Bernd
09/28/2018 (Fri) 07:28:29
No.19628
del
09/28/2018 (Fri) 07:28:29
No.19628
del
>>19626
I have no objection against that research as is, although quality of ionosphere data from war times looks suspicious.
>Why the BBC? RT can't do the same?
It is more about light, unseen bias. In modern anti-West (tm) circles (includen RT) stories of Allied bombings are used as ideologic thing, like, "USA always were evil, no one in WW2 did such atrocities, even Germans didn't bomb cities fully. And remember the Hiroshima".
On other side, pro-West sources try not to talk about this, because target of bombings were nazis, and nazis are absolute evil.
With holocaust situation is different, anti-West sources rarely speak about it (except when they need to attack modern Germany), but pro-West remember it very often.
I have no objection against that research as is, although quality of ionosphere data from war times looks suspicious.
>Why the BBC? RT can't do the same?
It is more about light, unseen bias. In modern anti-West (tm) circles (includen RT) stories of Allied bombings are used as ideologic thing, like, "USA always were evil, no one in WW2 did such atrocities, even Germans didn't bomb cities fully. And remember the Hiroshima".
On other side, pro-West sources try not to talk about this, because target of bombings were nazis, and nazis are absolute evil.
With holocaust situation is different, anti-West sources rarely speak about it (except when they need to attack modern Germany), but pro-West remember it very often.