/l/ - The Lounge

Off-topic discussion

All users of /b/: read >>>/meta/3253
[Make a Post]
[X]





How do we stop this? Nanonymous No.6377 [D][U][F][S][L][A][C] >>6402 >>6413 >>6554
File: 972e6e51402696e9446a01ab0152d663c99864e64fdafeb94dd9d5206e2a02ae.jpg (dl) (995.16 KiB)

How do we make the world stop treating ugly Jewish women like sex goddesses? It's not funny anymore.

Nanonymous No.6379 [D] >>6382

delete this shit hakase

Nanonymous No.6380 [D] >>6381 >>6414

Make up in general has really ruined the image of women. It enables even the ugly women to mask themselves and allows them to whore out. This is the main reason why these "jewess'" are seen as pretty at all is because they put layers of make up on to mask themselves and erasing their insecurities. I believe that make up generally needs to be banned because it shields women who don't take care of themselves under a mask to make it seem like they are healthy. Without it however you see the true personality of the women. I wish that women didn't wear make up its disgusting.

Nanonymous No.6381 [D] >>6383 >>6384 >>6385

>>6380
>make up in general has really ruined the image of women
Make-up is around since civilization. Fuck, women of athens were wearing make-up and what-not.
>ugly women to mask themselves
Why do you see only with eyes? You can't mask that you are ugly and stupid. It's impossible.
>seen as pretty at all is because they put layers of make up
Man with good taste not, other men don't matter.
>generally needs to be banned
You would just see ugly women without make-up. Would it change anything? Yes, ugly people would kill nice people because they wouldn't feel nice.
>I wish that women didn't wear make up
I don't. Ugly women without make-up are just as disguisting as with make-up.

Nanonymous No.6382 [D] >>6383

>>6379
Agreed. Doing your fucking job or BTFO.

Nanonymous No.6383 [D]

>>6381
I really have no arguments against this I was just trying to answer op's question then went on a bit of a tangent.
>>6382
This isn't the worst thread I've seen

Nanonymous No.6384 [D] >>6386

>>6381
>It enables even the ugly women to mask themselves and allows them to whore out.
It's really not hard to see how ugly most of them really are. When I see celeb pictures or meet people all dolled up irl, my reaction is literally: "Even with all these cosmetics and hair treatments this is the best they can do."

Nanonymous No.6385 [D][U][F]
File: 7f46f943e28a8c47fd255fbb29990689acf51f6771f3a606b1062db1064d51ad.jpg (dl) (9.86 KiB)

>>6381 (me)
They intentionally damage their skin and as time passes they have to spend more and more money on skincare and make-up, as they need more of both. It's the same thing with hair bleaching.
And I simply have to quote Yves Rocher - "If you have to test your 'products' on animals, you don't know what you're doing."

Nanonymous No.6386 [D] >>6389

Once you learn to spot foundation, you see it everywhere you look. It's disturbing. I wonder what real people look like
t. born in a city, no escape yet

>>6384
There are a few "pornstars with and without makeup" images. They do magic tricks with makeup.

Nanonymous No.6389 [D] >>6405 >>6412 >>6417

>>6386
>they do magic tricks with makeup
I say bullshit - http://archivecaslytosk.onion/2014.11.12-071758/http://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanhatesthis/33-startling-photos-of-pornstars-with-and-without-their-make
judge for yourself

Nanonymous No.6402 [D] >>6414 >>6416

>>6377
Natalie Portman is an extremely attractive and underrated Jewess, you should've posted Scarlet Johansen.

Nanonymous No.6405 [D]

>>6389
Some look far better without the makeup.
Others look like completely different humans. Google and Facebook AI couldn't connect the before and after images I would think. Some witness protection grade shit.
The make-up faces look a bit plastic and generic, but its certainly a massive difference (and for some that's an improvement)

Nanonymous No.6412 [D] >>6413

>>6389
Most of their increased attractiveness comes just from the shit they put around their eyes. Why didn't women evolve to have dark black lines around their eyes, if it makes them so much more attractive?

Nanonymous No.6413 [D]

>>6377
It's simple anon, you should know the answer to this one. (Hint: it rhymes with mass)
>>6412
>tfw evolved

Nanonymous No.6414 [D]

There are things you can't fix with plastic surgery - like the shape of your legs. As opposed to getting a nosejob to get rid of that Abrahamic look. Looking at the overall figure is effective as well, which is why you get the shoving of thick asses and gigantic tits in your face. How else will genetic cesspools be made to look attractive? But your main issue stems from (((Hollywood))) being heavily marketed towards international consumption. So the usual solution applies.

>>6402
You can already see the "aging like milk" part setting in though. Give it a decade and she'll start looking even more like Ginsburg.

>>6380
I'd argue that abundance of makeup has ruined it. It's been available for almost all of human history, but only relatively recently has so much shit fell on womens' collective heads. They are also more likely to succumb to advertising that suggests not putting on a ton of makeup makes them somehow inferior to the defects that need it to look barely passable.

Nanonymous No.6416 [D]

>>6402
>jewess
>attractive
Fat chance. Look at the shape of that disgusting kike mouth. Repulsive.

Nanonymous No.6417 [D] >>6555

>>6389
God damn, some of them look 70+ years old.

Nanonymous No.6554 [D]

>>6377
She's looking rough. Does she have AIDS? Looks like she has some AIDS-related wasting.
http://archivecaslytosk.onion/YUVOc

Nanonymous No.6555 [D]

>>6417
Working in the sex industry doesn't look like a lot fun after all. Maybe in the 80 and 90 when they were doing 90 minutes movies instead of 15 20 min scenes per week, it was a good job, but not anymore.

Nanonymous No.6557 [D]

Turn off the TV.