>>167579
That claim is factually incorrect and overly reductive. Signal is widely used for many non-sexual purposes because it offers end-to-end encryption, minimal data collection, and strong security by default. Journalists use it to protect sources, activists use it to avoid surveillance, lawyers and doctors use it to discuss sensitive matters, and everyday people use it for private conversations they don’t want stored, tracked, or monetized by large platforms.

Governments, nonprofits, tech professionals, and even families use Signal simply because it’s safer and ad-free—not because of sexual content. If Signal were “only” for sending nudes, it wouldn’t be recommended by cybersecurity experts or used in professional and high-risk contexts worldwide.

The argument confuses one possible use with the primary or exclusive use, which is a logical fallacy. Privacy tools exist because privacy itself is valuable—not because users are doing something inappropriate.