/news/ - News

News & Current Events + Happenings

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Drawing x size canvas

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Catalog | Bottom

News & Current Events + Happenings
/news/ deserves actual news. Declaring agendas are not news. Do not post trolling bait threads.
Post quality threads only, and it's voluntary to crosspost them to /pol/
Never mandatory.

Expand All Images

Microsoft Threatens to Shut Down Gab After Anti-Semitic Posts by User Reader 08/10/2018 (Fri) 16:28:48 Id: e1dcf5 [Preview] No. 11769
RELATED: >>>/news/11602 ; >>>/news/11620 ; >>>/news/11631 ; >>>/news/11645 ; >>>/news/11711
ALTERNATIVES: >>>/endtimes/34 ; >>>/endtimes/39

Microsoft Azure, the web hosting provider for Gab, has given the company 48 hours to delete some anti-Semitic posts or face a Big Tech shut-down. Gab is a Twitter alternative that claims to protect the right to free speech. It's not a very good alternative, as the numbers just aren't there to keep it interesting. Most of the time it's just righties and ultra-righties fighting amongst themselves. But Gab's claim to fame is that they won't kick people off for having unpopular views or engaging in insult trading that morons refer to as "hate speech." For some, that's a worthwhile promise.

It should be noted that in America the term "hate speech" is not a legal one, at least according to the Supreme Court. So-called "hate speech," be it racist, bigoted, anti-Semitic or just plain mean, is protected as reaffirmed in Matal v. Tam in 2017. "Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express 'the thought that we hate,'" wrote Justice Alito.

It is, therefore, maddening when tech companies attempt to infringe on the public's right to speak (acting like the government) based on a specious "hate speech" claim, which is whatever they say it is because there is no legal definition. In America, speech that is obscene or incites violence is the only speech that is unprotected. Microsoft laughably claimed that the posts in question were "incitement to violence." While not pleasant, when I read them I had the urge to point and laugh, not hurt anyone. The Gab poster who caused all this uproar is some kind of stunted jackanape who stands out on the street corner with signs about how the bad Jooos hurt him or something. Really, who has time for this? But at the same time, why do we care? Why are we even giving this person air time? Oh, that's right... because Microsoft put him in the spotlight instead of ignoring him and letting him fade away into obscurity where they found him. Thanks, Microsoft!

I'll not be naming the blundering fool here because no one should give him any attention. It's enough to say he has the right to have the opinions most of us don't share and be done with it. Do we really have to analyze what he said to decide if he has the right to say it? Whatever it was, he can lose his job if his employer doesn't like it or suffer social consequences like everyone else who posts dumb things. But Microsoft has decided that an entire website can be taken offline because their gatekeepers don't like some posts a user made. How is this Microsoft's business? Gab pays for the hosting service from Microsoft Azure. How Gab runs its business is not up for discussion by Microsoft (or it shouldn't be). How do we know Big Tech isn't colluding and conspiring to get rid of competition? Has Microsoft has ever threatened Twitter?

A ZIP containing all Gab installation files has been linked to >>>/endtimes/ encase it gets shut down.


Reader 08/10/2018 (Fri) 16:30:33 Id: e1dcf5 [Preview] No.11770 del
Gab should just change web hosting servers and create a P2P app that people can use. That simple. Decentralize the platform like Tox has done.

Reader 08/11/2018 (Sat) 05:26:04 Id: 57410d [Preview] No.11786 del
>that simple
Nope, they have paid subscriptions so they need to have something centralized and so cannot properly decentralize or distribute content without certain private things being exposed.

Reader 08/11/2018 (Sat) 12:30:52 Id: aa3bed [Preview] No.11787 del
Well maybe Gab is not the best alternative. I'll give them credit for trying. Someone needs to form a P2P "twitter" platform, hell they could rip-off the same exact platform, call it "Tweet-2-Tweet" or something like that. Release it, mirror it all over the web and advertise the hell out of it via alternative media. By the time anyone wants to take it down, TOO LATE. Enough anons will be sharing copies of it and they won't be able to stop such a decentralized service. There, all censorship null and void, no one controls it but the individual users.

Top | Return | Catalog | Post a reply