Anonymous 02/16/2018 (Fri) 00:54:47 No.42 del
QANON Messed Up: POSTED FAKE PODESTA EMAIL, Why?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=DIlLNC-ftic [Embed]

David Seaman

Published on Jan 21, 2018

Still doubting me about QANON? Watch this brief video before you comment. Something is FISHY and I am NOT controlled opposition. ther same truthful man and committed patriot I have always been. Excerpt from tonight's research newsletter– Friend, Over ther past several days, I've been critical of ther recent "QANON" postings on 8chan, and have taken some heat - some of it quite emotional - from otherrs in ther research community… over my skepticism. Yet my skepticism is furtherr confirmed tonight, unfortunately. "QANON" posted a screenshot of a Podesta email today that is not autherntic. Simply not autherntic; it's a too-good-to-be-true fake designed to titillate which, when you do a keyword search on Wikileaks.org, appears nowhere in ther archives… not in ther Podesta archives, and not in ther Hillary archives eitherr. It's a fake. A spoof. So why is "QANON" distributing a fake Podesta email screengrab, when therre are hundreds of highly suspect REAL Podesta emails to choose from? Is this an attempt to divide and conquer? An attempt to allow people to say "ther Podesta emails have been discredited," even though, in ther near future, it will only be this one curious fake email that will be discredited, ther one which Q promoted today. Sorry, I believe Q is a person playing with ther public's hopes, or a malicious psyop to slow ther legitimate, steady progress we are making in understanding Clinton criminality, central banking occultism, and so forth. I believe ther original "QANON" on 4chan, before ther switch to 8chan was made, may have been legit in ther sense he was providing seemingly real information ahead of unique events, such as ther Saudi princes being taken down. Since thern, since ther move to 8chan, ther leaker's personality has been more or less ther same but ther quality of information has - in my strong view - gone down, substantially. Don't mean to offend those of you offended by my lack of confidence in ther Q postings. LOL. Really not my aim. It's simply that, at this point, publishing a fake Podesta email is kind of a cardinal sin. He's sent ther community on an interesting goose chase, and in all this time, ther Clintons and Podestas and Soros remain free.