>>5658
>in such a society, each person would be motivated to work for the good of society despite the absence of a social mechanism compelling them to work
So, to put it simply, you're assuming and betting on people being automatically motivated to work, due to good work conditions.
Isnt that rather naive though?
I mean, seriously, how many of those people actually exist? That'd be like 1% of the population, 5% tops. Even with good conditions, there's gonna be tons of people who just dont give a fuck and will want to do zero work. And if the commune takes care of those people, those 1-5% of the motivated workers will likely lose motivation seeing as all their work is going towards feeding lazy people. Any good will would quickly go down the toilet by then, honestly.
Not to mention, the logistics themselves of a small amount of motivated people actually managing to support everyone, even at full power.
You really think people would be happy to work if they didnt have the threat of starvation and homelessness over their heads? I dont think most people are strong or intelligent enough for that.