/l/ - The Lounge

Non board-specific discussion

[Make a Post]
[X]





Nanonymous No.15285 [D][U][F][S][L][A][C] >>15284 >>15288 >>15354 >>15362
File: 356586dffbef96598309fdceaab9d6a107b04e3cdb272e579f7b4398d43a891f.jpg (dl) (52.13 KiB)
Psychology fags explain this nightmare to me.

>Be me in a dimly lit room
>My old crush appears naked in front of me
>The odd part is that her breasts are tiny, much smaller than the real deal
>She does not come on to me and for some reason we are just friends
>Her father walks in and I attempt to explain the situation to him
>I make a joke about her age, in my dream she is 18 but I say I wouldn't mind if she was 17
>He grabs my teeth and starts breaking them
>I hear the sound of my teeth breaking
>I wake up sweaty and terrified

Nanonymous No.15286 [D] >>15287 >>15294
You want to have sex.
You are a pedophile.
You feel afraid of society judging you for it, you feel oppressed.
Somehow you are very conscious about your teeth health.

Maybe. Tell me if that makes sense.

Nanonymous No.15287 [D] >>15294 >>15295
>>15286
>You want to have sex.

Yes, I do, I have been wanting to hate fuck her ever since we stopped talking years ago

>You are a pedophile. You feel afraid of society judging you for it, you feel oppressed.

No. I am definitely not a pedo. We met when she was 17 and I was 19 so hardly hebephilia and far from pedophilia. I will admit that I am still attracted to her 17 year old image today.

>Somehow you are very conscious about your teeth health. Maybe. Tell me if that makes sense.

My teeth are great. Most likely the fear comes from American history X curb stomp teeth scene. I am not afraid of death but torture scares me

Nanonymous No.15288 [D] >>15295
>>15285
>My old crush appears naked in front of me
This is the meat. You are stuck in the past. So is your mental and sexual development.

THIS THREAD IS NOW A DREAM PARSING THREAD.. lets salvage this throwaway thread.

Nanonymous No.15291 [D] >>15296
Teeth breaking is a pretty common theme in dreams, I think it has to do with anxiety.

Nanonymous No.15294 [D] >>15296 >>15362
>>15286
>17
>pedophilia
No.
>>15287
>17
>hebephilia
No.

Learn what words mean before you use them, dumbfucks.

Nanonymous No.15295 [D] >>15297
>>15287
> No. I am definitely not a pedo.
Maybe not, you know best.
I'd just not brush the possibility so quickly.
> Most likely the fear comes from American history X curb stomp teeth scene.
There are lots of types of torture, yet you got stuck with that. It could be that the scene happened to be the most impressive for you, but you still could be overfocused on teeth.

>>15288
>You are stuck in the past. So is your mental and sexual development.
Interesting theory, colleague. Are you that sure about our subject's mental development though?

>THIS THREAD IS NOW A DREAM PARSING THREAD.. lets salvage this throwaway thread.
I had the dream the other day when I was about to shit myself while dreaming inside of a dream, so when I woke up to another dream I got full pants of shit, but when I finally woke in panic I realized there was no shit and I didn't even want to go! That was some clearly bizzarre experience.
Though that episode was a final to a long beautiful dream where I was wandering around the land, by the seashore, there was a lot of sun, and a warm, windy day with clouds rapidly passing by. I was having some adventures I don't quite remember, sleeping, swimming and feeling awesome. I do love to spend my time wandering around.

Nanonymous No.15296 [D] >>15298 >>15302
>>15291
>teeth dreams
I barely have those. It feels really odd.

>>15294
>No.
I got that impression mostly to the fact that she was flat, and that he stated her age awkwardly as if he was in court or something.
Anyway I'm pretty sure all sex with minors gets lumped together under one big "pedo" umbrella, which is obviously wrong, but since the age of his crush wasn't clear anyway I found it acceptable to use a generic word.
Also do note that he is probably much older now, and wants to go back to have sex with a memory who has a mental development of at most 17-year-old, which is the main moral argument for "protecting children" from that - they are easily fooled.

Nanonymous No.15297 [D][U][F] >>15298 >>15300
File: 954ebaade3c2b3d26f43873592e775a568e1b72e2094505573aa7c9b0a3bb216.jpg (dl) (221.79 KiB)
>>15295
>shitty dream ception
FECES! Feces have layers. "Shitters have layers.
Ya get it. We both have layers!"
You also have pretty dreams afterward because thats how post-shits feel.

>DREAM PARS
I've been having many dreams where I can remember very detailed and coherent conversations. Albeit not sensible or plausible normie talks but good ones. I literally cited Charles Murray in one or FBI Crime stats *cringe*. I've also had flying dreams where the most effective way to float and glide was doing a Roman Salute. I hovered around my city and saw everything so vividly. One dream was at day, the other by night.

The lights, drunkards exiting the bars, police chasing down niggers, and firemen extinguishing fires.

What does this mean?

Nanonymous No.15298 [D]
>>15296
>barely have teeth dreams

>>15297 (me)
Same. Never had any teeth dreams in my life but have had plenty of anxiety.

Nanonymous No.15300 [D]
>>15297
>What does this mean?
That means that you are a dangerous white supremacist terrorist with mind powers, and that the glow is at your heels, and that you're an orange bolt of lighting passing everything in sight, and basically you are fucked now. Tell us where you live kid.

Nanonymous No.15302 [D][U][F] >>15305
File: 7a8cfdeedb36dcb28c7b4159313c73c7a7f6e55623567ab3f1af506836cb5776.jpg (dl) (80.42 KiB)
>>15296
>she was flat
So is Cara Delevigne.
>Anyway I'm pretty sure all sex with minors gets lumped together under one big "pedo" umbrella,
Sure, by morons. Morons believe lots of stupid things, like in the validity of horoscopes, that antibiotics can treat viral infections, and that anyone the second they turn 18 is a "pedo" if they're attracted to anyone 17 years, 364 days, 23 hours, 59 minutes, 59 seconds old or younger. But I don't want to believe that you're a moron. I want to believe that you're an intelligent person who can use words correctly.
>Also do note that he is probably much older now
Assumption. Also, how much is "much"? Also, irrelevant. Whether he's 19 or 90, wanting to have sex with a 17 year old isn't pedophilia. Or hebephilia. Or illegal in most U.S. states and most of the world. Whether it's a good idea is another matter entirely, and it's not what's under discussion. You realize the person in question is no longer 17?
>wants to go back to have sex with a memory
I'll admit, you have me here. I definitely don't support having sex with memories. We must protect them from the sexual advances of perverted nanochanners. #StopStatutoryMemoryRape #MeToo
>mental development of at most 17-year-old
Women never develop mentally beyond 17 or so. Read Schopenhauer's On Women.
>which is the main moral argument for "protecting children" from that
Are you trying to make a moral argument that a child in a dream needs to be protected? Also, while 17 year olds are minors, they are not children. Stop infantilizing them.
>they are easily fooled
So are lots of adults, but it's not illegal to fuck them.

Nanonymous No.15305 [D] >>15307
>>15302
>So is Cara Delevigne.
We both don't know how flat and "child-like" his vision was, so it's meaningless.
>But I don't want to believe that you're a moron. I want to believe that you're an intelligent person who can use words correctly.
I don't care what you think. I will use conventional words as I see fit.
>Assumption. Also, how much is "much"?
Not an assumption. He said "years". It usually means several years, so he could easily be under 30 at least.
>Whether he's 19 or 90, wanting to have sex with a 17 year old isn't pedophilia.
>and it's not what's under discussion. You realize the person in question is no longer 17?
It wasn't exactly 17 as the vision was altered somewhat. When I called him a pedophile I wasn't implying he was into <10-year-olds, though it's irrelevant now, because it's really far fetched to assume stuff like this without any feedback.
>Women never develop mentally beyond 17 or so. Read Schopenhauer's On Women.
I wouldn't take some 19th century dead dude's authority osn women matter. Also, if I remember correctly, his view on women is not strictly consistent and that he believes women can indeed develop their potential, and in a sense, can do it beyond what men can. "I have not yet spoken my last word about women. I believe that if a woman succeeds in withdrawing from the mass, or rather raising herself above the mass, she grows ceaselessly and more than a man."
>Are you trying to make a moral argument that a child in a dream needs to be protected?
Nah.
>Also, while 17 year olds are minors, they are not children. Stop infantilizing them.
Minors have way too many restrictions imposed on them by the society, so they actually cannot lead a full-fledged adult life. That's why they are treated as children and while this may be stupid, it kinda makes sense. Don't fuck around if you're not responsible for yourself, i.e. if worst comes to worst, other people have to deal with your bullshit. Though I might agree that the age of full responsibility should be lowered. 14 y.o sounds really reasonable to be frank.
>So are lots of adults, but it's not illegal to fuck them.
I will repeat myself, adults are supposed to deal with full consequences. Kids are not.

Also let's not turn this thread into yet another minor laws discussion. It is way too big for such a thread. Go create a thread on /pol/ and I might come there. I probably will.

Nanonymous No.15307 [D] >>15308 >>15314
>>15305
>We both don't know how flat
Irrelevant. Also, he never said she was flat. Just that her breasts were smaller than in real life. "Flat" is a term you introduced. You're reading into it.
>and "child-like" his vision was
Nothing in his description of the dream justifies assuming that the 18 year old in the dream (which he said she was, in spite of his joke to her father) was "child-like" at all. Again, you're reading into it.
>I don't care what you think.
Same desu.
>I will use conventional words as I see fit.
Ah. Moron, then. You're so averse to just admitting that you said something stupid that you double down on doing it. Most people do that; I think it's probably a universal in human psychology. I'm sure I do. But it's amusing to see someone do it.
>Not an assumption.
>He said "years". It usually means several years
O! irony!
>It wasn't exactly 17 as the vision was altered somewhat
Having reread what OP wrote, you are correct. It wasn't 17 at all. It was 18.
>When I called him a pedophile I wasn't implying he was into <10-year-olds
Then you were using the word like an uneducated moron, as noted above. Which is fine, I just had unrealistic expectations of you.
>I wouldn't take some 19th century dead dude's authority osn women matter
>Proceeds to quote the 19th century dead dude.
Is this real life?
>I believe that if a woman succeeds in withdrawing from the mass, or rather raising herself above the mass
Ah, and this happens so commonly. It's rare for a man to raise himself above the mass (as you've amply demonstrated for us). It's nearly unheard of for a woman.
>minors...actually cannot lead a full-fledged adult life
Nobody said or implied they could.
>I will repeat myself, adults are supposed to deal with full consequences.
I will repeat myself: some adults can't. Because they're "easily fooled" or not very bright. Do you propose a law prohibiting sexual contact with adults who are "easily fooled"? If not, you're a hypocrite.
>Also let's not turn this thread into yet another minor laws discussion. It is way too big for such a thread. Go create a thread on /pol/ and I might come there.
But it's not really a minor laws discussion, and I have no interest in changing e.g. age of consent laws. It's a discussion between someone who has unthinkingly imbibed every trite, mass-media sentiment about human intellectual and sexual development in childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood (that'd be you) and someone who has thought about things more broadly and deeply (that'd be me). I apologize for calling you a moron; that was unwarranted. However, I don't intend to continue this conversation because you have absolutely nothing interesting to say on this matter. I could pull any random dipshit off the street and hear pretty much the same things you've said in this thread. You bring nothing to the table.

sage for way offtopic. Sorry we shit on your thread, OP. I'll be quiet now.

Nanonymous No.15308 [D] >>15311
>>15307
And then I forget to sage. Domine, miserere mei, quoniam peccavi.

Nanonymous No.15309 [D] >>15315
Don't fight kids!
hebephiles are based though

Analize my dream of yesterday instead.
The first thing that i can remember is that i am at my grandparents house, but the layout of the house is all wrong, some parts are incomplete, literally planks of wood on nothing, other parts are too luxurious while granps house is really modest, the house has two floors while in reality it has only one, it's pretty surreal.
During the dream i interact with my grandparents and they seems happy, i'm sleeping in their house for the night it seems, i'm sleeping in one of the incomplete parts, it's almost not even a room, with holes in the walls and the floor.
When i am about to go to bed, which is just an old blanket on the ground, it starts to rain heavily, then it becomes a thunderstorm, i take an umbrella to protect myself from the rain, but a thunder strikes on the umbrella and shocks me and sets me on fire.
I don't remember exactly what happended after, but it was really umpleasant the part where i burn alive, there was also a girl but i can't remember her face.

I often have surreal dreams where i am in familiar places that are different in ways that makes absolutely no sense like in this one, often people that i know behave in really strange ways usually hurting me or just being crazy, sometime in sexual ways in particular my sister.
I also have those teeth dreams, but the worst are the ones where i get stabbed and i can somehow feel the pain and the blade going inside my body slowly.
I almost always have nightmares, it's rare to have a good dream for me.

Nanonymous No.15311 [D] >>15312
>>15308
>hebephiles are based though
Not really. The logical reason Western societies hate any form of philia is that it's usually exploits the less mentally matured person. We usually want people to build families together and have the most healthy offspring. Older competitors destroy this dynamic. Just think if it was your kids? Pedo Manchildren never think like this because they are mentally children that won't have children. I personally think that black and white laws like a 1 year difference equates to statutory rape is stupid. However, I propose that after a certain point the penalties should just increase depending on the age gap relationships before 18 years of age.
Senior to Freshman? Meh, mow the law and pick up garbage. "Don't do it again." Senior to Middleschooler? Juvenile Detention and Rehabilitation. Starcucks manchild employee and Middleschooler? (Personally death in my opinion)


>sexual ways in particular my sister
God so many people on this board are willing to share uncomfortable stuff like this? Deciphering this shit won't make it any more obvious than it already is.

Nanonymous No.15312 [D]
>>15311
>a 1 year difference equates to statutory rape
Maybe in burgerland. Where I live there's a 2 year grace period for kids below 16.

Nanonymous No.15313 [D]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent

Nanonymous No.15314 [D] >>15317
If you wanted to stop the conversation, then you should have.

>>15307
>You're reading into it.
>was "child-like" at all. Again, you're reading into it.
Not that much. Unless her breasts were weirdly surreally disproportional and the whole picture of a human body just falls apart. "Tiny" is the word, you know.
>Same desu.
And yet you proceed to teach me about shit I already know or whatever. You are either a troll or a moron.
>Ah. Moron, then. You're so averse to just admitting that you said something stupid
I don't think using the word "pedophile" as a proposition here is stupid. Just a bit far-fetched maybe.
As for medical term vs legal/conventional term for this shit, then again, if you weren't a moron, you wouldn't sperg out about it over half a thread. People use words as they like. I'm not going for hebephilia or ephebophilia (the OP's case) as a term here if I can use an umbrella term.
>O! irony!
30 y.o. vs <17 (15? 13?). The irony. If pedophilia was defined solely as the age your sweetheart tells you, then you wouldn't be in trouble. Though mostly the part where he talks to the father did it for me.
>Is this real life?
This was mainly for you to question your own beliefs. Schopenhauer didn't even do a real scientific research, Schopenhauer did make his observations in the era when women were oppressed, and you quote him for no good reason, really.
>Ah, and this happens so commonly.
Irrelevant. You were talking that "women NEVER develop mentally past 17". Well, I guess men rarely develop mentally past 12, or we wouldn't have this moronic conversation, hehe.
>Nobody said or implied they could.
If you cannot lead an adult life, you're a child. You said not to call them children, so it's a counterargument.
>I will repeat myself: some adults can't. Because they're "easily fooled" or not very bright. Do you propose a law prohibiting sexual contact with adults who are "easily fooled"? If not, you're a hypocrite.
If you are a legal adult, you legally have to deal with consequences, though of course you can opt to not to. A minor is defended by the law to a certain degree which makes some vital problems go away. A minor is a projection of the parents' will to a certain degree as well.
On a tangential note, there are talks about infantilizing of the modern society because of welfare or whatever else your government does for you. It is to further illustrate the difference between children and adults.
>who has unthinkingly imbibed every trite, mass-media sentiment about human intellectual and sexual development in childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood
I believe our conversation didn't even go that far. I just defended the usage of a word "pedophile" on a specific occasion. Also it's you who talked about women mental development while sperging out over the use of the word like a broken calculator. And guess what? Nobody even asked you. What a glorious site. What a demonstration of maturity.

>and I have no interest in changing e.g. age of consent laws
So, you want to bitch about them and the society standpoint on it, yet never engage into a legal or whatever fight for it. You know what? You are even worse than I thought. You are a pathetic piece of shit. Do me a favor and never talk about this on nanochan ever again, OK?

Nanonymous No.15315 [D] >>15359
>>15309
I don't know what to say about your dream other than that your family matters a lot for you, but you could enjoy the game called "Hello Neighbor".

> I often have surreal dreams where i am in familiar places that are different in ways that makes absolutely no sense like in this one
I thought vidya games cured the "it makes no sense" bias, at least for dimensional concerns. Or I dunno, just learn maths and read Alice in Wonderland.

Nanonymous No.15317 [D][U][F]
File: a928dd2af5521e0b36f07aa7e14948a526a6599dc60ecc3a784e320e69d9ae41.png (dl) (47.25 KiB)
>>15314
>Do me a favor and never talk about this on nanochan ever again, OK?
>OK?
S-starfag? Is that you?

Nanonymous No.15332 [D]
Explain this to me:
I'm walking in beautiful, as if gruzian valley with women in her 60s. She's mere shape throwing shadow and visited me only to tell me my dad died as she was his last sponsor. Nothing happens, we just walk through the valley. We haven't said a word.
Scene shifts, we are about to go sleep in big white bed in sun filled room. I don't know whether I just woke up or whether I'm going to sleep actually. The only image in my head then becomes her white lace panties. She had nothing else as she was lying on the pure white blankets. I don't know how was her ass nor her pussy nor anything else. She was just a vessel for them. I'm not sure what happened then or if anything happened at all (I think I fucked her), but she's suddenly 18, radiant and naked. Day became night, she's day, she's sun.
Then there's no me. Nothing sees only her slender neck, but it has either rope markings or as if her head was once severed and then sewn back to her body, red-white, more white than red stitches, or choke markings. Whether it was her head or her body nothing doesn't know, she could've been made up of multiple persons and that's it. That's where it ends.

Nanonymous No.15354 [D]
>>15285
Dream symbolism is, in the end, always subjective. That makes it tough to interpret just from a description.
What was your relationship (or lack thereof) with your crush like? How about your father?
As far as teeth breaking, that's fairly common in dreams, it doesn't necessarily mean anything besides your father hurting you. But again, you're the best judge of that.

Nanonymous No.15359 [D]
>>15315
>hello neighbour
So when?

Nanonymous No.15362 [D] >>15451
>>15285
>not fucking crush
>get beaten up by her dad instead
>>15294
>underage is not pedo
white people

Nanonymous No.15386 [D] >>15387
Why are teeth dreams common? I've been burned by fire, fell of cliffs, been shot by guns, and even stabbed in face with a katana. I have never had anything happen with my teeth.

What are you guys doing to get them?

Nanonymous No.15387 [D]
>>15386
Why are they common?

Nanonymous No.15451 [D]
>>15362
>underage
Flappy burger has no right to tell anybody who's underage or not.