Hello Nanonchan, I am a poorfag who rarely comes across any great deal of disposable income, but I’m expecting to get a good ~£200-£250 from the bank (in money they owe me) in a week or so. Naturally I plan to save about half of it and spend the other half on books.
So, given ~£100-£125 what would Nanonchan have me buy? Non-fiction, fiction, politics, philosophy, history, poetry, biographies, ancient, classical, modern, adventure, drama, fantasy, choose anything you’re interested in from any genre. I’ll name a few of the books I’m thinking of buying, so feel free to base your suggestions on that trend, or go in a radically different direction if you think I’d do better with a varied book diet.
The Darkening Age: The Christian Destruction of the Classical World
By Catherine Nixey
The Hermetic Tradition: Symbols And Teachings of The Royal Art
By Julius Evola
The Mystery of The Holy Grail: Initiation And Magic In Quest For The Spirt
By Julius Evola
Revolt Against The Modern World
By Julius Evola
Our Culture, What's Left of It
By Theodore Dalrymple
I Am A Cat
By Sōseki Natsume
The Travels of Marco Polo
By Marco Polo
Xi Jinping: The Governance of China (volume I and II)
By Xi Jinping
War And Peace
By Leo Tolstoy
(There’s really beautiful hardcover box set with three individual hardcovers of this book for only £5 at a local book shop near me.)
I think 10 is a good place to start of, but by no means will I buy all, or probably even half of these books in one go. I’ll probably end up buying ~4 of these ~4 of Nanonchan’s suggestions, and the rest will be spent in local book and charity shops. But I’ll no doubt keep a lot of your suggestions for later on when I have the time and money.
Anyway, thanks for the suggestions Anon’s! I hope one of my 10 books interested you.
I went to bed right after making this. I didn’t think I’d get so many replies so soon, but needless to say I’m not complaining.
>>16332 Sorry, I can’t find this. Do you have a link?
>>16332 >If you're a poorfag why are you buying books?
Because as I said I’ve come across a more than decent amount of disposable income. Most people would piss this away on drink or other hedonistic pass times, at least I’m buying something of worth with it.
Also I wasn’t aware that Tor book sites existed, so thanks!
>>16339 Sounds really interesting, although unfortunately it’s pretty pricey. I’ll download a PDF of it.
>>16340 I have no idea what the second book on you list is, so I’ll be interested in checking that out.
>>16342 >Because as I said I’ve come across a more than decent amount of disposable income. Most people would piss this away on drink or other hedonistic pass times, at least I’m buying something of worth with it.
Very based of you.
polite sage cause i'm not lit expert and have nothing to recommend
A Vision by Yeats
On Love by Chekhov
Bel-Ami by Maupassant
Discourses by Epictetus
Metamorphoses by Ovidius
Manual of Piety by Brecht
Leaves of Grass by Whitman
All Things are Possible by Shestov
The Man Who Sees Ghosts by Schiller
The Theatre and its Double by Artaud
Un coup de dés jamais n'abolira le hasard by Mallarme
>>16345 >>16346 >>16348 >>16349 It’s really nice to see so many interesting suggestions. As I said I won’t be able to buy all of these, but I’ll look through them all and pick out some of the most interesting ones.
I’ll post what I end up buying in about a week or two from now. Some of you guys should do the same if you have the money. We have a lot of great suggestions so far.
>>16347 A based Hāfu friend of mine suggested this awhile ago to me. I’ve already read it, but I’ll buy a copy if I find one that’s cheap enough.
>>16350 I bought pic related a week ago at a local book shop for only £1. There’s about 16 of them and they all originally cost £3.99. Just search for “the complete pomes of [enter the name of popular English speaking poet] wordsworth” and you should find some of them. They have Lord Byron and Percy Bysshe Shelley, so I’ll pick those up too.
I also have Kipling. 928 pages of Kipling for only £3.99 at Waterstones. Fucking based.
>>16351 Savitri Devi was half Greek, does she count?
>>16354 I have three categories for books. Classics, or books I personally find really interesting (or anything I might find for cheap in an IRL bookshop) which I’ll try to buy hard, or at least paper copies of. Books I’m semi interested in, that aren’t important or historical, which I read online. And anything else, fanfiction, things I’m curious about but particularly interested in reading, which I’ll listen to on YouTube, if they’re there.
>>16363 Thanks! I’ll check all of my suggestions out later on tonight.
>>16364 Yes, but I personally want to build my own little library, plus I prefer reading an actual book, and the vast majority of them are cheap enough, even for me.
>>16365 You insist on wasting your money on books "to build a library" (there is no use in a library!), and because you are in the habit of holding a book, and turning its pages. This is why you're poor, and will remain poor.
>>16367 If you are anglo good for you, but I'm not willing to pay for digital copies nor willing to read what's translated into my language in english.
>>16372 >Fuck you guys! I said I'm only spending half of it and these books will likely last me for a good few months.
>for months
Do you have 12/6 week?
>>16374 >not unironically living the NEET /lit/ life
But seriously, I’ve been trying to get a job for awhile now. I’ve applied for ~30 jobs in the last two months and out of that I got only one interview, of which I failed.
I guess autistic retards with no real life skills, experience, or qualifications just aren’t big in the market these days. Who’d have thought it?
>>16375 >sued
>some can't be bought in a physical version, some not even in digital
I'm stealing dead man's work, in worse case work of the one who wrote preface (and annotation), I'm stealing what isn't even printed because there's no money in it. Where's the moral grounding? How do (((they))) justify it?
>>16376 >pepe
Nanochan isn't 4cucks.
>I’ve applied for ~30 jobs in the last two months and out of that I got only one interview, of which I failed
I applied for ~10 and failed one interview.
>I guess autistic retards with no real life skills, experience, or qualifications just aren’t big in the market these days. Who’d have thought it?
I applied for shit like selling clothes and imo there's nothing you need for it except looking nice and not gloomy and having basic knowledge about fashion and about what the brand sells and overall being charismatic person easy to be around. I'd fail though, I'm not easy to be around despite being charismatic.
Seems like you are in the trap too. How to get the real life skills and experience when they want both beforehand? Qualification can be done, but not the previous two.
>>16377 >Nanochan isn't 4cucks.
Since when was pepe exclusive to 4chan? I personally enjoy him.
>I applied for shit like selling clothes
I applied for some of the most low tier jobs out there. McDonald’s, shop assistant, etc. The personality tests that their websites give out are what really trip me up. Do you how fucking depressing it is to do a 40 minute arbitrary personality test, only to be told at the end of it that you’re not even capable stacking fucking shelves, despite the fact that you’ve not even talked to anyone, nor were you given any chance, just ~60 questions that read like “are you a creative or logical thinker?” Why the fuck do you care what kind of thinker I am when my job could literally be done by a 70IQ Somali? I’m here to sweep up shit and put heart attack enduing foods on shelves, not think.
Actually talking to a human being is a fucking miracle, getting a job seems impossible from where I’m standing.
>>16377 >How do (((they))) justify it?
Friendly reminder that Anglos invented the copyrights
>The concept of copyright developed in England with the invention of the printing press
>n reaction to the printing of "scandalous books and pamphlets", the English Parliament passed the Licensing of the Press Act 1662,[15] which required all intended publications to be registered with the government-approved Stationers' Company, giving the Stationers the right to regulate what material could be printed
>>16386 It probably is, but there’s so many other more interesting books out there. Plus it’s probably quite expensive to get a good copy. They give them away for free in churches, but I might as well just read a PDF if I’m going to take what’ll essentially be a extra large pamphlet.
>>16391 Copyright is unfortunate, but necessary. People are greedy. How many great books do you think wouldn’t have been written if we had no copyright laws, meaning that the writer would make next to nothing on them?
Also pic related is pretty obligatory, and I suppose I should also call you a kike and tell you to gas yourself, etc.
>>16392 >Copyright is unfortunate, but necessary. People are greedy. How many great books do you think wouldn’t have been written if we had no copyright laws, meaning that the writer would make next to nothing on them?
How did it work before? And what does it have to do with lawyers being able to sue you for reading book written by long dead man?
>>16394 >how did it work before
before the printing press, the only way to copy something was to painstakingly copy it by hand. Before that, people couldn't reasonably make money off of selling copies of something, they could only really recieve commission to write it in the first place.
>>16394 >And what does it have to do with lawyers being able to sue you for reading book written by long dead man?
Don’t get me wrong, I’m 100% against that. A book belongs to it’s author, when he dies it should become public domain.
>>16395 >No author who deserves any money is alive.
Literally every book I’m buying was written by someone who’s been dead longer than I’ve been alive.
>Why are you considering it if you're a poorfag?
Because most books are cheap, and I personally like owning and reading physical copies.
>>16392 Go be anywhere else.
Get a or different job, go for a walk, travel, move, clean your room, whatever.
Just don't get stuck in a rut.
Worst case you become pic related.
>>16392 >How many great books do you think wouldn’t have been written if we had no copyright laws, meaning that the writer would make next to nothing on them?
Majority of the great works would still be made.A better question is:"How many people would never read this book if they couldn't find it for free online?"
Have you ever been in a bookstore, and seen all the meritless, largely nonsensical, poorly written excrement of average minds, which are on the shelves: Harry Potter, Game of Thrones, Jordan Peterson, fantasy, sci-fi, erotica, dietary guides, modern philosophy (self-help literature), activist literature, biographies of literally-whos, books by mass-media personalities, by YouTubers and bloggers or by authors, whose pseudonyms contain numerals, etc., all of which have a disuniform, ugly appearance, and look jarring aligned on the shelves? By buying books, this is the industry you are needlessly supporting. If you really want a physical book, there still exists public libraries, or you can print out a digital copy. Don't buy books.
>>16392 >>16397 >People are greedy
Not just da joos?! What an insane concept!
>if we had no copyright laws, meaning that the writer would make next to nothing on them
You NEETsoc retard realize copyrights have nothing to do with that? Copyright laws were invented as means of censorship and monopoly which I know you statistcuck are fond of.
>Also pic related is pretty obligatory
Of course da joos are responsible for everything bad in the world and the sole reason Anglos fought against the Krauts were da joos manipulation because muh smart and strong white race is so feeble to da joos magic tricks.
>>16418 Sorry, but that would be impractical, to say the least. Besides I get out fairly often and take care of myself, so I can’t see myself getting stuck in a complete rut. But thanks for the concern anyway. Hopefully I’ll find something.
>>16419 I think you’re pretty naive. Even some of the most beautiful authors can have unconscious alterer motives, that even they might not be aware of.
>>16420 I’ve always wondered who the hell actually buys a lot of these books. I imagine that a lot of them are just thrown away. They cost (a lot) less than a pound to produce and they sell for ~£20, so I could easily see a good 1/3 of the books you get in a place like Watersones being trashed.
Regardless I don’t feel bad for supporting the industry. If a book shop wants to buy and then trash books that’s on them, same goes if someone wants to buy them. It doesn’t affect me, and it’s at least moderate better than watching modern movies.
>monopoly which I know you statistcuck are fond of.
Most people would consider me quite left wing economically, although I’d say that Capitalism is inherently left wing, and considering that I reject it for anti-materialist and pro traditionalist reasons that if anything I’m quite economically right wing. But regardless, I’m not a cuck to big corporations and monopolies, but I do believe that an individual should be allowed to profit of the fruits of his own labour, but monopolies and corporations are an entirely different thing.
I don’t know what the current copyright laws are, so when I advocate for the idea of copyright laws you can’t judge me based on them, considering that mine would probably be radically different.
>the sole reason Anglos fought against the Krauts were da joos manipulation
Britain joined and stayed in the war for the exact same reason that they fought
France during the Napoleonic era, and Germany along with Austria-Hungry during WWI, because a strong power in Europe could have spelled the end of the Empire, or even the country itself. They purposely tried to pit different European powers against each other because they knew that they were no match on their against a unified and strong Europe. They were technically stronger, richer, and more technologically advanced, but their resources were also the most widespread, meaning that a major power in Europe could either easily overrun Britain, or Britain would have to leave the Empire defenceless and open to attack, both of which were clearly unthinkable ideas to them, so their best bet was to continuously undermine any up and coming European power.
Hitler actually talked about this in Mein Kampf, which is why I’m personally so perplexed by the idea that he thought any peace treaty with Britain would be possible. He knew why Britain opposed him and would continue to oppose him, and yet he genuinely thought that he could have come to a reasonable arrangement with them. I guess he was just idealistically hoping like the Japanese, that Britain and America were too morally weak to put up much of a fight. Unfortunately he was clearly wrong.
Don’t get me wrong if you look into this stuff and dig deep enough you’ll certainly notice the massively disproportionate Jewish influence, but they weren’t the actual catalyst. One thing to note about the Jews is that they are rarely a catalyst of anything, they mostly find places to fan the flames of subversion, but they usually can’t be blamed for initially lighting said flame. They’re best at jumping on the naturally destructive impulses of other peoples and inciting them, the impulses themselves are just an unfortunate circumstance of human nature.
>>16426 <although I’d say that Capitalism is inherently left wing
<I
>muh unique baseless reasoning
<I’m not a cuck to big corporations and monopolies
>I just want muh state to control everything because I think freedom is degeneracy
<I don’t know what the current copyright laws are, so when I advocate for the idea of copyright laws you can’t judge me based on them, considering that mine would probably be radically different
>yet I defend them
<and neither I knew the reason behind originally in the past
Dumb NEETsoc admits his own ignorance
<They purposely tried to pit different European powers against each other because they knew that they were no match on their against a unified and strong Europe
>muh baseless conspiracy
<the massively disproportionate Jewish influence
And what about the white left? Oh, right pointing out whites being leftists would supposedly be meaningless right? Because they're aren't le different race. They're many right wing Jews and left wing whites but counting that would ruin your retard collectivist black and white ideology which aligns race with political ideology.
<but they weren’t the actual catalyst
<One thing to note about the Jews is that they are rarely a catalyst of anything, they mostly find places to fan the flames of subversion, but they usually can’t be blamed for initially lighting said flame
>The NEETsoc' schordinger Jew
>muh subversion
How come muh strong and smart white race get easily "subverted"?! I know it the evil joos mind tricks! You realize how superstitious and dumb you sound? No better than the average peasant in medieval times.
>>16427 >And what about the white left?
I’m not denying the fact that there are countless degenerate Whites, but if you look at the left, or just about anything a NatSoc would complain about, you’ll see a massively disproportionate amount of Jews in said movements.
>How come muh strong and smart white race get easily "subverted"?!
>easily
You call the slow and methodical subversion of a civilisation over countless decades, if not centuries an easy challenge to overcome?
>You realize how superstitious and dumb you sound?
Any half honest person who’s done any research into the JQ has to at least see that there’s a lot of big “coincidences” going on for such a trend to take place.
>>16432 Hello Nanon, I`ve been here since December so, I am able to help you out. Askuanigger`s writing style varies, but the subject matter hardly changes or alters. For simplicity, I am going to create a list in order to help you identify Asukanigger:
1. If the post has no objective argument, and derails the thread, it`s more than likely Asuka. (He tends to cherry pick alot).
2. His go to words include: "muh," "Joos," "wiggers," "cumskins," "cuck," "hurr," "falseflag," "le," you get the picture.
3. He tends to incorporate italics, emboldening, spoilers and other formatting methods such as
>this
and
<this
4. He enjoys putting words into "quotations," and I suspect he is acting as the Schizo Boomer on /pol/ who always uses (((parenthesis))).
5. There is not one post he hasn`t made that doesn`t include bashing Whites or mentioning Hapas. The former, talking about how dumb Whites are. (Probably his coping mechanism for his father falling for the Asian meme).
6. Since, as far as I remember, the change in administration, Asukanigger has/was avatarfagging it up. He hasn`t done so within the last month, but it`s much easier to identify his older postings.
7. He`s always talking about how cancerous /pol/ is. That is because his agenda seeks to remove it from Nanochan, and thus he makes copy paste threads and general low quality threads. (These are easy to spot as well, as they involve some bashing of Europeans 90% of the time).
8. He spergs out, a lot. Once again, just look for incoherent response that do not provide any foundational argument what so ever.
9. He really hates Nat Socs, or any form of ideological European identity. Sometimes he will post images comparing Hapas to some fat lards. (Also, Nanochan was created because of wanting a new /pol/, lol).
>See original 8chan post
To me, these are what identify Asuka the most. Other Nanon`s may have other ways as well.
>>16439 Thanks, I’ll try to keep this in mind. If I notice too many of these trends I’ll simply ignore him.
Also to be quite honest I was only told about this place 2-3 months ago by a friend, and I’ve seen everything you’ve just described all over the site. I’ve actively tried to make high quality threads and posts, alongside assimilating into Nanochans culture, but this guy on the other hand has probably been here for around a good year, yet he acts like a complete Nigger, with no respect for Nanochan or its culture.
>>16377 <copyrights invented by the joos hence they're evil
>>16392 <copyrights were actually invented by the Anglos hence they're good
>>16428 <<I’m not denying the fact that there are countless degenerate Whites, but
<but
And everything you just said before is meaningless. Either you faggot admit that leftism isn't unique to Jews or deny it. Because if you admit that than it's not muh race problem, but political problem in general which it is.
<slow and methodical subversion of a civilisation
Again, aren't muh white people smart enough to overcome it? How come it's only the joos "subversion" that works? Also you hypocrite faggot keep ignoring the existence of white lefties.
<<the JQ has to at least see that there’s a lot of big “coincidences”
Again are you going to keep ignoring the existence of right wing Jew and leftie whites?
<<"wiggers," "cumskins," "cuck," "hurr,"
<<mentioning Hapas
<<Asukanigger has/was avatarfagging it up
These weren't in my posts
>>how cancerous /pol/ is
It's true look how you obsessive cunts keep shoving muh joos and muh NEETsoc politics everywhere.
<do not provide any foundational argument what so ever
>because I said so
<Nat Socs
<any form of ideological European identity
Not the same thing moron and I have nothing against the latter, if anything your fuhrer was against it as he tried to conquer all Europe.
<<turning into a major derail
Originally we discussed the nature and creation of copyrights but since you ignorant NEEtsoc admitting you have no actual fucking clue about the issue and just want to detame the Jews because you stupid faggots got nothing better to do.
>>16445 >you stupid faggots got nothing better to do.
You clearly don’t have anything better to do than derail my thread. Either contribute to the thread or fuck off.
If you continue with this conversation I’m just going to completely ignore you, however if you actually want to act like a fucking adult and participate instead of attacking people I’ll act accordingly.
Saving the thread from hapa's derail Sorry if anything was mentioned before, can't be bothered to ctrl+f. Dropped having hard copies some time ago, now i "read" audiobooks like a pleb. Much more information is lost this way, wouldn't recommend, unless you have no other option.
Guy Julius Caesar - Commentarii
// great book about 0 A.D. germanic tribes and their lifestyle by the famous Roman traveler
Ernest Theodor Amadeus Hoffman - Devil's Elixirs
// nice detective book with many mystical elements written by the last of the dying romanticists
Donald Trump - the Art of the Deal
// good guide for project manager of basically any field, not just construction; basically fuck bloomberg, squeeze a penny, or die penniless
Farnsworth Ward - Farnsworth’s Classical English Rhetoric
// good read for any english literature major or generally a person trying to learn good written english
Schiff Peter - How an Economy grows and why it crashes
// basis intro to economics for your 60yo aunt
Tolkien - Lord of the Rings
// an okay collection of "hum-hum-hum" songs, connected together through some mary sue fantasy story; fuck elves; don't trust the gnomes too
Virgil - Bukoliks, Georgics, Aeneid
// based pastoral life is based, fuck society and degenerate cunts
// aeneid is a deep tongue massage of Caesar's anus and retcons about his connection to Roman Goddess Venus
Homer - Iliad
// shake your spears and steal their shields, good history of the greek great ancient war by the former soldier
Machiavelli - Prince
// step-by-step guide how to become a political jew and pit each of your enemies and friends against each other, while you rub your hands in seclusion and enjoy all the profits
Omar Hayam - Rubai
// poetical rewriting of an old greek and roman authors by the most famous arabic drunkard
Yukio Mishima - Confessions of a Mask
// i'm not gay, but i'll indulge in a bad habit to this statue! in short: his autobiography and self-flagellation
Plato - Whole Collection of works
// read plato in whole, mate, he is worth it; many of his dialogues sound retarded at the start, but then he unveils it to something bigger and better, acting as a good oratory guide
Sun Tzi - the Art of War
// war doesn't change a bit, this guide is timeless
// since it is "chinese", i wonder from whom was it stolen?
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn - Dorozhenka
// a view on a second world war from the eyes of a soviet citizen
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn - 200 years together p. 1&2
// the study on the jews which put him into the hated state by everyone
Thanks mate! I’m thinking of going down to Waterstones tomorrow with all of these suggestions in tow. (both yours and everyone elses) I’ve not got the money yet, but it’ll fun to see what I can find.
>>16600 There were some complications with the bank, although I have an interview with them tomorrow and if that goes well I should have my money in a few days, and all my books ordered within a week after that.
Here’s what I’m definitely buying. The Bhagavad Gita, The Eddas, Passing of The Great Race, Revolt Against The Modern World, The Hermetic Tradition, Impeachment of Man, The Art of War, The Darkening Age:The Christian Destruction of The Classical World, All Quite On The Western Front, No Chance:A Postmodern Odyssey, The Travels of Marco Polo, The Temple of A Golden Pavilion, Man’s Search For Meaning, and I Am A Cat.
That’s going to cost me about £150 all in, and should last me for a good few months.
>>16367 How do booklets like you cope with the fact that you can't have open 6 books at the same time unless you have three monitors? Only thing that ebooks offer is easier searching, easier access and that they are gratis. That is if you are okay with looking at the monitor instead of the paper and constant alt-tabbing doesn't give you headaches.
>there is no use in a library
Why? If you are settled there's point in it, even if only as a decoration. You don't have to scroll through some retarded nonexistent list. Amazon can't delete your books. ...
>>16997 >How do booklets like you cope with the fact that you can't have open 6 books at the same time unless you have three monitors?
I can have open 100 books at the time and just alttab between them. You still can read only one at once so what the fuck is the point. i can also leave them all open in the background and go something else and find them in the exact same state later. I can write into them without destroying their value.
>That is if you are okay with looking at the monitor
Im already used to looking at the monitor literally all my wake hours so... I do invert the colors though
>Only thing that ebooks offer is easier searching, easier access and that they are gratis
You are saying that as if it wouldnt matter. All of these things are massively important for me and it would still beat physical copies if it were just a single one of them.
> Amazon can't delete your books.
They cant delete them if you pirate them either. What takes an entire building i can store on a 2.5 inch hdd. I can search it in seconds for literally anything i want and i can even search in the files themselves. Books degrade and eventually turn to dust if you dont take care of them. A file is forever, unless you willingly delete it or are retarded with your backups.
I can also take it on-the-go by simply copying it on my phone, which is a thing i have on me regardless instead of dragging 2 kilos of dead weight around. On the same phone i can store an entire library worth of books if i so wish thanks to swappable SD cards. If I want to share it with somebody, i can just send it over the internet instead of having to arrange a meeting, be without it the entire time and having to arrange getting it back. I also dont need a fucking light source, possibly bothering whoever happens to be sharing the room with me at the time.
The future is now grandpa, have fun with your worthless room filler.
>>16997 >pros:
>easier searching
>easier access
>they are gratis
>can carry thousands around with you at a time
>built in dictionary
>cons:
>need to set one down before you can pickup a seventh one
>have to look at monitor instead of paper
>alt-tabbing might give you headaches
>computer monsters might jump out of the screen and eat you
>>16997 It is a greater trouble to keep open six physical books, than it is to keep open sixty digital ones; you need the physical space to set the six books, and you need a clamp or weight to hold the page, which must be removed when turning the page, and which may damage the book.
Books do have a use in decoration, if decoration is a use, but it is costly: non-uniform cardboard rectangles of varying sizes irregularly aligned on a flatpack shelf is not aesthetically pleasing. In the first place, it is not the material object of the book, that is valuable, it is the written content of the book, which is independent of the object, and can be presented in a non-physical and non-concrete manner. Besides, you can print out and bind a digital book yourself, if you really want a physical copy.
>>16457 >many of his dialogues sound retarded at the start
Any way how to treat the fact that I'm overread? Everything I read seems retarded. I have no money.
>>17189 LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO what fucking nigger ISP do you have?
>oh no it doesn't have a (R) Certified (TM) HTTPS (C) certificate we cannot let you on for your security
>>16378 >corporate employers
Too bureaucratic, try to find some small business or something to do with hard labor.
>personality tests
>not IQ tests
This needs to change.
>>17544 >hard labor
>employment in general
Enjoy being worked like a machine, breaking your back by age 40, and receiving no compensation through it all.
At least a farmer peasant could always say they were more or less living for themselves. A wageslave is below a peasant, possibly even a serf.
Face it. In AD 2019 getting a job means ruining your body, mind, and soul, in unpaid servitude to the local branch of the ZOG. It's not just a crime against yourself, but also your nation, and you don't even get anything for it. It's one of the greatest evils imaginable.
It's why communists are so awful whether others get it or not. A labor revolution means labor, labor in our present era means servitude to the Jew. "We'll serve the Jew on our own terms!" are the words of a true puppet.
It is no surprise the Jews are behind all communist agitation.
OP. I’ve had endless trouble with the bank so I thought “fuck it,” and just ended up printing a book. The paper I used is shit and way too big, but I’m planning on buying paper made specifically for books as well as a basic book binding kit. 90% of what I’d want to buy is in the public domain, so I might as well just make my own books.
I read dickens's great expectations right now and good lord, it's awesome, I'm used to read stephen king and he's basically king of victorian era.
My favourite character is Pip; I completely get him, and by that I mean completely. His ambitions are close to me as I have planned great future for myself and kinda resembles me, I often lose sight of my surroundings as well when I have a target. Shamefully I can't identify with him being social outcast, it would help with immersion. Whatever.
I hate tho that it makes le evil ruling class bad, like, what the fuck? Aristocracy got the money by hard labour and aristocracy always ruled the weaker, that's just how it is, I would would be nowehere if it wasn't for dirty middle-class and basically 94% of all population. I love dickens for his social themes and immersive stories, but sometimes I ask myself whether dickens had to have opinions he had when he was basically an aristocracy as well. Someone help please?
So, given ~£100-£125 what would Nanonchan have me buy? Non-fiction, fiction, politics, philosophy, history, poetry, biographies, ancient, classical, modern, adventure, drama, fantasy, choose anything you’re interested in from any genre. I’ll name a few of the books I’m thinking of buying, so feel free to base your suggestions on that trend, or go in a radically different direction if you think I’d do better with a varied book diet.
The Darkening Age: The Christian Destruction of the Classical World
By Catherine Nixey
The Hermetic Tradition: Symbols And Teachings of The Royal Art
By Julius Evola
The Mystery of The Holy Grail: Initiation And Magic In Quest For The Spirt
By Julius Evola
Revolt Against The Modern World
By Julius Evola
Our Culture, What's Left of It
By Theodore Dalrymple
I Am A Cat
By Sōseki Natsume
The Travels of Marco Polo
By Marco Polo
Xi Jinping: The Governance of China (volume I and II)
By Xi Jinping
War And Peace
By Leo Tolstoy
(There’s really beautiful hardcover box set with three individual hardcovers of this book for only £5 at a local book shop near me.)
No Chance: A Post-Modern Odyssey
By Argent Templar (One of, if not my favourites YouTubers. https://youtube.com/user/LibertyandJustice771
I think 10 is a good place to start of, but by no means will I buy all, or probably even half of these books in one go. I’ll probably end up buying ~4 of these ~4 of Nanonchan’s suggestions, and the rest will be spent in local book and charity shops. But I’ll no doubt keep a lot of your suggestions for later on when I have the time and money.
Anyway, thanks for the suggestions Anon’s! I hope one of my 10 books interested you.