>>22319
I don't like how you put it, though, it sounds like amerifat-tier ideological consumerismfreedum
when first-hand facts are not available, instead of 'picking a bias' one is supposed to glean from varied and unavoidably biased sources and distil one's own conclusion
although in most cases it is, that bias doesn't even have to be of sinister or ulterior intent, it simply is, unavoidably, the most one can hope for is honest and bona fide but still biased information

>>22320
sure, I understand, and I now see that I overreacted (i was angered by reading some feik noos nonsense from someone I wanted to believe should know better than to adopt propagandistic terminology about propaganda)

>>22327
>is there are difference between...
not much at all, including the ones writing for traditional media, they are all basically scum
https://www.johnderbyshire.com/Opinions/Culture/journalistsarescum.html

>"Official" journalism is dying everywhere
it does seem to me that things like investigative 'journalism' is dying, but it might be that mostly what it's dying is the mythological image of journalists as being much more than cranks and pawns