>>215
>Would you really consider a women that's slept with 3 other men to be your women.
I feel like this a submissive stance to take. If you aren't confident in your ability to satisfy a woman and make her yours then that's a problem. A true man should be able to make even a slut feel like a virgin when they're with them. I find that men who of value virginity the most often have insecurities surrounding their manhood. This can be most clearly seen in incel communities which instead of increasing their social value and skills seek to blame others for their inability to lose their virginity.

In the book "Why Is The Penis Shaped Like That and Other Reflections on Being Human" by psychologist Jesse Bering he cites the work of evolutionary psychologist Gordon Gallup that the purpose of the shape of the penis is to displace semen of other males and better position their own semen increasing their likeliness of paternity. If we go by nature then it seems humans shouldn't value virginity much and should be competing with other males to spread their genes.

>Virgins are good in that regard because the love will specifically between the two partners and less chances of cheating occurring.
Is there any proof to back this up? I feel that if a woman has been with multiply partners and deemed that you're the best then she's less likely to cheat. There's no curiosity of what's out there or what could have been.

>Also eventually your virgin wife will turn into a MILF no?
No, I dread the day I when MILFs are my age or younger. The joy of MILFs is conquering someone more experienced than you along with the caring motherly aura they exude.
>I mean there's always the harem option.
That's just degeneracy. Having multiply sex partners is fine if you know what you're doing but marriage is a exclusivity contract between two partners with no exceptions.