Part 2.
ACTUALLY, BELONGING TO LGBT DOESN'T OBLIGATE ME TO TAKE ONE POLITICAL POSITION! FOR EXAMPLE, I'M A FEMBOY NAZI, AND MY FRIEND IS A LESBIAN CONSERVATIVE OF THE ULTRA-RIGHT, AND MY FATHER IS A FURRY PATRIOT.

I'll repeat, as in the first part, this insinuation can sound different and be either too bold or cleverly disguised. But you should get the gist of it, beyond the words.

And the gist is this: all views and points of view are equal, and every motherfucker deserves to have their own point of view, even if it's destructive to the LGBT community and will lead to your personal death.

No.
Not all points of view are important.
Some points of view are shit. And they're crap because of the obvious conflict of interest.
If your country has made it its goal to destroy everything non-traditional, and you're a furry patriot, then you're harmful not only to yourself but to the entire furry community.
If your country has made it its goal to promote traditional marriage, ban abortions, and large families, and you're a lesbian and a conservative, then you're just a lunatic who doesn't understand cause and effect.
If neo-Nazi groups set as their ideal the image of traditional masculinity established by directors like Leni Refenstahl and sculptors like Arno Becker, then you and your striped stockings are of no fucking use to them.

So, to sum it up:
AN LGBT REPRESENTATIVE CAN HAVE TWO POLITICAL POSITIONS: THE ONLY TRUE ONE AND THE MORONOUS ONE.