>>76413
>not really funny
in a sardonic way, I would maintain that it is. but I can appreciate a broader sentiment towards humanity and how her behavior (and my own, to be honest) reflects something undesirable.
>>76417
>its an underage girl acting sexually for old men online
again, I didn't know about pukara until quite recently, but what exactly is the evidence that she is or even was underage at one point while posting on /r9k/ or elsewhere? I've seen a few posts of picrel on desu archive, and one or more people say
>DUDE SHE'S FUCKING 14!
which may certainly be true, I just want to know what the proof is and where I can see it.