<tl;dr
>Do the opposite of Max Stirner

whittling some NEET philosophy
Concerning Max Stirner where appropriating spooks, I would argue the inverse, of the individual being the individual's only spook, by citing the CIA consciousness energy grid as the foundation of spook activity, diminishing significantly as one gyres to integrate with the state, further abstracting particulars which is neither the state nor the individual as necessitating articles and means all eventually defaults to the state through the death of legacy.

a group of spooks get together to produce meaningless documents designed to maintain spooking in the absence of spooks, elaborated as humanity and God.
One can observe spooky action at a distance when one is concerned primarily with moral relativism at the root of decision making when another spook is perceived real or otherwise, either as sacrifice or compromise to comfort.
Comfort is not an illusion, a witness to the persistence through discomfort will in any instance alleviate the spook in us.

There is only spook and comfort. You and the state, before any elaboration and after all is tried and tested.