>>187170
>The username on one of her tiktok accounts began “noschizo” once.
it would be so easy to believe you if you provided at least screenshots of your claims.
i still think noschizos pedro site is absolutely controlled by the anti sturdychan kay and sico clique, but there is no smoking gun evidence as there was with schan and easychan which would make it easy enough even for normies to understand
>>187171
>Nekomin operated multiple sites
he operated one provably, that one being nekochen. there is some tangential evidence of him helping sico start her own site, such as him being included in her drawings, but there is no concrete evidence. i dunno what more sites you are talking about. easychan was mod 1 / rando + sico operated website with maybe help by nekomin or the person who right now runs noschizos and schan was sico + sturdymin or maybe some other person helping her
>>187345
>yet she chose to defend him (posting voice notes)
she is an ugly mentally ill liar

i saw some expose or truth accounts pop up trying to spread stuff posted in this thread but i dont see that working ever. there is enough evidence to support claims that were shared in the threads about her being a cp seller + running a cp sharing website + defending pedrophiles etc, but if you show this stuff to a normie they would just write you off as a schizo as the corpus of evidence is just so vast and hard to believe. like who would ever believe that a underage girl moved in with a pedrophile who lived on a different continent with her parents blessings, even after having history of selling child porn. just absolutely insane.
not to mention she threatens lawsuit against people who try to share this information. i just cant see a way for her to ever face any consequence or even for more people to know this lore