/b/ - Random

Anything goes.

[Make a Post]
[X]





Nanonymous No.1619 [D][U][F][S][L][A][C] >>1790
File: f453bff02e22d61adf06fdab3ec40751171f5399d58ec4863dc22c6fef6ea4f3.jpg (dl) (85.05 KiB)
Anyone listen to Tool? What do you think of Fear Inoculum? Personally, while I think it is prety good, I don't like it as much as their older stuff.

Nanonymous No.1623 [D] >>1654
I used to listen to their older stuff. "Sober", etc.

Nanonymous No.1626 [D] >>1654
I used to listen to tool a lot when I was a pothead in hs. The new album isnt nearly as good as you say but nowadays I find I cant listen to their old stuff either. I still love their instrumentals mostly but not Maynards whiny bitch voice and lyrics.

Nanonymous No.1654 [D]
>>1623
Opiate and Undertow were pretty raw, which is something they lost after that.
>>1626
Do you have any examples of his whiny bitch lyrics? Won't argue about the voice, but the lyrics seem fine to me.

Nanonymous No.1786 [D]
instrumentals are great. The lyrics are the same metaphysical shit i appreciated while on drugs

Nanonymous No.1788 [D]
fuck it, make /mu/ thread someone

Nanonymous No.1790 [D] >>1803
>>1619
>I don't like it as much as their older stuff.

Most rock bands are like that. They get progressively worse as their career goes on, often straying too far from their original sound, or not trying as hard musically or lyrically. There are exceptions to this, but a good rule of thumb is to listen to discographies in reverse chronological order.

Nanonymous No.1803 [D]
>>1790
It's because after 1 or 2 albums (ignoring the first few which may be experimentation or premature) it becomes their career and just like anything else capitalism produces, it's shit.