No, they aren't. They are cartoons, not something that can't be done irl, obviously. We have pets, cartoons do not have that. An anthropomorphic character is not an animal.
"modified a bit" my ass. They are literally toony and/or clearly fictional, no one else can be that way in real life, you fucking incompetent idiot. A pet is a housepet. A furry is not. A furry is capable of talking, whereas a REAL, breathing pet is not.
No I am not a zoophile for being into something that's clearly not a fucking animal. And if anthropomoprhics do use traits, it's usually for a comedy effect and not related to zoophilia you moron. >>2422
I'm not triggered and neither is anyone, you just shouldn't be posting those things, Klim.
"inexplicable reason", you mean you're being a pedophile and I'm judging you for that? >>2423
Yes I know what it means, you're gonna be so crazy and violent with us if you keep being so pedophilic... if you know what stress is, either. >>2441
Those are not from deviantart. He's finding them either on the dark web or on something besides Google.
Deviantart already bans exploitive content if it were ever posted there - and thankfully no one has to see their eyes burned on that site with those disgusting images
What sick fetishes, being into an adult, who clearly consents to things and blushes about it is not a sick fetish