Damn, I made some typos, hope you can still read what I intended to say. Well I guess I'll finish up on religion. Since I started my ethics journey with god.

god is the superking, back in the day kings made you follow orders with a might makes right (by deciding who is left) principle of the strong doing as they please and the weak suffering as they must, this remains the care today FYI.
Well the king and his men can't have their eyes everywhere to catch every subject who disobeys him, so they cleverly invested a suoerking who can see everything and who will punish you after you have died, conveniently the one time when your punishment cannot be verified, and the punishment will be the worst possible pain you could ever experience, delivered unto you forever, while obedience is rewarded with the greatest pleasure one could receive delivered to them forever, but once again only after you are dead.
It's a scam, a con, but we are invested in it because they were also smart enough to make us tie our entire identities to it, its in out art, culture, and government, throughout history. That's western religion in a nutshell.

I took one fork of the Eupythro dilemma, that of accepting divine command theory that anything can be good if god says it is, and went from there to ask why it is that what god says is good, is good.

But the other lath is to say that god is making reference to some third source of goodness, and the end of my reasoning led me to that conclusion, the ultimate lifeform.

And I could further speculate that the reason the ultimate lifeform is of such importance is probably because that's the only way at least some part of the universe can know itself, and perhaps peek out at what lies beyond its boundaries.