>>5587 >300 IQ posts, great discussion
Where did you come from that nanochan seems to be so good in your eyes?
I still desperately search for /lit/ or /philosophy/ board/forum but can't find any. The internet is quite hostile to anything not visual and even more to anything that can't be easily consumed and requires knowledge.
>>5590 It's because image boards and other places on the internet get infiltrated by people motivated and funded to create chaos and division, while thinking they're doing good, while blaming the results of that on us:
>>5546 >>5582 >>5583 <huehue, you guys can't organize can you, it's your fault though
>>5590 >>5592 >The internet is quite hostile to anything [...] that can't be easily consumed and requires knowledge.
The reason for that may be related to efficiency (convenience, time): if it's too arcane it may not be worth the time. What I'm saying is that "hostility" may be just a natural reaction to word bloat, like when you detect somebody's purposefully wasting your time.
>>5594 Sure, people don't take the time to read anymore, but I don't think people are hostile to a well-written, informative wall of text, they simply ignore it and spam their opinions and shitty memes which causes those people to not even attempt to put much effort in the posts they make and move on, leave the place.
And of course, (anonymous) message boards are often a terrible medium because it is so easy to derail, shit up, or to cause discord on, and the moderation and ownership of those platforms are often corrupted, do not have our best interest at heart, and are controlled (opposition).
>>5597 Haha, I know it's a bit shitty to blame everything on a single factor. Excuse me for my retardation.
>>5598 >discussions aren't really that high-tier here
It's as common as there are "high-tier" people, I myself are of average intelligence, certainly not "high-tier", and I'm a quite active user on here.
>>5594 >the whole post
yes and no, the problem lies within the medium itself
While I don't believe ADHD exists, the internet is probably, just like any other visual media, adhd trigger; you are distracted by everything and the way how things started moving so fuckin fast since comunications boom, you just don't want your attention to be locked on something worthwhile that needs more time spent on and something you can't immediatly share with others while there are many other things seemingly worthwhile you can invest your time in, only more easy to grasp and escapist in nature.
Internet is hostile to elaborate things.
I wouldn't care if there weren't any /lit/ boards, but finding someone, say, well-versed in hegel outside of universities is nearly impossible, and even there it's hard when most people read rand and now they see themselves as philosophers >>5596 Take /film/ on 8chan as example. It's rather slow board considered patrician. It's /tv/ without da jooos. Yet 90% of all posts are shitposts or oneline replies.
300 IQ anon here. If you're still using imageboards instead of communicating telepathically with your fellow 300 IQ brethren, then just kill yourself tbh.
>>5646 9000+ IQ anon here. I'm sharing consciousness with the Universe. The Universe is displeased with your lack of potential. It suggests you should hasten your return to the low energy state tbh.
>>5663 Ah, ratwires. We shilled there near the beginning. But if you came from there how did you not learn about the spoilers you fucking moron, look at the source code.
>>5590 >I still desperately search for /lit/ or /philosophy/ board/forum but can't find any.
You don't need a board specifically for literature or philosophy to discuss literature or philosophy. Like, just make a thread, bro.
>>5900 >when nanochan was good
The only time nanochan was good was before (((hapase))) shut it down because she was too mentally unstable to deal with a bit of botspam. Even now, botspam is the major weakness of hapase's mental state. Whenever hapase sees bot spam, she cries in front of her computer and takes over-drastic measures such as banning everything or fucking shutting down the whole site.
Hapase needs to go, she is the cancer ruining nanochan. Women are not fit to lead anything, even a 1PPH antarctican worm farming board.
>>5904 In my opinion hakase just needs to add some range/multiple deletion functionality. I'd be fine with selecting 100 spam posts one by one then deleting them all in one go, instead of deleting one at a time.
>be me
>go on nanoch0n
>see overboard
>300 IQ posts, great discussion
>tfw double-digit iqlet
>tfw can never contribute fully to nanochan