>>2112 >a group of shills and QRposters using low quality porn to push their shitty (((cryptocurrency))) >oy vey this will liberate us from the (((bankers))) guys!
>>2150 >OY VEY if it's not my imaginary computer money, it must be kikemetal!!! These two things are the only things with value! Oy vey! If it's not one it's the other, goy! Choose one, OY VEY!
I'm not a Jew, but certainly a victim of evil Jews, like many. There are some good Jews BTW. PDF related. Also I'm done answering you cryptic non-responses.
BTW I have solved the WORLD equation. Postmodernism = individuals opting out from the modernist system.... but governments don't like this because it weakens traditional authority... HOWEVER, the (((Kabal))) realised that by promoting 'diversity' and the fringe in every jurisdiction that they could actually reduce the differences between places. Promote diversity to kill global diversity. Genius. Chaos would result requiring another strong central authority to 'save' people. This would be the (((KABAL))) global government since by then there would be no more ethnic or cultural unity (except maybe being black and muslim or Indian/Chinese).
Most crypto currency junkies don't understand that the end goal here is one of several other attempts of trying to create an even more international currency to form and replace the current money from being printed out. Whenever I see some hack talk about how bitcoins (or some other crypto currency) I have to cringe. They use the same propaganda the commies use. IE, they will become more prosperous, will end world hunger, etc. The fact is you're playing right into the banks hands. If they truly wanted to shut down crypto currencies they would have done it already as they have most countries in the palm of their hand. I personally think crypto currency is an ok concept as long as it is trying to establish a national currency with the government bank actually run by the country itself, not some private bank that's just exploiting fractional banking. This is why it turns me off at the moment. Most people that shill this are trying to make it into an international movement instead of by a country basis. A bunch of libertards is what they are tbqh.
>>2230 >They use the same propaganda the commies use. IE, they will become more prosperous, will end world hunger, etc.
Honestly that just looks like people experiencing sunk cost fallacy trying to justify to themselves why they risked their livelihoods investing in crypto and to exaggerate its impact and usefulness to drag more retards into the scheme. You can find people posting shit like that in communities discussing a specific stock company too. It's basically a softer version of a ponzi scheme
>>2223 The vast majority are not, yes.
>>2230 The whole point of crypto is not to have it be FIAT that can be created out of nothing arbitrarily. Instead math decides.
>>2232 The existing (((world central bank system))) is synagogue of Satan controlled pozi scheme. Sure most cryptos are also ponzis but I've found a good one. Do you not see the potential to break free from Fiat and to finance an insurgent machine or two?
>>2241 Work-backed currency is the superior system. Define the minimum wage at 1 dollar per hour. That means for some rando labourer, working 1 hour is guaranteed to get him 1 dollar - more for skilled professions of course. In this way, the currency is backed by the work of the people, and not by some rather useless metal like gold, or resources whose value can change depending on supply and demand.
t. total economics n00b
>>2243 You would have to find a way to restrict the monetary supply then. The monetary supply would have to be calculated based on the total population X the number of hours in a year or however long the interval before currency expansion should be. A good concept but hard to implement in practice... and again a TRUSTED authority is required. Once established a true cryptocurrency doesn't have a trusted authority, besides the distributed program itself. However few people have the skills to audit code, and see the economic implications. I don't even. I just invest based on my limited knowledge and intuition. A Time based currency is inherently (national) socialist as well but that doesn't have to be a bad thing.
Any currency is only ever as valuable as it commonly accepted as payment. This is why Fiat still leads, because governments establish FIAT for the benefit of the (((bankers)) but also themselves as puppets I suppose. Government is second in the global hierarchy to Finance.
>>2245 The money could be created by the government. The government would mandate a small fixed tax payment in the work-based currency, and employ people paid in work-based currency to build roads and whatever. This would serve as the initial "seed" for the valuation of the currency.
Again, this might be a shitty theory, please point out any flaws.
Any technology is just a tool, can be used to free or enslave. The (((world elites))) of course, want to enslave... and perfect their system of slavery. Really the BORG or Universal Technological Communism is their end goal.
>If there was a bowl of M&Ms and 99% where poison would you eat those M&Ms?
Is this a joke about women?
Or are you anti-technology/tools?
Living like a wild animal is hard.
At this point I should have just bought silver, but I did buy some and lost money there as well. All markets are rigged. The 'free market' does not exist. PIVX is the best cryptocurrency there is, but yes it's still a cryptocurrency, not supported by any government, and unlikely to be the candidate for (((their))) world currency given the PIVX manifesto. Again PIVX is the best cryptocurrency... but it's still a cryptocurrency, and all- at least legitimate cryptos still move with BTC. Proving that discriminating investors are still a minority.
>>2484 What about TOR? It's the most common onion routing portal. Not that I use it. Whew, just fuck off if you have nothing to add (((shill))).
I will ignore negative shill posters that don't add anything from now on.
>but mathmatics decides though
How is fractional banking not based on mathmatics? It's the exact same situation with federal banking except the private bankers coin out all the money at will and demand we pay interest on the money supply itself for something they did. Not only is the debt we have an impossible one, it's also completely controlled by people who's only interest is making more money off of the debt machine monstrosity they have created. Having the government control the banking system within the country is the only good solution as bitcoins and international bankings only real aim is to create a more globalized world. A world where there are no borders, no self determination, and no freedom whatsoever. See the greenback and Andrew Jackson. No debt. Yet you have the audacity to tell me that these new methods are the only way to """stop""" the swindle?
>Muh fiat currency
Ah yes, the mystical illusion that money has to be backed by gold or some other scapegoat the bankers have created to stop you from looking at the real issue here. The fact is, money is backed by the productivity of a country, not this illusory idea of it being backed by some material. Name one country that has a thriving economy (that isn't some colony leeching off of largesse from other countries), that aren't productive societies. Also a couple question: how can you know that bitcoins won't succumb to the same swindle that has been happening for hundreds of years?
https://pivx.org/
http://www.zdex.exchange/
PIVX will liberate us from the (((Bankers)))
SIEG HEIL