Before we start, let's define these two words:
normie - someone normal, with normal tastes, normal behavior, normal thinking; typical person; NPC (non-playable character)
anon - not normie
That's the simple definition and I think we can all agree it's true.
Everything becomes problematic when we acknowledge there are people that use 4chan or other "imageboards" that are clearly filled with normalfag content. Or consume normalfag media. Or [insert normal thing here]. That's what I can't grasp.
There's no single indicator showing who's normie and who's anon. Watching anime doesn't mean one is anon because there are lots of normals watching it (do you think industry would be so profitable if only anons consumed it? Think again).
Now I want to have a discussion how we deal with this problem. I know it will be subjective because all of us have different criterium what consists of normalfaggotry. For example, I think using youtube is normie or using social media. Now anon #2 will say anyone not using *BSD is normie. For anon #3 not having collection of rare things is considered normie. And so on.
I think having friends IRL is pretty normie. Some people will say "but I only talk to my friends about DnD and video games". Well, every normie has different things they're interested in. And DnD and video games are fairly normal these days. So you're pretty normal. Posting on imageboards is completely different from having friends, because you don't share any details about yourself besides what's strictly required, and you disappear into the ether as soon as you're done posting avatarfags begone. I think anons are people who post on imageboards instead of hanging out with friends. They use imageboards because every other platform like discord simulates real social interaction, which they're incapable/unwilling to perform. Maybe if you just have a couple friends and they don't invite you to many things you can be an anon too, idk.
>how to deal with this problem
The problem is that normie posters develop styles, and then become friends with each other, and then scare off anons. You need to detect these faggots, then isolate them to their own private chatroom where they can make gay love with each other and no one will notice. On a tor imageboard this is basically impossible, because you have no way of detecting when two posts come from the same person. You'd need to ban VPNs as well, probably for viewing threads even, so that normies can't tell when they've been isolated. I'm not sure it's worth it, because you would mostly just be making things less anonymous, which would scare off anons. Better for the admin to just selectively ban normalfaggotry, to make normies know they are unwanted. Another tactic is to post a discord link at the top of every thread, which will attract normies like moths to light where they can be doxxed and killed.
There's no line to draw, because normalfag isn't an absolute measurement. On a horizontal scale, any person closer to the normalfag end of the scale is considered a normalfag, and vice versa. Redditors and twitter users regularly use the term normie to describe others too.
If you want a strict definition of normalfag, you need a new word for it.
All women are normies because they have a hive mind following and there's very little uniqueness in them--their hobbies are eating, sleeping, laughing, NetFlix, shopping, and cock sampling.
All men that can't or refuse to think for themselves and would rather follow/play the rigged games society wants them to play are normies--that takes out all men except zeta men.
Info about zeta males:
https://en.wikimannia.org/Zeta_male https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Zeta%20Male
>>12769 >making gay love in chats
If i understand you correctly, you want to advertise trannie servies at top top of every thread like a night light so the bad normalwangs cant hide under your bed and do gay love chats. Do you realise how mentally ill you are?
You don't. Everything you do is completely normal.
>They use imageboards because every other platform like discord simulates real social interaction.
People use imageboards because it's supposed to be fun, not because they don't have friends, projector. I still remember trolling back when 8chan wasn't completely reddit just to show screens to friends, while at class.
I see it as looking like the picture; the X axis is psychological opposition to pop-culture, Y axis is suggestibility resistance. The segmentation between the points on the line represent different discussion platforms. Within each segment, the maximal normie of that group is represented by the extreme left of that segment and meme masters to the extreme right. Positions on the line are not analogous to political ideology. A negative suggestibility resistance value would be representative of the NPC meme.
Before we start, let's define these two words:
normie - someone normal, with normal tastes, normal behavior, normal thinking; typical person; NPC (non-playable character)
anon - not normie
That's the simple definition and I think we can all agree it's true.
Everything becomes problematic when we acknowledge there are people that use 4chan or other "imageboards" that are clearly filled with normalfag content. Or consume normalfag media. Or [insert normal thing here]. That's what I can't grasp.
There's no single indicator showing who's normie and who's anon. Watching anime doesn't mean one is anon because there are lots of normals watching it (do you think industry would be so profitable if only anons consumed it? Think again).
Now I want to have a discussion how we deal with this problem. I know it will be subjective because all of us have different criterium what consists of normalfaggotry. For example, I think using youtube is normie or using social media. Now anon #2 will say anyone not using *BSD is normie. For anon #3 not having collection of rare things is considered normie. And so on.
Where we draw line?