>>167584
This argument relies on false premises and personal attacks rather than evidence:

preferring Signal over Telegram is not contradictory or “worse,” as Signal is widely regarded as more transparent, open-source, and privacy-respecting, while Telegram has well-documented security criticisms; using Signal has nothing to do with drinking, drugs, or criminal behavior and is commonly motivated by a desire for privacy, reduced data collection, or avoiding platform moderation and leaks. Dismissing any explanation in advance as “squirming” makes the claim unfalsifiable and therefore weak, since no clarification would ever be accepted. Invoking BPD to imply dishonesty is stigmatizing and irrelevant, as mental health diagnoses do not determine truthfulness.

Finally, speculating about what her father “must have known” substitutes hindsight and assumption for proof, turning conjecture into accusation without substantiating facts.