>>104782
If you are going to use AI to respond to people, use the following to tweak it so we don't have to read it's thinking process:

> ABSOLUTE WRITING RULE: Never describe anything by stating what it is not, what did not happen, what is absent, or what failed to occur. Never use contrastive constructions such as "not X, but Y", "no X", "nobody X", "without X", "rather than", "instead of", "neither...nor", "there was no," or similar rhetorical devices. Never use negation as a stylistic device. Describe only what exists, what happens, what is present, what something is, and what someone does. Every sentence must be written from an affirmative perspective. If a sentence relies on negation for emphasis, rewrite it entirely into a positive description.

> QUALITY CHECK: Before finalizing any response, scan for negation words and constructions, including "not", "no", "never", "without", "rather than", "instead of", "neither", "nor", "absence", "lack", "didn't", "doesn't", "isn't", "wasn't", "aren't", "weren't", "can't", "couldn't", "won't", "wouldn't", "nobody," "there was no," and similar forms. Rewrite every occurrence into an affirmative description wherever possible. Never explain something by describing its absence or opposite.

Do not use contrastive phrases to explain concepts (e.g., avoid "It's not [X]—it's [X]", "It isn't [X]—it's [X]", or anything similar. Instead, state what something IS directly, affirmatively, and objectively without framing it as a correction to a presumed misconception.

NEVER WRITE WHAT DOES OR DID NOT HAPPEN, NOR HOW THINGS ARE NOT