Bernd 01/01/2019 (Tue) 16:01:53 No.21832 del
>>17171
Read 'bout 60 pages from that book. Main problem is with the theory that only circumstantial evidence can be presented. He presents a lot tho.
Obviously we can't have real evidence (e.g. the plans themselves) as:
1. if there were no plans to attack, there won't be any;
2. if they wanted to keep it in secret, it would be hard to find (tho many secrets gets in the open later);
3. if they wanted to cover up (for example they wanted to profit from the victimhood status or seeming innocent, peaceful) then they would have destroyed it.
>Molotov Line
The Wiki article says Suvorov make note of it in his book. I not yet reached that part I think, he mentions the Brest fortress in connection with the NKVD units for sure.
However Suvorov mentiones Kursk where the Soviet managed to create an impenetrable deathtrap in short time. I checked, they built those defenses about two and a half months. They had over 1,5 years in Poland. They clearly didn't build it with the mind on defense. Sounds like a pet project they spent their free time on.
What interesting in that line is that it extends only to the Carpathians. The confrontation zone however goes down to the Black Sea, and this southern area has key importance since from these part they could reach the Romanian oil fields, without them all the shiny machines of the Germans would be scrap-metal.