>>167586
This claim is largely speculative and overstates both authority and certainty: admissions offices do not pre-judge or blacklist applicants based on third-party emails, alleged “evidence,” or online accusations, and any proper scrutiny would be limited to verified, relevant information submitted through formal channels. A “concerning digital footprint” is vague and subjective, and without proven academic misconduct or criminal findings, it is unlikely to determine an admissions outcome. Predicting rejection as a certainty ignores due process and the fact that universities evaluate applicants holistically. Finally, telling someone to “go home” or “fix your life” is not an argument but a value judgment that adds no factual weight and does not establish wrongdoing or justify claims about her academic future.