They are a tranny psyop group on discord recruiting underage kids to convert them to the "pink pill" ideology. They function like a cult, in order to join you must either cut the name of one of their members into your forearm or start Hormone replacement therapy (HRT).
This is what we currently know about them
>They use /r9k/ and /soc/ as their main platform to recruit
>The current admins/leaders are named Cass and Kyouko
>A big part of the server might be underage
>They trade hard cp in the nsfw channel
>They promote cutting and suicide
>They dox those that tries to leave the cult or disagree with them
Lots of cults out there. For example dick cutting is still promoted on infants in local hospitals where I live. They need the cells for the cosmetics industry, also Jews and Muslims lel. New-half psyop doesn't sound bad, but the cutting is sick.
>They trade hard cp in the nsfw channel
If you have proof report it to police or FBI, don't post it here and expect us to crusade against them to save the retards of r9k.
>4cucks
>dickscord
>r9k
<oh no guys it's cancer!!! z0mg wat do?
who could have guessed, huh? ignore the mentally ill trannies and let them keep killing themselves. disgusting creatures.
Is there a reason I should care what a bunch of retarded losers from cuckchan are doing?
>oh no I joined a cult and gave them my personal information and posted pictures of myself in panties now degenerate retards on the internet are doing degenerate things with this information I willingly provided in a goyscord known for being filled with degenerate trannies!!!
All of these idiots are getting the bullet, who gives a shit. Just kill them as they come and otherwise pay them no attention. There is no rehabilitation for faggots and degenerates. They must all be put down.
>>2289 If I know you are or have been a faggot once the day of the rope comes around you're being systematically eradicated from society. There are no "pure" faggots and there is no distinction between the various kinds of faggotry. Faggot enablers get the bullet too.
>>2302 It really isn't a reason. Things are not self-evident because you say they are. You didn't dodge the question because you have no reasons, but because you are afraid of having your reasons challenged, and that makes you pathetic.
>>2297 Do you legitimately not understand why faggotry is problematic for the ethno-state or are you shit-posting? I'm not particularly interested in wasting time explaining something to someone who is going to pretend to be retarded at every turn.
>>2308 Are you really so arrogant that you think the way society is currently trending that we are heading in any other direction? If you're a faggot I'd advise much more caution than that. Or perhaps you're a kike, in which case arrogance is kind of the name of your game, no matter how many times it gets you systematically slaughtered or expelled.
>>2310 If you are going to assume that every single thing you read that you disagree with is shitposting then what the fuck are you here for? Do you even think? Or do you just regurgitate everything you hear?
Of course you've reached the finality of your belief system. There is nothing left to consider, but of course you are right! Every time you think you may be wrong, it's because of Jewish Homosexual influences.
>>2292 I know you don't realize this but their are several people who want an ethnostate as well. For example, interracial threads on 8ch/cuteboys/ always get derailed before they can even begin (all by natsocs). I would have gladly died defending hitler and the third reich regardless if they would have won the war or not.
>What about reproducing though
In all likelihood, gays will never reproduce directly but we could always donate sperm/ovums so that the infertile/people who have reproductive problems can reproduce. People who are classified as not being straight make up about 3.5% of the population and of that 3% about 60% identify themselves as liking their own sex exclusively. Which only makes up 2.1% of the population. Question, do you truly believe that would make any real impact on the reproduction problem?
>Who cares?
You should care because the only things things that truly matter is your family, your country, and your race. Chistianity has only aimed to defile these things with altruistic "values" which place man above natural law and every people being exactly the same regardless of all known facts about racial iq differences, dna, bone structure, metabolism, etc. Altruism is fine as long as it is trying to help people in a positive and nondestructive manor. But, boundless altruism has only been a disaster for the white race. It has influenced liberalism, has destroyed the nuclear family model, it has promoted non-white migration, and has erroded genuine culture with this metropolitan non-culture of the attempt to absorb as many different cultures as possible while denigrating its own. Which is nothing more than a self contridictory paradigm.
>Gays would never go natsoc that's nothing but a lie!
It is not. When I first watched the greatest story never told, I nearly cried my ass off. After that I had it in me to keep on researching (mein kampf, the myth, zweites buch, white power, the international Jew, etc) and found that I've been lied to my entire life. Almost everything my history teacher taught me was completely wrong (especially on major subject matter). The Jews own over 90% of the press, over 40% of all the worlds wealth (likely higher because Jewish bankers refuse to publish their net worth), almost the entire education system, the entertainment industry, etc etc etc. They also have a huge hand in politics and actively fund election campaigns in some cases not even being a citizen of said country. If you want to be a politician and are an "anti-semite" good luck because you'll have to face unbelievable odds to make it into office and even if you do you'll get targeted and thrown in prison with some bogus scandal, and if that doesn't work they'll try to assassinate you (see Abraham Lincoln, JFK, General Patton, etc). This is why democracy is garbage and just another tool to d&c the masses with a bunch of jargon about "equality" instead of logical reasoning and facts. Republican or Democrat, there is no difference they both promote most of the same things.
>>2353 Also, if you identify yourself as apart of the lgbtbbq movement you deserve the bullet. In fact, I'd suspect an overwhelming majority of gays to be useful idiots who will hang on the dotr and I personally would gladfully participate in such an event as I fucking hate your guts. If you are some flavor of sjwism, are a racetraitor, communist, etc. You you deserve the rope.
>>2351 >completely dodging the question and sperging out
There was absolutely no reason to take offense to that post unless it was correctly pointing out your intent.
>>2353 >people who are classified as not being straight make up about 3.5% of the population
Gays aren't born gay. Faggotry is overwhelmingly influenced by culture. If you have a productive society you don't have faggots.
>Question, do you truly believe that would make any real impact on the reproduction problem?
It's not about gays making a dent in reproduction numbers. Any relationship that does not result in children or literally can not result in children is counter-productive. Counter-productive actions should always be avoided.
>Gays would never go natsoc that's nothing but a lie!
I'm well are of the existence of delusional faggots who are intelligent enough to understand the appeal of the ethno-state but too selfish to actually contribute to its creation in any meaningful way. You are not worthy of protection. Faggots aren't worth even thinking about for more than a minute when deciding who gets the bullet. The jews push faggotry, faggotry is an inherently counter-productive action, faggots have alarmingly high rates of STD's. You haven't made a single argument for why a group of brainwashed retards who like to get shit on their dicks for fun should be tolerated. Your autistic rant about how much you romanticize the ethno-state is absolutely meaningless. You could simply replace fag with jew in this context. A jew will never be tolerated, a fag will never be tolerated, no matter how much he pleads. They both cause more problems than they solve, they are both small enough minorities to the point where it would be relatively simply to eradicate them. Slaughtering faggots is simply a no brainer.
I likely understand sexuality more than you ever could. Which is why I say by the time the day of the rope comes around you should stop being a faggot. Because you and I both know you weren't born a degenerate, you choose to indulge in this. Unless you've made faggotry somehow a part of your IRL identity and aren't just in the closet. Then you're getting the bullet either way. Let your friends no that there is no refuge for faggots in the ethno-state. I've met too many of you fucking freaks who think I will tolerate their existence because they hate niggers and jews. Chinks, paki's, pajeets all hate niggers and jews as well. They are still getting the bullet if they don't flee back to their shitty country. There are no based minorities. Just foreign invaders raping lands they have no right to.
>>2356 >Gays aren't born gay
Except they really are. I've already tried being attracted to my opposite sex and it never works out no matter how hard I try. Also, being gay has genetic markers, have been found to naturally occurring in several species, and gay conversion therapy has always been found to not be effective. https//www.livescience.com/50058-being-gay-not-a-choice.html
>Counter-productive actions should always be avoided
So Adolf Hitler should have been shot then?
>too selfish to actually contribute to its creation in any meaningful
But I DO contribute to society. I have a job, pay my taxes, and have even contributed to community cleanup duties picking up tons of liter. How am I not contributing to society?
>The jews push faggotry
They also constantly push straight pornography. Should all straights be executed because of Jewish actions?
>faggots have alarmingly high rates of STD's.
Technically true. But the reason for it is because they are decadent and screw as many people as possible without actually having a relationship with someone. Something I am against btw.
>You could simply replace fag with jew in this context
>Gays own most of the press, wealth, banking, etc
>They both cause more problems than they solve
Except homosexuality in japan and China never caused any major problems and existed there for centuries. It wasn't pushed in people's faces nor was it ever suppressed (in Japan specifically as China in 1840 banned it due to the wests influence).
>you choose to indulge in this.
Except I never did. I have been attracted to my own sex since I hit puberty and never understood heterosexuality.
>I've met too many of you fucking freaks who think I will tolerate their existence
There you are. You are making something that isn't a problem a problem. You do not have to tolerate me but you should have no right to stop me from having a relationship just because your garbage judeo-christian scriptures told you so. You cannot force people to accept your dogma no matter how hard you try and no matter the draconian method you will not succeed in stopping people from believing in evolution and paganism no matter how hard you try.
>foreign invaders raping lands they have no right to.
No kidding tell me something I don't know.
>>2358 No they aren't. The vast majority of faggots were molested as children. As society gets more degenerate and corrupt faggotry increases. Faggotry is objectively correlated between cultural influence not biological influence. You choose to be a shit-dick.
>So Adolf Hitler should have been shot then?
I don't know what you're alluding to but hitler is not the end all paragon of everything to strive for in ethno-nationalism. You're appealing to authority.
>But I DO contribute to society.
Contributing to society and contributing to ethno-nationalism are fundamentally different things.
>They also constantly push straight pornography.
You can not possibly be this stupid. You know that it's absurd to equate relationships to pornography. You also knew that I would simply respond with "all pornography is degenerate". Stop pretending to have a nigger brain because you can't face reality.
>But the reason for it is because they are decadent and screw as many people as possible without actually having a relationship with someone. Something I am against btw.
Just because you personally are against it doesn't change the nature of it. A jew personally being against israel or the malicious nature of kikes doesn't mean he gets spared. Ethno-nationalism means collectivism. Collectivism means approaching things from a larger perspective and not an individual perspective.
>Except homosexuality in japan and China never caused any major problems and existed there for centuries.
Japs and chinks are subhuman insectoids with failing societies. Their example is not one to follow.
> You do not have to tolerate me but you should have no right to stop me from having a relationship just because your garbage judeo-christian scriptures told you so.
Christianity has nothing to do with it. We've already established that faggotry is a counter-productive action. Counter-productive actions are immoral and should not be tolerated. It's my duty to my people to snuff your diseased ridden kind off of the face of the earth for the productivity of the nation.
>You cannot force people to accept your dogma no matter how hard you try and no matter the draconian method you will not succeed in stopping people from believing in evolution and paganism no matter how hard you try.
This is why you're a faggot. You are weak willed. You have no grit and only want everyone to get along. The ethno-state will only be created through mass genocide. The day of the rope is absolutely inevitable at this point. Fascism is the only way we are to achieve order. Your delusions of a world in which we can achieve an ethno-state without "forcing people to accept your dogma" are quite hilarious. I hope for your sake that you are a teenager, because a fully developed brain should not be this retarded. Though perhaps its the aids rotting your mind.
>>2359 >The vast majority of faggots were molested as children
I see this meme repeated all the time. Proofs?
>As society gets more degenerate and corrupt faggotry increases
Where is the proof for that statement? Not all 'degeneracy' is homosexual and most 'degeneracy' is heterosexual.
>Faggotry is objectively correlated between cultural influence not biological influence.
Where's your evidence for that? Oh right, you made that up.
>I don't know what you're alluding to
It is a fact that Hitler in his younger years was a drifter and homeless. He also chose to be celibate. Should he have been shot for these being unproductive?
>Appeal to authority
Nigger, he was one of the founders of national socialism and the leader of the third reich. There were also a few unemployed (although it drastically decreased) during adolfs rein as well. Also should priests have been shot for being celibate and unproductive to society?
>Contributing to society and contributing to ethno-nationalism are fundamentally different things.
How are they fundamentally different in anyway? In order to contribute in either society you'd have to do the same exact things.
>Ethno-nationalism means collectivism
Not entirely. National socialism was all about collectivism as long as you maintain your freedom as an individual and aren't traitorous to the reich. Hell, he even de-nationalized the economy and even supported small businesses (something republicucks won't do).
>Japs and chinks are subhuman insectoids with failing societies. Their example is not one to follow.
They have some of the longest running empires to ever exist. In fact, Japan had the longest running empire in history lasting 2600 years!!! How is that not a successful.country?
www.eupedia.com/history/longest_lived_empires_in_history.shtml
That's not even including the fact that during ancient Rome, homosexuality was very common and not against the law. >Christianity has nothing to do with it.
Sure it doesnt.
>We've already established that faggotry is a counter-productive action.
The only thing we have established is that you think that celibacy should be an offense that should be enforced by executing people for it.
>You have no grit and only want everyone to get along.
But I do have grit. If foreigners, niggers, kikes, etc refuse to leave on their own volition or by us guiding them out they should hang to death.
>The ethno-state will only be created through mass genocide.
Really? Hitler didn't have to genocide anyone to achieve his ethnostate. Sure there were plenty of executions but that is not genocide. What's next you're going to tell me the holocaust was real?
>Your delusions of a world in which we can achieve an ethno-state without "forcing people to accept your dogma"
Except I never said that. That's nothing but strawman. Don't get me wrong, force is absolutely necessary in order to achieve a workable ethnostate and to keep the civil upheaval of the Jew hindered and kept out of the country. I just believe that the most enforcible and important parts of society should be race and nation. If someone wants to be an athiest, Christian, pagan, etc should be allowed to be these things as long as you don't disparage others for having these views and recognize people of your own race as a brother and comrade.
They're still at it? I though he got doxed and threatened with spreading cp so he started freaking out and quit like a faggot? It really shouldn't be that hard to dox him, and they already have enough shit on them to get vanned.
>>2375 >Where is the proof for that statement? Not all 'degeneracy' is homosexual and most 'degeneracy' is heterosexual.
Ancient Rome, America, the entirety of western civilization. More youth now than ever are self-reporting as bisexual. To deny that culture is influencing and increasing the number of faggots within society is to deny that the sky is blue.
>Where's your evidence for that? Oh right, you made that up.
Do you legitimately and truthly believe that the current culture is not influencing people to be faggots? It seems like you are just selectively deciding when to believe something. In another conversation you may rant about how parents are turning their children into trannies and fags and how kikes are brain washing children through promoting faggotry on television, yet in this conversation you'll pretend as if you could not possibly perceive culture ever influencing the behavior of a society. It's either delusion or dishonesty.
>Should he have been shot for these being unproductive?
Sure, degenerate people should be shot. I'm not sure what your argument is. Are you seriously trying to say that because someone somewhere might do something someday possibly that they shouldn't be punished for their actions known in the moment? That is quite ridiculous.
>Nigger, he was one of the founders of national socialism and the leader of the third reich.
Irrelevant.
>Also should priests have been shot for being celibate and unproductive to society?
Sure. I don't really understand why you presume I have some sort of religious faith or that I care about christ cuckery.
>How are they fundamentally different in anyway? In order to contribute in either society you'd have to do the same exact things.
Your ability to contribute to a kiked society is meaningless. Your existence is antithetical to a productive society as you can not be reasonably expected to remain healthy, let alone produce healthy off-spring.
>But I do have grit.
Yet you can't keep yourself from getting shit-dick.
>Really? Hitler didn't have to genocide anyone to achieve his ethnostate.
Hitlers country didn't consistent of 60% non-whites. Fuck all of europe was essentially already an ethno-state you fucking retard. Stop these stupid false equivalencies.
>I just believe that the most enforcible and important parts of society should be race and nation.
At the end of the day both you and I know that if an ethno-state was achieved people would swiftly start killing off faggots. Your utopian vision of a white boy lover world is delusional. The only society in which you can draw any comparison to is one filled to the brim with degeneracy and pedophilia. The internet has warped your mind into thinking that white men are anything but absolutely fucking repulsed by your very existence. Imageboards and your faggot pseudo-IRC clients have normalized ironic homosexuality for a lot of people, but when push comes to shove real men want nothing more than to cave your skull in. So please tell your larping butt-buddies, faggots get the bullet first.
>>2375 Here's some actual science on homosexuals since that seems to be where this thread is going. 46% is actually lower than I expected and not all homosexuals, but it's a very significant amount especially compared to 9%
>In research with 942 nonclinical adult participants, gay men and lesbian women reported a significantly higher rate of childhood molestation than did heterosexual men and women. Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. Twenty-two percent of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women reported homosexual molestation. This research is apparently the first survey that has reported substantial homosexual molestation of girls. Suggestions for future research were offered.
>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/11501300/
>redefining what it means to be productive citizen to making children (literally nigger logic!)
>who was hitler, napoleon (only had one legitimate child), nikola testla, Isaac Newton, D.H. Lawrence, Alexander Pope, Beethoven, etc
>n-no they didn't contribute to the betterment of humanity at all!!!
>advocating genocide as the only solution to fixing a problem.
>thinking that we wouldn't have the technology to deport a huge bulk of the shitskins tommorow if we just forced a lot of the transportation system to do exactly that
>what are sectors
now generally speaking, white birth rates should be encouraged and state programs should be instituted to help nurish this, but i can scarce see of how executing a bunch of homosexuals (who are natsoc and minding their own business) would contribute to society at all. why don't you take your larping and hit the road with your hollywood tier propaganda? i mean seriously. also, even in ancient rome pedophilia was frowned upon and vilified.
>>2385 >because <insert anomaly> here did something productive anything they were even remotely associated with must now be tolerated within the ethno-state
Your entire logic is fundamentally flawed. It's fine if you're comfortable openly parading as a faggot during the transition into the ethno-state. It's only going to make tracking you down that much easier. The fact that you find the notion of a fagno-state more plausible than my threats is pretty entertaining, though. I'll give you that much.
>>2384 Do you even know what those statistics even mean? They mean that homosexuals are molested an alarming amount of times as children. That's all it proves. The only way you'd be able to prove that it converts them, is to prove that they we're straight before the molestation. In fact, if you were to interpret it that way, you'd practically be giving pedos ammo as they'd say that they were pleasured into being homosexual. Here's some info from the study you cited:
>Twenty-four (96%) of the 25 men who experienced incest viewed themselves as homosexual before the incest.
>with two (29%) of these women regarding themselves as homosexual before the
incest. Four (36%) of the 11 women experienced homosexual incest, with 3 (25%) of them regarding themselves as homosexual before the incest.
I couldn't find the whole study (guarded behind strict paywalls), but your wild guess is not based on fact.
>>2389 I never suggested anything. You seem to be quite defensive, though. 46% vs 9% is VERY significant. I'd like to hear your theory as to why homosexuals have experienced such a higher rate of childhood sexual abuse. I can only come up with two rational explanations: childhood sexual abuse can lead to homosexuality, or that homosexual children sought out sexual abuse because homosexuals are statistically exponentially more promiscuous. Although since it was classified as sexual abuse that implies it was not consensual, though the abused homosexuals could have still considered it abuse because of the age difference but regarded it as an enjoyable experience. Can't tell if that clarified because the paper isn't viewable like you said, and there is a huge lack in research on the more unsavory statistics concerning homosexuals.
>>2391 I see so many Nazi-sympathisers obsessed with people who are not purely heterosexual. This is very Semitic. In pre-christian Europe, divergent sexuality was only viewed as bad in the case of broken vows, or failing to continue the family line. Why don't internet Nazis focus on attacking circumcision? Circumcision or genital mutilation is a key element of Semitic faith in their dark Saturn... and is promoted and prevalent in North America and Britain.
Another amusing thing I find is supposedly straight men attacking non-conformist males. If you are a straight man why do you care if you have less competition? Again from the Nazi perspective, control over borders and the direction of demographic change i.e. eugenics is the only thing that really matters.
>>2421 >Why don't internet Nazis focus on attacking circumcision?
They routinely do. This is a thread about faggots and their degeneracy. Stop pretending to be retarded.
>>2422 >If you are a straight man why do you care if you have less competition?
If you view relationships from the primitive perspective of competition you've already completely misunderstood the point of traditionalism and the ethno-state. Your mind is approaching the topic from how it would benefit you as an individual within a kiked hyper capitalist society, and not how it would benefit your nation state. All of the points you are making sound like they are coming from the mind of a literal child they are so entry level. At least the weeb from the other day engaged in thoughts that could reasonably be considered legitimate arguments. You're just spouting retarded nonsense while posting faggy cartoons.
>>2423 Well said.
>All of the points you are making sound like they are coming from the mind of a literal child they are so entry level.
Well he is posting "nya" and pretending to be a cute anime cat boy/girl when in reality he's just a gross male who thinks emasculating himself will solve his problems.
>>2356 >>2359 >>2378 >Faggotry is overwhelmingly influenced by
culture.
Your basic assumption which you have failed to prove thus far. The fact that people are born with genetic traits pointing toward homosexuality at all disproves that point
>If you have a productive society you don't have faggots.
Like the other anon pointed out, japan and china have been very productive societies that have been so for thousands of years and have been 1st world pretty much since there inceptions. Why would a small percentage of the population hold back the entire population from being a productive society?
>Counter-productive actions should always be avoided.
It sounds to me that simply having fun to you is a counter-productive action and should be avoided at all costs
>I'm well are of the existence of delusional faggots who are
intelligent enough to understand the appeal of the ethno-state but too selfish to actually contribute to its creation in any meaningful way
Coming from someone who literally thinks that breeding is the only way to contribute to society that's rich. By your own logic, shitholes in southern africa who accept institutionalized welfare from 1st world countries are "productive societies"
>The
jews push faggotry, faggotry is an inherently counter-productive action, faggots have alarmingly high rates of STD's.
The jews push /lgbt/ crap because it divides the masses on meaningless issues. A so called issue that they are propagandizing in order to cause social turmoil in the political sphere so that they can easily take more power from their host countries. As for the stds, what do you have to worry about? Unless you are a homosexual or some junky you shouldn't have to worry about this. Also, the anon you replied to was clearly against having sexual relations with someone without staying in a relationship or breaking vows with someone
>You haven't made a single argument for why a group of brainwashed retards who like to get shit on their dicks for fun should be tolerated.
And you my man haven't come up with a single valid reason of why they shouldn't have legal protections and why they shouldn't be allowed to participate in national socialism. Your "argument" boils down to them not having rights because they 'inherently can't reproduce'. I take offense to that because my own sister is sterile and can't reproduce offspring. If your planning on genociding homosexuals that would fight by your side just because they can't reproduce, then the sterile and celibate need to be killed as well as that would be the only logically consistent thing to do. You are no comrade of mine. I'd rather die from infighting and allow the jews to take complete control of the situation than allow some slime like you to take over the government. There is no honor in what you're advocating for
>You could simply replace fag with jew in this context.
This is a false equivalence fallacy on practically every point made by him
>They both cause more problems than they
solve, they are both small enough minorities
What is your point here? What problems have homosexuals even inherently caused and are responsible for? Not all homosexuals are apart of the lgbt movement and the lgbt movement is inherently not homosexual. Just because jews promote this movement doesn't mean you can just up and shove all homosexuals into the same category and say they inherently want to have extra privileges and rights than heterosexuals do. Also, check your premise here. National socialists are even bigger minorities than even gays are. Why should people participate in your purge trial to achieve your version of a perfectly monolithic society based off of subjective bullshit? There are several different groups of people within the natsoc movement who differ with each other on several issues. You are acting like every genuine person within the movement agrees with you on this or any given issue. That is clearly not the case and the movement consist of one persons narcissism
>I likely understand sexuality more than you ever could.
You clearly don't. You are just parroting what other people are saying about it with virtually no logical/factual backing
>hate niggers and jews. Chinks, paki's, pajeets all hate niggers and jews as well. They are still getting the bullet
if they don't flee back to their shitty country.
What's your point here? He was arguing for an ethnostate just as you are. This is also a non sequitur. What does being gay have to do with entire geographical locations?
>No they aren't. The vast majority of faggots were molested as children.
>Faggotry is objectively correlated between cultural influence not biological influence.
Something you have never even came close to proving in this entire thread. Also, if that were the case gays wouldn't have been murdered in Christian Europe of the hundreds of years of its existence
>Contributing to society and contributing to ethno-nationalism are fundamentally different things.
They clearly aren't fundamentally different in anyway. Different yes, but not fundamentally different. If that were the case then paying taxes, having a job, and doing community services wouldn't be a contribution within a natsoc country
>You know that it's absurd to equate relationships to pornography
Except it really isn't. The fact that people in first world countries are not producing children is in part due to pornography. Should all people who are white (that's a lot of fucking people) be shot for having sex and not acting in the prospect of procreation because of jewish influence?
>Just because you personally are against it doesn't change the nature of it
See above. It's not that people are just not having sex, it's just that people are not using it to procreate. You are using a double standard here
>Japs and chinks are subhuman insectoids with failing societies.
Says no one ever. That's also rich coming from someone who advocates for a productive society as the end all be all in a society.
>Christianity has nothing to do with it.
But it does. The origins of anti-homosexuality in europe was because of christianity. Almost their entire case was because "it was unnatural and against nature". Not only is this the appeal to nature fallacy, it is also not founded in reality as we know it. Homosexuality has been documented across a very diverse spectrum of species on this Earth. Also, I find it ironic they'd use that argument when almost their entire ideologue is fundamentally against looking at things from a scientific perspective and against the very basis of what nature is
>We've already established that faggotry is a counter-productive action.
You've established precisely nothing
>Counter-productive actions are immoral and should not be tolerated
Already covered this. Having fun or enjoying a pass time to you is immoral. Why don't you quit your larping and fuck off
>You are weak willed. You have no grit
and only want everyone to get along.
Funny coming from someone who shapeshifts to whatever works for your argument in the moment. You are so weak willed that you can't even stay logically consistent for two minutes. You are also a loser for believing talking shit on the internet means you have grit or are some tough guy irl. In fact, that's almost your entire argument. You used the fallacy of argumentum ad baculum to back practically everything you say
>ethno-state will only be created through mass genocide.
Nice hollywood narrative you having going here Moshe. How much are they paying you?
>Fascism
Fascism and national socialism are not the same thing. Fascism is a form of government that had progressive income taxes, typically does not have private property, is not concerned with race, and was determined to achieve more "equality" especially among the sexes. Know how I know your larping?
>ethno-state without "forcing people to accept your dogma"
The other anon already covered this, also nice strawman
>fully developed brain should not be this retarded.
Hilarious coming from someone who resorts to petty threats on an anonymous imageboard and of spewing fallacies in every other sentence
>More youth now than ever are self-reporting as bisexual.
Well, no shit. That statistically makes sense as the human population is higher than ever before. Also, if your going to come up with the percentage argument, I will need to see the sources for this statement
>Inb4 shifting the burden of proof
>To deny that culture is influencing and increasing the number of faggots within
society is to deny that the sky is blue.
Even if that were the case. Who's to say it's not just them discovering their own sexuality and not them being brainwashed by today's culture like you seem to think
>Do you legitimately and truthly believe that the current culture is not influencing people to be faggots?
See above
>It seems like you are just selectively deciding when to believe something.
You've already done plenty of that thus far
>In another conversation you may rant about how parents are turning their children into trannies and fags
There certainly is plenty of evidence for that. Unfortunately, all I can do is point to individual studies in fact one case right here:
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2016/10/22/boy-treated-as-a-girl-by-his-mother-suffered-significant-emotional-harm-court-hears proved that forcing a child to be a tranny or a faggot is harmful and when the kid was released from his abusive mother he turned right back to normal. There is no doubt that his mother was being "culturally" influenced to do this sick shit to her own child. But the evidence proved that the brainwashing simply wasn't effective. Also, we live in cultural decay. Stop pretending that this "melting pot culture" is an actual culture. How is having multiple contridictory elements in a social climate a culture?
>I'm not sure what your argument is.
His argument was quite clear.
>I don't really understand why you presume I have some sort of religious faith or that I care about christ cuckery.
Coming from someone who thinks that there are any valid argument against homosexuality coming from a non-religious perspective that is quite rediculous.
>Your existence is antithetical to a productive society as you can not be reasonably expected to remain healthy
Says who? There is something called a blood test and something called a relationship restricted to one person you know
>let alone produce healthy off-spring.
This has already been covered. Even Hitler didn't have kids and was unhealthy by the time of his death
>Inb4 stonewalling with false authority fallacy
You have used this incorrectly. You see, a false authority fallacy happens when you give someone's opinion on something when said person has dubious credentials. How does this fallacy having anything to do with this argument?
>Fuck all of europe was essentially already an ethno-state
According to who? Germany (during the Weimar period) was one of the many pissholes of the world. They had race mixing, communism, liberalism, etc. How the fuck was Germany an ethnostate??? The rest of your "argument" you went back on Argumentum ad baculum and isn't worthy of a response. No wonder we'll never fucking get our ethnostate. Because of faggots like you who can't realize when they are wrong. Your entire train of thought is totally jewd.
>I can only come up with two rational explanations: childhood sexual abuse can lead to homosexuality, or that homosexual children sought out sexual abuse because homosexuals
Nice false dichotomy. Anyway, your misuse of science has already been covered right here:
https://www.centerforinquiry.net/uploads/attachments/Anti-gayActivismandtheMisuseofScience_1.pdf Btw,I am not a faggot but the fact you want to destroy anyone who is willing to be an ally and you exclude the only for one reason, can only prove that you are not willing to compromise unless it is 100% adoption of your position
>>2493 >Coming from someone who literally thinks that breeding is the only way to contribute to society that's rich.
Breeding is the only meaningful way that the vast majority of people can contribute to the ethno-state. You are operating under the notion that 99.99% of faggots aren't diseased ridden drug addicts and that in this hypothetical world that has never existed within respectable white nations they would be anything but what they always have been.
>By your own logic, shitholes in southern africa who accept institutionalized welfare from 1st world countries are "productive societies"
Niggers are more productive than the average whites if their ultimate goal is preserving their race. You seem to consistently forgot the goal here is to create an ethno-state. Not to create some weird le ebin imageboard ancap culture state.
>As for the stds, what do you have to worry about? Unless you are a homosexual or some junky you shouldn't have to worry about this.
Your argument against having a significant portion of your society plagued with disease is that I probably won't catch it? The more your constantly breed and mutate diseases the more viral and dangerous they can become. It doesn't sound like a stretch to say that faggots constantly creating more and more dangerous strands of virus' might very well be the end of humanity all together.
>I take offense to that because my own sister is sterile and can't reproduce offspring.
Appealing to muh emotion with an irrelevant anomaly. This conversation is about generalizations that can be effectively used to increase a societies productivity.
>You are no comrade of mine.
I feel like that went without saying.
>I'd rather die from infighting and allow the jews to take complete control of the situation than allow some slime like you to take over the government.
I do not doubt that you would rather see the world burn than have to deal with just not shove dicks in your ass. I would expect nothing less from a narcissist. The difference between me and you is that I haven't decided to hinge my life on being tolerated by others. The fascist way is about conformance, not tolerance.
>There is no honor in what you're advocating for
There's no greater honor than slaughtering malicious creatures who are fully aware of what they are doing and why it is wrong.
>say they inherently want to have extra privileges and rights than heterosexuals do.
I don't think you want extra privileges. I don't think you deserve any privileges.
>You are acting like every genuine person within the movement agrees with you on this or any given issue.
The thing is, they do. As I said before, you people live within an internet echo chamber. You are disconnected from real average white people. Hardline fully self-aware ethno-nationalism being a "minority" ideology is irrelevant. Every healthy man, woman, and child at their core are racist and homophobic. The difference between me and you is that you still perceive ethno-nationalism as some sort of opinion, where as I see it as an irrefutable truth. Fascism is the one and only truth. Fascism is a constant pursuit of the truth. It makes no difference whether or not you don't like the fact that vast majority of people despise faggots on a primal level. There is a reason why faggots have been despised since the dawn of time, regardless of your cherry picked degenerate societies that inevitably failed. People will always default to hating things that are different from them. At the end of the day there's no difference between exiling a nigger or a faggot. You are simply expelling the other to preserve your culture.
>The fact that people in first world countries are not producing children is in part due to pornography.
And we've already established that porn is degenerate.
>It's not that people are just not having sex, it's just that people are not using it to procreate. You are using a double standard here
What exactly is your question? If you engage in sex outside of marriage you should probably be shot, yes. It's an unproductive action that arguably becomes a counter-productive action as the distribution of women becomes warped.
>That's also rich coming from someone who advocates for a productive society as the end all be all in a society.
What is productive to an insect is not necessarily what is productive to a man.
>Homosexuality has been documented across a very diverse spectrum of species on this Earth.
Arguing that homosexuality should be tolerated because it exists in nature is just as much of an appeal to nature as the opposite. Homosexuality is literally fucking bourgeois. People back not a hundred years ago had to have massive families with tons of children if they wanted to live past 50 and be taken care of by their children. Homosexuality simply got you an early death. Homosexuality gets you an infinitely higher rate of disease transmission. Every single thing about homosexuality goes against what should be your instinct to thrive and continue existing. Cannibalism exists in nature, suicide, depression, self-mutilation, everything exists in nature. What exists in nature is completely fucking irrelevant because we are nature. What thrives in nature is what matters. The norm is what matters.
>Having fun or enjoying a pass time to you is immoral.
Many pass times are degenerate and should not be participated in. The fact that your mind can't comprehend the concept of a productive pass time just shows how far gone you really are. Read a book nigger.
>That statistically makes sense as the human population is higher than ever before.
Nigger are you fucking retarded? More people doesn't suddenly mean that the number of self-reported faggots goes from 4% to 45% you stupid motherfucker. You could increase the population ten fold and if culture had no influence it would stay exactly at 4%. I don't even know why you are sticking so desperately to an idea as absurd as culture having absolutely no bearing what so ever on the behavior of a population.
>Who's to say it's not just them discovering their own sexuality and not them being brainwashed by today's culture like you seem to think
The percentage of people attracted to planes has increased, the percentage of people attracted to animals has increased. There is no such thing as sexuality on a biological level for 99% of people. You have no biological function to make you attracted to anthropomorphic fucking planes. Getting off for men is entirely mechanical. What you are capable of being attracted too has nothing to do with some god given set of psychological attributes. Every healthy man on this planet can get off to every and any kind of porn if he sets his mind to it. Why are you pretending like you don't understand the porn rabbit hole? Suddenly when it suits you faggots you tend to forget a lot of what every single man lurking here knows from experience to be true.
>Even Hitler didn't have kids and was unhealthy by the time of his death
Muh hitler is not an argument. We already went over this.
>Inb4 stonewalling with false authority fallacy
Someone did something something somewhere at sometime so everything they were ever even remotely associated with must now be tolerated. Some nigger became a doctor, therefore all niggers are great, etc. We already went over this and it is a phenomenally fucking stupid argument. Stop repeating it. Your cherry picked anomalies are irrelevant.
>Germany (during the Weimar period) was one of the many pissholes of the world. They had race mixing, communism, liberalism, etc. How the fuck was Germany an ethnostate???
Relative to the modern western world you disingenuous fucking sperg. Germany was not 60%+ non-whites.
>can only prove that you are not willing to compromise unless it is 100% adoption of your position
You need not prove what I'm willfully admitting. But as I've said, my approach is the most commonly accepted one. Anyone keen on an ethno-state most certainly disgusted by faggotry. To imply otherwise is frankly delusional. I'm honestly not sure where you got the idea into your head that ethno-nationalists were made up of a majority homosexual allies. You've spent too much time circle jerking on the internet and not enough around real people friend. But you also seem to be implying that you don't want to see kikes systematically killed, so you're an even bigger normalfag that the literal faggot is. Go back to cuckchan and stay there.
This is /r9cute/
They are a tranny psyop group on discord recruiting underage kids to convert them to the "pink pill" ideology. They function like a cult, in order to join you must either cut the name of one of their members into your forearm or start Hormone replacement therapy (HRT).
This is what we currently know about them
>They use /r9k/ and /soc/ as their main platform to recruit
>The current admins/leaders are named Cass and Kyouko
>A big part of the server might be underage
>They trade hard cp in the nsfw channel
>They promote cutting and suicide
>They dox those that tries to leave the cult or disagree with them