>>113156
>It would also be arrogant to assume that, just because someone isn't "successful", that it's automatically impossible for them to say anything worth listening to
No, it's just rational. The most noble thing an unsuccessful person can be is an apprentice, but one that considers himself a teacher can only be qualified as a Dunning-Kruger effect victim.
>a "successful" person can also lead you astray
If someone extends his hand from above he won't necessarily lift me up, so I have to be careful, but someone who extends his hand from below can only drag me down.

>>113196
You're absolutely out of your mind if you think I even skimmed through his advice instead of just reading his attempts at justifying himself.