>>203228
>kays dns were a part of the group that sexualized minors and groomed them, be it kosaki, rando, pokisage
Kay isn't in contact with any of those people, and hasn't been for a long time.

>you are the one being disingenuous. you very well know what peak chip toks mean. its the ones with her nip slips that were banned even on sturdy
If they were banned I doubt I even saw them more than once or twice. And honestly chip is kind of flat so it's hard to gauge her exact age without the benefit of a timestamp. Isn't she like 20 now? Are those toks more than 6 years old?

>you lied about kosaki being the only donator. i do not care about your copes
You know full well what you meant by "donator." None of the people who were mods or in her private server besides kosaki was spending hundreds/thousands on her.

>17 year old is considered a child or a minor
Legally that can be true. In terms of physical and cognitive development, it's not.

>every kay discord mod just so happens to be a telegramnigger or a groomer or a pedrophile
No. Simply having telegram doesn't say anything about one's intent. It's what you DO on telegram that matters.
And again, kay isn't in contact with most of the people you're calling groomers/pedros. Say what you will about rando, kosaki, and pokisage - they're gone. And there's no evidence of anyone that's left being either of those things.