>>189219
y'allst folx keep acting like everything she says has to be true just because it came out of her own mouth. if she really lies, trolls, and says outrageous shit for attention then why are y'allst folx suddenly treating her stories about her grandparents like they're confirmed facts? that's literally just taking her word for it. and being in nsn before getting kicked doesn't magically prove every single thing about her is genuine either. people get into groups for different reasons and people also play up personas online all the time.

being interested in ww2 or reposting edgy shit doesn't automatically mean she secretly believed all this years before either. y'allst folx are looking back at old reposts and acting like they're some smoking gun when most of it is just hindsight. if there was actual proof from back then then sure, but saying "she made hints" isn't evidence by itself.

at the end of the day, criticize her for the stuff she's actually done and said publicly. don't start filling in the gaps with assumptions or treating every story she tells as fact just because it supports your argument. if the evidence is solid then it should be able to stand on its own without reaching.