>>203206
>what makes you think anyone else in that chat knew, either?
rando used the specific wording of peak chip which is a dead giveaway he was referring to specific toks from when she was 13 and 14
>I didn't say they weren't underage
you used a very weaselly wording
you said
>very few of the girls posted there were under 15-16
and
>and a fair amount over 18
which make it seem like majority of girls posted on ttg were either 17 or over 18, an abject lie
>The vast majority of girls are physically mature at that age (tanner stage 5) - physically they are adults.
whats even your point? the girl rando was referencing as peak and that he feels something (sexual) towards had no visible sexual characteristics
>I know for a fact this is not true
has he or hasnt he donated (subs count) to her on twitch. has he or hasnt he been her moderator since she was a minor in her discord and on twitch. has he or hasnt he been active on telegram and on sturdy?
>They had a relationship
she left her family to move in with him, while underage, and autistic, he manipulated her and controlled her via suicide baiting and other schemes, he ran easychan because she was infatuated with sturdymin and he positioned himself as a substitute. its the definition of grooming
>She did NOT know rando was a mod.