>>2549
>Children are fucking retards if you haven't noticed. They can be manipulated into wanting whatever.
True. Maybe the parents of the children or someone responsible for them should permit it or not. But, do not permit they from doing this, even if they want and their parents agree, is stupid.

>>2550
I do know about the basic of pharmacodynamics of neurotransmissors and receptors in humans. Your links are flawed because they are *not* evidence made from children that had sex.
First link:
>ADHD
ADHD have nothing to do with this discussion. The dopamine released while on sexual activity is temporary, and the maximum this dopamine would do is make the person euphoric, nothing more. You could argument, though, that the children could become addicted to sex/masturbation and do it every day... then that's bad because too much modulation of this transmissor could upregulate or downregulate them, causing problems like ADHD and others. Anyway, there's no evidence that the children became immediately addicted to sex just because she/he did it once or even many times.
>serotonin
Same thing above. Sexual activity release serotonin temporarily.
>Autism and Oxytocin
Again, nothing to do with sexual activity. I would even bet that oxytocin release in large quantities (don't need to be sex, but, say, a massage) could be beneficial for children.

The last links is about exogenous DHEA. Nothing to do with sex and children.

Now, about hormones, I think it *could* change some pathways or activate some genes, but there's no evidence. The research in this field is complex exactly because it's illegal test the effects of masturbation, for example, on children. And most children that tell their parents that they had sex with someone is (probably) abused and forced to do it. These abused children cannot be used as a evidence for serious research, because there's psychological effects (not present in consensual, non coersive, sex). And, again, I'm not defending this kind of act; I'm defending non coersive sexual activity.