Bernd
11/17/2020 (Tue) 22:44:35
No.41045
del
11/17/2020 (Tue) 22:44:35
No.41045
del
>>41042
>They thought they are solving a problem and they actually did. Imagine having 1,5 mil+ more potentially hostile minority in Turkey.
Weird thing, they were resettled in syria which was ottoman clay at the time and they had no intention to lose it. What you are doing now interpreting the past according to present.
>I understand your aversion when people say that those committed something horrific whom you identify yourself with.
Am I speaking something non english? I'm saying we did not, if there was an aversion I would take the atleast we admit it route and proceed to not officially recognize it and not pay any kind of reperation.
>I understand your aversion when people say that those committed something horrific whom you identify yourself with.
If you are implying not genociding makes us holier than others, that is not the case, neither I believe so.
What you write in here does not prove it in any way at all. You just say it's okay to admit it and everyone can be bad. Well if this is your way of your research, I hope your local police and court makes your research like this when an incident happens, I'm sure you would see marvelous results.
Notice I'm intending to reject this slandering, I never brought up what happened to the Turks in balkans because it is completely unrelated to the subject. It only makes the discussion more politican than the lawful one. It matters because the term genocide is a lawful term whatever we like it or not. It's not a term to randomly throwed around.
>They thought they are solving a problem and they actually did. Imagine having 1,5 mil+ more potentially hostile minority in Turkey.
Weird thing, they were resettled in syria which was ottoman clay at the time and they had no intention to lose it. What you are doing now interpreting the past according to present.
>I understand your aversion when people say that those committed something horrific whom you identify yourself with.
Am I speaking something non english? I'm saying we did not, if there was an aversion I would take the atleast we admit it route and proceed to not officially recognize it and not pay any kind of reperation.
>I understand your aversion when people say that those committed something horrific whom you identify yourself with.
If you are implying not genociding makes us holier than others, that is not the case, neither I believe so.
What you write in here does not prove it in any way at all. You just say it's okay to admit it and everyone can be bad. Well if this is your way of your research, I hope your local police and court makes your research like this when an incident happens, I'm sure you would see marvelous results.
Notice I'm intending to reject this slandering, I never brought up what happened to the Turks in balkans because it is completely unrelated to the subject. It only makes the discussion more politican than the lawful one. It matters because the term genocide is a lawful term whatever we like it or not. It's not a term to randomly throwed around.