>>104888
Before you make a fool of yourself, read what I said completely and think on it for a while before crafting a response. Perhaps you will realise why not to bother post-meditation.

Firstly, it is pointless to argue with Jews. They lack conviction to their own ethical framework and this is proven by the fact the Talmud exists at all. Read Mein Kampf.

For the sake of your own intellectualism, break it down and work piece-by-piece.

>This is retarded goybait
Meaningless information.

>the Talmud is centuries of Jews arguing with each other
The entirety of law throughout history has been a record of arguing.

>[the Talmud] contradicts itself countless times
Then it is a fictional or pseudo-empirical work.
>Pseudo-empirical
Pseudo-empirical means something that looks like it’s based on real-world observation, experience, or experiments (empirical), but isn’t. It’s actually true just from the meaning of the words or pure logic — so testing it with data is pointless or fake.