>>2992
> I have no idea.
> We really did look up the laws
>>2982
> Drawn or computer generated images which depict childlike characters having sex or their private parts exposed are illegal in the United States. These are called "simulated child pornography".
No it's not:
> Simulated child pornography was made illegal with the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (CPPA). The CPPA was short-lived. In 2002, the Supreme Court of the United States in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition held that the relevant portions of the CPPA were unconstitutional because they prevented lawful speech. Referring to Ferber, the court stated that "the CPPA prohibits speech that records no crime and creates no victims by its production. Virtual child pornography is not 'intrinsically related' to the sexual abuse of children".
In US jurisdiction you have no legal obligation to delete any drawings except photo-realistic. So don't bother.