>>203209
>you used a very weaselly wording
>you said
>>very few of the girls posted there were under 15-16
Don't say it's weaselly wording. Were they or were they not mostly 15+? Were there or were there not a fair amount over 18 (and even more now)? Now maybe I'm wrong (I certainly didn't track every girl's age), but that's the impression I had. It's not an "abject lie," and that hyperbole doesn't serve you well.

>the girl rando was referencing as peak and that he feels something (sexual) towards had no visible sexual characteristics
I'm trying to think if I've ever seen a chip tok of her as an actual child... maybe? But it very likely got deleted. In any case, I don't think prepubescent chip is what people meant by "peak chip," either, so I think you're being disingenuous here.

>has he or hasnt he donated (subs count) to her on twitch
Are we counting subs on twitch as donations? Like, regular self-only subs and not gifted subs? How much do you think that is, in total? Maybe $50 spread over 2-3 years? Do you think that gets you any kind of special treatment? That canthinkynjoyer guy has bought thousands in kick subs and he hasn't even been let in her discord.

>has he or hasnt he been her moderator since she was a minor in her discord and on twitch. has he or hasnt he been active on telegram and on sturdy?
"Active" on telegram is a stretch, but otherwise yes. And?

>she left her family to move in with him, while underage, and autistic, he manipulated her and controlled her via suicide baiting and other schemes
Yeah, pretty bad stuff. That was after she was already there though, as far as I know. Also he's autistic, too, which I think is fair to point out if you're going to imply that she was especially vulnerable because of it.