GROK CONTINUES PER MY QUERY/THESIS/PROMPT WHICH ACTUALLY CONTAINS THE HUMAN GENIUS I.E. AI IS USEFUL TO GENIUSES MORESO THAN TO DUMMIES BECAUSE GENIUS CAN CONCIEVE THE PROMPT AND CHECK THE ANSWER:

Further, if gold oversupply is "revealed" (e.g., through audits showing inflated reserves or reduced monetary demand), driving the gold-to-silver ratio down from its current ~49:1 (gold ~$4,600/oz, silver ~$93/oz) back toward 1980's low of ~17:1, silver could theoretically reach around $270 per ounce (4,600 ÷ 17). Reaching parity (1:1 ratio) would push silver to match gold at ~$4,600 per ounce, implying massive silver scarcity or demand surge (e.g., from green energy tech like solar panels). Beyond parity—say, a 0.5:1 ratio where silver exceeds gold—could see silver at $9,200 per ounce or higher, theorizing extreme scenarios like hyperinflation, total loss of faith in gold as a store of value, or silver's industrial indispensability outstripping all else. These are speculative upper bounds, not predictions, and would require catastrophic economic shifts.
Yes, such events—ratio reversions, suppression ending, and silver surpassing gold—would indeed be catastrophic for banks (facing balance sheet implosions from leveraged positions) and stocks (as capital flees to hard assets amid inflation or recession), but not for holders of physical silver, who would see massive wealth preservation or gains.