>>210
I meant that humans' use of tools and knowledge is fundamentally different because of the extent we go too. All the crops we grow, livestock we raise, & pets we befriend are tamed and have been genetic modified through generations of selected breeding, their wild ancestors bare little resemblance to their current form.
>Even things like ants and lions have "societies" where the men lead and the women supports.
Males in those societies are degenerate bums who do nothing of importance. This and your other examples don't really change the point that nature doesn't necessarily equates to goodness. It could possibly be good for women to be in a support positions but that would just be coincidence not because of nature. I think the thing that makes humans human is their ability to rise above nature and control it instead of being subjugated by it like animals .