>>5627
I did answer by asking to elaborate what he meant, since he seemed to imply that in a communist society everybody should have to work (?). in order to have a discussion there has to be a basic understanding of the matter by both sides, something which is clearly lacking here, that's why I suggested that the guy should do a little preliminary research. I am not your tutor, I don't have to explain anything you can easily learn yourself by a google search.
If there's not that basic level I mentioned, the discussion becomes pointless and revolving around preposterous, childish questions like this >>5628 or the one about lazy people, which is a waste of everybody's time. You can keep throwing poop around pretending you're having a sensible argument, that doesn't mean I should play along or be interested in it.