviour). Surely you'll be consequent in your conviction and abstain ANY activity releasing dopamine which you deem immoral? By its nature, browsing and replying on Nanochan releases dopamine at various activities and intervals. Or do you consider Nanochan more moral than the porn being posted on it?
>>13129
>resort to Freud bullshit?
>not accepted in modern psychology.
Please refrain from critisicing Freud untill I finished his book of dream psychology. Thank you <3
[Catalog][Overboard][Update]
[Reply]6 files, 31 replies
Site will go down in a few hours
https://boards.4chan.org/h/thread/5411286