>>203223
>Were they or were they not mostly 15+?
sexualizing of minors has been tolerated on every iteration of ttg since wsg with a very small minority of people against it. kays dns were a part of the group that sexualized minors and groomed them, be it kosaki, rando, pokisage etc
>don't think prepubescent chip is what people meant by "peak chip,"
you are the one being disingenuous. you very well know what peak chip toks mean. its the ones with her nip slips that were banned even on sturdy
>Are we counting subs on twitch as donations?
you lied about kosaki being the only donator. i do not care about your copes
>she was 17, not a child
17 year old is considered a child or a minor
>"Active" on telegram is a stretch, but otherwise yes. And?
every kay discord mod just so happens to be a telegramnigger or a groomer or a pedrophile, very peculiar that she keeps them around right? almost like there is pattern to this. i wonder if her nazi friends she has been associating with are also pedrophiles. for sure not? right....?
>No one else knew before she did. Kay had already left the server and was out of contact by then, but she did return briefly
nobody cares about the exact day and hour of when everyone figured it out. kay at some point found out about the fact her mod groomed a child and did NOTHING about it, as a matter of fact she then did a whole 17.999 is not grooming spiel. its partially her fault sico was groomed.

But please keep going, you are really helping kays case by being a pedro and in the same breath defending her