/b/ - Random

Anything goes.

[Make a Post]
[X]





Ephebophilia Nanonymous No.4172 [D][U][F][S][L][A][C]
File: 3c7c50277091b4f3def8a66d1cc05ad2680969ab374491585633dec5ea63313d.jpg (dl) (647.47 KiB)
Pedophilia was never normal and was only practiced by sick individuals.But men marrying women as young as 16 has been a common thing even in late 20th century.Right now we just live in a fake society which pretends that a woman is not attractive just because she is a day younger than 18.90% of 17 year olds are not even virgin and half of the had 3 or more sexual partners.And these whores need a law to be "Protected" from exploitation by slightly older men.

Nanonymous No.4174 [D]
> boys can for some reason shoot straight since +/-12
> girls can have children even before that
But noooooo its 'unnatural'. Can you explain to me then why did humans evolve that ability if they arent supposed to use it for more than half a decade?

Nanonymous No.4177 [D] >>4178
basically kid-on-kid is allowed
kid-on-adult isnt
live with it gramps

Nanonymous No.4178 [D] >>4201
>>4177
>basically kid-on-kid is allowed
kid-on-adult isnt
live with it gramps

Teens aren't children

Nanonymous No.4187 [D] >>4199
half your age plus 7 rule should replace existing age of consent laws

old farts fucking gold diggers is defenerate behavior

Nanonymous No.4199 [D]
>>4187
>half your age plus 7 rule should replace existing age of consent laws

That would mean a 20 year old could not date below 17 and a 30 year old man below 22.I could agree to that if our society was not as fucked as it is.Normally you would want your partner to be less than 5 years younger than you anyways to avoid generational difference.

>old farts fucking gold diggers is defenerate behavior

I really don't view that as the most degenerate coupling.Sex with strangers and interracial couplings are far more degenerate in my book.

All this thread is about is pointing out the hypocrisy of "protecting" young sluts and acting like older men being attracted to half naked teens is some sort of mental illness.

Nanonymous No.4201 [D] >>4209
>>4178
the point was that you are old and busted
go to your funeral please

Nanonymous No.4209 [D] >>4210
>>4201
>the point was that you are old and busted
go to your funeral please

I am 21

Nanonymous No.4210 [D]
>>4209
let me drop some redpills for you
if you cannot hook up with some t33n qt while being that age, your old and busted and ugly and creepy
simple as that
society may want to screw with you, but if your girl doesnt charge you with bullshit, you should be fine

What is the age when somebody becomes sexually developed again? Nanonymous No.4282 [D][U][F] >>4287
File: c94dfb80bf3e143ff1f969c6014df62663cba668b114162b9f8c8b9282e5fb53.jpg (dl) (41.85 KiB)
Nothing wrong with sexually developed humans having sex with other sexually developed humans.
You cannot disprove this.

Nanonymous No.4287 [D] >>4289 >>4292
>>4282
The logic being used here is that since children are not to be considered to able to make the decision whether they want to have sex, the government is going to decide for them. It makes sense as it would be pathetically easy to manipulate a child to have sex with you.
Imo if the child were able to make the decision itself there isnt really anything wrong with it as long as the pedo would be loving and gentle. They cant though and this is the world we live in. There is nothing we can do about it really.

Nanonymous No.4289 [D] >>4293
>>4287
Being attracted to 17 year olds isn't pedophilia and teens are not easily tricked into sex. They care about looks and money as all consenting adults.

Nanonymous No.4292 [D][U][F]
File: c0a6c632a8a0c9a2deb6f86b59675131fae069cd67542bde934fffdf4b4161e6.jpg (dl) (38.64 KiB)
>>4287
>children are not to be considered to able to make the decision whether they want to have sex
Having or not having sex is not some kind of business decision where you need to evaluate pro and cons and having decisional skills, it's part of our instincts, even grown up people don't think about sex rationally and follow what they like or think that they want. In fact there is not that much difference between an horny 13 year old and an horny 18 year old.
Even when i was 13 I counsciously craved having sex and there was no manipulation involved.

What I find really absurd is the demonization of an act that was perfectly normal before.
If you married a 13 year old girl 100 year ago, with the consent of their parents it was normal, now it's the end of the world.

Fucking normalfags ruining everything.

Nanonymous No.4293 [D] >>4294 >>4295
>>4289
There is no exact point in ones development where they suddenly become able to make the decision. Especially since everybody develops at different speeds. You do however need to put some number in the law book so that its perfectly clear who to put into jail an who to not. Picking the number just before the designated line proves nothing. Most 16yos definitely are children by any metric you could come up with. I do agree that some people definitely dont need it this high but unless you want to implement some kind of sex pass there really is no way out.
>>4289
Basing a decision only on instincts and feelings is a thing only subhuman animals do. You can take the fact that we dont allow our children (coincidentally highly underdeveloped compared to a legal person) to do such a thing as a sign of how far did we come as a civilization. Theres a lot of rational thinking one needs to do before consent, such as:
- will this person pass some nasty germ onto me
- did i take proper measures to ensure i dont end up multiplying myself
- (in case of a virgin since there might be regrets later) is this the way i want to lose my virginity?
And most importantly
- am i being manipulated by my partner who might just want to drip and dip?

Having sex definitely does have an impact on a person and a highly promiscuous society is a society that isnt headed anywhere good. I too would fuck anybody at that age and im sure everybody else would too but that would not be an idea.

Nanonymous No.4294 [D]
>>4293
All medically proven non virgins aka whores should be allowed to legally prostitute themselves even if they are 16 years old.

Nanonymous No.4295 [D][U][F] >>4296 >>4297
File: e91e292cae5a9e2e50357fbccb5a871f79313ee9ecd6f9e07287bacd86e4d2b6.jpg (dl) (41.79 KiB)
>>4293
>You do however need to put some number in the law book so that its perfectly clear who to put into jail an who to not.
It's easy, is the person physically sexually developed? Then no crime.
>muh rational thinking
Basing every decision on rationality is literally reddit tier.
It's fine to base some decisions on your feelings and instincts, romantic relashionships and sex are in this category.
We are not machines.
>will this person pass some nasty germ onto me
No way of being sure of it it even for an adult.
Do you make every girl you want to have sex with take a test before? Do you live in the real world or in fantasy?
>is this the way i want to lose my virginity?
People give too much credit to virginity.
I wish i lost my virginity when i was 13, spending your best years without sex gives lot of stress, i argue that letting teens fuck also older people would make them less stressed and more focused and happy.
>am i being manipulated by my partner who might just want to drip and dip?
No way of being sure of it it even for an adult.
If we lived in a not cucked society kids could ask for advice to their parents.
Also the possibilities of a dump is lower if the partner is older, so one more argument pro ephebophilia.

Nanonymous No.4296 [D] >>4298
>>4295
>No way of being sure of it it even for an adult.
If both you and your wife have waited to be married before having sex to have children you can be sure that she is not infected.

Nanonymous No.4297 [D][U][F] >>4300
File: 1b6e65b454e5b47033acf01949038f3a3332dd56fd94e19bef043d186a5c0ea6.gif (dl) (1.88 MiB)
>>4295
> is the person physically sexually developed?
How do you judge that? 11yos can get pregnant so that metric would lead us nowhere.
> Basing every decision on rationality is literally reddit tier.
I would argue that putting the lizard brain in charge is the reddit here.
> It's fine to base some decisions on your feelings and instincts
No its not. You have any idea about the fucking non-stop orgies that would follow if everybody started doing that?
> Do you make every girl you want to have sex with take a test before?
You can totally make a very good judgement based on what you know about the person. Very difficult to do if you are a child though as you know very little about the world around you.
> No way of being sure of it it even for an adult.
Again, you can make a very good guess if you are an adult. If you are a child, you cant. If you legalized it there would be a very large amount of children manipulated into sex and dumped
> kids could ask for advice to their parents.
Show me one teen thats gonna consult their fucking parents before having sex

Nanonymous No.4298 [D]
>>4296
That has nothing to do with the topic of adult person has sex with teen person.
If they care about it they can marry or do whatever. Marrying at age 14 or lower was very common.

There is no difference between a teen-adult relationship and a adult-adult relationship, I would argue that teen are adults.

Nanonymous No.4300 [D][U][F]
File: 1e01e35d9635217b649acf45f492ccbd77767ede85f62fa6c5cda3b79ab9bedd.jpg (dl) (435.87 KiB)
>>4297
>How do you judge that?
Science? If you really need a number you could take the national average of the year girls get their first menstruation and boys start forming sperm. I don't have data at hand but i guess it would be around 11-13.
>putting the lizard brain in charge is the reddit here
Luke really puts it best watch:
https://invidio.us/watch?v=1czUp-MvWvE
https://invidio.us/watch?v=SZU-em6URmw
Using rationality in every aspect of your life is bugman-tier.
You need to go back.
>You can totally make a very good judgement based on...
Also teen can, and they can ask for advice to parents, school and friends, it's also gonna be lot of experience for them and good for their growth.
Even when you're an adult you can find yourself in the situation where there is a disparity of experience betweeen two persons, that doesn't mean that you are gonna be manipulate or anything like that. Your way of thinking makes me think you have an inferiority complex and are scared of others.
>Show me one teen thats gonna consult their fucking parents before having sex
That is part of the problem.

Nanonymous No.4305 [D][U][F] >>4307 >>4416 >>4419
File: 0f932822e873af76c283c2f7a6c3b278ee32c551b90cb8eabd6dc51527d92b6a.jpg (dl) (237.36 KiB)
Roasties and their enablers are the ones that increased the age of consent. Girls start puberty at 11 and finish at 16. Education for Amish women ends at 14 then they're encouraged to get married and shit out puppies. Cunts around the world shit out crotch goblins before they reach 18. Teen porn is the most popular porn category among men because men are attracted to neoteny in females. Men do not want old roasties. Everthing got fucked for men since whores can vote though.
whores can vote>>cucked politicians with a hunger for power promise to do what they want>>the government enforces their cucked laws with violence or the threat of violence>>men get fucked because whores are 51% of the voter base.

Nanonymous No.4307 [D]
>>4305
this

Feminists increased the age of consent cause this way they can brainwash girls into hating men before they can even have their first sexual experience.

Nanonymous No.4402 [D]
Question to nanons:
What is the lowest aged girl you would have sex with?

Nanonymous No.4416 [D]
>>4305
You realize feminists never achieved anything ever.
It's men who don't want their daughters/granddaughters fucked with who stand by AOC laws.

Nanonymous No.4419 [D] >>4470
>>4305
>Everthing got fucked for men since whores can vote though.
whores can vote>>cucked politicians


Voting changes nothing but weak men allowed women to become whores and got cucked out of family life.

Nanonymous No.4470 [D][U][F]
File: 82809fbd2ba83d2e85dd077a290e20b536dc2f25fbedc92b1e37de64ed5ab27f.jpg (dl) (85.76 KiB)
>>4419
>Voting changes nothing but weak men allowed women to become whores and got cucked out of family life.
You are wrong cuck. Just like national socialists you don't want to hold women accountable for their actions and subsequent consequences. You want to blame other people but women i.e men, muh jews, etc.. If women lose their ability to put someone in political power politicians will no longer give a shit about their desires anymore. They will cater to men. Things like gender quota hiring, the age of consent, no fault divorce and the whore get more than half, government funding for feminist diarrhea, blatantly misandric and man hating laws, etc. will slowly change. Most importantly the white population will increase when women are no longer given preferential treatment in education and employment. Yes they'll be home making them white babies.

Nanonymous No.4492 [D]
If you have the parents' consent then it's none of the state's damn business, and anyone who snitches to the government gets the bullet.

Nanonymous No.4671 [D] >>4672
imagine a bunch of virgin autists arguing about who should be allowed to have sex with who

Nanonymous No.4672 [D]
>>4671
>t. threatened