>>2546
Okay, you haven't. Should've read one more line.
Still no idea why even go for this line of reasoning if you understand that it's irrelevant to what should be considered a proper behaviour.

Next thing: you assume evolutionary perspective as correct and it simply isn't. Evolutionary biology came about at a point when science's understanding of organic complexity was far lower than what we have today. Did you know that each cell is basically a factory full of nanomachines? Biologists didn't until recent years. The very idea of "simple organisms" falls out of the window right away. Evolution has a long history of wrongfully attributing relation to species that upon closer inquiry prove to be completely different.

>Who know what is right and not?
Moral issues are sometimes quite tangled I admit but here's an easy one: fucking children is wrong.

>they deriberately want to do
Children are fucking retards if you haven't noticed. They can be manipulated into wanting whatever.