Took the test at https://8values.github.io I'm suprised of the Diplomatic Axis, it says I am patriotic when I am not, probably it's cause I interpreted some nationalistic questions as "my group" instead of "my nation", tbqh is there even any difference?
Anyway take the test for fun if you want.
This thread is also for other kind of tests or questionnaires not only political onces, hence why I made it on /l/ and not /pol/.
Im about as boring as it gets. I would have guessed myself much more on the anarchist side but ah well. Some of the questions very very vague and retarded so maybe thats why it didnt go well.
Interestingly when ive done the test some time ago i was much more in the extremes... i wonder what happened.
>>17972 >>17968 Wtf, thats like my exact idea of a dystopia. What drives you to want something like that?
Took the meme personality test at https://www.16personalities.com INTP-T 100% introverted, yep.
This was not the first time i took this test, compared to the previous times the Tactics and Identity traits became more balanced(before i was unbalance towards Prospecting/Turbulent), this is somewhat related to reality, I am trying to be more organized and confident.
>>17976 Im gonna go on a stretch and say that almost everybody here is INTP, and those who are not will be at most one letter off.
There, saved everybody from getting datamined, thank me later.
>>17982 Sometimes people answer what they wish they were like instead what they really are. You sure its not one of those cases?
I find hard to believe somebody not introverted found his way here
>>18002 That test is fucking genius. Of all the ones ive did today this one was the hardest
The warnings didnt quite work for me (probably because i hate manipulating people), though the scientific portion was pretty on point
>>17998 >obligatory iq test
Karl Dönitz placer here again, got 16/16 and its a pretty quick test. The only issue is that they should remove numbered choice answers so you avoid answers like (4)5, as on the fraction question for instance.
These questionnaires always label you as a nahtzee if you act reasonably and don't proclaim your life is dedicated to the betterment of Zion, and in this one in specific, some questions either make no sense or are simply stupid.
I'm not even going to include questions that by all logical reasoning would only have one answer but cucks don't seem to have the brain capacity for them, I'm just going to list a few but not all of the ones that don't even make sense.
>democracy is more than a decision-making proccess
It's a popularity contest, so it's not more or less than a decision-making proccess because that's fucking unrelated.
>Oppression by corporations is more of a concern than oppression by governments.
The government is a corporation... >Excessive government intervention is a threat to the economy.
Excessive is by any measure "too much" so regardless of what you think about government intervention, the only conclusion this question leaves out is yes.
>Military action by our nation is often necessary to protect it.
It's physically impossible to protect a nation without military action.
What's next? Moving a car through the psychic power of the 30iq brain of someone who asks such a question?
>Victimless crimes (such as drug use) should not be crimes at all
Drug use isn't a victimless crime.
With so many victimless crimes around the world, they could have picked any of them, but they went and picked a crime that commonly has an absurdly high number of victims.
Has the writer of this ever been anywhere near a crack addict den?
The question can't be answered.
>All authority should be questioned.
NO, LET'S LISTEN AND BELIEVE!!!!!
Okay, this one does make sense, but I seriously fucking hope even the most brain damaged californian doesn't actually think to themselves "yep, listen and believe"
>To chase progress at all costs is dangerous.
What if I chase "progress" (whatever that is) at the cost of all life on the planet?
Yeah, that's pretty fucking dangerous m8. In any case, there's only one answer.
>>18015 Oh and I'm a tard myself and didn't even actually look at the result, I already knew upfront I was a Fascist because they are the only ones associated with all practical reasoning in AD 2019.
But what the heck about "Markets" opposes "Equality" and what the heck about "Tradition" opposes "Progress?"
>>18017 The drug user although crimes against oneself should be treated the same as victimless crimes, their family, anyone in close proximity of the drug user and whatever drug den they frequent if any, society as a whole.
And then they extremely often get so addicted the only thoughts they have are acquiring the means to get high again, which often involves theft and robbery, or they might momentarily go insane under the high and violently lash out.
>>18018 And you really believe you can solve all that by putting everybody who disobeys in prison? And also that everybody who disobeys actually deserves jail time and a criminal record, forever condemning them to be treated the same as thieves and murderers?
>>18015 >>18016 Authoritarians, doesn't matter if fascists or communists always imagine themselves to be the ones in power when violence is gonna be used, they don't understand that building systems of control always will go against them sometime in the furute.
Example:
Fascists are pro censorship -> but when it gets used against them(white suprematists for example) then the cry for muh freedomz.
Communists are pro redistribution of wealth -> but when salaries go down and taxes go up they complain and cry muh i'm poor i can't pay.
Authoritarians are incapable of seeing long term in the future, they are dominated by emotions and propaganda, fascism and communism is for retards.
Libertarianism and pro-freedom ideologies are for intellectuals.
>>18030 Also its about the laziest approach to running a country. Instead of solving the underlying issues, they attempt to solve the problem by simply ordering the citizens to stop being so problematic.
>>18030 Nanon, I take issue with your rationale of what is, by normie standard, the "Alternative Right." More to the point, your assessment of what fascist are today. Arguably, only the most read and well versed of political theorist who call themselves fascist, are ideologically subscribed to fascism on it`s whole. But, for the average Far Right Gen Z, they simply call themselves fascist, but are not the power house, subscribed intellect of past fascist movements.(Me being Gen Z myself). To suggest that, "they," be it White Supremacist, Ethno-Nationalist and ETC, are concerned about censoring others isn`t too accurate for today's Far Right ideological group. More so, when was the last time you saw a gen Z or young Far Right extremest call for the censoring of other ideological groups, and having his fellow peers agree with him. If anything, they skip that whole notion and go straight for killing everyone who isn`t in my in group. That is the new generation of Far Right. No need to censor Jews, Niggers, Spics and Mudskins when there aren`t any to censor.
As far as Libertarianism is concerned, you will never have such a system with a Non-homogeneous society. Circa 2015, myself being a Libertarian, many came to believe that the only solution is the Far Right, and many Libertarians gradually moved to the end of the spectrum. This being caused by, as many Anons put it, "RedPills." Ex: Pre-Genetic Disposition.
The rest of your post is generalization and name calling, so there`s not much to address there.
>>18053 >another horrible test
No. Them harry potter tests you're used to taking are horrible. However, any fairly replicable test is a valid means to measure. To extrapolate further beyond morals requires a bit testing like gathering data on demographics, brain imaging, and emotional responses, basically differences between test takers. Which we are collecting and use that to formulate many current solid hypotheses on our current political divide.
You can probably get this from Potter tests but with less predicative power. The more tests you take while answering honestly, the more we'll probably know about you and others. So, what's the deal?
>not particularly accurate "basic human decency"
People don't agree on this though and studies show differences towards this. Why do you think we can't even agree on what "decency" is? For example, why do some think homosexuality is impure while some range from acceptability all the way to indoctrinating 5 year olds? Why do some think questioning the government is wrong? Is racial, class, or social inequality natural and is it a good thing?
What is your idea of an accurate morality test or even a basic personal test with some validity?
>"basic human decency" test with some shoehorned shit about politics
The test gauging your Loyalty appear to you as arbitrary topical politics. While it is not strictly political it is the questions that affect your judgement from day to day decisions, and also show the influence on your possible political leaning and voting patterns. Is that political? Even so it's still important.
>>18104 My boomer dad didn't agree with the butcher when the butcher told him you can get 2 sirloins out of a single cow. That doesn't change the fact that he's a fucking retard and there are 2 sirloins on a cow.
When it comes to truth, whether people disagree on anything is irrelevant. Truth isn't what the majority agrees with you normalfaggot.
>>18113 There are objective facts and subjective opinions, not everything in the world can be explained and proved with scientific rigor. That's why there are different interpretation of the world and how society should be run.
I'm suprised of the Diplomatic Axis, it says I am patriotic when I am not, probably it's cause I interpreted some nationalistic questions as "my group" instead of "my nation", tbqh is there even any difference?
Anyway take the test for fun if you want.
This thread is also for other kind of tests or questionnaires not only political onces, hence why I made it on /l/ and not /pol/.