MIFSUD>>FUMIS DEMEANUR-(*)-           -(*)-IS AN WELL KNOW AIR SERVICE MESSAGE
>IF YOU MISS THE EARINGS>-(*)-
			>THEN DECREASE MEANINGS/EARINGS
			>THEN EAR ME AND OUR/YOUR REMEDY
			>THEN REMEDY
			>THEN READ MEANS DECREASE
			>THEN REMAIN/REMAIL/PREVAIL/PREPARE VEIL
			>THEN YOU REMIND THE MEAN

(**)--START MSGTRSL---HOPE NO SWEAT--(**)

>MIFSUD>
>M IF (S) (A) UD>
>M IS (A) (F) UD>

>IF MIFSUD AUDIO IS CIA FRAUD>
			>THEN YOU'D SAY FAISAL SAUD 
			>THEN YOU'D SAY FAISAL DEFRAUD HIS SON
			>THEN YOU'D USE OUR MAIN DOOR

>IF MIFSUD IS MODIFYING HIS AUDIO>
			>THEN CIA HAS A MAIN FAISAL AUDIO
			>THEN CIA HAS A MAIN SAUD AUDIO
			>THEN CIA HAS A MAIN KHALID AUDIO

>IF MIFSUD AUDIO IS A MOSSAD DISINFO FOR SAUD>
			>THEN JUDAS IS FAISAL
			>THEN JUDAS IS CIA
			>THEN MIFSUD IS SAUD MOUTH

>IF MIFSUD AUDIO IS A MOSSAD DISINFO FOR FAISAL>
			>THEN JUDAS IS SAUD
			>THEN JUDAS IS KHALID
			>THEN JUDAS IS SALMAN

>IF MIFSUD AUDIO IS A MOSSAD DISINFO FOR USA>
			>THEN JUDAS IS SAUD/SAUDI MILITAR OFFICER
			>THEN JUDAS IS FAISAL MILITAR OFFICER
			>THEN ALL HOUSE OF SAUDI IS UNDER FISA AUDIENCE/JUDICE

>IF SAUD MISS OUR CIA MAN>
			>THEN YOU'D FIND MIFSUD IS A FRAUD
			>THEN YOU'D FIND MIFSUD IS A SAUD MOUTH
			>THEN MIFSUD IS A CIA MAHUT

>IF FAISAL MISS OUR CIA MAN>
			>THEN MIFSUD IS A MOSSAD DEMISED
			>THEN MIFSUD IS A CIA DEMISED
			>THEN MIFSUD IS A MISUNDERSTANDING

IF KHALID MISS OUR CIA MAN>
			>THEN MIFSUD IS A LID
			>THEN MIFSUD IS MAUDLIN HIS FAMILY
			>THEN MIFSUD IS AIDING HIS MISFIT DAUGHTER

>IF SAUD HAS A MAINFRAME IN SOUTH SAUDI ARABIA>
			>THEN YOU'D DEFACE SAUD INTELLIGENCE
			>THEN YOU'D DISMANTLE SAUD MILITAR FORCES
			>THEN YOU'D DISUSE SAUDI ARABIA AMBASSADOR

>IF MAIN USA (CYBER) FORCES DEMAND AUDIENCE FOR FISA JUSTICE>
			>THEN MIFSUD MUST HAVE AN AUDIO OF FAISAL SAYING
			 KHALID THAT SAUD IS A JUDAS
			>THEN MIFSUD MUST HAVE AN AUDIO OF SAUD SAIYNG 
			 FAISAL THAT KHALID IS A JUDAS
			>THEN MIFSUD MUST HAVE AN AUDIO OF KHALID SAYING
			 SAUD THAT FAISAL IS A JUDAS

>IF MIFSUD IS AN OLD ID USED FOR MASSUD>
			>THEN YOU'D SAY MIFSUD IS A SAUD ASSET
			>THEN YOU'D SAY MIFSUD IS A USA ASSET
			>THEN YOU'D SAY MIFSUD IS A MOSSAD ASSET

>IF MASSUD IS STILL ALIVE IN SOUTH USA>
			>THEN YOU'D OFFICIALLY DEFEND FMI
			>THEN YOU'D NON OFFICIALLY DEFEND FMI
			>THEN YOU'LL FIND A SOLUTION TO MATHEMATICAL MYSTERY

>IF MASSUD IS STILL ALIVE IN USA SAFE DOMAIN>
			>THEN YOU'D FIND A MYSTERIOUS FILE AUDIO WICH DIM A SOLUTION FOR UFO
			>THEN YOU'D FIND A SOLUTION IN A USA DEM FILE
			>THEN YOU'D FIND A SOLUTION TO A PHYSIC MYSTERY



-(**)--END OF MSSG--

-(*)PERSONAL NOTE-

-THERE ARE STILL TOO MANY MEANINGS AND TOO MANY OVERLAYS-

-Obviously having a map is of little use if you don't know the route. Lacking all the data, we can only infer that there is a topologically overlapping road to the map, and that this last one has a beginning and an end (Endchan): a Mobius ring could possess the appropriate characteristics, although from the purely mathematical point of view it would introduce others variants; moreover this could lead to a clear violation of the second principle of thermodynamics, since in any case the entropy records information about the system that is not available. The fundamental problem therefore remains that of meaning; at the beginning of the last century, Hilbert set up a similar problem: to establish once and for all the validity of mathematical reasoning (that is, from the semantic point of view, to give it a meaning rather than its own independence: mathematics is the study of absolutely necessary truths, and what more vital need exists in man than that of meaning?) through a series of inference rules that must be self-consistent. A little later Godel took it upon himself to deny the expectations (of both solipsists and intuitionists); his Theorem "demonstrated" (ironically) that the second Hilbert problem cannot be solved: for every set of inference rules, there are correct proofs that the same rules invalidate.

However ALL this seems to me not to have a heart:

Therefore you must always keep in mind that a path is only a path; if you feel you should not follow it, you must not stay with it under any conditions. Does this path have a heart? If it does, the path is good; if it doesn't, it is of no use. Both paths lead nowhere; but one has a heart, the other doesn't. One makes for a joyful journey; as long as you follow it, you are one with it. The other will make you curse your life. One makes you strong; the other weakens you. 

The characteristics of a solitary bird are five:
the first, which flies towards the highest point;
the second, which does not bear companions, not even like him;
the third, which aims with the beak to the skies;
the fourth, which has no definite color;
the fifth, which sings very gently.

Saint John of the Cross


SO THIS IS THE END OF MY BROADCAST 

- Best wishes to ..whatever it is. We met by chance: let's leave as friends