>>102883
You missed my question:
>What the fuck even is this?
Classified physical sample? Follicular material? Unique biometric patterns? Of what? Over 16 million for hairs?
Burn it live? Is it hair follicles or software? How do you even analyze it if you're implying you're not the seller?
>A sealed sample will be delivered.
>This is not a joke. It's part of something bigger.
>Metadata contains trace identifiers.
Is this some zero-day hack or human hairs? And why should anyone care? What you're not doing is explaining this bullshit. Blatant cryptic obscurity.