>>44495
Ahhhhh about those hooters, those huge tits look nice and sexy when the woman is young....but once that woman reaches 50 years of age those tits will start to sag, and by 60 years of age she'll have wrinkled sagging tits just like every other once-hot milf. Anything unnaturally large - even buttocks - will one day sag and wrinkle up. If I were young I'd seriously avoid marrying a woman with unnaturally large tits. Even fake ones loaded with silicone. I don't mind a woman having smaller tits as long as they are natural and she is overall sexually attractive.

By the way, not using the cuckcuckgo search engine anymore. Was looking for a photo to link here of a sexy young female model and literally nothing came up in the image search results, it's as if they completely prohibited the results for "adult female model", that's cancel culture despotism at it's finest! Google is no better as they only link to copyright pay-wall sites and half the results were shit anyway.

>>44499
with age all the skin will sag, on the face, on the chest. smol tits won't look good over 50 either

>>44499
Nothing lasts forever anon. Especially good things

>>44499
Even when a woman is young her huge tits hang down. It's hard to find a big pair of knockers that maintain their perkiness, not to say that it's impossible to find that. Smaller tits are more attractive and cute, could just be that I prefer "cuter" women rather than a bimbo look. Either way, tits are tits. Don't let the potential future sag prevent you from marrying a genuinely nice girl; all looks fade away. No 50 year old woman looks like how she did when she was 20. Your best bet is finding a girl who is health conscious, because a healthy diet significantly prevents aging of the skin. Also, sun light exposure drastically ages skin. This is why a MILF can have a wrecked face but nice tits and stomach, because they aren't exposed to sun when under clothes.

>cuckcuckgo
You shouldn't use them anymore period. They started admitting to censoring search results and picking biased results when it comes to the Russia v. Ukraine thing. This completely defeats their entire purpose of being "better than Google". If they publicly admit censoring, who knows what else they're doing. Your best bet is using Brave search, Searx, or Yandex is pretty decent for images.

>>44532
not the anon you replied to
i use bing (and firefox), it just works, just as good as any other, but better
bing is what google was years ago, it just works, simple as that
nothing i can complain about more than what its worth, all is shit imho, seriously

literally a month ago i got a friend to change from chrome to firefox; i sent him a bunch of addons too, adblockers & such
shits workin out totally swell for him so far

>>44534
If your interest is purely good search, then do what works for you. If your interest is staying private from tracking (which it seems is the case since you advocated for adblockers), don't use Bing. It's owned by Microsoft, which is the M in FAGMAN. They're no different when it comes to data collection.

If you like using specifically Bing and want privacy, there is a solution. Use a Searx instance. They essentially serve up the information a search engine provides, while keeping you private from the search engine. You can select any Searx instance from this list: https://searx.space/. Click one under "URL", then click the gear icon in the top right hand corner. Then select the "engines" tab and you can select to only search from Bing. You can tell it to also search from Google if you'd like, so you can get multiple search results from different search engines at the same time.

Good on you for making the change. Keep in mind that adding more add-ons to your browser can make you more identifiable to the websites you visit. Again, if your main concern is keeping private from nosy trackers, try to use the Brave browser. It has trackers blocked by default, and blocks ads by default, no need to add extra plug-ins. Ultimately, your best option is to use the tor browser, which endchan even has an onion for.

>tfw no negro mammy to suckle to sleep

>>44537
i just use my search engine to search mostly simple shit, few times i do any other; the most obscure things i search are random manga titles & heirloom breeds of plants rarely known to even science
(though over the years, no matter what i use, nothing can find what i want anymore, even by exact name; fucking dogshit, that it)
i personally see no point in using anything to "obscure" my trail, i've been followed for years & will continue to be
the "main" addons i use are ublockorigin & ghostery, they do their job well enough, i only want a effortless troll through the current wastes of the intraweb

>>44534
Firefox is good if you know how to fortify it using about:config otherwise it is a datamining telemetry-ridden botnet. I have a better tip, use the new Librewolf browser, it is much like Firefox only with much, much more secure about:config settings built-in and it removes all their Big Tech telemetry bullshit. I have Librewolf and the only thing I tweaked using about:config was disabling WebGL and WebRTC protocols (if you don't already know those protocols make your VPN less secure and can expose your real IP).

>>44539
If you really want to cover your tracks locate the local browser directory and find all the .sqlite database files, add each to a manual bleacher like Ccleaner or Bleachbit and routinely wipe all that data after browsing. It will leave no trace of previous browser activity and will be like a fresh install every time you load it back up.

Just a warning: if you do this you better make a list of sites you like to visit, and if you have any online accounts you better have your passwords well memorized or make a list of them too.

>>44545
Usually a full-system VPN with a kill-switch should mitigate against potential IP leaks, including those from WebRTC. I read that WebRTC had a security update and most browsers should ask permission from the user before allowing WebRTC traffic. I run a VPN and I just checked using several leak detection tools in a clean browser with WebRTC enabled, and had no leaks.

Could it be that this is less of a concern now than it was in 2015 when Mozilla and Google added WebRTC to their browsers? Not advocating for not turning it off in your browser, it is a good idea.

It's sad to know that these women probably no longer look like this. At least these photos are a record of a better time, or a better looking time.

>>44569
I use the Browser Leaks website to check my browser security, it is one of the best online security testers out there today:

http://www.browserleaks.com/

It's not just WebGL or WebRTC that makes your browser vulnerable, it's also small things like the Geolocation API built-in (which you can disable too). If you have Javascript enabled there are about a dozen different ways web browsers are made vulnerable. Another tip for online security is to use something like Noscript to control what does and what does not have access to your browser's Javascript when you access sites. Disabling third party Javascript access to your browser is a good idea.

>>44571
Each era has it's own unique positives and negatives. The overall trajectory seems to be getting worse due to a multitude of reasons such as systemic corruption, national overspending/debt insolvency aka price inflation, wars over dwindling resources, the increasing utter faggotry and stupidity in current media and entertainment, etc. Times today will seem like the "good 'ol days" decades from now sadly.

>>44575
>I use the Browser Leaks website to check my browser security, it is one of the best online security testers out there today:

Thanks for the info anon

This is why they created the pandemic, to distract us from the tits.

>>44646
To depopulate tits. To con and depopulate the world from lots and lots of tits and dicks. Semi-successfully, but luckily not as successfully as they hoped to btw.

Videos you like
https://husba.nl/invite/i=38315