>>44259
Quite a couple of lines worth of interest in that article.
It's not easy to piss into the wind. If one side of the media is overly loud, it's hard to be heard.
During first Fidesz govt. (1998-2002) they had very little to work with, the soc-lib media just flooded everything. They slowly built up since then, and after 2010 they bought up media outlets by the kilo. The soc-lib media screamed ofc, and they have some truth, on low level Fidesz has much pull (even I notice it), but large names mostly out of their reach and all the fortresses still stand.
Additionally there's the narrowcasts of the individuals on social media, gangin together often belching primitively all bunch of nonsense, but they all add to the message, which is getting repeated over and over, and that's the goal.
The third force is the western media. They easily pick up the socialist, and liberal narrative, supporting the "oppressed".
If the government relies on a weak structure of a coalition, it can be even more tough.
>we live the outrage culture.
This is the first time I see formulated the phenomenon like that, and it seems right. Strong emotional outbursts but little follow up with deeds. Big smoke, small flames.
>The former socialist countries have more antibodies...
Yeah, deep impressions were left.
Maybe gonna look into Slovenia's politics, then gonna post in the politics thread. Is an Eastern Block in the EU builds up slowly?