Uranium Deal Turns Spotlight on Hillary Clinton But Not the Way She Wanted

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Charles Ortel and Ekaterina Blinova

Hillary and Bill Clinton could have been involved in "pay-to-play" schemes, while transferring money through their charity in a non-transparent manner, according to Wall Street analyst and investigative journalist Charles Ortel who believes that the uranium deal may become the trigger for an all-out inquiry into the Clinton Foundation.

The Clintons' "modus operandi" is first, to lie under oath, and, second, to obstruct justice from within government and even from outside government, Charles Ortel alleged, commenting on investigations launched by the Senate and the House of Representatives into the Obama-era uranium deal. It was rumored that as secretary of state Hillary Clinton approved the agreement benefiting Russia in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation (CF) from Canadian mining industry leaders involved in the deal. Clinton refuted the claim that she helped support the donors' interests.

Hillary's Uranium Case: Why Now?

Answering the question why of all times Hillary Clinton's uranium case has surfaced now, Ortel noted that it was Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley who kicked off the initiative following the release of reports by US journalists John Solomon and Sara Carter.

Ortel believes that Attorney General Jeff Sessions "has been dragging his feet on putting resources behind a full and complete investigation of the network of charities operated by and for the Clintons that seems to be engaged in the largest frauds perpetrated in modern history, when one considers all the tentacles."

While speaking to Alabama voters in late September, Donald Trump responded to their chant "lock her [Clinton] up" by saying: "You've got to speak to Jeff Sessions about that." Then, during an October 18 congressional hearing, Attorney General Sessions dropped the hint that the Justice Department was looking into the alleged conflict of interest involving the former secretary of state.

Is the Clinton investigation launched by the US Congress, and, allegedly, Sessions, connected to the ongoing Trump-Russia probe?

Ortel assumed that the narrative concerning Trump's supposed collusion with the Russians during the 2016 presidential elections, promoted by "Team Obama" and "Team Clinton," is nothing but an attempt to prevent the US president from disclosing "potential criminal activities involving government officials, donors and others [who] might get prosecuted once the Trump administration finds its feet."

"When Trump shocked many by winning, Team Obama and Team Clinton must have realized that skeletons created and put in closets from January 20, 2009 onwards, might get exposed," he explained.

"At first, it seems consideration was given to contesting the election result, and then to obstructing the inauguration. As these moves failed, the Trump-Russia collusion narrative ultimately triggered the appointment of [Special Counsel Robert] Mueller, and then of his team," Ortel said.

The Clinton Foundation Brought Into the Spotlight, Again

The alleged conflict of interest has once again brought the Clinton charity's murky financial activities into the spotlight. According to Ortel, who has been investigating the CF for the past few years, the Clintons have a long record of receiving grants, including from foreign nations, and not disclosing it in an appropriate manner.

"There are various laws that require a US charity to disclose its government grants, including those from foreign nations," the investigative journalist explained. "When you look through the IRS tax forms from 1998 through 2007 for the Clinton Foundation, you will see that the line 'government grants' is not filled in for any of these 10 years."

Ortel noted that "On December 18, 2008, the Clintons reluctantly provided a table that purported to show donor information concerning cumulative contributions, arrayed in a misleading fashion by category." "This list includes numerous 'governments' so the CF and its trustees knowingly omitted crucial information on tax forms submitted for 1998 through 2007," the analyst highlighted.

However, Ortel emphasized that the list is "misleading" because "the largest category $25 million and up failed to highlight that UNITAID had donated hundreds of millions by December 18, 2008, and had even advanced monies for 2009 to the CF in 2008."

UNITAID, an organization aimed at providing access to drugs and treatment for AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis patients worldwide, was founded with the assistance of former US President Bill Clinton and then French President Jacques Chirac in 2006. The entity was officially established by the governments of Brazil, Chile, France, Norway and the United Kingdom while the CF was named as one of its key partners.

"These donations had gone to the Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS Initiative, Inc., an AR [Arkansas] legal entity whose authority to operate had been revoked on March 31, 2008, with effect from December 31, 2007. Moreover, the French government and possibly other donors had grown quite concerned about this illegal activity around then," the analyst surmised.

In addition to federal filings on government grants, New York and California require detailed disclosures that still have not properly been made by the Clinton charity concerning government grants,  amount and intended purposes.  "So, one issue that is deeply troubling for the Clintons and for the regulators who still seem willing to give the Clintons, lawyers, accountants, a pass is what purposes did the donors intend the Clinton Foundation to carry out in each year from 1998 forward. And exactly when, if ever, was the CF authorized by the IRS [Internal Revenue Service] and the states to be more than a Little Rock Presidential Records Repository and Research Center," the Wall Street analyst underscored.

Given the fact that lots of data are omitted in the CF balance sheets the question arises what actually happened to these various government and other donations, Ortel asked.

How Clinton Charity Evolved Into Monstrous Non-Transparent Network

So, when did this trend start?

Citing Taylor Branch, the Pulitzer Prize-winning author and Bill Clinton's secret diarist, Ortel said "Bill Clinton was thinking about his library immediately after he won his first presidential election." However, the charity intended to gather money for the William J. Clinton Presidential Center in Little Rock has transformed into an enormous and non-transparent international network.

"Early on in Arkansas, [the Clintons] likely discovered that no one actually checks what really happens to sums spent by governments in the granular ways that forensic accountants and investigators can check, if they wish to," Ortel remarked.

The investigative journalist elaborated that "with the 'charities,' operating without controls, the Clintons, their allies, and others can divert incoming funds to side accounts, and declare only a portion of the vast sums that actually are sent their way." He highlighted that "with the balance of 'revenues,' they can claim expenses of any amount they wish, but ensure monies go to allies who can then kick back portions of sums actually sent."

"Had the American public learned the truth starting in 2001, the Clinton Foundation long ago would have been shut down, and possibly trustees and Clinton family members, as well as executives would have been prosecuted, convicted, and incarcerated," he alleged.

According to the analyst, there were many other scandals "that plagued the Clintons, while and after Bill was a president."

"During and after the 1996 election, allegations were made and subsequently investigated that the Clintons and Democrats tapped foreign money sources, including possibly the Chinese and there were endless hearings," he said, referring to the 1996 US campaign finance controversy — an alleged effort by the People's Republic of China to influence domestic American politics.

However, Ortel stressed that "these hearings never seemed to go to the heart of underlying issues, possibly because both politicians in both parties (illegally) may have been engaged in the same bad behavior."

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Anderson Coopers Gerbil's picture

Joltin Jeff Sessions has her back all is well

BullyBearish's picture

what has kept this from happening so far and will prevent it from going much further is that those responsible for policing this bull$hit are very dirty themselves...by design, the bankers "own" them by letting them get away with enough to threaten to use it against them if they stray too far...

 

they are ALL dirty...

J S Bach's picture

Could this be the bucket of water that finally melts the witch?  Don't bet on it.  There are far too many complicit criminal politicians involved and the unholy duo would gleefully drag them all down should that apocalyptic moment come.

johngaltfla's picture

If Loral Aerospace didn't get the Arkansas dirtbags, nothing will.

El Oregonian's picture

Whitewater Part #2.

Iran/Contra = Mena Arkansas = Clintons

jcaz's picture

"May"?????

Fuck- what more do they need at this point-  her cashing the check at her local Quick-Cash?????

Chupacabra-322's picture

“The Clintons' "modus operandi" is first, to lie under oath, and, second, to obstruct justice from within government and even from outside government and third, Murder / Execute anyone who might blow the whistle or turn States evidence on them.”

Like how I edited that?

SWRichmond's picture

Can you wipe this with a cloth, you fucking miserable criminal cunt?

MozartIII's picture

Nothing will happen! It's the Clintons, they are the law. Whatever they approve, will then happen. Sessions was bought and paid for long ago!

Chupacabra-322's picture

Then, it will be Scorched Earth with these Pure Evil War Criminal Treasonous Seditious Psychopaths via vigilante justice by Execution From Extreme Prejudice.

Oldwood's picture

Corruption is universal. No one can afford for them to dig TOO deeply. For many of us our jobs depend upon it as corpporate America has become so entwined in this corruption few would exist today without it.

SybilDefense's picture

Perhaps if we the people got a little taste of the winnings, like if a bank of politician is found guilty of graft or manipulation, each american would receive a portion of the fine in our own government funded direct deposit account.  Get caught selling influence for a $180M gain, then every american gets $X.  Profit by $8 billion manipulating the market, your account goes cha-ching.

If the Dems stole money to gain power, why pay the fine to the ones in power.  Its not like "fines and reparations" are an expected credit on the gov books.  If the people got a refund for illicit gov behavior (instead of the gov), then I'm pretty sure HBSC's fine wouldn't go from $1.3 B down to $150k after the dust settles, announced on Xmas eve on page 39.  We pay the gov to do a job.  If they don't do what they promise, or use the position illegally, I want my money back.

GUS100CORRINA's picture

Uranium Deal Turns Spotlight on Hillary Clinton But Not the Way She Wanted

My response: Be very careful, then, how you live—not as unwise but as wise, making the most of every opportunity, because the days are evil.

HRC and most leaders in the political establishment serve a dark master. I will stop right here.

LOCK HER UP AND FIRE MUELLER ASAP!!! 

thebigunit's picture

I don't think Trump is dirty.

they are ALL dirty...

Trumpus Maximus has been thinking of running for president for a long time.  And I think he was well aware of how dirty and vicious it was, especially in New York.

Trump realized that he was and is a big target, therefore, he kept his nose clean.

There's a reason that the "Russia collusion" investigations haven't turned up anything on Trump.

The Dems just assumed they would find dirt on Trump just by appointing a Special Counsel, because they ALWAYS find dirt.  But, there used to dealing with Democrats.

Surprise! Trump is clean!

samsara's picture

Naw, no pot charges, they're safe

Bush will put in a good word for them

Farqued Up's picture

Something doesn’t smell right about Sessions in a good way, alll are too tight lipped. It was all bluster and then all quiet for months, now, the hammer is going to drop.

We hope!

WillyGroper's picture

i think ur right.

couldn't turn it into a partisan witch hunt like the entire last admn...optics.

mueller has flipped...reason for the narrative 180.

Duc888's picture

 

 

Sessions currently is running three seperate investigations into Hillary.

jmack's picture

worked up a Comey Campaign poster..

 

https://imgur.com/a/eYMm1

 

 

    Is it true that on the Chinese calendar, 2020 is the year of the weasel?

 

    Did you know that weasels are great at killing rats?  Especially if they are ratting on HIllary.

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aL9c7418ZgU

 

The Wizard's picture

No doubt the Clinton's were using every contact they had to figure out what type of investigations Sessions was conducting. It had to be tight lipped.

The Clintons' "modus operandi" is first, to lie under oath,

They don't lie they define the terms as it is best suited to circumvent criminal statutes. It all comes down to what the meaning of "is" is.

youarelost's picture

And the GOP protected her and will do it again. Nothing will come of this.

 

Single Party rule. 

nightwish's picture

Need we hear more? I say we go straight to a hangin, or guillotine will also do just fine. Maybe a game of guillotine bowling to add some levity.

Winston Churchill's picture

A televised garrotting would be far more entertaining.

earleflorida's picture

the lionist`she`devil dresses in angelic white [always] before the crimson tide reaches its zenith marinating her naivety prey with a serpents tongue occluding ones sirens`song?

VideoEng_NC's picture

All one can say at this point is, there sure has been a lot of rope that's been fed out.

FoggyWorld's picture

Nobody available to catch it.

hxc's picture

Hmmm... would that be 4-dimensional rope? ;)

sheikurbootie's picture

Some weasel like Podesta will talk when pressured with jail.

Hillary's gig is UP! 

D503's picture

New book incoming, "This is What Happened That Time."

hotrod's picture

Trump will reelected if he will will PROSECUTE SOME OF THE CLINTON, OBAMA WHITEHOUSE, DNC, FBI  CRIME

Be the law and order PRESIDENT.  Voters from both parties will respect that.  HANG'EM HIGH DON

FoggyWorld's picture

Problem is Trump doesn't seem to understand that many who voted for him expected him to deliver on the very issues you mention.

Just doesn't seem to be happening.

Duc888's picture

 

 

Fasten your seat belts.

HardlyZero's picture

"...for an all-out inquiry into the Clinton Foundation."

Thank you all, and for getting me to today. 

Rumble....

DjangoCat's picture

How much patience do you have.  Mine is growing thin.

lester1's picture

Nothing will happen. Hillary is above the law. She has dirt on everyone in Washington DC. Jeff Sessions is terrified of her.

garcam123's picture

Sessions probably sucked her cock a few times and is OWNED!  He looks like a punk too!

Leave the fucking potheads alone you old cocksucker!

DjangoCat's picture

+100  Leave the potheads alone.

Loanman26's picture

 Charles,

Between George & Jason and yourself you have put yourself at risk by digging for the truth.

Thank you

 

In your opinion based upon the information you have uncovered,

 in what capacity is the MIS Department involved?

It appear the Chopras had the most to lose. Do you think they were the DNC leak?

Loki Libertarian's picture

Lock her up.... lock him up.... lock em all up....

G_T_A_44's picture

The Uranium One deal was nothing short of Treason. This goes far; far; far beyond Pay-For-Play.....

DirtySanchez's picture

Enough is enough.

On national television....

Take the entire Clinton family and put the flame thrower on them until they are gone.

Then throw them in the garbage.

hooligan2009's picture

for hillary clinto to have secured the democrat party nomination for presdient, she would have had to have paid off many sitting democrats to support her.

funds no doubt diverted via all kinds of "schemes" from the CF, the CGI or whatever C device.

as with the poorest nations, the libtard socialist demoNrats, under Obama, employed as many minorities as possible, using racial discrimination (against "whites") to create the swamp.

wintess the number of Obama holdovers even now, working for government agencies, in the Fed and even the white house - probably 50-60,000 all up - all scared shitless that they will be held up to a standard that is not based on racial discrimination and, instead, is based on ability.

the racial discrimination practised by obama has harmed generations of people for decades to come, for the simple reason that so called "positive" discrimination in favor of any group, sows the seeds of distrust AGAINST that group, regardless of any true ability of those that would never dream of seeking the "boost" from discrimination.

this negative impact from doscrimination (positive or negative discrimiantion) applies to women, minorities, LBGTQ - all those receiving it.

what is not being talked about is the massive age discrimination (of men ad women) in all areas, but espeically technology, where only H1B visa holders or loud mouthed libtard snowflakes need apply.

but then "agism" is a bogotry that the MSM will never, ever cover, despite the fact that those over 50 are the largest consumers of the crap peddled by the MSM on tv or newsprint. under 50's are turning off the MSM and "cutting all chords".

bleh..

The Divided Stoopids of DuhMerica's picture

And what's going to happen to any of them?...

Not a fucking thing.

Now move along... Nothing to see here.

Karl Marxist's picture

Of course not if lazy spectators like you have your way.

“Rebellion to tyranny is obedience to God.”-ThomasJefferson's picture

The founding fathers would more than likely approve of the armed citizenry turning their weapons on every Clinton, Bush, Obama, and most every member of congress.

The USA is no longer a republic; rather a banana republic.

NickPeeMe's picture

The Uranium one story was in the NYT years ago this is news because why? Hillary lost get over it.

Duc888's picture

 

 

Nice try a-hole.

 

NOW LET'S HEAR SOME OF THE LATEST STUFF

In Part Three we reviewed stunning information suggesting a major "data dump" from Wikileaks is very imminent.

We are already one day past the initial window of October 21st, 2017. This upcoming week could be of pivotal importance.

If this data dump is as big as the insiders are claiming, it is the Alliance cyber equivalent of a nuke.

The Cabal definitely seems to be aware of this, and is fighting back with everything they've got -- including the badly-botched Vegas atrocity.

With the full spread of data we have shared in previous sections, it appears this data could produce absolute proof that Seth Rich leaked the Podesta papers.

Seth Rich's suspicious murder may well have been another "inside job" to punish him for revealing the truth -- and dealing a death-blow to the Cabal.

This story has percolated for some time and it may finally be reaching its epic conclusion.

 

LET'S HIT THE GROUND RUNNING

        The latest disclosures appear in a 4Chan archive called 4plebs.

The way you search for the leaks from this insider is by using the Find function on your browser, and then putting in his anonymous code name.

These code names are usually just a collection of random characters, but they do allow you to trace everything the person says in any one thread.

In this case, the code name that was assigned to him was pI4yGye9. Everything we are about to read was written on a single day -- October 16th.

There may well be other leaks since then, but this is already a huge volume of interesting data to sort through, and more than enough for one article.

I have done some very light editing to make it more readable, while also leaving most of the mistakes untouched.

Here we go.

 

Latest 4Chan Insider Disclosures -- Inside 4Plebs Archive https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/145494390  

ID:pI4yGye9 Mon 16 Oct 2017 06:30:31 No.145496201 Report

Quoted By: >>145496428 >>145497390 >>145498118 >>145499469 >>145500343 >>145500674 >>145500697 >>145501056 >>145501435 >>145504810 >>145506911 >>145515910 >>145494390 >>145491189 # Friendly reminder that I won't "announce" myself with nicknames y'all gave me anymore.   BUT, Assange will release if he makes it to the 21st.   It will only PROVE the irony of what Clinton is implying because she's right, but not in the way the media is spinning her statements.

The overall release will conclude and confirm that the Clinton Campaign/DNC collided with Russia themselves in an attempt to catapult Trump over his GOP competitors during the primaries, then use bolster his cordial business relationship with Russia/Putin, to push the "Russia collusion/hacking" narrative.   The problem for them is that Wikileaks has held a lot of this info for a while, via NYPD pbtained files/ communications collected from Huma/ Weiners laptop.   They had mirrored the files/ communications before handing it over to the FBI as part of their initial investigation, which is why they publicly threatened the FBI themselves, stating if the FBI didn't release and push for DOJ indictments, the NYPD would release.

This is why I said last night, it's not a pizza release.   Yes, there will be the same Podesta-style creepy-coded references, maybe a few unironic Weiner owned images of pre-teens he sent dicks and tits back and forth with.   [These will be] sprinkled throughout communications which will be included in this dump, because Wikileaks doesn't remove or edit the total bulk of any files, they publish it all in full.     BUT, Hillary will not go down for pizza as a result of this dump.

This dump will be broad. It will probably be the biggest file dump Wikileaks has ever published in size.   And when it's out there, it's going to leave NO DOUBT on things like, WHO colluded with Russia, WHY it was done, WHAT crimes Hillary (as Secretary of State AND as a presidential candidate) and the elite DNC/GOP/Obama admin, like Lynch, Comey, etc. actually committed.   Again, when it's done you will have ZERO DOUBT AS TO WHO IS ACTUALLY GUILTY OF CRIMES AND ELECTONS RIGGING.  

 

 

ID:pI4yGye9 Mon 16 Oct 2017 06:45:56 No.145497390 Report

 

Quoted By: >>145497904 >>145498237 >>145498961 >>145499469 >>145500602 >>145501435 >>145501749 >>145505398 >>145507956 >>145509790 >>145510486 >>145510831 >>145496201 And please remember, Trump knows and has known EXACTLY what Assange has...   It's why he's been able to be so bold and seem like he's playing "4D chess" in front of the media by making claims about things like "wiretappings" and other loose statements that always seem to come true later.   This release is why he pretended not to know/ be mad about Sessions recusing himself from "Russia", but he knew all along.    [He] also knew he couldn't afford another bullshit Flynn loss the MSM and establishment would try to pull, had he not recused upfront.     It's why Comey wasn't REALLY FIRED. He did it to let Trump take it as a win, but Comey knew and they pre-negotiated his "surprise public firing".   It's why Mueller was put in place on purpose, but has unironically, only found more ties to collusion and criminal election fraud/activity back to the DNC, Hillary Campaign and shady GOP establishment, who has been involved in the attempted demise of Trump, all along.   When this is done, the FBI and CIA won't have a f--ing leg to stand on.   And if Sessions/Trump hadn't played their cards right... the DOJ wouldn't have a leg either.   Assange gave Mueller/ the FBI until the 21st.   Trump is aware of the deadline and hopes Mueller will bite the bullet, do right for the people and for the sake of justice and come out with it all on his own to end the investigation that will ultimately end anyway when Assange drops what he's sitting on.   Trump knows it's better for the people if Mueller does what's right. It will restore people's faith in justice and our departments.   If Assange gets it done himself as I expect, then like I said, Trump will have no choice but to address the downfall of TWO of the 3, 3 letter agencies/ departments I mentioned last week... FBI and CIA.   Mueller and team have until the 21st, assuming Assange keeps his promise and/or no one gets to him first.   Assange dropped his hash yesterday. They ALL KNOW WHATS COMING... regardless of who makes it public first.     Q: So we've gotta wait 5 more days for an Assange release?   ID:pI4yGye9 Mon 16 Oct 2017 06:59:14 No.145498545 Report Quoted By: >>145499469 >>145501015 >>145501113 >>145501435 >>145496428 If Assange holds up his end as initially promised, then yes. But remember, Assange ALWAYS hypes his releases up.   He ALWAYS releases the hashes of his next expected release to his "publishers", in advance.   Releasing them 5-7 days in advance is normal for him.     Hence he released the first hash of this release last October, and then the embassy and his Iceland HQ, went dark.   Then, he held the release, as he felt delayed due to NBC conveniently releasing the Billy Bush/ Trump bus tape they purposefully held and timed, in an attempt to swing the upcoming October debate that next week.   He didn't want his release to be overshadowed by the media's coverage of the Trump, "grab 'me by the puss" tape. It was a smart move on his part, but then his shit went off the grid.   This actually answers the questions some have posed about this new hash not opening the files related to the initial hash last October.   They don't match because he's picky and anal.   He reverified and validated the files over the better part of the last year, to ensure his sudden network outage and breach at HQ/ Embasdy, didn't corrupt any files that could come back to bite him in the ass and ruin his pristine track record of accuracy.   So, he released the new hash to confirm authenticity against that data set. It was another good move on his part.     Whoever turned his and Wikileaks's lights/ infrastructure off, could've corrupted his files and hoped he f---ed up and just threw up a release they knew they could poke holes in because they sabotaged the files.   He's really pretty smart, you know...   It's why Trump has so much faith and balls of brass when it comes to his confidence in the bold yet vague statements he makes publicly.   [This includes statements] like "wiretapping" and razzing the media with one-line zingers they can't figure out, and then talk about/ hypothesize over for a week's new cycle.     Q: Then why was Hannity and Cernovich saying something big today? They need to shut up if nothing delivers because it's demoralizing.  

ID:pI4yGye9 Mon 16 Oct 2017 07:09:37 No.145499432 Report

Quoted By: >>145501435 >>145504979 >>145507166 >>145498118 Hannity is riding the hash coattails. You all assumed 7 as 7 days, and would then assume 7 means Monday, because he wasn't on the air yesterday.   7 referred to last night's hash drop.   Hannity now gets to address/ hype this on his show until the 21st, or until Assange decides he's not getting enough reach or traction from Mueller and team, then decides to say f--- it, and release.   For his sake, I hope he does what he said and gives til the 21st.     I want to see Mueller have to proactively address and publicly disclose it all himself, than Assange do it. This is what Trump is hoping as well.   It bodes better for Trump and the admin, if the "special prosecutor" America demanded, costing tax payers more than $1 million/day investigating what Trump AND Mueller both know is factual bullshit, looks better if Mueller breaks himself.   Assange and Hannity are playing this like a f--ing pressure cooker against Mueller and everyone else guilty and involved, right now.   They're all scrambling trying to figure out what they can do and sadly for them, time is up.   There are VERY FEW options left for them.          And in this environment, with so many people paying such CLOSE attention to EVERY F--ING DETAIL released about everything AND ANYTHING (like the Vegas "investigation" shit show of "evidence" and "reporting"), they all know their old, standard, bag of once successful tricks, won't work.        Continue here.... https://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1221-4chan-wikileaks?sho...  
NickPeeMe's picture

The Uranium one story was in the NYT years ago this is news because why? Hillary lost get over it.

NickPeeMe's picture

The Uranium one story was in the NYT years ago this is news because why? Hillary lost get over it.