/meta/ - Board Meta

[Make a Post]
[X]






Something has to be done! Nanonymous No.5543 [D][S][L][A][C] >>5547 >>5588 >>5745
Something has to be done about the endless "botnet" derailing happening in /g/ posts. It's causing legitimate discussion to be stifled in favor of defeatism, "the jews", "everything is botnet" etc.
Please ban this topic from showing up in threads unless it is a thread explicitly about security.

Nanonymous No.5544 [D]
STFU worrthless fagggot

Nanonymous No.5545 [D]
I agree, except when "everything is botnet" comes with a explanation on why the anon thinks that.
For the /pol/ slangs, they should have been banned long ago.

Nanonymous No.5546 [D] >>5552 >>5554 >>5745
I can't be bothered to enforce bans on random things, if it's something that derails a thread report it. Use global meta thread next time, a fucking thread died for this.

Nanonymous No.5547 [D] >>5554
>>5543
>certain talking point need to be removed
Definitely hapafag but if not. No one cares about you losing arguments or losing focus in a thread. Content and quality control is a community effort as well as a moderation one. The only problems around here happen to repeats of the same topics and inefficiency.

In otherwords, stop responding to shitty posts. faggot

Nanonymous No.5552 [D] >>5554
>>5546
>I can't be bothered
An apathetic admin? I've seen incompetent ones but this is a new low.

Nyanonymous ## Global Volunteer No.5554 [D] >>5563
>>5552
(>>5546 is me not admin)
I'm just saying that it's a pain in the ass to enforce, since at the end of the day it's yours truly that would have to deal with all the resulting drama and i do this in my free time, i think i have a say in the matter.
We already have a rule against derail, so again just report and it will be decided case by case. (>>>/l/10558)
>>5547
>Content and quality control is a community effort as well as a moderation one.
I agree with this, there's a limit to what the moderation can do, meddling too much it's often counterproductive, building a good community is not something that the administration alone can achieve it's also up to the users.

Nanonymous No.5558 [D][U][F]
File: daebb2e5219c22272e72507818cd65bd8fc46109aac8550862efcb85b7ed0fed.jpg (dl) (233.03 KiB)
>no examples of the posts he considers to be offending so no one can address his argument directly
>blanket whinging about a massive issue within society and the entire tech industry
>"Something has to be done!"
>muh defeatism

sakamoto ## Nanochan Administrator No.5562 [D] >>5567 >>5571 >>5577
>>5561
Alright then, my official stance with regards to your false flagging and psyops is this: Any post on nanochan which could, in good faith, be construed as being made by asukafag, or any post which furthers the current agendas of asukafag, will be deleted at the full discretion of the moderation. If you look like asukafag and you smell like asukafag, you will be treated as one. Yes, this means the "ban" now also includes those sympathetic to, or those with the same agendas as asukafag. Your continued patronage is not worth the effort required to accomodate you.

Nanonymous No.5563 [D]
>>5554
>We already have a rule against derail, so again just report and it will be decided case by case.
This. Wordfilters are for fags. If the post is shit, report it.

Nanonymous No.5567 [D]
>>5562
ryokaidesu

Nanonymous No.5571 [D] >>5594
>>5562
Hey retard, literally no one at any point has ever been opposed to a hard line stance on anything. In fact multiple people have wanted you to take a hard line stance with your moderation. Do you know what that means? It means actually fucking communicating what the fuck you considered offending behavior to be. No one knows what the fuck it is you consider the "agenda" of [namefag] to be. You haven't defined anything, you just delete every post that tries to understand exactly what the fuck it is you're trying to accomplish.

A post got deleted for talking about national socialism, that is apparently a talking point of namefag, is national socialism now an offending post topic? If it is then fucking say so. People want to know what they can and can not say so they can either post without fear of having their posts deleted or so they can just leave this board if the things they were interesting in discussing are now "bannable".

COMMUNICATE YOU DUMB FAGGOT

Nanonymous No.5577 [D]
>>5562
This post is hapa tier. I stand by my scripted drama theory.

Nanonymous No.5588 [D][U][F]
File: 2685742bd1c13bfd5e03997b63017360900c7caadd4a4bbff5eb6b78a8020287.jpg (dl) (50.42 KiB)
>>5543
Almost all of /g/'s userbase is from 8/tech/, what did you expect OP?

sakamoto ## Nanochan Administrator No.5594 [D]
>>5571
>COMMUNICATE YOU DUMB FAGGOT
No, actually I think I've been communicating a bit too much. Your writing styles continue to reek of asukafag, and you're the only person outside of asukafag continuning to whine about this. I won't be responding to your posts anymore, and if you continue to make any more replies I'd advise the mods to delete them as soon as possible, as I will. My definition of such a post would be anyone directly arguing with the moderation with regards to "[namefags]" or "avatarfags" for the time being.
I hate to say this, as this goes directly against everything I believed the moderators of a community should be, but if you feel any amount of butthurt as a result of this decision, feel free to leave any time.
>asukafag still this salty about umarufag being appointed

Nanonymous No.5598 [D]
>>5596
Moderation is always arbitrary. Also, just in case people reading this missed the other post in the middle of the thread - there is currently 0 examples from cockmongling OP or anybody else of the behavior they are describing. I'm deliberately ignoring other faggotry since it's not related to the topic at hand. I wish /meta/ was relegated to /pol/ status of being hidden from overboard, because it feels like visiting some gay Discord server instead of an imageboard with all the drama being bumped to the top.

Nanonymous No.5599 [D] >>5600 >>5615
Just wanted to say that entering nanochan is becoming a unpleasant experience.
For some reason, there's too many retards replying. Don't know if that's an asukafag plot and I don't care at all if it is or not.
I just feel tired of getting into a thread and see such low effort posts, when I myself put at least some time/research in trying to communicate some knowledge I have to others. I end up with the impression that it's a unilateral exchange here and that I'm not getting anything anymore out of it. Not even parasocial relationships.

I can point examples of these "low-effort" posts, if needed be. But OP description is accurate.

Nanonymous No.5600 [D] >>5602
>>5599
And yet you don't. There are no examples with 13 replies and counting, why even say "if need be"? List them. Or even better - read the previous attempt at this shit in the global meta >>>/meta/8 starting from 5052.

Nanonymous No.5601 [D][U][F]
File: bcfae89a645612a959664ad7335a07eef5ae86c24fd1ff6f52c923479419bbba.jpg (dl) (309.10 KiB)
>Something has to be done
<my official stance with regards to your false flagging and psyops is this: Any post on nanochan which could, in good faith, be construed as being made by asukafag, or any post which furthers the current agendas of asukafag, will be deleted
There is nothing to be done. A single shitposter on this board went from trending topic to obsessive collective focus. I doubt we're going to recover tbqh. With that said, please don't reward said shitposter's efforts by going to his board(s?) either.

Nanonymous No.5602 [D] >>5615 >>5634 >>5745
>>5600
Have you thought that maybe people are tired of exposing the obvious?

To give some example from this last week:
>Linux spyware thread
>messes kernel with microcode right in the OP
>uses /pol/ slangs
https://nanochanqwrwtmamtnhkfwbbcducc4i62ciss4byo6f3an5qdkhjngid.onion/g/7752.html

>Thread about RaspPi
>retard spams "Trust Zone", without any explanation:
https://nanochanqwrwtmamtnhkfwbbcducc4i62ciss4byo6f3an5qdkhjngid.onion/g/7811.html#post7823

>Thread about C programming
>retard says it's "botnet"
https://nanochanqwrwtmamtnhkfwbbcducc4i62ciss4byo6f3an5qdkhjngid.onion/g/7784.html#post7845

>same thread
>retard talks /pol/ retardation
https://nanochanqwrwtmamtnhkfwbbcducc4i62ciss4byo6f3an5qdkhjngid.onion/g/7784.html#post7847

>thread about GCC
>retard does this kind of shit
https://nanochanqwrwtmamtnhkfwbbcducc4i62ciss4byo6f3an5qdkhjngid.onion/g/7636.html#post7695

>thread about config files
>"spotted the pajeet"
https://nanochanqwrwtmamtnhkfwbbcducc4i62ciss4byo6f3an5qdkhjngid.onion/g/7632.html#post7676

>meshnet thread
>"darpa shills and the amerimutts"
https://nanochanqwrwtmamtnhkfwbbcducc4i62ciss4byo6f3an5qdkhjngid.onion/g/7706.html#post7711



Do you need more? I'm tired, really. I don't get in this place to see trash like this.
There's about 4 anons here that are really good and I would really like to have conversation with them. But I can't anymore because these monkeys trash everything.

Nanonymous No.5603 [D] >>5605
We should unironically have listened to asukafag when he said to delete /pol/.

Nanonymous No.5605 [D]
>>5603
>using the word "unironically"
Back to 4chaim with you, kike

Nanonymous No.5615 [D] >>5617
>>5599 >>5602
It's the same as it's always been, even during the brief period when /pol/ was gone. If you dislike the culture of nano/g/, I'd suggest lainchan as an alternative.

Nanonymous No.5617 [D] >>5620
>>5615
>It's the same and always has been
No you faggot. It started getting that way when pigchan went down. Then hakase left because he saw the place going to shit, and the new admin hasn't even tried to fix the problems yet.
This place is fucking trash. I'm leaving as soon as there's somewhere to leave to. And lainchan is not an option. Full of (((commies))).

Nanonymous No.5620 [D] >>5624
>>5617
Remember when hakase used to call out posts like these with
<hurr you just lost a valuable customer!!1!!111!!
http://nanochanqwrwtmamtnhkfwbbcducc4i62ciss4byo6f3an5qdkhjngid.onion/meta/430.html#post611
http://nanochanqwrwtmamtnhkfwbbcducc4i62ciss4byo6f3an5qdkhjngid.onion/meta/252.html#post268
Good times.

Nanonymous No.5624 [D] >>5745
>>5620
Hapase was really the best wasn't she
>cute girl
>programmer
>competent admin
>funny
and now she's gone forever

Nanonymous No.5634 [D]
>>5602
>Have you thought that maybe people are tired of exposing the obvious?
I have. But when you probe the "tired" people, they turn out to be full of shit every single time. By either being too new or butthurt about their pet topic having a couple of shitpost replies.

>7752
Thread's already been reported in the appropriate meta a couple of days ago.
>/pol/ slangs
Aside from the OP itself, which is 4cuck tier bait?

>7811
Very recent development, this poster in particular is probably Willy himself adapting a different strategy.

>7784
I'll say the same thing as last time. Look at the fucking posts surrounding it. Only you and 2 other monkeys took the bait, the conversation went on as usual. Stupid. Nigger.
>same thread
Zero replies. Do you need medication every time you see a post that reminds you of /pol/?

>7636
I once again remind you to weigh useful reply ratio to this. The shitpost itself branched into Clang on BSDs.

>7632
>7706
>completely ignored post in the middle of a thread
See above.

>Do you need more? I'm tired, really.
I need examples that actually managed to derail the thread. You gave me 2 - one of which is a fuckup on the jannies' part, the other is a result of some sperg having an inflamed bout of schizophrenia because of mental illness season. None of which happened until about a week ago.
>I don't get in this place to see trash like this.
What, you join an imageboard on a network where you can't mitigate spam via IP or have any handles and you, in the middle of forced drama faggotry, are surprised that things get out of hand sometimes? The more you delete, the more feedback and excitement you will provide to the people casually baiting. It won't work against some hardline retards, but do you at least understand this?
>But I can't anymore because these monkeys trash everything.
It's not them. It's you. This is not a mall and you are not a middle aged cunt looking for a manager. Step away from the keyboard, take a deep breath and continue replying to posts that are worth it. And use the report thread for things that warrant it, not what gets on your feels. I'm not sure how, but you'll manage it.

Nanonymous No.5745 [D] >>5780
>>5543
shut the fuck up retard. windows 10 is trash in every way conceivable, but instead of explaining it to retards like you every time, it's easier to just say botnet
also it's /tech/, not /g/
>>5546
meanwhile, log is filled with random bans for random bullshit on every board
>>5602
I agree those posts are retarded, but there are retards on every forum on the internet.
>>5624
yeah i liked the original site better tbh

Nanonymous No.5780 [D]
>>5745
>also it's /tech/, not /g/
o i am laffin