Not sure if this belongs in /meta/.
How should you (and I) advertise Nanochan? I'd assume just sharing it to "cool" friends and people who seem intellectually capable to not make low quality (shit)posts.
Should I even be questioning this or just leave the site entirely for wanting to potentially compromise its current comfiness?
Also I feel like this thread has already been made so if it has been then do what's necessary.
>>3590 I don't see any problem with advertising it far and wide. The fact that nano is hidden-service-only will eliminate 95+% of IB users and 99.99+% of normalfags in itself.
Unfortunately, no matter how much of a seekrit klub the place is, there will always be a handful of morons that somehow find their way here.
>>3596 not true
many goys use tbb on daily base and with eff/facecucked/twatter memeing about it all day long, everybody knows about nonexistent muh "dark web"
>>3597 This, and retards should be dealt with good moderation. There are many retards on Tor as well, and Tor has been popularized quite hard the last few years, not really a fringe thing only "true hackers" use
Also Tor is compromised as fuck, but whatever.
>>3600 so like a 8ch in terms of boards? or like a list to visit all the shitty little chans? problem with having a 'overboard' for all the chans would be who is in control of it and who moderates it. I believe there are a few individuals out there trying to make a decentralized version of a image board, but I can not remember their name pic related is me
>>3604 >decentralized version of a image board
There's Millchan, which works quite okay. But it requires people to install ZeroNet (if no proxy is available) and enable Javascript :^)
I'm >>3605
Don't go out of the way to keep Nanochan as muh secret club, but don't go out of your way to advertise it either. Small boards are comfy as fuck. I've had some top quality discussions here that would never have been possible on a bloated chan. Enjoy it while it lasts.
I think a anonymous community that is so small that you can tell who a poster is by their posting style and images, is against the nature that anonymous communication can bring to the conversation.
>>3761 Nah, I don't think Hakase (or anyone) can imitate different people by opinion, writing style and activity at any giving time. Though there are too few people on here to be sustainable.
>>3762 (me)
Anyway, Nanochan doesn't make it very convenient for people to use. There's no indication whether something has changed, you have to load the whole thread to see what has changed, there's no overboard, and its only accessible over Tor.
>>3763 >Nanochan doesn't make it very convenient for people to use
That's the point.
>There's no indication whether something has changed, you have to load the whole thread to see what has changed
This is perfectly fine. The only thing I'd like to see is the relative post times brought back. I figure hakase is working on it and it will be back eventually. Other than that there is no need to know the exact second a new post is made. It's simple enough to just click update on the thread.
>there's no overboard
Yes there is newfag.
>and its only accessible over Tor
That's the point. Go back to pigchan you fucking retard.
>>3763 It's not bad if you don't want the entire board infested with pigchan retards such as yourself. I'd certainly prefer if the posts per day were a little bit higher, but I'd rather have them the way they are than artificially increasing them by inviting legions of alt-kike subhumans to shit up the place.
>>3766 >Yes there is newfag.
Not a newfag, been here almost since the beginning but that's retarded... oops.
>That's the point.
What's the point. Are you implying people using Tor are better than those not using Tor, as you can tell that's not the case :^)
>relative post times
You mean, "last post on" or something along those lines?
>>3768 >Are you implying people using Tor are better than those not using Tor
Just because a handful of retards slip through the cracks doesn't mean that tor doesn't deter pigchan niggers. You've spent so long on imageboards that only exist to profiteer off of user data that you can't even fathom one which cares more for quality of posts over quantity. By the nature of being a strictly tor based website it is next to impossible to profile users and sell their information. Considering you unironically use ellipses I'm just going to assume you're a literal pajeet who couldn't possibly care less about anonymity or security, though.
I don't think relative post times will make a comeback unless hapase switches back to dynamic page generation, or semi-dynamic page generation (ssi etc.)
Anyway regarding op's topic, what other imageboards should we advertise on? Pigchan is out of the question, I think hapase already dredged up all the worthwhile users (and some of the cancer as well) from that place. Jewch and 3cuck are mou shindeiru (and were cancer anyways).
I think the disabling of the clearnet gateway kicked off a couple users, as well as the address scheme change which kicked off a couple more. Those people were morons, sure, but it is still a reason why the site is getting less active.
>>3770 Actively posting unsolicited "advertising" is retarded and cancerous. If you happen to browse the low PPH unpozzed pigchan boards that have flown under chinkmonkeys radar and someone openly displays a problem with the website and a desire for an alternative then let them know about the place. This is the most effective way to get long lasting users who are used to low PPH imageboards and aren't the typical alt-kike spergs. Getting 5 people who have a brain and make high quality posts is worth more than getting 500 cuckchan cross-posting idiots.
>I don't think relative post times will make a comeback unless hapase switches back to dynamic page generation, or semi-dynamic page generation
That's unfortunate. I think it's the one feature that is perhaps a little too inconvenient to live without.
>>3771 >a little too inconvenient to live without
You could always write a userscript to do it for you. I think there's a userscript thread up on /meta/, you could check there.
>>3768 >relative post times
meaning "3 hours ago" vs. "2019-01-17 03:13:42"
>>3771 >the address scheme change
the old address is still up, or are you referring to dropping the /nano/ prefix?
>>3772 >you could always write a userscript to do it for you
(different guy) I can't because I'm a brainlet
>there's a script on /meta/
already tried it, it doesn't account for the timezone change.
>>3774 >are you referring to dropping the /nano/ prefix?
yes
>it doesn't account for the timezone change
huh interesting. when I get back to my computer I might have a look and see what should be changed
>>3846 BBS niggers are just like mailing list niggers. They are mostly lolbergs and are interested in being polite and all that gay shit that would get you called a newfag on an IB.
Not sure if this belongs in /meta/.
How should you (and I) advertise Nanochan? I'd assume just sharing it to "cool" friends and people who seem intellectually capable to not make low quality (shit)posts.
Should I even be questioning this or just leave the site entirely for wanting to potentially compromise its current comfiness?
Also I feel like this thread has already been made so if it has been then do what's necessary.