>>171868
Here's AI to explain it to you like I said. If you were actually into the occult or astrology you'd know these very basic things.

Most professional astrologers reject the idea of "cusp signs" as a blend of two zodiac signs, insisting the Sun is definitively in one sign or another at birth.��This popular concept arises from pop astrology for those born near sign transitions (e.g., late Sagittarius/early Capricorn), but experts attribute "mixed" traits to other chart factors like nearby planets or degrees, not a hybrid sign.��Why Professionals Dismiss CuspsMathematically impossible: Signs span fixed 30° arcs; the Sun can't occupy two simultaneously.��Undermines core techniques: Aspects, dignities, and timing rely on precise sign boundaries.�Better explained by full charts: Adjacent planets (e.g., Sun in Aries with Mercury in Pisces) create perceived blends.��A tiny minority or novices might entertain narrow "cusp energy" for exact transitions (within hours), but consensus among serious practitioners is clear: cusps aren't real.