>>24094
>similar to-
You're still using a real photograph of a real person.
That is not good. What's worse is that; the real person in the "subject" you claim, doesn't consent.
That post about "noncon and con meaning nothing" was just naiveness from when I was 17, I'm sure I see the diffrence between the both.
So unless I had said "yes" to you, which I did NOT - at the time of you making lora crap - I don't agree to even having my face there at all. I just don't. And using my childhood photos (teen or not) isn't any better.
It's weird.
>which you won't under-
I understand a lot. I know you just want to make me feel weirded out.
>d-does not have any undera-
I'm sure you uesd a picture from 2020 that would make it say otherwise.
I'm not even trying to say you do any SA material but holy fuck you can't just do this without htinking about the consequences of even using a TEEN ACTOR from disney channel. What is wrong with you.
Using people or teens for your Lora stuff. ou have to be fucking stupid or insane to think of doing that.
Claming it "doesn't exist irl" won't save you. Fuck you.
If sexual abuse on anyone real is illegal then so should using real people in AI stuff. It's no wonder why AI is frowned upon and condemned.

If you skip all of these warnings and make an excuse, just so you know, you're gonna get a visit by the FBI soon, or even worse, the IRS.