>>39184
I don't have that disorder, do I?
Again, using a 3 year old video isn't proof.
And no, these aren't any proof either.
Give up.
>y-y-you better give u-
Oh no, that's relevant. I WAS groomed by an OLDER LEGAL AGED PARTY, AT *AGE 17* in 2021.
That is FUCKING illegal.
You don't fuck up someone by forcing them to send nudes, EVER!
>m-
Maybe you shouldn't let Klim make faux streams of my web network.
>>39186
it's not a claim. it's a dreadful, scary, and IRL event.
being groomed - online or not - wasn't a fucking reward, but it sure did make me see what kind of cruel monsters are out there; since again, humanity is fucked up. and to just push that aside as "oh no you were actually "willing", although i couldnt tell because I DONT CARE about your fucking nervous state as a minor." is fucking disrespectful. it's like you WANT more kids to be hurt. it's like you don't want to hear my side of being sexual abused... you fucking naive bastard. rot in hell