Use this thread to post reports for posts which violate either the global rules stated on the main page, or the board rules of the board it is posted on.
When making a report be sure to include:
* A link to the post in question
* A short description, and context if applicable, of why you think that post should be removed.
I would like to append: Any post in this thread which is not either a report or discussion about a report will be removed since it is derailing.
no, this post doesn't count lol
>>>/b/3351 Already a pedo thread here >>>/b/2075 that serves an identical purpose. Pedo support threads at all are pretty fucked, but at the very least I think the debate should be contained to a single thread so they can't just memory hole the last thread every time their logical inconsistencies gets exposed.
This thread seems too dumb to not be a shill post. The author claims that /pol/ opinions are mainstream on Russian tv including the fact that Jews run the world.
Anti Jewish sentiment cannot be found on Russian tv and this guy is an obvious shill.
>>1732 >it's these fags again
From the rules thread:
>nano/pol/ is an explicitly National Socialist board. Promotion of anti-white ideologies or pro-jewish ideologies is not permitted.
If you don't like this, go to 8chan where they have """(((free speech)))""" on their /pol/.
>erisposter (separate guy from the spammer) and pedoposters autosaged or nuked outright
>obvious shitstirrer in three separate threads needs his freeze peach
Sends a bad message, but that's your call.
>>2926 Well, since we have flagrant abuse of this rule, I'm going to amend it. I think two levels of dereferencing are reasonable.
>Child pornography is not permitted. Links to child pornography are not permitted either,and neither are links to websites which contain a significant number of direct links to CP.
Goddammit, mods. I repeat: post >>2885 in thread >>>/g/2826 violates rule 1. Specifically, the second link links to at least 15 direct links to CP (a significant number, no?)
>>2941 this is what you should have posted the first time. the link in question was a directory of hundreds of random onions. but thanks for clicking them all to find out which ones are cp, for your research i guess?
>>2942 You are right, but I don't sense that the purpose of the post was cp (unlike the earlier "flagrant abuse" cited earlier by hakase >>2927, which was willful). I say leave it up at the mod's discretion.
>>2944 So you think the post shouldn't have been deleted because the posting of a link to links to CP was unintentional, while the other one was intentional? Intentional or unintentional, flagrant abuse or accident, it is no less or no more lawful.
>>2945 No, I'm arguing that the indirect cp links were not the majority of the list and also not intentional. no matter, the post was deleted anyway.
>it is no less or no more lawful.
adhering to the spirit of the law is often a better guideline than its letter.
>>2945 >unlawful
This is a hidden service, hapase can enforce whatever she wants to. The only reason we disallow cp is because it's degenerate, not because it's un(((law)))ful.
I think we should use our (((common sense))) regarding the reports. If it's not a direct link or if there is no intention to link to CP content, I don't see why it has to be censored.
We are using a hidden service after all, CP and drugs are everywhere. We all agree that it's something made for degenerates and weak people and since we don't want to attract that kind of users, censorship is the only weapon we have.
A further reminder that posts ITT which derail the thread are NOT PERMITTED and will be deleted. This is a reports thread, not a site meta thread. The only discussion which is permitted is about whether the reported post(s) break global or board rules. See >>1130 for precedent.
>>3711 >can you elaborate
You made multiple implications throughout your various posts that you were me. Then when others started wondering if you were the admin all along, you continued to lead them on.
And when your proposal was denied, there was a suspicious amount of shit-stirring that started to appear on /l/. defeatist threads and threats to "spam this site everywhere".
Every post in this thread not about reports will now be deleted (and soon this post too). If you want to continue this conversation (I don't) bring it to one of the other /meta/ threads.
>crowd pressure
There's no pressure. Nobody's forcing me to allow porn. I just don't mind it as much as you might.
>Fine, but make sure to delete cartoon spam from my thread as it breaks rule 2.
Fair. Done
I am reporting >>>/l/11416 which clearly violates /l/ rule #1:
>Do not make threads here which fit in another board (except for /t/).
The aforementioned thread fits in /meta/ much better than in /l/.
/l/ should not be clogged with meta issues, especially spammed meta issues from the butthurt /pol/nigger who can't handle looking at anime girls without jacking off.
>>3165 Yet another reminder that any post that is not a report will be deleted to keep this thread readable, if you want to contest moderation use >>>/meta/4068
>>>/b/339 Its confusing and causing autistiman to respond even though its autosage and obvious test thread. Out of curiosity will BO or mod go and clean up obvious test threads in /b/ at any point?
>>4461 There's any 'auto-protection' system against flooding? Sakamoto, if you're reading this: you can activate some Tor features on the server to mitigate concurrent connections, in case the nanochan software doesn't support flooding 'detection'. Add this to /etc/tor/torrc:
>>4481 Nervermind, just saw this:
>MaxThreadsPerHour = tonumber(POST["mtph"]) or 0,
This should be by board, not a global value... but, sakamoto, put this value to 20 or 30 and combine with the above tip. This will mitigate the amount of damage spammers can do.
>>4484 >This should be by board, not a global value
What do you mean? It's by board, not global. Though I think it should be.
>>4481 I'll try these settings, thanks. Though I don't think these would matter much, since you only need a POST request to make a thread/post anyway, and a single circuit can generate as many posts as they want.
>>4527 >>4529 >>4531 >>4533 This is the report thread, continue your discussion somewhere else.
>>4526 Nothing against the rules in that thread, it's a discussion thread it's fine where it is.
>>4534 TBH I think threads that are deliberately created to "piss someone off" belong in /b/.
If you want me to point at the rule, I'll go with
>4. Do not make threads about a topic which cannot generate a good conversation.
Now, I know that you hate him and I don't support him in the slightest, but hey, make it somewhat less obvious that you are biased. xP
>>4544 >hey, make it somewhat less obvious that you are biased. xP
You misspelled "based" there star.
>4. Do not make threads about a topic which cannot generate a good conversation.
If the thread went by "i'm posting le ebin porn to piss off antipornfag" and that was it i would agree. But the OP started an actual discussion and people joined it, so it did generate a "good discussion" in the end.
And for the last time use the moderation feedback thread for this kind of inquiries, this thread should only be used to report stuff or with time it becomes unreadable.
>>4547 Thread was made before /l/ rules came about and aren't covered under it, and personally I don't think the dump rules should be a thing (only hakase removed dump threads), and nobody's complained about them before you so I never did anything about it. And since I said I won't enforce /l/ rules myself I'll let the other mods decide.
>>4547 >>4551 I've updated /l/ rules, so that certain dump threads that generate discussion(even if only though images) can stay up. I think those two threads kind of fits the definition, the comfy thread more than the cute one, this is my personal opinion ofc but for now i've decided to keep them there.
If you want le rules:
2.Flooding is not permitted. We define flooding as posting similar posts more than 3 times per hour (yes), making a thread on a topic for which a thread already exists, or posting in such a way that it significantly changes the composition of a board (sure). Common sense will be utilized. (read: fuck you pornfag)
>>4605 Pictures of japanese women in a thread about japan is not derail. To be fair i'm tired of your drama, i got better stuff to do than policeing your threads from anything that triggers you.
>>4607 I thought moderation will finally acknowledge my problem and be more flexible, but no. Shitting my threads is fine, most of my threads are deleted or autosaged because le broken rules and rules are only suiting mods and "common sense" means you, Global Volunteers, can decide what's allowed and not. If I created this thread on /l/ it would get autosaged "belonging on /pol/" and this is how I'm rulecucked because on /l/ such things would be against rules (hahahahaha nice joke). How can porn pics in anti-japanese thread be suitable can you tell me? It's spam just like hapa is spamming overboard and you're deleting spam BUT NOT IN MINE THREADS. hapa derailment was deleted but we could argue it discussed humans on the site for humans so it's not derailment, right? This place is a fucking joke with you dude as a mod, second mod is also you btw.
SPAMMING PORN IN SERIOUS THREAD? = A'IGHT
DISCUSSING FORBIDDEN SUBJECTS (HAPA, PORN, ANIME IN BAD LIGHT) = GTFO YOU FUCKING SPAMMER
>>4636 /g/ is for technology and related things, what is discussed are politics and mediocre controlled opposition at best, with premise being drama/politics
>>4639 /pol/ is for politics and while no politics are discussed, it still has politics premise
>>4647 >/pol/ is for politics
A thread on communism / socialism would have been against the original rules and is against the current rules of /pol/. Specifically the current rule of
<no pro jewish ideologies
>>4713 >A thread on communism / socialism would have been against the original rules and is against the current rules of /pol/. Specifically the current rule of
Actually the old /pol/ rules had an exception, where outside all other threads which were by default explicitly natsoc, the board is allowed one thread for each different ideology.
>>4881 When making a report be sure to include:
* A link to the post in question
* A short description, and context if applicable, of why you think that post should be removed.
>>4883 >spam is the same thing as evil and bigoted anti-indian Hate speech
this place is as dead as a graveyard, but I wouldn't feel uncomfortable in a graveyard until I noticed the mumbling, twitching madman that's also wandering it.
>>4880 >>4881 >>4883 Alright, this is definitely the work of asukafag. Too similar to the spam that was also made in /pol/. No idea why he decided to do it outside of /pol/ too, I guess he decided hiding it wasn't good enough and still sullied his hapa heaven somehow. Offending posts deleted, and captcha is now enabled on all boards.
>It's just poltards shitting up everything, exactly as I said would happen.
Not sure if you're genuinely out of the loop, or you're just asukafag. Check the logs, he's been false flagging for quite a while now.
>>5025 That thread was created before the ownership of nanochan changed. Personally, I'm not a fan of deleting old threads so I have enabled autosage on the thread. If another mod wants to delete the thread go ahead.
>>5483 You are an idiot. I wrote this post and I am definitely not asukafag. I made a valid point on society and its problem with irredeemable feminism.
>>5482 Inflammatory sure, but inoffensive and low chance of derailing the thread. Basically, more of a shitpost than bait.
>>5483 Looks like a regular anon with yellow fever to me. Though the thread itself is an asukafag psyops, so I'll just go ahead and delete the whole thing.
>>>/pol/6880 Shill thread. No reasonable attempt was made at arguing his point with data. Thread is obviously just a standard tranny shill/slide post. Lazy OP's like that should be deleted on sight.
>>>/g/7752 has already been mentioned in >>5482. Low effort shit with a worthless OP. Has some good posts but mostly schizos at this point. Delete or autosage, either is fine.
More derail on the openbsd thread. Please delete this "computer science degree" comments. I think this is meant to show openbsd users as snob people and they don't contribute anything. Besides that, it's probably asukafag again (don't you get tired you fucking fag?):
https://nanochanqwrwtmamtnhkfwbbcducc4i62ciss4byo6f3an5qdkhjngid.onion/g/8140.html
>>6587 What's your issue with it? I seem to remember him making another thread or something about his imageboard, so if there is already a thread for it I'll delete this new one.
Use this thread to post reports for posts which violate either the global rules stated on the main page, or the board rules of the board it is posted on.
When making a report be sure to include:
* A link to the post in question
* A short description, and context if applicable, of why you think that post should be removed.