>>18350
yeah I thought so, I got identical results so I assumed that's what you used
you might actually be the same anon that suggested it last time I asked lol

it does a decent job but I find it can be hard to get consistently good results, and the program doesn't really give you any tweaking/adjustment options to compensate for artifacting issues beyond choosing a different upscaling model - but there's only one model that's really worth using
I wish there was a greater variety of upscaling software to try, but since the AI is still in relative infancy most of them are still just experimental models on obscure github repos

would be nice to get some more capable tools in-between "push button to make faec happen" and "needs software engineering degree just to install"

>>18352
thanks for the links, I didn't know about a couple of those