Update 3:
Some more soundbites out of Russia, via Reuters:
- RUSSIAN FOREIGN MINISTRY SAYS BRITISH GOVERNMENT HAS OPTED FOR FURTHER ESCALATION BY EXPELLING RUSSIAN DIPLOMATS
- RUSSIAN FOREIGN MINISTRY SAYS BRITISH PM STATEMENT IS A FLAGRANT PROVOCATION
- RUSSIAN FOREIGN MINISTRY SAYS BRITISH GOVERNMENT HAS CHOSEN CONFRONTATION WITH RUSSIA
* * *
Update 2:
The head of the Upper House of Parliament in Russia has called the expulsion of diplomats a "provocation". He has promised Russia will react in a "fast, tough and reciprocal way".
Separately, Angela Merkel said that the EU is united on Russia but must keep talking to Russia. The German chancellor said: "We take the findings of the British government very seriously ... We will present a common European view here.
"Nonetheless, I say we can't break off all contacts now. We must still talk with the Russians despite all differences of opinion."
Julian Assange has also chimed in:
Theresa May is in a difficult position. If the Kremlin was knowingly behind the claimed nerve agent attack on Sergei and Yulia Skripal then it is likely designed to provoke a UK response with Russian moves already gamed out. Only a highly creative response can avoid such a trap.
— Julian Assange ⌛ (@JulianAssange) March 14, 2018
Whilst expelling suspected intelligence agents is showy deterrent (such agents apply pressure towards their government to not engage in action that causes them to booted out) it also has high costs: Better the agent you know.
— Julian Assange ⌛ (@JulianAssange) March 14, 2018
* * *
Update:
As previewed earlier, Theresa May announced that Britain will expel 23 Russian diplomats who are "undeclared intelligence officers", i.e., spies. The retaliation comes as part of a range of measures in response to the poisoning of former double agent Sergei Skripal.
Speaking to parliament, Theresa May said the Russian state was culpable in the nerve agent attack in Salisbury on former Russian double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia and is the reason for the expulsion of 23 diplomats: "All who been identified as undeclared intelligence officers. They have just one week to leave," she said.
UK will expel 23 Russian diplomats over nerve agent poisoning #Salisbury pic.twitter.com/1geAdkrZ58
— Sky News (@SkyNews) March 14, 2018
"This will be the single biggest expulsion for over 30 years and it will reflect the fact that this is not the first time the Russian state has acted against our country" she added.
She says Russia's response "has shown complete disdain" and the country has offered no explanation for the Russian-made novichok nerve agent used in the attack. The PM says the matter has been treated with "sarcasm, contempt and defiance".
Russian response has demonstrated "complete disdain" for gravity of events in #Salisbury and they have provided "no credible explanation" says @Theresa_May pic.twitter.com/GYbS7W6Exi
— Sky News (@SkyNews) March 14, 2018
Echoing what she said earlier, May said that "Either this was a direct act by the Russian state against our country, or conceivably the Russian government could have lost control of a military grade nerve agent" and added that "In the aftermath of this appalling act against our country, this relationship cannot be the same."
"Either this was a direct act by the Russian state against our country, or conceivably the Russian government could have lost control of a military grade nerve agent" - @Theresa_May on #Salisbury pic.twitter.com/57nZbjTK4q
— Sky News (@SkyNews) March 14, 2018
The move was among a set of measures announced in retaliation for what Mrs May called the “highly likely” involvement of the Russian state in the poisoning of former spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter on British soil.
Other highlights from the retaliation include the suspension of some Russian assets, a quasi boycott for the world cup, where no UK officials will be present, a suspension of all high-level contact with Russia, as well as sanctions for human-rights violations.
- MAY: U.K. TO EXPEL 23 RUSSIAN DIPLOMATS IN RESPONSE TO ATTACK
- MAY: EXPELLED RUSSIAN DIPLOMATS ARE INTELLIGENCE OFFICERS
- MAY: EXAMINING NEED FOR NEW COUNTER-ESPIONAGE POWERS
- MAY: WILL LOOK INTO SANCTIONS FOR HUMAN-RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
- MAY: WILL FREEZE RUSSIAN ASSETS WHERE POSSIBLE
- MAY: WILL USE EXISTING POWERS TO MONITOR TRAVELERS TO U.K.
- MAY: NOT IN OUR INTEREST TO BREAK ALL DIALOGUE WITH RUSSIA
- MAY: WILL SUSPEND ALL HIGH-LEVEL CONTACT WITH RUSSIA
- MAY: NO ATTENDANCE BY OFFICIALS AT WORLD CUP
- MAY: NO MINISTERS, ROYAL FAMILY TO WORLD CUP
- MAY: SAYS SOME MEASURES AGAINST RUSSIA IT CANNOT DISCLOSE
- MAY: WON'T TOLERATE FLAGRANT BREACH OF RUSSIA'S OBLIGATIONS
- MAY: WILL GET OPCW TO VERIFY U.K. ANALYSIS OF NERVE AGENT
Furthermore, May said the UK will examine the need for new "counter-espionage" powers and will deploy some measures against Russia which it cannot disclose, although as Bloomberg's Leonid Bershidsky notes, "a secret response, if one is implied, won't do May much good. What the public cannot see isn't happening."
As a reminder, following Litvinenko's death several years ago, the UK similarly expelled Russian diplomats, suspended security cooperation, broke off bilateral plans on visas, froze the assets of the suspects and put them on international extradition lists; which makes today's response comparable.
Commenting on the response, Julian Rimmer, a London-based emerging-markets trader at Investec, said earlier that "there is no way the investment case for Russia cannot be undermined by whatever constitutes a 'full range of measures' from the U.K. PM," and added that "One can dispute the relative impact of the measures once they have been announced, but the net effect, to a greater or lesser extent, can only be detrimental."
Sure enough, the ruble is sliding on the news.
As are Russian stocks.
Commenting on the action, the Russian ambassador to the UK warned that Britain should expect retaliation for diplomat expulsions Alexander Vladimirovich Yakovenko tells Sky's Senior Political Correspondent Jason Farrell the UK's actions are "unacceptable" and that Moscow considers the expulsion of Russian diplomats "a provocation".
He says the measures have "nothing to do with the situation that we have in Salisbury".
"This is a really serious provocation."
Sure enough, Interfax reports that a Russian senator is calling for even more British diplomats to be expelled than the 23 Russians the U.K. is ousting.
And just like that the Cold War has made another return, this time in Russian-UK relations.
* * *
Courtesy of SkyNews here are the key excerpts from Theresa May's speech:
It was right to offer Russia the opportunity to provide an explanation
But their response has demonstrated complete disdain for the gravity of these events.
They have provided no credible explanation that could suggest they lost control of their nerve agent.
No explanation as to how this agent came to be used in the United Kingdom; no explanation as to why Russia has an undeclared chemical weapons programme in contravention of international law.
Instead they have treated the use of a military grade nerve agent in Europe with sarcasm, contempt and defiance.
There is no alternative conclusion other than that the Russian State was culpable for the attempted murder of Mr Skripal and his daughter - and for threatening the lives of other British citizens in Salisbury, including Detective Sergeant Nick Bailey.
This represents an unlawful use of force by the Russian State against the United Kingdom.
It has taken place against the backdrop of a well-established pattern of Russian State aggression across Europe and beyond.
It must therefore be met with a full and robust response.
It is essential that we now come together – with our allies - to defend our security, to stand up for our values and to send a clear message to those who would seek to undermine them.
This morning I chaired a further meeting of the National Security Council, where we agreed immediate actions to dismantle the Russian espionage network in the UK…
…urgent work to develop new powers to tackle all forms of hostile state activity and to ensure that those seeking to carry out such activity cannot enter the UK…
…and additional steps to suspend all planned high-level contacts between the United Kingdom and the Russian Federation.
Let me start with the immediate actions.
Under the Vienna Convention, the United Kingdom will now expel 23 Russian diplomats who have been identified as undeclared intelligence officers.
They have just one week to leave.
This will be the single biggest expulsion for over thirty years and it reflects the fact that this is not the first time that the Russian State has acted against our country.
We will fundamentally degrade Russian intelligence capability
We will urgently develop proposals for new legislative powers to harden our defences against all forms of hostile state activity.
This will include the addition of a targeted power to detain those suspected of hostile state activity at the UK border. This power is currently only permitted in relation to those suspected of terrorism.
And I have asked the Home Secretary to consider whether there is a need for new counter-espionage power
We will also table a Government amendment to the Sanctions Bill to strengthen our powers to impose sanctions in response to the violation of human rights
We will also make full use of existing powers to enhance our efforts to monitor and track the intentions of those travelling to the UK who could be engaged in activity that threatens the security of the UK and of our allies.
So we will increase checks on private flights, customs and freight.
We will freeze Russian State assets wherever we have the evidence that they may be used to threaten the life or property of UK nationals or residents.
And led by the National Crime Agency, we will continue to bring all the capabilities of UK law enforcement to bear against serious criminals and corrupt elites. There is no place for these people – or their money - in our country.
We have had a very simple approach to Russia: Engage but beware.
And I continue to believe it is not in our national interest to break off all dialogue between the United Kingdom and the Russian Federation.
But in the aftermath of this appalling act against our country, this relationship cannot be the same.
So we will suspend all planned high level bi-lateral contacts between the United Kingdom and the Russian Federation.
This includes revoking the invitation to Foreign Minister Lavrov to pay a reciprocal visit to the United Kingdom...
…and confirming there will be no attendance by Ministers - or indeed Members of the Royal Family - at this Summer’s World Cup in Russia.
There are some that cannot be shared publicly for reasons of National Security.
And, of course, there are other measures we stand ready to deploy at any time, should we face further Russian provocation.
Many of us looked at a post-Soviet Russia with hope. We wanted a better relationship and it is tragic that President Putin has chosen to act in this way.
But we will not tolerate the threat to life of British people and others on British soil from the Russian Government. Nor will we tolerate such a flagrant breach of Russia’s international obligations.
This was not just an act of attempted murder in Salisbury – nor just an act against UK.
It is an affront to the prohibition on the use of chemical weapons.
And it is an affront to the rules based system on which we and our international partners depend.
We will work with our allies and partners to confront such actions wherever they threaten our security, at home and abroad.
* * *
Earlier:
The UK was braced for a showdown with Russia on Wednesday after a midnight deadline set by Prime Minister Theresa May expired without an explanation from Moscow about how a Soviet-era nerve toxin was used to strike down a former Russian double agent.
Russia, which denied any involvement in the poisoning of Sergei Skripal and his daughter with Novichok, a nerve agent developed by the Soviet military, said it was not responding to May’s ultimatum until it received samples of the nerve agent, in effect challenging Britain to show what sanctions it would impose against Russian interests.
“Moscow had nothing to do with what happened in Britain. It will not accept any totally unfounded accusations directed against it and will also not accept the language of ultimatums,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Wednesday according to Reuters. He added, however, that Russia remained open to cooperating with Britain in investigating the poisoning, blaming the British authorities for refusing to share information.
Russia’s Interfax news agency reported the Russian embassy in London planned to ask for consular access to Yulia Skripal, Sergei’s daughter.
Britain’s response to the expiry of the deadline and lack of explanation from Moscow was expected to be announced by May in parliament later, after May convened a meeting of the National Security Council at her Downing Street office in the morning. Furthermore, Bloomberg reported that the U.K. has called for an urgent meeting of the UN Security Council to update Council members on the investigation into the nerve agent attack in Salisbury, the U.K. Foreign Office said in a tweet.
The UK has called for an urgent meeting of the UN Security Council to update Council members on the investigation into the nerve agent attack in Salisbury. pic.twitter.com/jFQ2HA4JV0
— Foreign Office 🇬🇧 (@foreignoffice) March 14, 2018
In retaliation, it is possible that London could call on Western allies for a coordinated response, freeze the assets of Russian business leaders and officials, limit their access to London’s financial center, expel diplomats and even launch targeted cyber attacks. Furthermore, as Boris Johnson threatened, the UK may also cut back participation in the soccer World Cup, which Russia is hosting in June and July.
Meanwhile, as Reuters notes, the UK has already started its retaliation:
- BRITAIN TO EXPEL SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF RUSSIAN DIPLOMATS THOUGH NOT AS MANY AS IN 1971 - SKY NEWS REPORTER SAYS
This is likely just the start.

On Tuesday, President Trump told May by telephone Russia “must provide unambiguous answers regarding how this chemical weapon, developed in Russia, came to be used in the United Kingdom,” the White House said. The White House said Trump and May “agreed on the need for consequences for those who use these heinous weapons in flagrant violation of international norms.”
A British readout of the conversation said, “President Trump said the US was with the UK all the way.”
As a reminder, Skripal, 66, and his daughter Yulia, 33, were found slumped unconscious on a bench outside a shopping center in the genteel southern English city of Salisbury on March 4. They have been in a critical condition in hospital ever since. British scientists identified the poison as a military-grade nerve agent from a group of chemicals known as Novichok, first developed in the Soviet Union in the 1970s and 1980s.
On Monday, Theresa May said either the Russian state had poisoned Skripal, a former Russian military intelligence officer, or Russia had somehow lost control of its chemical weapons. Putin said last year that it had destroyed its last stockpiles of such weapons.
May said Russia had shown a pattern of aggression including the annexation of Crimea and the murder of former KGB agent Alexander Litvinenko, who died in 2006 after drinking green tea laced with radioactive polonium-210.
A public inquiry found the killing of Litvinenko had probably been approved by Putin and carried out by two Russians, one of them a former KGB bodyguard who became a member of the Russian parliament. Both denied responsibility, as did Moscow.
Counter-terrorism officers began investigating the death of another Russian in Britain on Tuesday, although police said it was not thought to be linked to the attack on the Skripals. Nikolai Glushkov, 68, who was an associate of late tycoon Boris Berezovsky, was found dead on Monday. Berezovsky was found dead in March 2013 with a scarf tied around his neck in the bathroom of his luxury mansion west of London.
And now that the UK has formally commenced retaliation, all eyes are on the Kremlin and how Putin will respond.
Comments
Where is the evidence? Normally you have to produce some evidence if you want to accuse someone - in this case the UK is demanding that Russia proves that it didn't do it...
This has all the hallmarks of a set-up designed and intended to poke the Russian bear...
Edit: I am delighted no officials are going to the World Cup - why should they get a freebe off the taxpayer? They can buy their own tickets!
Russians have asked for the samples of evidence to be provided to them for analysis, but it was not done by UK side.
In reply to Where is the evidence? by EuroPox
Brexit Boris...how are Russian/English trade negotiations coming along...tic...toc...
Impatient Orban removed Hungarian London stored gold...confidence vote...LOL!
In reply to Russians have asked for the… by Belrev
** large drums playing in accelerating cadence as the Joomanji intensifies **
In reply to Brexit Boris...how are… by Déjà view
She wouldn't dare do anything about the sandniggers raping the girls. Probably because her dry old cunt itches for some sandnigger cock once and awhile.
In reply to ** large drums playing in… by WTFRLY
It's a good thing that "Russia" didn't poison any of the Brit's pet Muzzies, otherwise bombs would be flying as we speak. It is amazing how the Muzzies can go around stabbing, raping and throwing acid on the indigenous people and keep getting a pass.
In reply to She wouldn't dare do… by Gaius Frakkin'…
Come on, ZH, it was a non-public inquiry masquerading as a public inquiry.
Details matter.
In reply to It's a good thing that … by Whoa Dammit
100% right Shemp
Update: Time to turn off the heat Vlad!
In reply to … by Shemp 4 Victory
Don't let any soccer fan with a British passport into Russia for the World Cup.
In reply to 100% right Shemp by wildbad
This is very disappointing. After all the saber-rattling, all the doom-porn posts...they both pussy out.
I guess it was one big tease after all...
Next time don't be pussies, push the goddamned button!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ra-WJZyBkGY
I mean if you really mean it!
In reply to Don't let any soccer fan… by DillyDilly
Great rebuttal by Nafeez Ahmed: The UK government is manufacturing its nerve agent case for ‘action’ on Russia (https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/the-british-governments-russia-…)
https://olduvai.ca
In reply to This is very disappointing. … by kralizec
Kitman
In reply to Great rebuttal by Nafeez… by skbull44
One might note the timing--early spring. Winter is a good ways away, so it won't matter too much if Russia shuts off the gas.
Which they should do come November.
In reply to Kitman by kralizec
Russia Russia Russia! It's all about Marsha! I mean Russia!
In reply to One might note the timing-… by tmosley
The US and London banker cabal and their neo-con buddies are going to continue to push Russia with the intent of starting a war. This will not end well . . .
In reply to Russia Russia Russia! It's… by D503
Like the UK couldnt counterfit the stuff by now.
In reply to The US and London banker… by Dickweed Wang
Or any other chemist.
In reply to Like the UK couldnt… by 1 Alabama
Bad Vlad! There, take that!
In reply to Or any other chemist. by FIAT CON
Obviously, the CONFLICT WITH RUSSIA is just getting started.
PREPARE for World War 3.
In reply to Bad Vlad! There, take that!… by IH8OBAMA
An interesting write-up.
In reply to Obviously, the CONFLICT WITH… by pier
can't imagine who down voted the truth of the situation.
But there won't be any war, not as we have all 'witnessed'. As soon as the first missal is fired, they all will go off. And that is that.
Good luck all.
In reply to Obviously, the CONFLICT WITH… by pier
Or it came from left over Ukrainian stockpiles from the cold war.
In reply to Or any other chemist. by FIAT CON
Yea- got to love how May tries to limit the range of possible causes, poisoning the well/agitprop 101:
"It could only have been the Russians doing it willfully or through their negligence.
In the entire range of possibilities, there aren't any other possible explanations.
Not only am I Prime Minister, I'm the world's greatest forensic scientist and police investigator.
Come and rest your critical faculties in the glow of my own unbounded omniscience!"
Thus spracht May.
In reply to Like the UK couldnt… by 1 Alabama
And she never heard of Christopher Steele and hasn't looked to see just who his dossier writing friends might be. To that, she has never heard of Arkancide.
In reply to Yea- got to love how May… by r0mulus
Clearly a false flag manufactured to discredit Russia in the on-going Russia bashing campaign being conducted by the Rothschild evil, puppet axis of the UK, the US and Israel - which are three war-mongering, exploitive nations which have absolutely no real honor or independence. I am so very sorry that nations like my own, Canada, have no integrity and are led by such scummy lying bastards, and pray we will wake up and come to the support of Russia.
In reply to Like the UK couldnt… by 1 Alabama
Don't hold your breath there, Mr. Baggins. The Canadian parliament passed our own version of the Magnitsky Act with unanimous approval.
How's that for weird.
In reply to Clearly a false flag… by FBaggins
Concur. Why try to foment war with a country full of Caucasians? Israel gotta be behind this shit.
In reply to Clearly a false flag… by FBaggins
So you can buy the formula for $30 from Amazon for the last decade:https://www.amazon.com/State-Secrets-Insiders-Chronicle-Chemical/dp/1432725661
The scientists who developed it defected to the USA in 1992 and has pointed out on Facebook that anyone could have produced it or it could have come from multiple locations:
https://www.rt.com/news/421200-uk-novichok-agent-allegations/
https://www.sott.net/article/379951-UK-claims-of-Russian-responsibility-for-Skripal-poisoning-discredited-govt-manufacturing-propaganda-operation-against-Russia
Do people actually even understand that unless a chemical is of low, contaminated quality that it is very rare to be able to tell where it's been manufacturered? Whether using DSC / TGA / DMA / FTIR etc etc one basically pure chemical is utterly indistinguishable from another. How do i know this? BECAUSE PART OF MY JOB for 2 years USED TO BE TO ANALYZE & THEN CLONE CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS by getting another manufacturer to replicate it. They are INDISTINGUISHABLE - functionally, technically & legally. I really thought most people understand this - Yes? No??!?
There is so much not just wrong with all this, but actually nonsensical, whether from a basic technical viewpoint to due process to clear propaganda to straight plausiblity to simple logic. I can't be bothered saying more as, to quote the fabulous Karen Straughan, "there is only so much FUUUUCK i can push into my head every day", or as Lavrov just said in the UN re Syria and the US's clear incoherence "I simply don't have any normal terms left to describe all this"
https://www.sott.net/article/379936-Russian-to-Judgement-on-the-Skripal-Poisoning
https://www.sott.net/article/379962-Spys-Salisbury-Porton-Down-Sergi-Skripal-and-Fourteen-and-a-half-certainties
In reply to Like the UK couldnt… by 1 Alabama
The underlying assumption that a Soviet and hence assumed Russian Novichok programme existed - is open to serious doubt.
The only source for the story of a Soviet/Russian programme to develop a new class of military nerve agents codenamed Novichoks is a defector in the 1990s named Vil Mirzayanov. He claimed that one of these compounds was 5 to 8 times more toxic than VX and that production of these compounds had continued after the Chemical Weapons Convention came into effect. He explained the many publications in the open literature by Soviet chemists on compounds with similar structures as a deception to provide cover for secret research on other more toxic compounds, and gave structures for these compounds.
A review of chemical warfare agents in 2016 (http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/chapter/bk9781849739696-00001/978-1-84973-969-6) by Robin Black, who had just retired as head of the detection lab at Porton Down, states that there is no independent confirmation of Mirzayanov's claims about the chemical properties of Novichok compounds.
The report of the OPCW's Scientific Advisory Board's meeting in April 2013 made a similar statement, and did not recommend adding these compounds or their precursors to the list of scheduled chemicals banned or restricted under the CWC. The members of the scientific advisory board included people who, like Black, were heads of western chemical defence labs. These labs would almost surely have undertaken experimental tests of Mirzayanov's claims about the toxicity of these compounds. So if members of the scientific advisory board who were in a position to know the results of these experiments did not recommend adding these compounds to the list of scheduled chemicals, we can reasonably infer that they were not found to be military grade nerve agents.
In reply to … by RationalLuddite
I am British and I am sick to my stomach with this woman's kow-towing to the banker's and their one-world that is now fragmenting. Now we can expect all countries to follow Erdigan's lead and take back their Gold or have it "frozen". Once confidence is lost it's gone forever.
In reply to Russia Russia Russia! It's… by D503
You all over there are really in the belly of the neocon beast. I wish you the best of luck. Never stop educating your community about the reality of the bullshit situation the West and the UK are in.
In reply to I am British and I am sick… by Precious Hawk
Good timing for a Spring Offensive starting in Ukraine. Or not.
It just struck me that perhaps the EU had an incentive in all of this - perhaps there were back-channels between Russia / UK looking for trade deals, and God knows the EU wouldn't want that to happen, so a quick slap with some nerve-agent, and all deals are off. (I realise this is pretty unlikely, but anything involving making the EU look bad is OK in my book)
In reply to One might note the timing-… by tmosley
It's more likely than Russia being responsible for the poisoning. This is definitely something the EU fuckwits would pull - with CIA/Mossad help, of course.
May's hyperventilating response exemplifies the (((pants-shitting panic))) I've been pointing out. They're fucking terrified because the masses are awake, thoroughly pissed off, and not nearly as stupid as they thought we were.
Think about the wall-to-wall media plastering of that little Hogg asshole, just to make it look like every kid in America wants the 2nd Amendment repealed. Meanwhile, people are calling into talk radio shows, saying that their kids are being told that they MUST participate in this upcoming bullshit school walkout - or else.
Day. Of. The. Rope. It approaches.
In reply to Good timing for a Spring… by OverTheHedge
What the speech left out...
In reply to It's more likely than Russia… by HopefulCynical
Indeed it did.
Strangely it is unlikely that either Russia or the UK MI6 did it as it puts at risk their future recruitment of spies if they can't protect them after they have defected. This is a really big blow to MI6's ability to recruit in the future and could put at risk some of its current agents.
This is probably either the US or Mossad stirring things up to make intervention in Syria or Ukraine of both more palatable for Western public. As a by-product it also probably tried but failed to eliminate a lose end in the Steele Dossier.
In reply to What the speech left out… by Mr. Universe
"As a by-product it also probably tried but failed to eliminate a lose end in the Steele Dossier."
^^^ This.
In reply to Indeed it did… by JohninMK
Personally, I like pitchforks but you're right, it's long overdue. The whore media is clearly devoid of one crucial component; objective critical reasoning. So, in the midst of the endless recent Russia bashing, the Kremlin, no less, decided it would be a good time to release a signature neuro-toxin on the streets of the UK to neutralize some bumbling old bureaucrat. Just because. Not unlike an Assad under constant siege and microscopic surveillance deciding to gas "innocent Syrian civilians"; because Cunt Haley. Is anyone in the press ever going to ask "Why are illegal foreign troops perpetually in Syria?". Because terrorism? Sergei Lavrov is completely ignored by the whores because they simply cannot bend his clear and concise logic to fit their corrupt narrative. Our public servants' lofty accusations are indeed a sign of desperation; their outlandish plots stretch ever further from reality. Russia is targeted for insisting on taking the high road. The western corporatocracy is on life support. They begin to feel the confines of their predicament. Too bad pitchforks don't work so good in the corners.
In reply to It's more likely than Russia… by HopefulCynical
My time.
It is coming.
In reply to Personally, I like… by Sages wife
"it won't matter too much if Russia shuts off the gas."
Don't shut off the gas, just charge them double.
In reply to One might note the timing-… by tmosley
Russian trolls all over ZH once again
In reply to Kitman by kralizec
Call me all the names you want, I may be a troll, but I am certainly not a Russian. Get your facts straight before you start spouting off.
In reply to Russian trolls all over ZH… by Bulgars
Nafeez Ahmed gave them the recipe...
In reply to Great rebuttal by Nafeez… by skbull44
His brother who was living in Italy (in an article I read ) said the who thing was BS and none of the MSM fakts and claims made any sense .
In reply to Don't let any soccer fan… by DillyDilly
It is common knowledge that the majority of the UK population is hopelessly inbred. The remaining minority have known this for years, had adequate time to leave, but stayed anyway. half of my family's patience with them ran out around 1775, the rest of the family's patience was killed or chased off by Cromwell.
Go ahead, UK. Taunt those Russians. Poke them with a stick. That really makes them mad. When the inevitable occurs, all those Orwellian CCTV cameras you installed to spy on those whom you forced to pay for said spying - those cameras will capture the UK's final demise in 4K Ultra-HD, white-balanced color, and be used as filler for Russian "Idiot Drivers" videos on YouTube.
Goog's Translate app tells us the likely title of such videos:
Британские неудачи и веселье
In reply to Don't let any soccer fan… by DillyDilly
Dup. Doh!
In reply to Don't let any soccer fan… by DillyDilly
The ‘novochok’ group of nerve agents — a very loose term simply for a collection of new nerve agents the Soviet Union were developing fifty years ago — will almost certainly have been analysed and reproduced by Porton Down. That is entirely what Porton Down is there for. It used to make chemical and biological weapons as weapons, and today it still does make them in small quantities in order to research defences and antidotes. After the fall of the Soviet Union Russian chemists made a lot of information available on these nerve agents. And one country which has always manufactured very similar persistent nerve agents is Israel.”
In reply to It is common knowledge that… by ThanksChump
Exactly.
In reply to The ‘novochok’ group of… by Pol Pot
The Jews were in charge of the Soviet Union almost the whole time it was communist. Israel most likely had the nerve gas as soon as the Soviet chemists had it.
In reply to The ‘novochok’ group of… by Pol Pot
As I understand it, Stalin's purges of the late 50's were directed at the jews, and took them out of the equation.
In reply to The Jews were in charge of… by chestergimli
Stalin date of death? better look that...
Stalin ridded those considered threat his power
otherwise remained most of secret services
Actions such as Katyn Forest, others.
Search name list of Gulag Administrators 1917
thru Stalin, and his Brother in Law who
dynamited Christ's Cathedral to ground
In reply to As I understand it, Stalin's… by Socratic Dog
Pagination