>autosaged threads now are completely kicked out of the overboard
>getting this upset over "low quality" with posts on /b/
I suddently realized that I am the shit test. And you admins certainly don't pass it.
Autosaged threads have always been hidden from the overboard, since it was first released.
>hurr durr don't care about quality on /b/ because lolrandomXDDDD
Your threads are worse than cuckchan's threads. Be ashamed.
>>6356 Same.
If this thread DOESN'T get bumplocked, its not a good sign. That said, it shouldn't be bumplocked; the community just shouldn't be bumping it or responding at all.
>>6357 >It should be bumplocked, but it shouldn't be bumplocked
lolwut
Ideally, the second situation you described would occur. However, it's very likely that some easily-triggered morons would bump it up, causing it to clutter up the catalog and the overboard. These morons can't be removed since IP bans don't exist here.
Perhaps some sort of "semi-autosage" functionality should be implemented where each post only bumps the thread up a quarter or half-way up the catalog.
>>6356 Hackass has made it clear that you can have anything on /b/ as long as it aligns with his/her worldview somewhat and users aren't spamming the board as or under the disguise of the poster of a topic. See the reports thread in /meta/
>>6359 Yes that post is a bit contradictory but you said what I was thinking. The second situation is ideal but there may be one or two morons posters bumping it, or worse yet self-bumping.
I guess anything automatic can be exploited by trolls so they need to be autosage'd by moderation. On Tor especially, any popularity-based algorithm can be cheated (so for example using a sage/non-sage ratio to determine an autosage would not be a good idea so long as there are bad actors).
>>6366 >as long as it aligns with his/her worldview somewhat
Can you expand on this part? I have seen someone (likely you) complain about it before but I assumed it was someone pretending to be annoyed about the temporary E R I S ban.
Like I suggested before, it's much better when mod bans are only needed for spammers and outright CP posters. The rest should be ignored and let to sink through the board.
>>6366 What's really the problem is that we have a mentally unstable female hapa as admin. I bet she's just getting her boyfriend/brother/other male relative to write the code and then moderating it because she likes power and attention.
>>6370 Fuck eris. I'm not mad about it, but I've seen the site go down due to some amateur spam and umarufag convincing hakase to shut it down, people endorsing memecoins or random shit on /b/ getting autosaged (do a search for '(A)' on the various boards, outside of the overboard); even harmless shitposts get the treatment too.
Not that I'm in support for shitting up the site with effortless shitposting, but hakase's pretty inconsistent with the enforcement of it.
I've almost never complained about the state of nanochan, but I did make the post in the reports thread. Somehow it got into my head that the threads were too good to be pozzed like that, and forgot it was on /b/. Not like that should excuse anything, after how pigchan's /b/ turned out.
>>6354 <waah waah my one-liners were anchored
From the global rules on the main page:
>Flooding is not permitted. We define flooding as posting similar posts more than 5 times per hour, or posting in such a way that it significantly changes the composition of a board. Common sense will be utilized.
Reducing the quality of the board by posting trash is indeed a significant change in its composition. Thus, your threads should be deleted, if the mods follow the rules. Hapase did nothing wrong.
>inb4 t. hapase
Hakase is good at coding but definitely is just forcing his own view of what kind of imageboard they'd like nanochan to be, and honestly I don't think that's a good thing.
If he wants a specific website, he should just change the rules to reflect that.
>>6444 >hapase explicitly states its a fascist natsoc imageboard
>proceeds to operate it like a fascist natsoc imageboard
<h-hey what the fuck i want freeze peach dude!!! >:((((((
>>>/pigchan/
>>6449 Except she doesn't.
Btw she should rename /pol/ to /ns/, /natsoc/, /nf/ or whatever, /pol/ is very misleading when not-natsoc posters are ostracised and when board rules explicitly state being incorrect is punishable by deleting.
>>6452 >too stupid to read global rules
>implying there's only one version of being politically incorrect and that's being cocksucking zogbot [in the glorious future of white authoritarian hypercapitalistic maximalist state which is worse than bc hinduism, all in the name of muh [vague] Volk]
The name simply doesn't reflect the fact that it is not "Politically Incorrect" board.
>>6453 Your entire argument hinges on the fact that you've arbitrarily decided what /pol/ stands for. It's a pretty weird hill to die on but hey that's just how jews work I guess. Sperg out endlessly about something completely trivial to stir up problems that never existed in the first place. Day of the rope soon kike, be ready.
>>6454 Thanks for affirming me that you are underage troll.
/pol/ stands for the name it is acronym of, "Politically Incorrect". There's no other politics-oriented board and /b/ has "anything goes" rule, therefore can't be moderated while not going against its single rule, resulting in faggots like you not being deleted.
>>6455 >>6458 It's not like there's some precedent set that hapase strictly follows the board headers. You're bring your preconceived ideas of moderation from pozzed imageboards to one where the admin simply doesn't care what you think. /b/ is for posting "anything", but dumb shit gets deleted. /pol/ is for politically incorrect discussion, but obviously subversive threads get deleted. Only weak men fixate this hard on strict rules set out for them and feign ignorance about the culture and norms of their environment. The only person who would need to be told what is or is not allowed on nanochan's /pol/ is the kind of person that is likely to be shot on the day of the rope anyways. Sometimes I let my empathy get the better of me and actually feel kind of bad for you jews. It's like you are physically incapable of sliding without exposing your tired tactics. With how easily people can spot them out it's only a matter of time before the final solution comes about.
>>6471 >Code of Conduct is a great thing!
>I like sucking cocks!
>I LOVE IT!
ABSOLUTE STATE OF /POL/ I never got deleted or moderated, just so you know. It's just that the FUCKIN NAME OF THE BOARD IMPLIES THE BOARD IS ACTUALLY POLITICALLY INCORRECT WHILE IT'S NOT.
I hope you get killed first, nigger, I sure do.
have some "cultural bolshevism", faggot
>>6455 Y'know, when only national socialism is allowed as a political opinion, that pretty much means that within the confines of this website, national socialism is anything but politically incorrect.
Most of the users here have never heard of pigchan, and truly don't care about people claiming otherwise.
If nanochan is not about having free speech, what's the point of having it on tor? Just literally put it anywhere else dude.
>>6490 Privacy/Anonymity. That's a main selling point of nanochan. Lazily moderated pol boards are a dime a dozen.
of course the whole anonymity aspect worked out well for hackase! I don't see how you are convinced this is a natsoc centric site. Is there a thread on another board I missed. Or are you just subconsciously projecting your desires.
>>5492 >>>/pol/1 >2. nano/pol/ is an explicitly National Socialist board. Promotion of anti-white ideologies or pro-jewish ideologies is not permitted.
>3. Do not make more than one thread at a time about an "alternative" ideology such as libertarianism.
Seems like /pol/ isn't so much about politics as it is about national socialism. If only national socialism is allowed on /pol/, it's not politically incorrect.
>>6493 It turns out I've only browsed /pol/ through the overboard and never saw the sticky.
Agreed.
>no anti-white ideals
>hakase is not even european
That's cute
>>6493 I don't have any problem with the latter of rule number two, except not being defined what does anti-white/pro-jewish states for, but
>nano/pol/ is an explicitly National Socialist board
goes straight against the name of the board and third rule too.
And if it's truly National Socialist board, it should ban discussion of all other economic systems except capitalism too. >>6494 hah
>goon niggers still shitposting and rewriting history
It was politically incorrect FOR FOURCHAN. Nothing you're imagining was prohibited from its predecessors or from /b/ for that matter. We're talking about things that moot "i host a board for cp and gore" poole found offensive enough to ban, and he named what that was, each time he closed the boards before it. Explicitly, in his words, it was for "being stormfront". Not topics Bill Maher hosted on his show, you contextless, neoliberal-tier, nigger-kikes.
>>6485 >Code of Conduct is a great thing!
Isn't this exactly what you're arguing for though? Correct me if I'm misinterpreting but you are sperging out because you don't have an exact rule set laid out for you to follow. This is essentially the exact same issue the leftists took with Linux which is why they forced in the CoC. I hope I'm just misunderstanding something because otherwise this is just getting sad.
>>6490 I'll agree that the board should probably be titled something other than "politically incorrect" as its header. It's really not that big of a deal though. But
>Most of the users here have never heard of pigchan
This is just retarded and wrong.
>If nanochan is not about having free speech, what's the point of having it on tor?
Anonymity.
>>6496 Yeah most of this thread are blatant leftypol goons. They'll get bored and leave eventually once they realize a forum of 8 or 9 people isn't worth all this effort.
>>6499 No. I'm arguing for banishing the "natsoc" rule and rule three or for changing the name. That's all. Decide for yourself.
And
> what does anti-white/pro-jewish states for
what I meant by this is when I say "intelligent nigger is better than dumb white", is it anti-white/pro-kike? it sure isn't >not that big of a deal
you express through words faggot
>leftypol goons
Afaik /leftpol/ is /pol/ and /leftypol/ are insects. Not sure if you really want to start accussing someone of something like that other redditor.
>autosaged threads now are completely kicked out of the overboard
>getting this upset over "low quality" with posts on /b/
I suddently realized that I am the shit test. And you admins certainly don't pass it.