>>90341
That last person with the full hazmat suit was smarter than all of them. Average masks never work for containing viruses. I explained this in 2020, but I'll repeat it again.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/85814
"The authors pointed to research showing particles 0.04 to 0.2 μm "can penetrate surgical masks." For the coronavirus responsible for SARS, particles were estimated to be within that range at 0.08 to 0.14 μm" (μm = micrometer)
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-1342
"The median viral loads after coughs without a mask, with a surgical mask, and with a cotton mask were 2.56 log copies/mL, 2.42 log copies/mL, and 1.85 log copies/mL, respectively. All swabs from the outer mask surfaces of the masks were positive for SARS–CoV-2, whereas most swabs from the inner mask surfaces were negative" + "Neither surgical nor cotton masks effectively filtered SARS–CoV-2 during coughs by infected patients."
So 4/100ths to 20/100ths of a micrometer can penetrate surgical masks. Most who have been using surgical masks in a professional setting are already aware they're primarily for splash protection, not safety from virus transmission. How do you think people with cloth masks and/or coffee filters (which filter 20 microns and up) feel right now? Confident? Delusional. It doesn't seem to strike many people's minds that cloth is absorbent. Despite the fact dishtowels/washcloths are used to absorb spills, the Surgeon General dumbass negro Jerome Adams recommended on mass media that people should be wearing cloth masks from shirts and other bullshit. Now, dishcloth(or in the UK-tea cloth) will filter 60% of 10/100ths of a micron and up, you still have to worry about the other 40% you're taking in. He wasn't recommending dishcloth. The average T-shirts and over the counter cloth masks these gullible assholes are wearing filter 30% of airborne particles 50 microns and higher, but they have the illusion of safety and that's good enough for them.